Skip to main content

Vibrational Playback Experiments: Challenges and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Studying Vibrational Communication

Part of the book series: Animal Signals and Communication ((ANISIGCOM,volume 3))

Abstract

Playbacks are one of the most useful experimental tools in animal communication research. Playbacks of substrate vibrations present special challenges, but conducting high-fidelity vibrational playbacks is not difficult and depends less on the specific equipment used than on avoiding some common pitfalls. We review the major issues, describing both the problems and a range of solutions. Our focus is on playback through living plants, but most of the issues apply to playback through other substrates as well. The major challenge for playback through any substrate is that the vibrational signal is almost always changed by the playback equipment and the substrate, so that the signal received by the focal animal is different from the one intended by the experimenter. The general solution to this problem is to measure the changes imposed by the playback system and to pre-filter the playback signal to compensate for them. A second challenge is to ensure that the focal animal receives a signal at the appropriate amplitude. Achieving the proper amplitude is a straightforward process. However, amplitude is substrate dependent (e.g., on a plant, amplitude is inversely proportional to stem diameter), and the experimenter should choose a realistic amplitude for the substrate. Other issues include choices of playback device, natural versus artificial substrates, single versus multiple substrate exemplars, and playback in laboratory versus field. Our goal in this chapter is to give experimenters, especially those just starting out, the knowledge and confidence needed to conduct high-quality vibrational playbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barth FG (1982) Spiders and vibratory signals: sensory reception and behavioral significance. In: Witt PW, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 67–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (2002) A spider’s world: senses and behavior. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MS, Johnston GR, McDaniel JG, Warkentin KM (2010) Vibrational signaling in the agonistic interactions of red-eyed treefrogs. Curr Biol 20:1012–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (2005) Vibrational communication facilitates cooperative foraging in a phloem-feeding insect. Proc R Soc B Biol 272:1023–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (2010) Vibrational communication. In: Breed MD, Moore J (eds) Encyclopedia of animal behavior, vol 3. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 498–505

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, Rodríguez RL (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience 55:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, Tieu T, Hoy RR, Miles R (2000) Mechanical directionality in the response to substrate vibration in a treehopper. J Comp Physiol 186:695–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, Shugart HJ, Konrad KT, Tibbs K (2006) Variation in plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication. Ethology 112:779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cokl A, Virant-Doberlet M (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:29–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cokl A, Zorovic M, Millar JG (2007) Vibrational communication along plants by the stink bugs Nezara viridula and Murgantia histrionica. Behav Process 75:40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Hart NS, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Hunt S, Church SC (2000) Avian colour vision and avian video playback experiments. Acta Ethol 3:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman LJ, McClintock WJ, D’Eath RB, Brainard DH, Endler JA (1998) Colour perception and the use of video playback experiments in animal behavior. Anim Behav 56:1035–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1995) Phonotaxis in female frogs and toads: execution and design of experiments. In: Klump GM, Dooling RR, Fay RR, Stebbins WC (eds) Animal psychophysics: design and conduct of sensory experiments. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon SD, Uetz GW (2011) Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity. Anim Behav 81:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon SD, Uetz GW (2012) Environmental interference: impact of acoustic noise on seismic communication and mating success. Behav Ecol 23:700–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill PSM (2008) Vibrational communication in animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill PSM, Shadley JR (2001) Talking back: sending soil vibration signals to lekking prairie mole cricket males. Am Zool 41:1200–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S, Liu W-C (2001) Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Anim Behav 61:1029–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE (1986) Design of playback experiments. Auk 103:640–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE (1989) Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Anim Behav 37:600–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre F, Marting PR, Cocroft RB (2012) Competitive masking of vibrational signals during mate searching in a treehopper. Anim Behav 83:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrey AK, Clark DL, Gordon SD, Uetz GW (2009) Antipredator responses of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) to sensory cues representing an avian predator. Anim Behav 77:813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magal C, Scholler M, Tautz J, Casas J (2000) The role of leaf structure in vibration propagation. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2412–2418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Catchpole CK, Dabelsteen T, Falls JB, Fusani L, Gerhardt HC, Gilbert F, Horn AG, Klump GM, Kroodsma DE, Lambrechts MM, McComb KE, Nelson DA, Pepperberg IM, Ratcliffe L, Searcy WA, Weary DM (1992) Design and interpretation of playback: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW consensus. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK (2000) Playback experiments: design and analysis. Acta Ethol 3:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNett GD, Miles RN, Homentcovschi D, Cocroft RB (2006) A method for two-dimensional characterization of animal vibrational signals transmitted along plant stems. J Comp Physiol A 192:1245–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNett GD, Cocroft RB (2008) Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers. Behav Ecol 19:650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNett GD, Luan L, Cocroft RB (2010) Wind-induced noise alters signaler and receiver behavior in vibrational communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:2043–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Fink F, Gogala M, Traue D (1982) Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales MA, Barone JL, Henry CS (2008) Acoustic alarm signalling facilitates predator protection of treehoppers by mutualist ant bodyguards. Proc R Soc B Biol 275:1935–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell-Rodwell CE, Wood JD, Rodwell TC, Puria S, Partan SR, Keefe R, Shriver D, Arnason BT, Hart LA (2006) Wild elephant (Loxodonta africana) breeding herds respond to artificially transmitted seismic stimuli. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell-Rodwell CE, Wood JD, Kinzley C, Rodwell RC, Poole JH, Puria S (2007) Wild African elephants (Loxodonta africana) discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecific seismic alarm calls. J Acoust Soc Am 122:823–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polajnar J, Svensek D, Cokl A (2012) Resonance in herbaceous plant stems as a factor in vibrational communication of pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J R Soc Interface 9:1898–1907

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebar D, Höbel G, Rodríguez RL (2012) Vibrational playback by means of airborne stimuli. J Exp Biol 215:3513–3518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrseitz K, Kilpinen O (1997) Vibration transmission characteristics of the legs of freely standing honeybees. Zoology 100:80–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattman DA, Cocroft RB (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and repeatability in the mating signals of Enchenopa treehoppers, with implications for reduced gene flow among host-shifted populations. Ethology 109:981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw S (1994) Detection of airborne sound by a cockroach ‘vibration detector’: a possible missing link in insect auditory evolution. J Exp Biol 193:13–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tishechkin DY (2007) Background noises in vibratory communication channels of Homoptera (Cicadinea and Psyllinea). Russ Entomol J 16:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (2003) Is there an ideal behavioural experiment? Anim Behav 66:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JD, O’Connell-Rodwell CE (2010) Studying vibrational communication: equipment options, recording, playback and analysis techniques. In: O’Connell-Rodwell CE (ed) The use of vibrations in communication: properties, mechanisms and function across taxa. Transworld, Kerala, pp 163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunic A, Virant Doberlet M, Cokl A (2008) Preference of the southern green stink bug (Nezara viridula) males for female calling song parameters. B Insectol 61:183–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

RBC acknowledges support from NSF IOB 0820533. The manuscript benefitted from conversations with Ron Miles, Carol Miles, Peggy Hill, Matija Gogala, and Andreas Wessel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reginald B. Cocroft .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The following MATLAB programs use the Signal Processing Toolbox and the Control System Toolbox and have been confirmed to work in MATLAB 6.5 (R13) through to MATLAB 8.1 (R2013a).

1.1 Digital Equalization Filter

This program obtains the system equalization filter from stored measurements. A typical system would include the digital-to-analog converter, amplifier and vibration exciter, vibration medium, measurement transducer, anti-aliasing filter, and analog-to-digital converter. Prior to running this code, a continuous random signal (stored in WAVE file ‘Playback1.wav’) is played through the system, and the response is measured and saved (WAVE file ‘Recording1.wav’).

The power spectral density functions are estimated and used to obtain the magnitude of the input-to-output transfer function. The useful data range is taken between the specified lower and upper frequencies in hertz (variables ‘f_lo’ and ‘f_hi’), and the digital filter coefficients are estimated and saved (MATLAB data file ‘FilterCoefs.mat’). For evaluation purposes, the equalization filter is applied to the original playback signal and stored (WAVE file ‘Playback2.wav’). Arbitrary signals of different duration can be filtered this way using the identified filter coefficients, as long as the sample rates are the same.

MATLAB script for acquiring and implementing digital equalization filter:

  • close all, clear all

  • [out,fs,NBITS]=wavread(‘Playback1.wav’); %WAVE file with original playback

  • [in,fs,NBITS]=wavread(‘Recording1.wav’); %WAVE file with recorded signal dt=1/fs;

  • t_out = [0:dt:(length(out)-1)*dt];

  • t_in = [0:dt:(length(in)-1)*dt];

  • fftLength=4096;

  • [PSDout,Freq]=pwelch(out,ones(fftLength,1),[],fftLength,fs);

  • [PSDin,Freq]=pwelch(in,ones(fftLength,1),[],fftLength,fs);

  • Hcmp=sqrt(PSDout./PSDin); %Amplitude compensation filter

  • f_lo=40; f_hi=10000; %lower and upper cutoff frequencies in Hz.

  • lo=round(f_lo/(fs/fftLength))+1;

  • hi=round(f_hi/(fs/fftLength))+1;

  • Hcmp(1:lo)=0; Hcmp(hi:length(Hcmp))=0;

  • wn=Freq/max(Freq);

  • B=fir2(fftLength,wn,Hcmp); %this calculates the digital filter coefficients

  • A=1;

  • save FilterCoefs.mat B A

  • outcmp=filter(B,A,out); %this applies the digital filter to the signal

  • outcmp=outcmp*.9/max(abs(outcmp));

  • wavwrite(outcmp,fs,16,’Playback2.wav’);

1.2 Differentiation and Integration of Playback Signal

This MATLAB script numerically differentiates and integrates the time signal stored in a WAVE file (‘ArbPlayback.wav’). Differentiation of the signal can be approximated using the finite difference method (with ‘diff.m’), while integration of the signal can be approximated using trapezoidal integration (with ‘cumtrapz.m’). These methods work well if the time step is sufficiently small and if there is no noise in the signal.

When the signal has additional noise, the higher-frequency noise is increased by the differentiation process, while the lower-frequency noise is increased by integration. This noise can be reduced by using a first-order band-pass filter to perform the differentiation or integration. The band-pass center frequency is set to a high frequency for differentiation (variable ‘f_hi’), so the frequencies below the center frequency approximate a differentiation filter, while frequencies above are attenuated. For integration, the center frequency is set to a low frequency (variable ‘f_lo’), so frequencies below the center frequency are attenuated, while frequencies above approximate an integration filter. The appropriate center frequency also depends on the frequency content of the signal.

MATLAB script for differentiation and integration of playback signal:

  • wavfile=‘ArbPlayback.wav’; %WAVE file name with playback signal

  • [out,fs,NBITS]=wavread(wavfile);

  • dt=1/fs;

  • nt=length(out);

  • t_out =[0:dt:(nt-1)*dt];

  • %numerical differentiation by finite difference:

  • outdiff=diff(out)/dt;

  • outdiff(nt)=outdiff(nt-1);

  • %numerical integration by trapezoidal rule:

  • outint=cumtrapz(t_out,out);

  • % Differentiation filter: Band pass filter with high corner frequency

  • f_hi=10000; %upper cutoff frequency in Hz.

  • SYSc=tf((2*pi*f_hi)^2*[1 0],conv([1 f_hi*2*pi],[1 f_hi*2*pi])); SYSd=c2d(SYSc,1/fs,’foh’);

  • [Bcmp,Acmp]=tfdata(SYSd);

  • outfiltdiff=filter(Bcmp{1},Acmp{1},out);

  • % Integration filter: Band pass filter with low corner frequency

  • f_lo=10; %lower cutoff frequency in Hz.

  • SYSc=tf([1 0],conv([1 f_lo*2*pi],[1 f_lo*2*pi]));

  • SYSd=c2d(SYSc,1/fs,’foh’);

  • [Bcmp,Acmp]=tfdata(SYSd);

  • outfiltint=filter(Bcmp{1},Acmp{1},out);

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cocroft, R.B., Hamel, J., Su, Q., Gibson, J. (2014). Vibrational Playback Experiments: Challenges and Solutions. In: Cocroft, R., Gogala, M., Hill, P., Wessel, A. (eds) Studying Vibrational Communication. Animal Signals and Communication, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43607-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics