Advertisement

Who Is the Favored Bride? Challenges in Switching to a Multi-vendor Offshoring Strategy

  • Martin WienerEmail author
  • Carol S. Saunders
Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

This chapter explores the governance benefits and challenges that arise when a client firm switches from a single- to a multi-vendor offshoring strategy. It also looks at the management tactics that firms use for dealing with the arising challenges. To do so, we examine the case of a global corporation, which recently took the decision to onboard two additional offshore vendors after having worked exclusively with an Indian IT vendor for more than a decade.

Keywords

IT single- versus multi-sourcing Multi-vendor offshoring (MVO) MVO benefits MVO challenges Management tactics 

References

  1. Babar, M. A., Verner, J. M., & Nguyen, P. T. (2007). Establishing and maintaining trust in software outsourcing relationships: An empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1438–1449.Google Scholar
  2. Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(3), 301–328.Google Scholar
  3. Bapna, R., Barua, A., Mani, D., & Mehra, A. (2010). Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 785–795.Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, S., Gupta, A., & Hasija, S. (2012). Single sourcing versus multisourcing: The role of effort interdependence, metric-outcome misalignment, and incentive design. INSEAD Faculty and Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, F. P. (1975). The mythical man-month. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Carmel, E., & Agarwal, R. (2002). The maturation of offshore sourcing of information technology work. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 65–78.Google Scholar
  7. Carmel, E., & Tjia, P. (2005). Offshoring information technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.Google Scholar
  9. Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, L., & Young, A. (2006). Multisourcing: moving beyond outsourcing to achieve growth and agility. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deloitte (2006). Get the big picture: Outsourcing IT infrastructure, and finding your ‘guardian vendor’. In Deloitte CIO Club, Winter 2005/2006. London, UK: Deloitte & Touche LLP.Google Scholar
  12. Dibbern, J., Winkler, J., & Heinzl, A. (2008). Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 333–366.Google Scholar
  13. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H. R., & Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 119–145.Google Scholar
  16. Heeks, R., Krishna, S., Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Synching or sinking: Global software outsourcing relationships. IEEE Software, 18(2), 54–60.Google Scholar
  17. Holmström Olsson, H., O Conchuir, E., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008). Two-stage offshoring: An investigation of the Irish bridge. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 257–279.Google Scholar
  18. Hui, P. P., Fonstad, N. O., & Beath, C. M. (2008). Technology service inter-organizational relationships: An agenda for information technology service sourcing research. In S. Cropper, C. Huxham, M. Ebers, & P. S. Ring (Eds.), The oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huang, H., & Trauth, E. M. (2007). Cultural influences and globally distributed information systems development: experiences from Chinese IT professionals. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research: The Global Information Technology Workforce (pp. 36–45). New York.Google Scholar
  20. Iacovou, C. L., Thompson, R. L., & Smith, H. J. (2009). Selective status reporting in information systems projects: A dyadic-level investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 785–810.Google Scholar
  21. Keil, M., Im, G. P., & Mähring, M. (2007). Reporting bad news on software projects: The effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving. Information Systems Journal, 17(1), 59–87.Google Scholar
  22. Kirsch, L. J. (2004). Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 374–395.Google Scholar
  23. Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363–408.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, J.-N. (2008). Exploring the vendor’s process model in information technology outsourcing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 569–588.Google Scholar
  25. Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331–364.Google Scholar
  26. Levina, N., & Su, N. (2008). Global multisourcing strategy: The emergence of a supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decision Sciences, 39(3), 541–570.Google Scholar
  27. Mahnke, V., Wareham, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2008). Offshore middlemen: Transnational intermediation in technology sourcing. Journal of Information Technology, 23(1), 18–30.Google Scholar
  28. Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 618–634.Google Scholar
  29. Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26.Google Scholar
  30. Nagle, A., & Maughan, A. (2008). Single and multi-sourcing models. In Practical Law Company (PLC), Cross-border outsourcing handbook 2007/2008. http://www.practicallaw.com/8-380-6567.
  31. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.Google Scholar
  32. Rai, A., Maruping, L. M., & Venkatesh, V. (2009). Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 617–641.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J., & Roumasset, J. (1995). Sole sourcing, competitive sourcing, parallel sourcing: Mechanisms for supplier performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  34. Snow, A. P., Keil, M., & Wallace, L. (2007). The effects of optimistic and pessimistic biasing on software project status reporting. Information and Management, 44(2), 130–141.Google Scholar
  35. Tan, B. C. Y., Smith, H. J., Keil, M., & Montealegre, R. (2003). Reporting bad news about software projects: Impact of organizational climate and information asymmetry in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(1), 64–77.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Veltri, N., & Saunders, C. S. (2006). Antecedents of information systems backsourcing. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dr. Theo and Friedl Schöller Research Center for Business and SocietyUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Management and OrganizationStockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of ManagementUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations