Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Consistent Cross-Disciplinary Ontology for Business Process

  • Conference paper
Book cover Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2014, EMMSAD 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 175))

Abstract

This paper takes a cross-disciplinary view of the ontology of “business process”: how the concept is treated in the IS research literature and how related concepts (with stronger human behavioural orientation) from organisational and management sciences can potentially inform this IS perspective. In particular, is there room for socio-technical concepts such as technology affordance, derived from the constructivist tradition, in improving our understanding of operational business processes?

The paper draws on the current research being pursued by the authors in developing a theoretical framework for understanding the role of IT in organisational agility. In this developing theoretical model, we are seeking to include the user-oriented socio-technical dimension that distinguishes the IT “as-used” from the IT “as-designed” in our use of business process as an organisational building block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weske, M.: Business Process Management - Concepts Languages Architectures. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dosi, G., Nelson, R., Winter, S.: Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. In: Dosi, G., Nelson, R., Winter, S. (eds.) The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, pp. 1–22. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pentland, B., Feldman, M.: Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Ind. Corp. Chang. 14, 793–815 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J., Faraj, S.: Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 749–762 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boisot, M., McKelvey, B.: Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35, 415–433 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubé, L., Paré, G.: Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Q. 27, 597–635 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsang, E.W.K.: Case studies and generalization in information systems research: A critical realist perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 1–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Volkoff, O., Strong, D., Elmes, M.: Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change. Organ. Sci. 18, 832–848 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Q. 30, 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, M., Pentland, B.: Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 94–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giddens, A.: The constitution of society. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Latour, B.: Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Boston (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Orlikowski, W., Scott, S.: Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2, 433–474 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, M., Orlikowski, W.: Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22, 1240–1253 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tallon, P., Pinsonneault, A.: Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Q. 35, 463–486 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Tanniru, M.: Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 28, 283–322 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henderson, J., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Becker, M.: Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Ind. Corp. Chang. 13, 643–678 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Majchrzak, A., Markus, M.: Technology affordances and constraints. In: Kessler, E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory. Sage (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leonardi, P.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35, 147–167 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo, Y., Boland, R.: Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23, 1398–1408 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Winter, S.: Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 24, 991–995 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schreyogg, G., Kliesch-eberl, M.: How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 913–933 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hafeez, K., Malak, N.: Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: A structured methodology for identifying core competence. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49, 28–35 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Volberda, H., Lewin, A.: Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms: From Evolution to Co-evolution. J. Manag. Stud. 40, 2111–2135 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McKelvey, B.: Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organ. Sci. 10, 294–321 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Helfat, C., Winter, S.: Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strateg. Manag. J. 32, 1243–1250 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Augier, M., Teece, D.: Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance. Organ. Sci. 20, 410–421 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trkman, P.: The critical success factors of business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30, 125–134 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business process management: A survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Vidgen, R., Wang, X.: From business process management to business process ecosystem. J. Inf. Technol. 21, 262–271 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., Winter, S.: Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Teece, D.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 1350, 1319–1350 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pentland, B., Feldman, M., Becker, M., Liu, P.: Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Manag. Stud. 49, 1484–1508 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Melão, N., Pidd, M.: A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Inf. Syst. J. 10, 105–129 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Charles Crick & Eng Chew

Authors
  1. Charles Crick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eng Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DSV Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ilia Bider

  2. Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, Luxembourg

    Khaled Gaaloul

  3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Sem Sælandsvei 7-9, N-7030, Trondheim, Norway

    John Krogstie

  4. Université de Paris 1 Panthéon - Sorbonne, Paris, France

    Selmin Nurcan

  5. Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, Luexemboug

    Henderik A. Proper

  6. Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany

    Rainer Schmidt

  7. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Pnina Soffer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crick, C., Chew, E. (2014). Towards a Consistent Cross-Disciplinary Ontology for Business Process. In: Bider, I., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43744-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43745-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation