Unpacking the Impacts of Social Media Upon Crisis Communication and City Evacuation

Chapter

Abstract

In the UK National Security Strategy it was argued that networks, including those facilitated by social networking technologies, could impact upon security as a wide range of ideas could easily proliferate (2010, p. 16). As indicated in Chap. “ City Evacuations: their pedagogy and the need for an inter-disciplinary approach”, crisis communication is a vital aspect of effectively managing large-scale evacuations. This chapter therefore examines the implications of this new ‘mass of connections’ in the context of evacuation. It draws upon data from three highly varied UK city locations in order to examine the impact of social networking technologies upon official (i.e. first responder, local authority or national government led) emergency communication strategies. The chapter specifically addresses two inter-related findings: the opportunities for and threats to official crisis communication that emerge from the introduction and uptake of social networking technologies and the re-configuration of crisis information exchange between government, traditional media and citizens. The chapter concludes by offering a range of policy and practice recommendations focused upon improving communication strategies in the context of evacuation.

Keywords

Marketing Smoke Harness 

References

  1. American Red Cross survey (2010) Social Media in Disasters and Emergencies. Available via: http://www.redcross.org/www-files/Documents/pdf/other/SocialMediaSlideDeck.pdf. Accessed: 02 December 2010.
  2. Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly (July) 27(3):264–271.Google Scholar
  3. Bird D, Ling M, Haynes K (2012) Flooding Facebook - the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management (February) 27(1):27–33.Google Scholar
  4. Bnet (2010) Evacuation at Grand Central? Anatomy of a Twitter Rumour. Available via: http://www.bnet.com/blog/new-media/evacuation-at-grand-central-anatomy-of-a-twitter-rumor/4615 Accessed: 02 December 2010.
  5. Botha E, Farshid M, Pitt L (2010) How sociable? An exploratory study of university brand visibility in social media. South African Journal of Business Management 42(2):43–51.Google Scholar
  6. Chavez C, Repas MA, Stefaniak T (2010) A new way to communicate with residents: Local government use of social media to prepare for emergencies. International City/County Management Association (ICMA), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Coaffee J, Rogers P (2008) Rebordering the city for new security challenges: From Counter Terrorism to Community Resilience. Space and Polity 12(2): 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook N (2008) Enterprise 2.0: How Social Software Will Change the Future of Work. Gower Publishing Limited, Surrey, England; Burlington, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Crowley H (2013) Digital Trends 2013: Social data and social search in 2013. Experian.co.uk. 06 May 2013. Available via: http://www.experian.co.uk/blogs/latest-thinking/2013/05/digital-trends-2013-social-data-and-social-search-in-2013/. Accessed 02 February 2014.
  10. Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science 32(5): 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duggan M, Smith A. (2013) Social Media Update 2013. Pew Research Internet Project, Pew Research Center, December 30 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Funk T (2009) Web 2.0 and beyond: understanding the new online business models, trends and technologies. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  13. Hanna R, Rohm A, Crittenden VL (2011) We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons 54(3):265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan R, Thomas J (2006) Introduction. In: The New Media Theory Reader, edited by Hassan R, and Thomas J. Open University Press, NY, p.xvii-xxx.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53(1):59–68Google Scholar
  16. Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS (2011) Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons 54(3):241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lariscy RW, Avery EJ, Sweetser KD, Howes P (2009) An examination of the role of online social media in journalists source mix. Public Relations Review 35(3) 314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li C, Bernoff J (2008) Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Harvard Business Press, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Lindsay BR (2011) Social Media and Disasters: Current Uses, Future Options, and Policy Considerations. Congressional Research Service, September 6, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. Magro MJ (2012) A review of social media use in e-government. Administrative Sciences 2: 148–161.Google Scholar
  21. Mangold WG, Faulds DJ (2009) Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons 52: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pariser E (2011) The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin Press, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Posetti J (2012) The twitterisation of ABC’s emergency and disaster communication. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management (February) 27(1): 34–39.Google Scholar
  24. Prentice S, Huffman E (2008) Social media’s new role in emergency management. Idaho National Laboratory (INL), p. 1–5.Google Scholar
  25. PRnewswire (2013) Facebook Reports Third Quarter 2013 Results. PRnewswire.com. (Oct. 30, 2013). Available via: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/facebook-reports-third-quarter-2013-results-229923821.html. Accessed 02 February 2014
  26. Shirky C. (2011) The Political Power of Social Media-Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs 90(1): 12.Google Scholar
  27. Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  28. Sutton J, Palen L, Shklovski I (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference (Fiedrich F, and Van de Walle B, eds). Washington, DC, USA, May 2008, p. 624–632.Google Scholar
  29. Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics. Atlantic Books, London.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor M, Wells G, Howeel G, Rapheal B (2012) The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. A Facebook study from ‘Cyclone Yasi Update. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, (February) 27(1): 20–26.Google Scholar
  31. UK National Security Strategy (2010) A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy. HM Government report. Available via: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/61936/national-security-strategy.pdf. Accessed: 03 Mar 2014
  32. Wilkins R (2012) Foreword. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, (February) 27(1): 2.Google Scholar
  33. Yates D, Paquette S (2011) Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31: 6–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.University of WarwickWarwickUK

Personalised recommendations