Abstract
Treatments are designed to be used in the real world, in the original problem context. Once they are implemented in the original problem context, this is an important source of information about the properties of the artifact and about the treatment that it provides. This may or may not trigger a new iteration through the engineering cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
L.T.W. Agner, I.W. Soares, P.C. Stadzisz, and J.M. Simão, A Brazilian survey on UML and model-driven practices for embedded software development. J. Syst. Softw. 86(4), 997–1005 (2013)
J. Aranda, S.M. Easterbrook, G. Wilson, Requirements in the wild: how small companies do it, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007). (Computer Science Press, New York, 2007), pp. 39–48
E. Babbie, The Practice of Social Research, 11th edn. (Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, 2007)
M. Denscombe, The Good Research Guide For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 4th edn. (Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2010)
J.E. Hannay, A. Arisholm, H. Engvik, D.I.K. Sjøberg, Effects of personality on pair programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 36(1), 61–80 (2010)
M.D. Myers, A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretative analysis of a failed IS project. Accounting Manag. Inf. Technol. 4(4), 185–201 (1994)
J. Noltes, Data location compliance in cloud computing. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, August 2011. http://essay.utwente.nl/61042/
Z. Racheva, M. Daneva, A. Herrmann, K. Sikkel, R.J. Wieringa, Do we know enough about requirements prioritization in agile projects: insights from a case study, in 18th International IEEE Requirements Engineering Conference, Sydney, October 2010 (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2010), pages 147–156
C. Robson, Real World Research, 2nd edn. (Blackwell, Oxford, 2002)
J. Schalken, Empirical investigations of software process improvement. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 2007. http://www.cs.vu.nl/en/research/Dissertations-1995-now/index.asp
D.I.K. Sjøberg, B. Anda1, E. Arisholm1, T. Dybå, M. Jørgensen1, A. Karahasanovicacutel, M. Vokáccaron, Challenges and recommendations when increasing the realism of controlled software engineering experiments, in Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering, ed. by R. Conradi, A.I. Wang, LNCS, vol. 2765 (Springer, New York, 2003), pp. 24–38
C. Terwellen, Evaluating the behavior of embedded control software – using a modular software-in-the-loop simulation environment and a domain specific modeling language for plant modeling. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, November 2012. http://essay.utwente.nl/62824/
J.D. Vrielink, Phased array processing: Direction of arrival estimation on reconfigurable hardware. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, January 2009. http://essay.utwente.nl/62065/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wieringa, R.J. (2014). Implementation Evaluation and Problem Investigation. In: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43838-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43839-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)