Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the evolution of the relationship between a large university and its software vendor. The parties were engaged in several projects that developed tailored information systems (IS) for the administration of the university. Three systems are the focus in this case study: student records, student admissions and student mobility. Our point of view is that of the first author who was an insider in this process as he acted as a boundary role person between the client and the vendor, first as the chief information systems officer of the university during the formative years of student records and student admissions, and later as a contracted leader for student records and student mobility after he joined another university. In the case of student mobility we also describe and analyse the dissolution of the client-vendor relationship. We also investigate the process through which the boundary role was terminated in the case of student records. Using the history data as the basis, the authors picture the dynamics of the action strategies of the client side. The conclusion is that in this case when developing the student records system, the bond between the client and the IS vendor intensified more rapidly than the literature based on relationship marketing would suggest. Moreover, the relationship problems in IS development typically became apparent after a long period of cooperation, e.g., when the IS was taken into use and the parties realised that the functionality of the new system was inadequate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The case description is based on project documents, including five paper folders in the UH archive.
- 2.
The case description is based on project documents, including seven paper folders in the UH archive.
- 3.
The case description is based on project documents, including one paper folder in the UH archive.
- 4.
The case description is based on project documents, including three paper folders in the UH archive.
- 5.
This was a part of an e-mail message that fulfilled the role of a meeting memorandum (date 4.12.2000); translated into English by the first author.
- 6.
Confidential report delivered to the first author, dated 8.12.2003.
References
Adams, J. S. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of organisational and industrial psychology (pp. 1175–1199). Chicago: McNally.
Alajoutsijärvi, K., Möller, K., & Tähtinen, J. (2000). Beautiful exit: How to leave your business Partner. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1270–1289.
Allen, D. K. (2003). Organisational climate and strategic change in higher education: Organisational insecurity. Higher Education, 46(1), 61–92.
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.
Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Yiannis, G. (2001). Emotion, learning and organisational change. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 14(5), 435–451.
Applegate, L. & Montealegre, R. (1991). Eastman Kodak Company: Managing information systems through strategic alliances. Case 9-192-030. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Bakos, J. Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). Information technology, incentives and the optimal number of suppliers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 37–53.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information systems development. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 195–228.
Barley, S. (1990). Images of imagining: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1(3), 220–247.
Batonda, G., & Perry, C. (2003). Approaches to relationship development processes in inter-firm networks. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1457–1484.
Beath, C. M. (1983). Strategies for managing MIS projects: At transaction cost approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 133–147), Houston, Texas, 1983.
Beath, C. M. (1987) Managing the user relationship in information systems evelopment projects: A transaction governance approach. Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 415–427), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1987.
Boyle, M., & Parry, K. (2007). Telling the whole story: The case for organizational autoethnography. Culture and Organization, 13(3), 185–190.
Bunderson, J. S. & Reagans, R. E. (2010). Power, Status, and Learning in Organizations. Organization Science, 22(5), 1182–1194.
Christopher, M., Payne, A., & Ballantyne, D. (1993). Relationship marketing. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2002). Doing action research in your own organization. London: Sage Publications.
Cong, Q. & Chau, P. Y. K. (2007). Does interpersonalttrust also matter? Exploring the role of trust in successful IT outsourcing. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Copeland, D. G., & McKenney, J. L. (1988). Airline reservations systems: Lessons from history. MIS Quarterly, 12, 353–370.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Eklin, M. (2005). Tietojärjestelmäkehitys sosio-teknisenä prosessimallina, tapaustutkimus Oodi-tietojärjestelmästä (Information system development as socio-technical process model, the case of Oodi information system). Unpublished master’s thesis. Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
Feeny, D. F., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Redesigning the IS function around core capabilities. Long Range Planning, 31(3), 354–367.
Fitzgerald, G., & Russo, N. L. (2005). The turnaround of the London Ambulance Service Computer-Aided Despatch System (LASCAD). European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 244–257.
Gallivan, M. J., & Depledge, G. (2003). Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships. Information Systems Journal, 13, 159–190.
Gonzalez, R., Gasso, J., & Llopis, J. (2009). Information system outsourcing reasons and risks: An empirical study. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 4(3), 181–192.
Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1996). Cognitive elements in the implementation of new technology: Can less information provide more benefits? MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 99–110.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. London: SAGE Publications.
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991). The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 59–73.
Heiskanen, A. (1994). Issues and factors affecting the success and failure of a student record system development process, A longitudinal investigation based on reflection-in-action. Doctoral Dissertation at the University of Tampere, The University of Helsinki.
Heiskanen, A. (1995). Reflecting over a practice: Framing issues for scholar understanding. Information Technology and People, 8(4), 3–18.
Heiskanen, A. & Newman, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between information systems research and practice: The reflective practitioner as a researcher. In K. Kumar, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia (pp. 121–131), December 15–17, 1997.
Heiskanen, A. & Newman, M. (1998). The dynamics of IS procurement, case study of a budgeting and financial reporting system. In Baets, W. R. J. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Systems, Aix-En-Provence (pp. 839-852), June 3-6 1998.
Heiskanen, A., Newman, M & Saarinen, V. (1998). Innovations in fiefdoms: Developing a common student information system in six Finnish universities. In T. J. Larsen, L. Levine, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP Working Groups 8.2 and 8.6 Joint Working Conference, Helsinki (pp. 455–469), December 10–13, 1998.
Heiskanen, A., Newman, M. & Similä, J. (1996).Software contracting: A process model approach. In J. I. DeGross, S. Jarvenpaa, & A. Srinivasan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, Ohio, USA (pp. 51–62), 1996.
Heiskanen, A., Newman, M., & Similä, J. (2000). The social dynamics of software development. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10, 1–32.
Heiskanen, A., & Similä, J. (1992). Gatekeepers in the action structure of software contracting: A case study of the evolution of user-developer relationships. ACM Computer Personnel, 14(1 & 2), 30–44.
Heiskanen, A., Newman, M., & Eklin, M. (2008). Control, trust, power, and the dynamics of information system outsourcing relationships: A process study of contractual software development. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 268–286.
Hodgkinson, C. (1983). The philosophy of leadership. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Jasperson, J., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J. P., & Zheng, W. (2002). Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397–459.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251.
Jokelin (2000). Riskienhallinta tietojärjestelmän käyttöönotossa (Risk management in information system adoption). Unpublished master’s thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology.
Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24, 299–324.
Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: Theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 321–350.
Kern, T. & Willcocks, L. P. (2008). The relationship advantage: Information technologies, sourcing, and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Reprint 2008, original printing 2001).
Kirsch, L. J. (1997). The management of complex tTasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7(1), 1–21.
Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D. G., & Haney, M. H. (2010). Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21(2), 469–489.
Klein, H. K., & Rowe, F. (2008). Marshalling the professional experience of doctoral students: A contribution to the practical relevance debate. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 675–686.
Klepper, R. (1995). The management of partnering development in IS outsourcing. Journal of Information Technology, 10(4), 249–258.
Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37–48.
Lacity, M. C., Khan, S. A., & Willcocks, L. P. (2009). A review of the IT outsourcing literature: insights for practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(3), 130–146.
Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363–408.
Lacity, M. C., Willcocks, L. P., & Feeny, D. F. (1996). The value of selective IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 1996, 13–25.
Lacity, M. C. & Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information systems outsourcing: Myths, metaphors and realities, Wiley.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2002). Management information systems—managing the digital firm (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Levina, N. (2005). Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 109–130.
Levina, N., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 672–703.
Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for Implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363.
Markus, M.L. & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
Mason, R. O., McKenney, J. L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997a). Developing an historical tradition in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 21, 257–278.
Mason, R. O., McKenney, J. L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997b). An historical method for MIS research: Steps and assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 21, 307–320.
McCall, J. B., & Warrington, M. B. (1989). Marketing by agreement. Chichester: Wiley.
McEvily, B., Perrone, V. & Zaheer, A. (Eds.) (2003). Introduction to the special issue on trust in an organizational context. Organization Science, 14(1), 1–4.
McFarlan, F. W., & Nolan, R. L. (1995). How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 9–23.
McGrath, K. (2006). Affection not affliction: The role of emotions in information systems and organisational change. Information and Organisation, 16, 277–303.
McKenney, J. L., Mason, R. O., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Bank of America: The crest and trough of technological leadership. MIS Quarterly, 21, 321–353.
McWilliams, A. & Gray, S. R. (1995). Understanding quasi-integration. The Journal of Business Strategies, 12(Spring), 69–85. http://coba.shsu.edu/jbs/vol12/no1/12-1-5.html.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135–152.
Möllering, G. (2005). The trust/control duality: An integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20(3), 283–305.
Newman, M., & Sabherwal, R. (1996). Determinants of commitment to information systems development: A longitudinal investigation. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 23–54.
Ngwenyama, O. K., & Bryson, N. (1999). Making the information systems outsourcing decision: A transaction cost approach to analyzing outsourcing decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(2), 351–367.
Nurmi, A., Hallikainen, P. & Rossi, M. (2008). Coordination of complex information system development projects: A case study of Finnish universities. In S. Rivard & B. A. Aubert (Eds.), Advances in management information systems: Information technology outsourcing (pp. 245–264). New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc
Pannirselvam, G. P., Love, M. S., & Madupalli, R. K. (2011). IT outsourcing: Culture/cohesion’s impact on vendor performance. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(3), 266–278.
Panteli, N., & Sockalingam, S. (2005). Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organisational alliances: A framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems, 39(4), 599–617.
Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–724.
Pettigrew, A. (1972). Information control as a power resource. Sociology, 6(2), 187–204.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Puolanne E. (2007). Presentation by the consortium director at the Oodi-day. 17.10.2007.
Ravishankar, M. N., & Pan, S. K. (2006). The influence of organisational identification on organisational knowledge management. International Journal of Management Science, 32(2), 221–234.
Reed, M. I. (2001). Organization, trust and control: A realist analysis. Organization Studies, 22(2), 201–228.
Richmond, W. B., Seidmann, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1992). Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing. Decision Support Systems, 8, 459–477.
Robey, D., Bourdeau, M. C., & Rose, G. M. (2000). Information technology and organisational learning: A review and assessment of research. Accounting Management and Information Tecnologies, 10(2), 125–155.
Robey, D., & Farrow, D. L. (1982). User involvement in information system development: A conflict model and empirical test. Management Science, 28, 73–85.
Robey, D., & Farrow, D. L. (1989). Group process and conflict in system development: A conflict model and empirical test. Management Science, 35, 1172–1191.
Robey, D., Smith, L. A., & Vijayasarathy, L. R. (1993). Perceptions of conflict and success in information system development projects. Journal of Management Information System, 10, 123–139.
Rustagi, S., King, W. R., & Kirsch, L. J. (2008). Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Information Systems Research, 19(2), 126–143.
Saarinen, V. (2001). Kohti valtakunnallista opiskelijatietojärjestelmää – tapaustutkimus kuuden yliopiston yhteistyöstä (Towards nation-wide student records system—A case study of the cooperation of six universities). Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Information Processing Sciences, University of Oulu.
Sambamurthy, V. & Jarvenpaa, S. (2002). JSIS editorial—special issue on “Trust in the digital economy”. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 183–185.
Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 3–41.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner, how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Standish Group International, I. (2004). Chaos Demographics—2004 third quarter research report.
Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T., & Grönroos, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships for profit: The dynamics of relationship quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5), 21–38.
Tapio, S. (2002) Heila-tietojärjestelmäprojekti ja sen ongelmat: Tutkimus Helsingin yliopiston henkilöstöhallinnon tietojärjestelmän kehitys- ja käyttöönottotyöstä asiakkaan näkökulmasta (The Heila information system development project and its problems: An investigation of the personnel administration system development and adoption work as seen by the client). Unpublished master’s thesis, Depatrment of Education, University of Helsinki.
Whitten, D., & Wakefield, R. L. (2006). Measuring switching costs in IT outsourcing services. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15, 219–248.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heiskanen, A., Hekkala, R., Newman, M., Eklin, M. (2014). Information System Outsourcing Dynamics: A Case Study as Seen by a Client Boundary Role Person. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43819-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43820-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)