Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internationale Führungskräfteentwicklung mit 360-Grad-Feedback

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internationale Führung

Part of the book series: Die Wirtschaftspsychologie ((DWP))

Zusammenfassung

Nicht nur bei der internationalen Zusammenarbeit in Organisationen, aber dort in besonderem Maße, treffen häufig unterschiedliche Vorstellungen aufeinander, z. B. darüber, wie die Dinge zu erledigen sind und wie darüber kommuniziert wird, wie effektiv geführt wird und wie auf Führung reagiert werden sollte. Prallen unterschiedliche Arbeitskulturen aufeinander, kommt es so manches Mal zu unverständlichen Reaktionen und Handlungsweisen des Gegenübers. An einer Begebenheit, die mir im Bereich der internationalen Softwareentwicklung bekannt geworden ist, lässt sich dies für den Kontext der 360-Grad-Führungskräfteentwicklung gut veranschaulichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Obermann, C. (2013). Assessment Center. Entwicklung, Durchführung, Trends. Mit originalen AC-Übungen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fleenor, J. W., & Prince, J. M. (1997). Using 360-degree feedback in organizations: an annotated bibliography. Greensboro: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mahlke, J., Schultze, M., Koch, T., Eid, M., Eckert, R., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2015). Validation of 360 Degree Feedback Instruments: A Multilevel CFA–MTMM Approach for Multisource Feedback Instruments: Presentation and Application of a New Statistical Model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 00, 1–20. Published online 26. Juni, 2015, ISSN: 1070-5511 print/1532-8007 online.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuler, H. (Hrsg.). (2007). Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lepsinger, R., & Lucia, A. D. (2009). The art and science of 360° feedback. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fleenor, J. W., Taylor, S., & Chappelow, C. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nowack, K. M., & Mashihi, S. (2012). Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(3), 157–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360 degree feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ostroff, C., Atwater, L. E., & Feinberg, B. J. (2004). Understanding self-other agreement: a look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 333–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quast, L. N., Wohkittel, J. M., Chung, C., & Center, B. A. (2011). Patterns of self-other rating disrepancies and predictions of managerial career derailment: Comparing Asia to the United States. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the Academy of HRD (Asia chap.) International Research Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Atwater, L. E., Wang, M., Smither, J., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’rating of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 876–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckert, R., Ekelund, B., Gentry, W., & Dawson, J. (2010). I don’t see me like you see me but is that a problem? Cultural differences in rating discrepancy in 360-degree feedback instruments. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gentry, W., Hannum, K. M., Ekelund, B., & de Jong, A. (2007). A study of the discrepancy between self- and observer-ratings on managerial derailment characteristics of European managers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shipper, F., Hoffman, R., & D. R. (2007). Does the 360 feedback process create actionable knowledge equally across cultures? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robie, S., Kaster, K., Nilsen, D., & Hazucha, J. (2000). The right stuff: Understanding cultural differences in leadership performance. Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eckert, R., Ruderman, M. N., Gentry, W. A., Brodbeck, F. C., Braddy, P. W., Hannum, K. M., & Leslie, J. B. (2012). Global6 technical manual. Greensboro: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brodbeck, F. C. (2006). Navigationshilfe für internationales Change Management. Erkenntnisse aus dem GLOBE Projekt. Organisationsentwicklung, 25(3), 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brodbeck, F. C., Ruderman, M. N., Glover, S., Eckert, R., Hannum, K. M., Braddy, P. W., & Gentry, W. A. (2012). Global6 Report. Greensboro: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  20. House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Hanges, P. J., & Sully de Luque, M. F. (2014). Strategic leadership across cultures. The GLOBE study of CEO leadership behavior and effectiveness in 24 countrie. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business & Psychology, 25, 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Felix C. Brodbeck

Authors
  1. Felix C. Brodbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix C. Brodbeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

    Felix C. Brodbeck

  2. Institut für Angewandte Psychologie: Arbeit, Bildung, Wirtschaft, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Erich Kirchler

  3. Lehrstuhl Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

    Ralph Woschée

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brodbeck, F.C. (2016). Internationale Führungskräfteentwicklung mit 360-Grad-Feedback. In: Brodbeck, F., Kirchler, E., Woschée, R. (eds) Internationale Führung. Die Wirtschaftspsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43361-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43361-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43360-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43361-4

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation