Abstract
Organizations realize that benefits can be achieved by closely working together on the design of their business processes. But even when there is a joint design for a particular business process, the way individual organizations carry out that process may differ – either wittingly or unwittingly. This paper proposes an analytical approach that helps to compare how different organizations execute essentially the same process. This comparison is based on the alignment of recorded process behavior with explicitly defined process models. The distinctive feature of the proposed approach is that it supports the comparison of the actual execution of a process within a particular organization with its intended design, as well as with the variants of that design by other organizations. In this way, organizations can develop a better understanding of how they can work together and further standardize a process of common interest. We include an industrial case study from the context of the CoSeLoG project to demonstrate the value of this comparison approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance Checking using Cost-Based Fitness Analysis. In: Proceedings of EDOC. IEEE Computer Society (2011)
Betz, S., Eichhorn, D., Hickl, S., Klink, S., Koschmider, A., Li, Y., Oberweis, A., Trunko, R.: 3D Representation of Business Process Models. In: MobIS (2008)
Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards Cross-Organizational Process Mining in Collections of Process Models and Their Executions. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 2–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the Role of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity in Process Discovery. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 305–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Esgin, E., Senkul, P.: Delta Analysis: A Hybrid Quantitative Approach for Measuring Discrepancies between Business Process Models. In: Corchado, E., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M. (eds.) HAIS 2011, Part I. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6678, pp. 296–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Fill, H.-G.: Using Semantically Annotated Models for Supporting Business Process Benchmarking. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) BIR 2011. LNBIP, vol. 90, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Friedman, T.: Welcome to the ‘Sharing Economy’ (2013), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/friedman-welcome-to-the-sharing-economy.html (last accessed on February 19, 2014)
Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Configuration and Management of Process Variants. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Juan, Y.C., Ou-Yang, C.: A Process Logic Comparison Approach to Support Business Process Benchmarking. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26(1-2) (2005)
Kleiner, N.: Delta Analysis with Workflow Logs: Aligning Business Process Prescriptions and their Reality. Requirements Engineering 10(3) (2005)
Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G., Rinderle-Ma, S.: A Visualization Approach for Difference Analysis of Process Models and Instance Traffic. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 219–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Lu, R., Sadiq, S.: Managing Process Variants as an Information Resource. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 426–431. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Lu, R., Sadiq, S.: On the Discovery of Preferred Work Practice Through Business Process Variants. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 165–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. LNBIP, vol. 6. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Moody, D.L.: The “physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(6) (2009)
Outmazgin, N.: Exploring Workaround Situations in Business Processes. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 426–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Reijers, H.A., Freytag, T., Mendling, J., Eckleder, A.: Syntax Highlighting in Business Process Models. Decision Support Systems 51(3) (2011)
Rolstadås, A.: Performance Management: A Business Process Benchmarking Approach. Chapman & Hall (1995)
Teuteberg, F., Kluth, M., Ahlemann, F., Smolnik, S.: Semantic Process Benchmarking to Improve Process Performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal 20(4) (2013)
Verbeek, H.M.W., Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: XES, XESame, and ProM 6. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 60–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Buijs, J.C.A.M., Reijers, H.A. (2014). Comparing Business Process Variants Using Models and Event Logs. In: Bider, I., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43744-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43745-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)