Skip to main content

Fuzzy DEA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: Uncertainty and Operations Research ((UOR))

Abstract

In more general cases, the evaluation data are often collected through investigation into the quality of the natural language such as “good,” “medium,” or “bad” rather than a specific case. That is, the data are fuzzy. We can find several fuzzy approaches to the efficiency assessment in the DEA literature. Cooper et al. [14, 15], one of the DEA initiators, introduced how to deal with imprecise data such as bounded data, ordinal data, and ratio bounded data in DEA. Kao and Liu [29] developed a method to find the membership functions of the fuzzy efficiency scores when some observations are fuzzy numbers. Entani et al. [17] proposed a DEA model with an interval efficiency which is obtained from the pessimistic and the optimistic viewpoints. Since possibility measure (Zadeh [46]) has been widely used in dealing with fuzzy data, many researchers have introduced it into DEA (Guo and Tanaka [24] and Lertworasirikul et al. [32]). However, the possibility measure has no self-duality property, which is needed both in theory and in practice. In order to define a self-dual measure, Liu and Liu [38] presented the concept of credibility measure in 2002. This chapter will give a brief introduction to fuzzy DEA based on credibility measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brockett PL, Cooper WW, Hong CS, Wang YY (1998) Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 32:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnes A, Cooper W (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charnes A, Neralic L (1990) Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 48:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J Econom 30:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Morey RC, Rousseau J (1985) Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Ann Oper Res 2:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes A, Haag S, Jaska P, Semple J (1992) Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. Int J Syst Sci 23:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes A, Rousseau J, Semple J (1996) Sensitivity and stability of efficiency classifications in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 7:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chvatal V (1983) Linear programming. W. H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper WW, Thompson RG, Thrall RM (1996) Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann Oper Res 66:3–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2000) A unified additive model approach for evaluating efficiency and congestion. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 34:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2001) Slacks and congestion: response to a comment by R. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re and S. Grosskopf. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 35:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper WW, Deng H, Gu B, Li S, Thrall RM (2001) Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries (1981–1997). Socio-Econ Plan Sci 35:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper WW, Gu B, Li S (2001) Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to evaluating congestion in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:2–74

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (2001) An illustrative application of IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper Res 49:807–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (2001) IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) with CMDs (column maximum decision making units). J Oper Res Soc 52:176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper WW, Deng H, Huang Z, Li SX (2004) Chance constrained programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 155:487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Entani T, Maeda Y, Tanaka H (2002) Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur J Oper Res 136:32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fang SC, Puthenpura S (1993) Linear optimization and extensions: theory and algorithms. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  19. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re R, Grosskopf S (1983) Measuring congestion in production. Zeitschrift f\(\ddot{\mathrm{u}}\) r National\(\ddot{\mathrm{o}}\) konomie 43:257–271

    Google Scholar 

  20. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re R, Grosskopf S (1998) Congestion: a note. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 32:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  21. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re R, Grosskopf S (2001) When can slacks be used to identify congestion? An answer to Cooper, W. W. Seiford, L, and Zhu, J. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 35:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  22. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re R, Svensson L (1980) Congestion of factors of production. Econometrica 48:1743–1753

    Google Scholar 

  23. F\(\ddot{\mathrm{a}}\)re R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guo P, Tanaka H (2001) Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hurwicz L (1951) Optimality criteria for decision making under ignorance. Cowles Commission discussion paper, Chicago, 370

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hurwicz L (1951) Some specification problems and application to econometric models (abstract). Econometrica 19:343–344

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jahanshahloo GR, Afzalinejad M (2006) A ranking method based on a full-inefficient frontier. Appl Math Model 30:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kao C, Liu ST (2000) Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koza JR (1994) Genetic programming II. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Joines JA, Nuttle HLW (2003) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 139:379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu B (1997) Dependent-chance programming: a class of stochastic programming. Comput Math Appl 34(12):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu B (1999) Dependent-chance programming with fuzzy decisions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu B (2002) Theory and practice of uncertain programming. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu B (2002) Random fuzzy dependent-chance programming and its hybrid intelligent algorithm. Inf Sci 141(3–4):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(4):445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Seiford LM (1994) A DEA bibliography (1978–1992). In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford L (eds) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 108(1):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Infeasibility of super efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR 37(2):174–187

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wen ML, Li HS (2009) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): model and ranking method. J Comput Appl Math 223:872–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wen ML, You CL, Kang R (2010) A new ranking method to fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Comput Math Appl 59:3398–3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wen ML, Zhou D, Lv C (2011) A duzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) model with credibility measure. Inf Int Interdiscip J 14(6):1947–1958

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wen ML, Qin ZF, Kang R (2011) Sensitivity and stability analysis in fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA). Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhu J (1996) Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 90:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wen, M. (2015). Fuzzy DEA. In: Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis. Uncertainty and Operations Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43802-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics