Skip to main content

Development of Assessment Model for Research Efficiency of Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Service Productivity

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 215))

Abstract

Research in university is an essential part for national competitiveness and the foundation of knowledge and information of a society. This study assumed that the effective operation of limited resources by size of universities would be the plan for maximizing their effectiveness, and suggested grouping of similar universities by establishing a new classifying system. Based on new classifying system the current status of universities is assessed to help concentration on research activities for their target.

In this study, four models such as high efficiency expanding model (HEEM), high efficiency stable model (HESM), low efficiency stable model (LESM) and low efficiency expanding model (LEEM) were suggested through a practical analysis.

This chapter is based on the Ph.D. thesis of Dr. Jong-Woun Youn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banker, R. D., Cooper, W. W., & Charnes, A. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & De Witte, K. (2010). COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects. Tier working paper series, 05(3), 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihm, C. S. (2005). Achievements and problems of implementing higher education specialization policy in Korea. The Korean Journal of the Study of Educational Administration, 23(4), 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, Y. S., Choi, T. S., & Kim, S. H. (2002). Data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency. Incheon, Korea: Inha University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. H., & Kim, T. I. (2001). Evaluation and measurement of efficiency of the public sector. Seoul, Korea: Jipmundang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H., & Lee, H. S. (2008). A comparison between university evaluation and its efficiency as measured by DEA. The Korean Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. K. (2003). The theory and practice of local government productivity measurement. Seoul, Korea: Jipmundang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G., & Savage, S. (1997). Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics department at Australian universities. Education Economics, 5(2), 152–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, J. H., & Jung, C. W. (2005). Bankruptcy prediction using Negative DEA. Journal of Korean Operations Research and, Management Science, 7(3), 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, D. K., & Kim, K. J. (2005). The development of the business performance metric: Framework and application scenarios. Journal of Korean Operations Research and Management Science, 5(1), 580–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradi, J., Asmild, M., & Simak, P. (2004). Using DEA and worst practice DEA in credit risk evaluation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. K. (2009). A measurement way of operation risk evaluation of Korean seaports using negative DEA. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 25(2), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2000). Microeconomics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rah, M. J. (2004). An evaluation of efficiency of public university finance. The Korean Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 13(2), 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rah, M. J., & Kim, M. H. (2005). An international comparative study on the efficiency of higher education using DEA. The Korean Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 14(2), 205–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, J. S., Park, Y. G., Bae, S. O., Lee, K. S., & Cho, H. J. (2006). University innovation. Seoul, Korea: Samsung Economic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, J. W., & Park, K. T. (2009). University development models and efficiency analysis. Journal of Service Science, 1(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Woun Youn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Youn, JW., Park, K. (2014). Development of Assessment Model for Research Efficiency of Universities. In: Emrouznejad, A., Cabanda, E. (eds) Managing Service Productivity. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43437-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics