LISS 2014 pp 1123-1127 | Cite as

The Environmental Impact Assessment of High-Speed Railway Project Based on Entropy Weight

  • Yong Zhu
  • Jun Zhou
  • Shuaishuai Fan
Conference paper


Inappropriate human intervention in natural activities will inevitably occur in the process of high-speed railway construction, so the environmental impact condition inconsistent with the expected environmental impact of human. With the gradual strengthening of the people’s awareness of environmental protection and sustainable development in China, the environmental impact assessment of high-speed rail becomes an important part of the project feasibility study. This paper establishes a sort of environmental impact assessment system which includes many factors that affect the environment: the high-speed railway construction project environmental impacts evaluates through the use of Interpretive Structural Modeling and select a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight, and it draws comprehensive results of Environmental Impact Assessment to verify the feasibility of the program.


High-speed railway project Environmental impact assessment Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) Entropy weight Fuzzy evaluation 


  1. Dai WZ, Cao J (1998) The education quality evaluation method based on entropy weight method. Syst Eng Theory Pract 2(2):76–79Google Scholar
  2. Dongjiang Gang DJ (2003) Using the entropy weight coefficient method to evaluate enterprise information project. Strategy Manage 1(3):76–79Google Scholar
  3. Hoke J (2011) Recent combustor technology development progress. Society of automotive engineers 2011 AeroTech workshop, Toulouse, France. 1(7):33–35Google Scholar
  4. Johnson RA, Dean W (2000) Wichern practical multivariate statistical analysis. Tsinghua University, Beijing, pp 3–6Google Scholar
  5. Li JY, Bao T (2008) Clean development mechanism and implementation of legal protection in China. China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition), 1(2):17–19Google Scholar
  6. Ou ZF (2008) Railway Green Line Selection Decision Support System based on GIS (GRASDSS) knowledge base of the research. Central South University, Hunan, pp 7–9Google Scholar
  7. Phdungsilp A (2010) Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. J Energy Policy 38(9):4808–4817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu JC, Huang GH, Cheng J (2010) Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis for extraction of flavonoids from Apium graveolens L. stalks by entropy weight method. J Food Agric Environ 10(3&4):182–185Google Scholar
  9. Yu K, Li J (2004) Virtual enterprise risk management in the application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Ind Eng 1(3):40–44Google Scholar
  10. Yu JJ, Yu HM (2010) Comprehensive evaluation method of large engineering project environmental impact assessment based on multi-level fuzzy .Ecological economy. 1(7):150–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Management Science and EngineeringCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations