Skip to main content

Testis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1338 Accesses

Abstract

During the 7th week, XY male gonads begin to differentiate under the influence of a series of testis-determining genes. Sertoli cells surround germ cells to form testis cords, which nourish primordial germ cells and direct them into the pathway for male gametogenesis. In testes, germ cells (before spermatogonia) undergo mitotic arrest and are blocked from entering meiosis until after birth.

The etiology of primary ascending testis is unclear, but there are two different explanations: mechanical tethering and low-lying undescended testis. The first case of ectopic testis was reported for the first time by John Hanter in 1786; it is a rare congenital anomaly with incidence ranging from 1 to 5% of all cases of undescended testis. Crossed testicular ectopia is a rare but well-known congenital anomaly that was first reported by von Lenhossek in 1886, with an estimation of global incidence of about 1:4 million. Anorchia is defined as the absence of testes in a 46,XY individual with a male phenotype. Monorchia is a term applied for unilateral cases; it is a normal phenomenon in nonhuman animals, notably in beetles. Polyorchidism is an uncommon congenital anomaly defined as the presence of more than two histologically proven testes; most patients with supernumerary testicles are asymptomatic and have painless groin or scrotal masses; triorchidism is the commonest variety of polyorchidism, and it is frequently reported on the left side. Accessory spleen in the scrotum (Lienotesticular fusion) is virtually always on the left side where immature splenic tissue adheres to the developing gonad, epididymis, or vas deferens. The splenic tissue is subsequently pulled in a caudal direction with descent of the gonad; surgical exploration is generally needed to rule out malignancy especially in patients with intratesticular mass. If the surgical intervention is performed, orchiectomy is generally not indicated, and splenic tissue can be dissected out of the gonadal structure and the testis can be saved. Persistent mullerian duct syndrome (PMDS) is characterized by the presence of a uterus, cervix, and fallopian tubes in an otherwise normally differentiated 46.XY male.

Vas deferens anomalies usually present as agenesis of the vas, which may be associated with unilateral or bilateral hypoplasia or absence of other portions of the Wolffian duct derivatives and duplication of vas deferens. Testicular and epididymal appendages were once considered anatomic anomalies; however, some other authors report that these structures are present in the majority of normal individuals, but it revealed itself only along other pathologies as cryptorchidism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

Ascending Testis

  1. Yoshida T, Ohno K, Morotomi Y, Nakamura T, Azuma T, Yamada H, Hayashi H, Suehiro S. Clinical and pathological features of ascending testis. Osaka City Med J. 2009;55(2):81–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal PK, Diaz M, Elder JS. Retractile testis—is it really a normal variant? J Urol. 2006;175:1496–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan WG. Iatrogenic cryptorchidism from hernia repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142:671.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson JF, Azmy AF, Cochran W. Assent to ascent of the testis. Br J Urol. 1988;61(2):146–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atwell JD. Ascent of the testis: fact or fiction. Br J Urol. 1985;57(4):474–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenig DM, Snyder 3rd HM, Wu HY, Canning DA, Huff DS. The histopathology of iatrogenic cryptorchid testis: an insight into etiology. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1258–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stec AA, Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Pope JC, Brock JW, Adams MC. Incidence of testicular ascent in boys with retractile testes. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1722–4; discussion 1724–5. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hack WM, Meijer RW, Van der Voort-Doedens LM, et al. Natural course of acquired undescended testis in boys. Br J Surg. 2003;90:728–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ectopic Testis

  1. Tackett LD, Patel SR, Caldamone AA. A history of cryptorchidism: lessons from the eighteenth century. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(6):426–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sylla C, Ndoye A, Ba M, Gueye SM, Mensah A. Penile ectopic testis. Br J Urol. 1996;77:762.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zur kenntnis des Doppelhodens: on a double testis. Urologe. 1983;22(3):180–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ku JH, Jeon YS, Lee NK, et al. Two cases of perineal ectopic testis. Int J Urol. 2000;7:307–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Backhause KM. The gubernaculum testis hunteri: testicular descent and maldescent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1964;35:15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuyumcuoglu U, Erol D, Mataye E, et al. Bilateral perineal ectopic testes. Int Urol Nephrol. 1990;22:271–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valentina M, Genetalia MD. Antenatal ultrasound diagnosis of perineal ectopic testis: a case report. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001;13:31–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Celayir AC, Sander S, Elicevik M. Timing of surgery in perineal ectopic testis: analysis of 16 cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2001;17:167–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutson JM. Undescended testis, torsion, and varicocele. In: Grossfeld JL, O’Neil JAJ, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG, editors. Pediatric surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006. p. 1193–214.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutcheson JC, Snyder 3rd HM, Zuñiga ZV, et al. Ectopic and undescended testes: 2 variants of a single congenital anomaly. J Urol. 2000;163:961–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crossed Testicular Ectopia

  1. Von Lenhossek MN. Ectopia testis transversa. Anta Anz. 1886;1:376.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halstead AE. Ectopia testis transversa. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1907;4:129–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esteves E, Pinus J, Maranhao RF, Abib Sde C, Asis SV, Pinus J. Crossed testicular ectopia. Sao Paulo Med J. 1995;113(4):935–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrack S. Crossed testicular ectopia with fused bilateral duplication of the vasa deferential: an unusual finding in cryptorchidism. East Afr Med J. 1994;71:398–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gauderer MW, Grisoni ER, Stellato TA, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr RJ. Transverse testicular ectopia. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17:43–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lam WW, Le SD, Chan KL, Chan FL, Tam PK. Transverse testicular ectopia detected by MR imaging and MR angiography. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:126–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anorchia and Monorchia

  1. Brauner R, Neve M, Allali S, Trivin C, Lottmann H, Bashamboo A, McElreavey K. Clinical, biological and genetic analysis of anorchia in 26 boys. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tosi SE, Morin LJ. The vanishing testis syndrome: indications for conservative therapy. J Urol. 1976;115:758–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rousso I, Iliopoulos D, Athanasiadou F, Zavopoulou L, Vassiliou G, Voyiatzis N. Congenital bilateral anorchia: hormonal, molecular and imaging study of a case. Genet Mol Res. 2006;5(4):638–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Supernumerary Testicles

  1. Kheirandish P, Chinegwundoh F. An unusual case of triorchidism. JRSM Short Rep. 2010;1(6):55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lane A. A case of supernumerary testis. Trans Clin Soc Lond. 1985;28:59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergholz R, Wenke K. Polyorchidism: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2009;182:2422–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathur P, Prabhu K, Khamesra HL. Polyorchidism revisited. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18:449–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holder HGA. A problem case of triorchidism. J Urol. 1925;13:555.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zur kenntnis des Doppelhodens: on a double testis. Urologe. 1983;22(3):180–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tonape T, Singh G, Koushik P, Tumepalli T. Triorchidism: a rare genitourinary abnormality. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2012;4(2):126–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheah BJ, Teh HS, Peh OH. Supernumerary testicle in a case of polyorchidism. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:368–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcoxa CB, D’Cruz R, Holland AJ. Polyorchism in association with an undescended testis and testicular atrophy: report of a unique case and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2013;1(1):7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kundu AK, Deb D, Pradhan P, Ghosh G, Triorchidism CS. An incidental finding and review of literature. J Anat Soc India. 2001;50(1):37–9.

    Google Scholar 

Splenogonadal Fusion

  1. Bostroem E. Demonstration eines Paparates von Verwachsung der Milz mit dem lenken Hoden. Gesellschaft Deutscher Natruforscher und Aerzte, Verhandlungen der 56 Versammlung, Freiburg; 1883. p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pommer G. Verwachsung des linden kryptorchischen Hodensund nebenhodens mit der Milz in einer Missgeburt mit zahlreichen bildungsdefecten. Ber Nat Med Ver Innsbruck. 1888;144:17, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Putschar WGJ, Manion WC. Splenic-gonadal fusion. Am J Pathol. 1956;32:15–33.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fahmy MA. Rare case of continuous and discontinuous splenogonadal fusion in a single testicle. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2009;5(4):282–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sneath WA. An apparent third testicle consisting of a scrotal spleen. J Anat Physiol. 1912;147:340–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. von Hochstetter A. Spleen tissue in the left ovary of the left individual part of a human thoracopagus. Virchows Arch. 1953;324:36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashash B, Yadav SK, MalIik A. Splenogonadal fusion in a boy: case report and review of literature. Kuwait Med J. 2008;40(1):72–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chua HB. Spleno- gonadal fusion. Brunei Int Med J. 2011;7(2):101-1-3.

    Google Scholar 

Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS)

  1. Jordan M. Ein Fall von einseitigem descensus testiculorum (Ectopia testis transversa). Beitr Klin Chir. 1895;15:245.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ikoma F, Shima H, Yabumoto H. Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias. Br J Urol. 1985;57:334–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuhrke TD, Kaplan GW. Prostatic utricle cysts (Müllerian duct cyst). J Urol. 1978;119:765–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Desautel MG, Stock J, Hanna MK. Müllerian duct remnants: surgical management and fertility issues. J Urol. 1999;162:1008–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Agenesis of the Vas Deferens

  1. Kim B, Kawashima A, Ryu JA, Takahashi N, Hartman RP, King BF. Imaging of the seminal vesicle and vas deferens. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1105–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sirasanagandla RS, Nayak SB, Jetti R, Bha MRK. Unilateral duplication of vas deferens: a cadaveric case report. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46(1):79–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vohra S, Morgentaler A. Congenital anomalies of the vas deferens, epididymitis, and seminal vesicles. Urology. 1997;49:313–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stuhrmann M, Dork T. CFTR gene mutations and male infertility. Andrologia 2000;32:71–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlegel PN, Shin D, Goldstein M. Urogenital anomalies in men with congenital absence of the vas deferens. J Urol. 1996;155(5):1644–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duplication of Vas Deferens

  1. Liang MK, Subramanian A, Weedin J, Griffith DP, Awad SS. True duplication of the vas deferens: a case report and review of literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anomalies of Epididymal Attachment

  1. Han CH, Kang SH. Epididymal anomalies associated with patent processus vaginalis in hydrocele and cryptorchidism. J Korean Med Sci. 2002;17:660–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Priebe Jr CJ, Holahan JA, Ziring PR. Abnormalities of the vas deferens and epididymis in cryptorchid boys with congenital rubella. J Pediatr Surg. 1979;14(6):834–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill B, Kogan S, Starr S, Reda E, Levitt S. Significance of epididymal and ductal anomalies associated with testicular maldescent. J Urol. 1989;142(2 Pt 2):556–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elder JS. Epididymal anomalies associated with hydrocele/hernia and cryptorchidism: implications regarding testicular descent. J Urol. 1992;148(2):624–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cicigoi A, Bianchi M. Seminal duct abnormalities in cryptorchism: our experience with 334 cases. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1991;63(1):107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epididymal Cyst

  1. Vohra S, Morgentaler A. Congenital anomalies of the vas deferens, epididymis, and seminal vesicles. Urology. 1997;49(3):313–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poseya ZQ, Ahnd HJ, Junewickb J, et al. Rate and associations of epididymal cysts on pediatric scrotal ultrasound. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1739–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Homayoon K, Suhre CD, Steinhardt GF. Epididymal cysts in children: natural history. Pediatr Urol. 2004;171(3):1274–6.

    Google Scholar 

Appendages of Morgagni and its Torsion

  1. Alexander B. Seats and Causes of Diseases. London: Miller and Cadell; 1769.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colt CH. Torsion of the hydatid of Morgagni. Br J Surg 1922;9:464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones P. Torsion of the testis and its appendages during childhood. Arch Dis Child. 1962;37:214–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rolnick D, Kawanoue S, Szanto P, Bush IM. Anatomical incidence of testicular appendages. J Urol. 1968;100:755–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Favorito LA, Cavalcante AG, Babinski MA. Study on the incidence of testicular and epididymal appendages in patients with cryptorchidism. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30(1):49–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dix VW. On torsion of the appendages of the testis and the epididymis. Br J Urol. 1931;3:245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murnagh CF. The appendages of the testis and epididymis: a short review with case report. J Urol. 2008;31(2):190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fahmy, M.A.B. (2015). Testis. In: Rare Congenital Genitourinary Anomalies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43680-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43680-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43679-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43680-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics