Variation in Viruses

  • G. M. Findlay

Zusammenfassung

The fact that variation occurs in viruses has been appreciated in the East for many centuries in connection with variolation, while the production by Paste ur of a variant of the rabiesviruswas accomplished more than fifty years ago.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.: Observations on Morbid Poisons, Chronic and Acute, 2nd Ed. London: J. Callow, 1807.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, S.: A disease of fowls in Palestine characterised by leucocyte inclusions. Ann. trop. Med. Parasitol. 19, 127 (1925).Google Scholar
  3. Akazawa, S. and T. Matsumura: Swine pox in Chosen. J. Jap. Soc. vet. Sci. 14, 1 (1933).Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, R. A.: (1) Preliminary note on the infection of white mice and guinea-pigs with the virus of horse sickness. J. S. Africa vet. med. Assoc. 4, 1 (1933).Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, R. A.: (2) Studies on the neurotropic virus of horse sickness. I. Neurotropic fixation. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 4, 291 (1935).Google Scholar
  6. Alexander, R. A.: (3) Studies on the neurotropic virus of horse sickness. III. The intracerebral protection test and its application to the study of immunity. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 4, 349 (1935).Google Scholar
  7. Alexander, R. A.: (4) Studies on the neurotropic virus of horse sickness. IV. The pathogenesis in horses. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 4, 379 (1935).Google Scholar
  8. Alexander, R. A.: (5) Studies on the neurotropic virus of horse sickness. V. The antigenic response of horses to simultaneous trivalent immunization. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 7, 11 (1936).Google Scholar
  9. Alexander, R. A.: (6) Studies on the neurotropic virus of horse sickness. VI. Propagation in the developing chick embryo. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 11, 9 (1938).Google Scholar
  10. Alexander, R. A. and P. J. du Toit: The immunization of horses and mules against horse sickness by means of the neurotropic virus of mice and guinea-pigs. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 2, 375 (1934).Google Scholar
  11. Alexander, R. A., W. D. Nietz, and P. J. du Toit: Horse sickness immunization of horses and mules in the field during the season 1934–1935 with a description of preparation of polyvalent mouse neurotropic vaccine. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 7, 17 (1936).Google Scholar
  12. Allan, W. A.: Unpublished departmental Report. Vet. Dept. Uganda (1930).Google Scholar
  13. Amanschuloff, S.A., A.A. Samarzew und L.N. Arbusoff: Über die “Kull-Pocken”, eine Art von Hauterkrankungen bei den Kamelen im Uralbezirk (Kasakstan). Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 38, 186 (1930).Google Scholar
  14. Amies, C. R.: (1) An agglutination reaction in variola. Lancet 1932 II, 558.Google Scholar
  15. Amies, C. R.: (2) The elementary bodies of zoster and their serological relationship to those of varicella. Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 314 (1934).Google Scholar
  16. Anderson, I.: On epidemic varioloid varicella in Jamaica. Trans. Epidem. Soc. 2 (Session 1865–1866), 414 (1867).Google Scholar
  17. Andrewes, C. H.: (1) The immunological relationships of fowl tumours with different histological structure. J. Path. a. Bacter. 34, 91 (1931).Google Scholar
  18. Andrewes, C. H.: (2) The transmission of fowl tumours to pheasants. J. Path. a. Bacter. 35, 407 (1932).Google Scholar
  19. Andrewes, C. H.: (3) Some properties of immune sera active against fowl tumour viruses. J. Path. a. Bacter. 35, 243 (1932).Google Scholar
  20. Andrewes, C. H.: (4) The active immunization of pheasants against fowl tumours. J. Path. a. Bacter. 37, 17 (1933).Google Scholar
  21. Andrewes, C. H.: (5) Further serological studies on fowl tumour viruses. J. Path. a. Bacter. 37, 27 (1933).Google Scholar
  22. Andrewes, C. H.: (6) Viruses in relation to the aetiology of tumours. Lancet 1934 II, 63, 117.Google Scholar
  23. Andrewes, C. H.: (7) A change in rabbit fibroma virus suggesting mutation. I. Experiments on domestic rabbits. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 157 (1936).Google Scholar
  24. Andrewes, C. H., P. P. Laidlaw, and W. Smith: (1) The susceptibility of mice to the viruses of human and swine influenza. Lancet 1934 II, 859.Google Scholar
  25. Andrewes, C. H., P. P. Laidlaw, and W. Smith: (2) Influenza: Observations on the recovery of virus from man and on the anti-body content of human sera. Brit. J. exper. Path. 16, 566 (1935).Google Scholar
  26. Andrewes, C. H. and R. E. Shope: A change in rabbit fibroma virus suggesting mutation. III. Interpretation of findings. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 179 (1936).Google Scholar
  27. Andrewes, C. H. and Wilson Smith: Influenza: further experiments on the active immunization of mice. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 43 (1937).Google Scholar
  28. Andrews, W. H.: The determination of immunological types of virus. 4th Progress Rep. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Committee. Section III, p. 62. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1931.Google Scholar
  29. Aragão, H. de Beaurepaire: Sobre o microbio do myxoma dos coelhos. Brasil-Med. 25, 471 (1911).Google Scholar
  30. Araki, S.: S atische Beobachtungen über Herpes zoster und Herpes simplex. Jap. J. Derm. a. Ur. 41, 97 (1937).Google Scholar
  31. Armstrong, C.: The Selection of a Heat-Resistant Strain of Vaccine Virus (Rabbit Testicular). Publ. Health Rep. (Am.) 44, 1183 (1929).Google Scholar
  32. Armstrong, C. and R. D. Lillie: Experimental Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis of Monkeys and Mice produced by a Virus encountered in Studies of the 1933 St. Louis Encephalitis Epidemie. Publ. Health Rep. (Am.) 49, 1019 (1934).Google Scholar
  33. Arnold, K. V.: Neuere Arbeiten über Variola und Vaccine. Erg. Hyg. usw. 10, 367 (1929).Google Scholar
  34. Astruc, J.: Dissertation sur la contagion de la peste, où l’on prouve que cette maladie est véritablemente contagieuse et où l’on répond aux difficultés qu’on oppose contre ce sentiment. Toulouse: J. J. Desclassen, 1724.Google Scholar
  35. Avaritsiotis, E.: Sur le neurotropisme de la dengue. Ann. Méd. 30, 5 (1931).Google Scholar
  36. Balog, P.: Histologische und experimentelle Untersuchungen über das infektiose Vulvapapillom der Kuh. Arch. Derm. (D.) 173, 518 (1936).Google Scholar
  37. Balozet, L.: (1) Receptivité de la chèvre et du cheval à l’inoculation intracérébral du virus claveleux. C. r. Soc. Biol. 107, 1461 (1931).Google Scholar
  38. Balozet, L.: (2) Expériences sur lapeste aviaire. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Afr. N., Tunis 23, 49 (1934).Google Scholar
  39. Balozet, L.: (3) Inoculation du virus de l’anémie infectieuse des equidés à d’autres espèces. C. r. Soc. Biol. Paris, 124, 1150 (1937).Google Scholar
  40. Barg, G. S., and L. S. Rudenko: Versuche zum Studium des nach Ledingham und McClean intrakul!an passierten Virus der Pockenvakzine. Z. Immunit. forsch. 85, 370 (1935).Google Scholar
  41. Basset, J.: Variole aviaire et vaccine. Immunité dans la variole aviaire. C. r. Soc. Biol. Paris, 94, 525 (1926).Google Scholar
  42. Bassi: Che puo essere la stomatite pustulosa del cavallo se non vaiolo equine o horse-pox. Mod. Zooiat. (1896).Google Scholar
  43. Bauer, J., H. R. Cox, and P. K. Olitsky: Ultrafiltration of the virus of equine encephalomyelitis. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 33, 378 (1935).Google Scholar
  44. Bauer, J. H. and T. P. Hughes: Ultrafiltration studies with yellow fever virus. Amer. J. Hyg. 21, 101 (1935).Google Scholar
  45. Beard, J. W. and J. G. Kidd: Antigenie individuality of certain papilloma viruses. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 34, 451 (1936).Google Scholar
  46. Beard, J. W. and P. Rous: Effectiveness of the SHOPE papilloma virus in various American rabbits. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 33, 191 (1935).Google Scholar
  47. Beaudette, F. R. and C. B. Hudson: (1) Cultivation of the virus of infectious bronchitis. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 90 (N. ser. 43), 51 (1937).Google Scholar
  48. Beaudette, F. R. and C. B. Hudson: (2) Cultivation of pigeon-pox virus on the chorio-allantoic membrane. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 93 (N. ser. 46), 146 (1938).Google Scholar
  49. Beck, C. E. and R. W. G. Wyckoff: Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis. Science 88, 530 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Bedson, S. P.: Herpes Zoster and Varicella in: A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, vol. 7, p. 157. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1930.Google Scholar
  51. Bendinger, G. G., M. C. Shilin u. W. I. Zaitzew: Forschungen über Ferkelpocken. Tierärztl. Rdsch. 41, 269 (1935).Google Scholar
  52. Bensis, W.: Étude clinique de la dengue. Par. méd. 2, 137 (1931).Google Scholar
  53. Berry, G. P.: (1) The transformation of the virus of rabbit fibroma (Shope) into that of infectious myxomatosis. Proc. amer. Phil. Soc. 77, 1473 (1937).Google Scholar
  54. Berry, G. P.: (2) Rabbit fibroma to myxoma transformation with heat inactivated myxoma elementary bodies. J. Bacter. (Am.) 34, 349 (1937).Google Scholar
  55. Berry, G. P.: (3) A non-lethal “mutant” strain of virus myxomatosum derived from fibroma virus. J. Bacter. (Am.) 36, 285 (1938).Google Scholar
  56. Berry, G. P. and H. M. Dedrick: A method for changing the virus of rabbit fibroma (Shope) into that of infectious myxomatosis (Sanarelli). J. Bacter. (Am.) 31, 50 (1936).Google Scholar
  57. Berry, G. P. and J. A. Lichty jr.: Immunological and serological evidences of a close relationship between the viruses of rabbit fibroma (Shope) and infectious myxomatosis (Sanarelli). J. Bacter. (Am.). 31, 49 (1936).Google Scholar
  58. Bierbaum, K.: Über bipathogenes Taubenpockenvirus. Arch. Tierheilk. 69, 439 (1935).Google Scholar
  59. Bierbaum K., E. Eberbeck u. W. Kayser: Anpassung von Taubenpockenvirus an das Huhn. Arch. Tierheilk. 64, 20 (1931/32).Google Scholar
  60. Bierbaum K., E. Eberbeck, K. Rasch u. W. Kayser: Weitere Untersuchungen über Geflügelpocken. Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 39–40, 141 (1931/32).Google Scholar
  61. Blakemore, F. and R. E. Glover: Variola in the pig. Vet. Record. 49, 750 (1931).Google Scholar
  62. Blanc, G., J. Caminopetros, and G. Melanidi: Clavelée et vaccine. C. r. Soc. Biol. 97, 456 (1927).Google Scholar
  63. Blanc, G., G. Melanidi et M. Stylianopoulo: (1) Contribution à l’étude expérimentale des varioles animales. L’encéphalite claveleuse du mouton, variole des chèvres et stomatite pustuleuse. C. r. Soc. Biol. 94, 959 (1926).Google Scholar
  64. Blanc, G., G. Melanidi et M. Stylianopoulo: (2) Contribution à l’étude des varioles animales. Variole des chèvres et stomatite pustuleuse. C. r. Soc. Biol. 95, 259 (1926).Google Scholar
  65. Blaxall, F. R.: (1) La variole en Angleterre pendant l’année 1922, avec quelques notes sur des expériences faites sur ce sujet. Bull. Acad. Med., Par. 88, 146 (1923).Google Scholar
  66. Blaxall, F. R.: (2) Small-pox in: A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, Vol. 7, p. 84. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1930.Google Scholar
  67. Blaxall, F. R.: (3) Horse-pox in: A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, Vol. 7, p. 148. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1930.Google Scholar
  68. Bleyer, J. C.: Über Auftreten von Variola unter Affen der genera Mycetes und Cebus bei Vordringen einer Pockenepidemie im Urwaldgebiete an den Nebenflüssen des Alto Uruguay in Südbrasilien. Münch. med. Wschr. 69, 1009 (1922).Google Scholar
  69. Bókay, J. von: Über den ätiologischen Zusammenhang der Varizellen mit gewissen Fällen von Herpes zoster. Wien. klin. Wschr. 22, 1323 (1909).Google Scholar
  70. Bollinger, O.: (1) Über Epithelioma contagiosum beim Haushuhn und die sogenannten Pocken des Geflügels. Arch. path. Anat. 58, 340 (1873).Google Scholar
  71. Bollinger, O.: (2) Über Menschen-und Tierpocken, über den Ursprung der Kuhpocken und über intrauterine Vaccination. Slg. klin. Vortr., Nr. 116. Leipzig: R. v. Volkmann, 1877.Google Scholar
  72. Bonnel, F.: Relation d’une épidémie d’alastrim survenue dans un détachement de tirailleurs sénégalais. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 21, 87 (1928).Google Scholar
  73. Bonnevie, P.: Milker’s Warts: infection from “false cowpox” with a paravaccinial virus. Brit. J. Derm. 49, 164 (1937).Google Scholar
  74. Borrel, A.: (1) Epithélioses infectieuses et épithéliomas. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 17, 81 (1903).Google Scholar
  75. Borrel, A.: (2) Variola des chèvres et stomatite pustuleuse des ovins. Arch. Inst. Pasteur hellén. 1 382 (1923).Google Scholar
  76. Borrel, A.: (3) Virus vaccine dans la péritoine du lapin. C. r. Soc. Biol. 121, 1084 (1936).Google Scholar
  77. Bouley, H.: De l’origine de la Vaccine sur le cheval. Rec. Méd. vét. 39, 735 (1862).Google Scholar
  78. Bozzelli, R.: Studio comparativo sul comportamento della cavia, del coniglio e del cane, trattati con inoculazioni simultanee di virus rabbico fisso e di strada. Gi. Batter. 14, 281 (1935).Google Scholar
  79. Brain, R. T.: The relationship between the viruses of zoster and varicella as demonstrated by the complement fixation test. Brit. J. exper. Path. 14, 67 (1933).Google Scholar
  80. Brandly, C. A. and G. L. Dunlap: An outbreak of pox in turkeys with notes on diagnosis and immunization. Poultry Sci. 17, 511 (1938).Google Scholar
  81. Bridré, J.: Les varioles des animaux domestiques. XI. Int. vet. Cong. London, III, 1 (1931).Google Scholar
  82. Bridré, J. et A. Donatien: Vaccine et clavelée. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 35, 718 (1921).Google Scholar
  83. Brunett, E. L.: Some observations on pox-virus obtained from a turkey. Rept. New York State Vet. Coll., 1932–1933, 69 (1934).Google Scholar
  84. Bruusgaard, E.: Mutual relation between zoster and varicella. Brit. J. Derm. 44, 1 (1932).Google Scholar
  85. Buckup, G.: Über das Verhalten verschiedener Variola-Vakzinestämme bei intrazerebraler Impfung von weißen Mäusen. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 134, 56 (1935).Google Scholar
  86. Buddingh, J. H.: (1) Comparison of the behaviour of a neurotesticular and a dermal strain of vaccine virus in the chorio-allantoic membrane of the chick embryo. Amer. J. Path. 12, 511 (1936).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Buddingh, J. H.: (2) A meningo-encephalitis in chicks produced by the intracerebral injection of fowl-pox virus. J. exp. Med. 67, 921 (1938).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Buddingh, J. H.: (3) A study of the behaviour of fowl-pox virus modified by intracerebral passage. J. exp. Med. 67, 933.Google Scholar
  89. Burnet, F. M.: (1) A virus disease of the canary of the fowl-pox group. J. Path. a. Bacter. 37, 107 (1933).Google Scholar
  90. Burnet, F. M.: (2) Immunological studies with the virus of infectious laryngotracheitis of fowls using the developing egg technique. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 685 (1936).Google Scholar
  91. Burnet, F. M.: (3) The immunological relationship between Kikuth’s canary virus and fowl pox. Brit. J. exper. Path. 17, 302 (1936).Google Scholar
  92. Burnet, F. M.: (4) The use of the developing egg in virus research. Med. Res. Council Special Rep. Series Nr. 220 (1936).Google Scholar
  93. Burnet, F. M.: (5) Influenza on the developing egg. IV. The pathogenicity and immunizing power of egg virus for ferrets and mice. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 37 (1937).Google Scholar
  94. Burnet, F. M.: (6) Influenza on the developing egg. I. Changes associated with an egg-passage strain of the virus. Brit. J. exp. Path. 17, 282 (1937).Google Scholar
  95. Burnet, F. M. and J. D. Ferry: The differentiation of the viruses of fowl plague and Newcastle disease: experiments using the technique of chorio-allantoic membrane inoculation of the developing egg. Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 56 (1934).Google Scholar
  96. Burnet, F. M. and D. Lush: (1) The immunological relationship between Kikuth’s canary virus and fowl pox. Brit. J. exper. Path. 17, 302 (1936).Google Scholar
  97. Burnet, F. M. and D. Lush: (2) Influenzavirus on the developing egg. VIII. A comparison of two antigenically dissimilar strains of human influenza virus after full adaptation to the egg membrane. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 16, 261 (1938).Google Scholar
  98. Burnet, F. M., D. Lush and A. V. Jackson: (1) The propagation of herpes, B and pseudo-rabies viruses on the chorio-allantois. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 17, 35 (1939).Google Scholar
  99. Burnet, F. M., D. Lush and A. V. Jackson: (2) The relationship of herpes and B viruses: immunological and epidemiological considerations. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 17, 41 (1939).Google Scholar
  100. Burnet, F. M. and J. Macnamara: Immunological differences between strains of poliomyelitic virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 12, 57 (1931).Google Scholar
  101. Caccavella: Observations sur la transmission de la peste bovine chez les antilopes pongo (Tragelaphus scriptus) et isha (Sylvicapra grimmi). Sérothérapie et virus de passage sur les bovidés. Ann. Soc. belge Méd. trop. 16, 309 (1936).Google Scholar
  102. Cameron, A. F.: Horse-pox directly transmitted to man. Brit. med. J. 1, 1292 (1908).Google Scholar
  103. Campenhout, E. van: Considérations sur le diagnostic de variola major et variola minor. Bull. Off. internat. Hyg. publ., Par. 27, 1738 (1935).Google Scholar
  104. Carmichael, J.: Rinderpest in African game. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 51, 264 (1938).Google Scholar
  105. Carnwath, T.: Zur Ätiologie der Hühnerdiphtheria und Geflügelpocken. Arb. ksl. Gesdh. amt, Berl. 27, 388 (1908).Google Scholar
  106. Carré, H. et J. Verge: Les anémies infectieuses des animaux domestiques. Bull. Off. internat. Hyg. publ., Par. 10, 87 (1935).Google Scholar
  107. Catsaras, J.: Pathologisch-anatomische Beobachtungen zum Dengue Fieber. Arch. Schiffs-u. Tropenhyg. usw. 35, 278 (1931).Google Scholar
  108. Ceeley, R.: Observations on the variolae vaccinae as they occasionally appear in the Vale of Aylesbury with an account of some recent experiments in the vaccination, retro-vaccination and variolation of cows. Trans. Prov. Med. Surg. Assoc. 8, 287 (1840).Google Scholar
  109. Cerruti, C. F.: La distribution du virus de lagrippe chez la souris infectée. C. r. Soc. Biol. 126, 500 (1937).Google Scholar
  110. Cerruti, C. F. et U. di Aichelburg: La réceptivité du lapin au virus de lagrippe humaine. C. r. Soc. Biol. 126, 501 (1937).Google Scholar
  111. Chaumier, E.: Note sur la transformation de la clavelée du mouton en vaccin Jennérien. Gaz. méd. Centre Tours, 10, 207 (1905).Google Scholar
  112. Chauveau, A.: (1) Production expérimentale de la vaccine naturelle improprement appelée vaccine spontanée. Rec. Méd. vét. 43, 305 (1866).Google Scholar
  113. Chauveau, A.: (2) Des conditions qui président au développement de la vaccine dite primitive. Rec. Méd. vét. 43, 625 (1866).Google Scholar
  114. Cheney, G.: Appearance of a dengue-like fever in Northern California. Arch. int. Med. (Am) 56, 1067 (1935).Google Scholar
  115. Chiari, B.: Il virus fisso dell’ Istiuto Siero Vaccinogeno Eritreo di Asmara (Ceppo Pasteur). Boll. Ist. sieroter. milan. 17, 47 (1938).Google Scholar
  116. Chluszow, K. A. u. A. M. Rastegajewa: Charakteristik der Virusstämme der Encephalo-myelitis (Bornaschen Krankheit der Pferde). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 43, 484 (1935).Google Scholar
  117. Chun, J. W. H.: Influenza: including its infection among pigs. Nat. med. J. China 5, 34 (1919).Google Scholar
  118. Clampit, J. M. and F. B. Gordon: Recovery of influenza virus from Chicago epidemic. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 36, 747 (1937).Google Scholar
  119. Clearkin, P. A. and D. Skau: The effect of repeated calf passage on the immunizing power of calf lymph. Brit. J. exper. Path. 12, 322 (1931).Google Scholar
  120. Cleland, J. B. and E. W. Ferguson: The nature of the recent small-pox epidemic in Australia: microbiological findings and animal inoculations. Proc. R. Soc. Med. (Epid. Sec.) 8, 19 (1915).Google Scholar
  121. Cohen, L.: Anterior poliomyelitis with reference to the occurrence of two attacks in the same individual: report of two cases. New Engld J. Med. 213, 601 (1935).Google Scholar
  122. Cole, R. and A. G. Kuttner: A filterable virus present in the submaxillary glands of guinea-pigs. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 44, 855 (1926).Google Scholar
  123. Cooper, H.: Ranikhet disease: a new disease of fowls in India due to a filter-passing virus. Indian J. vet. Sci. anim. Husb. 1, 107 (1931).Google Scholar
  124. Copeman, S. M.: (1) Vaccination: its natural history and pathology. London, 1899.Google Scholar
  125. Copeman, S. M.: (2) The inter-relationship of variola and vaccinia. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser B: Biol. Sci. 72, 121 (1902).Google Scholar
  126. Copeman, S. M.: (3) The relationship of small-pox and alastrim. Ann. Rep. Minist. Hlth. London for 1919–1920, App. II (1920).Google Scholar
  127. Cotton, W. E.: Vesicular stomatitis. Vet. Med. 22, 169 (1927).Google Scholar
  128. Cowdry, E. V.: Comparison of a virus obtained by Kobayashi from cases of epidemic encephalitis with the virus of rabies. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 45, 799 (1927).Google Scholar
  129. Cowdry, E. V. and G. H. Scott: Nuclear inclusions. Amer. J. Path. 11, 659 (1935).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Cox, H. P. and P. K. Olitsky: Neurotropism of vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.). 30, 653 (1933).Google Scholar
  131. Craigie, J. and W. J. Tulloch: Further investigations on the variola-vaccinia flocculation reaction. Med. Res. Council Spec. Rep. Series, Nr. 156. London: H. M. Stationery Office, (1931).Google Scholar
  132. Crawford, A. B.: Experimental vesicular exanthema of swine. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 90, 380 (1937).Google Scholar
  133. Cunha, A. M. da et J. Teixeira: Notes sur l’alastrim, relations d’immunité entre l’alastrim et la vaccine. C. r. Soc. Biol. 116, 61 (1934).Google Scholar
  134. Daddi, G. e C. Panà: (1) Ricerche sulle alterazioni prodotte nel cervello del coniglio dal vines influenzale inoculato per via intracranica. Gi. Batter. 19, 761 (1937).Google Scholar
  135. Daddi, G. e C. Panà: (3) Ricerca dell’ attivatà encefalitogena del virus influenzale inoculato per via intracranica nel topolino. Gi. Batter. 21, 439 (1938).Google Scholar
  136. Daubney, R.: Foot-and-mouth disease: the fixed virus types. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 47, 259 (1934).Google Scholar
  137. Daubney, R., J. R. Hudson, and P. C. Garnham: Enzootic hepatitis or Rift Valley fever: an undescribed virus disease of sheep, cattle and man from East Africa. J. Path. a. Bacter. 34, 545 (1931).Google Scholar
  138. Davies, D. S.: Ann. Rep. Med. Off. Health City and County of Bristol for 1904, p. 43 (1905).Google Scholar
  139. Davis, N. C., W. Lloyd, and M. Frobisher jr.: The transmission of neurotropic yellow fever virus by Stegomyia mosquitoes. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 56, 853 (1932).Google Scholar
  140. de Jong, D. A.: Le rapport entre la stomatite pustuleuse contagieuse du cheval, la variole équine (horse-pox de Jenner) et la vaccine (cow-pox de Jenner). Fol. microbiol. 4, 239 (1916).Google Scholar
  141. della Maria, G.: Encephalo-mielite infettiva dei bovini in Sardegna. Profilassi 8, 54 (1935).Google Scholar
  142. des Ligneris, M. J. A.: On the transplantation of Rous fowl sarcoma No. 1 into guinea-fowls and turkeys. Amer. J. Canc. 16, 307 (1932).Google Scholar
  143. Dible, J. H. and H. H. Gleave: Histological and experimental observations upon generalized vaccinia in man. J. Path. a. Bacter. 38, 29 (1934).Google Scholar
  144. Dinger, J. E.: Gelbfieber bei weißen Mäusen. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 121, 194 (1931).Google Scholar
  145. Dobberstein, J. u. C. Piening: Über eine übertragbare Anämie des Rindes und ihre Beziehungen zur Rinderleukose. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 50, 449 (1934).Google Scholar
  146. Dobson, N.: Pox in pheasants. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 50, 401 (1938).Google Scholar
  147. Dochez, A. R., K. C. Mills, and B. Mulliken: A virus disease of Swiss mice transmissible by intranasal inoculation. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 36, 683 (1937).Google Scholar
  148. Dodero, J.: (1) Dessiccation et conservation en glycérine des moelles rabiques (virus fixe de Hanoi). Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 30, 348 (1937).Google Scholar
  149. Dodero, J.: (2) Réactivation par séjour en glycérine du virus rabique fixe. C. r. Soc. Biol. 128, 150 (1938).Google Scholar
  150. Doerr, R. und M. Kon: Schieneninfektion, Schienenimmunisierung und Konkurrenz der Infektionen im Z. N. S. beim Herpes-virus. Zbl. Hyg. 119, 679 (1937).Google Scholar
  151. Doerr, R., S. Scidenberg u. L. Whitman: Untersucherngen über das Virus der Hühnerpest. Z. Hyg. usw. 112, 732 (1931).Google Scholar
  152. Doerr, R. u. E. Zdansky: Kritische und Experimentelles zur ätiologischen Erforschung des Herpes febrilis und der Encephalitis lethargica. Z. Hyg. usw. 102, 1 (1924).Google Scholar
  153. Donatien, A. et F. Lestoquard: (1) L’anémie pernicieuse du mouton et de la chèvre. C. r. Acad. Sci. 178, 2203 (1924).Google Scholar
  154. Donatien, A. et F. Lestoquard: (2) Recherehes sur l’unicité du virus claveleux. C. r. Soc. Biol. Paris 104, 267 (1930).Google Scholar
  155. Donatien, A. et F. Lestoquard: (3) Le virus claveleux. Rep. IIIe. Congrès internat. Path. comp. Athens. 1, 155 (1936).Google Scholar
  156. Douglas, S. R., W. Smith, and L. R. W. Price: Generalized vaccinia in rabbits with special reference to lesions in the internal organs. J. Path. a. Bacter. 32, 99 (1929).Google Scholar
  157. Downie, A. W.: (1) The immunologic relationship of the virus of spontaneaus cow-pox to vaccinia virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 20, 158 (1939).Google Scholar
  158. Downie, A. W.: (2) A study of the lesions produced experimentally by cow-pox virus. J. Path. a. Bacter. 48, 361 (1939).Google Scholar
  159. Doyle, T. M.: (1) A hitherto unrecorded disease of fowls due to a filter passing virus. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 40, 144 (1927).Google Scholar
  160. Doyle, T. M.: (2) Newcastle disease of fowls. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 48, 1 (1935).Google Scholar
  161. Doyle, T. and F. Minett: Fowl-pox. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 40, 247 (1927).Google Scholar
  162. Drago, A.: Su di un raro caso di esantema vaccinale generalizzato. Pediatria (Riv.) 32, 1045 (1924).Google Scholar
  163. Eberbeck, E. u. W. Kayser: Über das Vorkommen von Pockenerkrankungen bei Kanarienvögeln, Buchfinken und Sperlingen. Arch. Tierheilk. 65, 307 (1932).Google Scholar
  164. Eccles, A., E. O. Longley and J. K. Thomson: The demonstration of a change in the antigenic structure of a bovine strain of foot and mouth disease virus during serial transmission in the guinea-pig. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 50, 412 (1938).Google Scholar
  165. Echenique-Guzman, E.: Zur Frage der Virusänderung durch Kultur in befruchteten Hühnereiern und der Beziehung zwischen Variolavakzine und Geflügelpocken. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 139, 314 (1937).Google Scholar
  166. Edington, A.: Note on the correlation of several diseases occurring among animals in South Africa. J. Hyg. (Brit.) 3, 137 (1903).Google Scholar
  167. Edwards, S. F.: Rinderpest: some properties of the virus and further indications for its employment in the serum simultaneaus method of protective inoculation. Trans. 7th Congr. Far-East. Ass. trop. Med. 1927, III, 699. Calcutta, 1930.Google Scholar
  168. Eggeling u. Ellenberger: Stomatitis pustulosa contagiosa der Pferde. Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 4, 334 (1878).Google Scholar
  169. Eklund, C. M. and A. Blumstein: The relation of human encephalitis to encephalomyelitis in horses. J. amer. med. Ass. 111, 1734 (1938).Google Scholar
  170. Elford, W. J. and C. H. Andrewes: Estimation of the size of the fowl tumour virus by filtration through graded membranes. Brit. J. exper. Path. 16, 61 (1935).Google Scholar
  171. Elford, W. J., C. H. Andrewes, and F. F. Tang: The sizes of the viruses of human and swine influenza as determined by ultra-filtration. Brit. J. exper. Path. 17, 51 (1936).Google Scholar
  172. Elford, W. J., J. R. Perdrau, and W. Smith: The filtration of herpes virus through graded collodion membranes. J. Path. a. Bacter. 36, 49 (1933).Google Scholar
  173. Elford, W. J. and C. Todd: The size of the virus of fowl plague estimated by a method of ultra-filtration analysis. Brit. J. exper. Path. 14, 240 (1933).Google Scholar
  174. Ellerman, V. u. O. Bang: Experimentelle Leukämie bei Hühnern. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 46, 595 (1908).Google Scholar
  175. Elton, C. S.: Animal Ecology. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1927.Google Scholar
  176. Emoto, O., S. Kondo and M. Watanabe: On the epidemic of equine encephalitis which occurred in the year 1935 in Japan. J. jap. Soc. vet. Sci. 15, 41 (1936).Google Scholar
  177. Engelbreth-Holm, J. and A. Rotre Meyer: On the connection between erythroblastosis (haemocytoblastosis), myelosis and sarcoma in chickens. Acta path. te microbiol. scand. (Dän.) 12, 352 (1935).Google Scholar
  178. Erber, B. et A. Pettit: A propos de la pluralité des souches de virus poliomyélitique. C. r. Soc. Biol. Paris 117, 1175 (1934).Google Scholar
  179. Escalona, J. and F. Camargo: Bovine encephalomyelitis in Mexico. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 88, 81 (1936).Google Scholar
  180. Fehrsen, J.: Amaas or alastrim? Lancet 1922 I, 403.Google Scholar
  181. Ferriman, D. G.: Herpes zoster and varicella simultaneously in the same patient. Lancet 1939 I, 930.Google Scholar
  182. Findlay, G. M.: (1) Immunological and serological studies on the viruses of fowl-pox and vaccinia. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 102, 354 (1928).Google Scholar
  183. Findlay, G. M.: (2) Notes on infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. Brit. J. exper. Path. 10, 214 (1929).Google Scholar
  184. Findlay, G. M.: (3) Warts in: A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, Vol. 7, p. 252. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1930.Google Scholar
  185. Findlay, G. M.: (4) The relationship of Climatic bubo and Lymphogranuloma inguinale. Lancet 1932 II, 11.Google Scholar
  186. Findlay, G. M.: (5) Rift Valley fever or enzootic hepatitis. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 25, 229 (1932).Google Scholar
  187. Findlay, G. M.: (6) Unpublished observations. (1936.)Google Scholar
  188. Findlay, G. M.: (7) Variation in animal viruses. J. roy. micr. Soc. 56, 213 (1936).Google Scholar
  189. Findlay, G. M., N. S. Alcock, and R. O. Stern: The virus etiology of one form of lymphocytic meningitis. Lancet 1936 I, 650.Google Scholar
  190. Findlay, G. M. and J. C. Broom: Experiments on the filtration of yellow fever virus through “Gradocol” membranes. Brit. J. exper. Path. 14, 391 (1933).Google Scholar
  191. Findlay, G. M. and L. P. Clarke: (1) The susceptibility of the hedgehog to yellow fever. I. The viscerotropic virus. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 193 (1934).Google Scholar
  192. Findlay, G. M. and L. P. Clarke: (2) The susceptibility of the hedgehog to yellow fever. II. The neurotropic virus. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 335 (1934).Google Scholar
  193. Findlay, G. M. and L. P. Clarke: (3) Reconversion of the neurotropic into the viscerotropic strain of yellow fever virus in rhesus monkeys. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 579 (1935).Google Scholar
  194. Findlay, G. M. and R. Daubney: The virus of Rift Valley fever or enzootic hepatitis. Lancet 1931 II, 1350.Google Scholar
  195. Findlay, G. M., T. F. Hewer, and L. P. Clarke: The susceptibility of Sudanese hedgehogs to yellow fever. Trans. roy. Sos. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 413 (1935).Google Scholar
  196. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: (1) An interference phenomenon in relation to yellow fever and other viruses. J. Path. a. Bacter. 44, 405 (1937).Google Scholar
  197. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: (2) Vaccination contre la fièvre jaune au moyen du virus pantrope atténué employé seul. Bull. Off. internat. Hyg. publ., Par. 29, 1145 (1937).Google Scholar
  198. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: (3) Attenuation of the yellow fever virus by growth in tumours in vivo. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 30, 507 (1937).Google Scholar
  199. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: (4) Spontaneausvariation in the neurotropic strain of yellow fever virus. Brit. J. exp. Path. 19, 384 (1938).PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  200. Findlay, G. M. and R. D. Mackenzie: (1) The transmission of fowl pest to ferrets. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 146 (1937).Google Scholar
  201. Findlay, G. M. and R. D. Mackenzie: (2) Fowl pest: the susceptibility of monkeys hedgehogs and other animals. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 258 (1937).Google Scholar
  202. Findlay, G. M., R. D. Mackenzie, and R. O. Stern: Studies on neurotropic Rift Valley fever virus: the susceptibility of sheep and monkeys. Brit. J. exper. Path. 17, 431 (1936).Google Scholar
  203. Findlay, G. M. and A. F. Mahaffy: The susceptibility of Nigerian hedgehogs to yellow fever. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 417 (1936).Google Scholar
  204. Findlay, G. M. and R. O. Stern: The essential neurotropism of the yellow fever virus. J. Path. a. Bacter. 41, 431 (1935).Google Scholar
  205. Flexner, S.: (1) Concerning active immunization in poliomyelitis. Science 82, 420 (1935).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Flexner, S.: (2) Reinfeetion (second attack) in experimental poliomyelitis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 497 (1937).Google Scholar
  207. Flexner, S. and H. L. Amoss: Contributions to the pathology of experimental virus encephalitis. I. An exotic strain of encephalitogenic virus. II. Herpetic strains of encephalitogenic virus. III. Varieties and properties of the herpes virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 41, 215, 233, 357 (1925).Google Scholar
  208. Flexner, S. and P. F. Clark: Experimental poliomyelitis in monkeys. Ninth note: immunity principles; effects of hexamethylenamin (urotropin); early diagnosis; virus carriers. J. amer. med. Assoc. 56, 585 (1911).Google Scholar
  209. Flexner, S., P. F. Clark, and H. L. Amoss: A contribution to the epidemiology of poliomyelitis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 19, 195 (1914).Google Scholar
  210. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Committee. 5th Progress Rep. (1937). London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  211. Fothergill, L. R. and J. H. D. Dingle: A fatal disease of pigeons caused by the virus of the eastern variety of equine encephalomyelitis. Science 88, 549 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Fothergill, L. R., S. H. D. Dingle and S. Farber and M. L. Connerley: Human encephalitis caused by virus of the eastern variety of equine encephalomyelitis. New Engld J. Med. 219, 411 (1938).Google Scholar
  213. Foulds, L.: The filterable tumours of fowls: a critical review. Imperial Cancer Res. Found. Sci. Rep. 11, Suppl. 1 (1934).Google Scholar
  214. Francis, T., jr.: The immunological relationship between the viruses of human and swine influenza. J. Bacter. (Am.) 31, 37 (1936).Google Scholar
  215. Francis, T., jr. and T. P. Magill: (1) Direct transmission of human influenza virus to mice. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. Am. 36, 132 (1937).Google Scholar
  216. Francis, T., jr. and T. P. Magill: (2) Direct isolation of human influenza virus in tissue culture medium and on egg membrane. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 36, 134 (1937).Google Scholar
  217. Francis, T., jr. and T. P. Magill: (3) Antigenic differences in strains of epidemic influenza virus. II. Crossimmunization tests in mice. Brit. J. exper. Path. 19, 284 (1938).Google Scholar
  218. Frenkel, H. S.: On so-called spontaneaus cow-pox. 11th Int. vet. Congr. London, 1930, III, 22 (1931).Google Scholar
  219. Friedberger: Stomatitis pustulosa contagiosa der Pferde. Dtsch. Z. Thiermed. 5, 265 (1879).Google Scholar
  220. Friedberger and Fröhner: Veterinary Pathology, 6th Edit. Trans. M. H. Hayes. London: Hurst and Blackett, 1910.Google Scholar
  221. Freire Muñoz, C.: La acción de la vacuna antirrabica, considerada bajo distintos aspectos, en su aplicacion práctica y experimental. An. Fac. Vet. Montevideo. No’s 2–3, 197 (1937).Google Scholar
  222. Frobisher, M., jr.: A comparison of certain properties of the neurotropic virus of yellow fever with those of the corresponding viscerotropic virus. Amer. J. Hyg. 18, 354 (1933).Google Scholar
  223. Furth, J.: (1) The relation of leukosis to sarcoma of chicken. II. Mixed osteochondrosarcoma and lymphomatous strain 12. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 127 (1936).Google Scholar
  224. Furth, J.: (2) The relation of leukosis to sarcoma of chicken. III. Sarcomata of strains 11 and 15 and their relation to leukosis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 145 (1936).Google Scholar
  225. Furth, J. and C. Breedis: Attempts at cultivation of viruses producing leukosis in fowls. Arch. Path. 24, 281 (1937).Google Scholar
  226. Galli-Valerio, B.: La vaccinothérapie de l’epithélioma contagiosum (Geflügelpocke) des poules. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 67, 243 (1925).Google Scholar
  227. Galloway, I. A. and W. J. Elford: Differentiation of virus of vesicular stomatitis from virus of foot-and-mouth disease by filtration. Brit. J. exper. Path. 14, 400 (1933).Google Scholar
  228. Gastinel, P. et R. Fasquelle: Virus vaccinal de culture allantoi:dienne et vaccine generalisée. C. r. Soc. Biol. 130, 1554 (1939).Google Scholar
  229. Gay, F. P. and M. Holden: The herpes encephalitis problem II. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 53, 287 (1933).Google Scholar
  230. Geiger, W.: Virusschweinepest beim Wildschwein. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 45, 606 (1937).Google Scholar
  231. Genevray, J. et J. Dodero: Le virus rabique fixe de l’Institut Paste ur de Hanoi. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 57, 638 (1936).Google Scholar
  232. Gerlach: Quoted by Friedberger and Fröhner, Veterinary Pathology, 2, 620, 6th Ed. Trans. M. H. Hayes. London: Hurst and Blackett, 1910.Google Scholar
  233. Ghiannoulatos, G. P.: Aperçu clinique sur les séquelles nerveuses et psychiques de la dengue (un cas de pseudo-tabes). Rev. neur. (Fr.) 1, 599 (1931).Google Scholar
  234. Gilbert, S. J. and G. B. Simmins: (1) Observations on a disease of fowls due to a filterable virus and associated with leucocytic inclusions. J. camp. Path. a. Ther. 44, 157 (1931).Google Scholar
  235. Gilbert, S. J. and G. B. Simmins: (2) Further observations on cell inclusion disease of fowls and differential diagnosis from fowl plague. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 47, 201 (1934).Google Scholar
  236. Gilbert, S. J. and G. B. Simmins: (3) Notes on a minor outbreak of cell inclusion disease. J. camp. Path. a. Ther. 49, 148 (1936).Google Scholar
  237. Giltner, L. T. and M. S. Shahan: The 1933 outbreak of infectious equine encephalomyelitis in the Eastern States. North. Amer. Vet. 14, 25 (1933).Google Scholar
  238. Gins, H. A.: (1) Über Beziehungen zwischen Tier-und Menschenpocken. Z. Hyg. usw. 89, 231 (1919).Google Scholar
  239. Gins, H. A.: (2) Versuche über die Vakzination der Schafe. Z. Hyg. usw. 90, 322 (1920).Google Scholar
  240. Gins, H. A.: (3) Die Beziehungen zwischen den Menschen-und Tierpocken in: Handbuch der Pockenbekämpfung und Impfung. Berlin: R. Schoetz, 1927.Google Scholar
  241. Gins, H. A.: (4) Impfschäden. Z. Kinderhk. 24, 145 (1930).Google Scholar
  242. Gins, H. A. u. H. Kunert: Weitere Erfahrungen mit Kuhpocken-Schutzimpfung bei Schafen. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 45, 257 (1937).Google Scholar
  243. Glover, R. E.: (1) Variola in Domestic animals. Contagious pustular dermatitis of the sheep and goat. 11th Int. vet. Congr. London, III, 29 (1931).Google Scholar
  244. Glover, R. E.: (2) Immunization of birds against fowl-box and pigeon-pox respectively with viruses propagated on the chorio-allantoic membrane of the developing egg. J. camp. Path. a. Ther. 52, 29 (1939).Google Scholar
  245. Glover, R. E.: (3) Cultivation of the virus of Aujeszký’s disease on the chorio-allantoic membrane of the developing egg. Brit. J. exper. Path. 20, 150 (1939).Google Scholar
  246. Gordon, M. H.: Studies on the viruses of vaccinia and variola. Med. Res. Council Spec. Rep. Series No. 98. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1925.Google Scholar
  247. Green, A. B.: An outbreak of cow-pox. Lancet 1908 II, 719.Google Scholar
  248. Green, A. B.: (2) The Australian epidemic, 1914. J. Hyg. (Brit.). 15, 315 (1916).Google Scholar
  249. Green, R.C.: Types of fox encephalitis virus. J. Bacter. (Am.) 32, 119 (1936).Google Scholar
  250. Green, R. G. and J. E. Shillinger: (1) Rep. Minn. Wild Life Dis. Investigation 1, 13, 60 (1934).Google Scholar
  251. Green, R. G. and J. E. Shillinger: (2) Rep. Minn. Wild Life Dis. Investigation 2, 5 (1935).Google Scholar
  252. Greene, H. S. N.: Rabbit-pox. III. Report of an epidemic with especial reference to epidemiological factors. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 61, 807 (1935).Google Scholar
  253. Greenwood, M., A. Bradford Hill, W. W. C. Topley, and J. Wilson: Experimental Epidemiology. Med. Res. Council Spec. Rep. Series No. 209. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1936.Google Scholar
  254. Griffiths, F.: The significance of pneumococcal types. J. Hyg. (Brit.) 27, 113 (1928).Google Scholar
  255. Gye, W. E. and C. H. Andrewes: A study of the Rous fowl sarcoma No. 1: I. Filterability. Brit. J. exper. Path. 7, 81 (1926).Google Scholar
  256. Haagen, E.: (1) Weitere Untersuchungen über das Verhalten des Gelbfiebervirus in der Gewebekultur. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 128, 13 (1933).Google Scholar
  257. Haagen, E.: (2) Ein Verfahren zur Prüfung der Pocken-und Vakzineimmunität. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 131, 420 (1934).Google Scholar
  258. Haagen, E. und Du Dscheng-Hsing: Weitere Untersuchungen über das Verhalten des Kaninchenmyxomvirus in vitro. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 143, 23 (1938).Google Scholar
  259. Haagen, E., E. Gildemeister u. B. Cordel: Über das Verhalten des Variola-Vakzinevirus in der Gewebekultur. II. Mitteilung. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 124, 478 (1932).Google Scholar
  260. Hach, I. W.: Gewebskulturen als Methode zum Studium des Vakzinevirus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 94, 270 (1925).Google Scholar
  261. Hallauer, C.: I. Immunitätsstudien bei Hühnerpest. Z. Hyg. usw. 116, 456 (1934).Google Scholar
  262. Hallauer, C.: (2) Studien über die Variabilität des Hühnerpestvirus im Gewebsexplant. Arch. Virusforsch. 1, 70 (1939).Google Scholar
  263. Haslund, A.: Vaccinia generalisata und deren Pathogene. Arch. Derm. (D.) 48, 371 (1899).Google Scholar
  264. Hassko, A., L. Vamos und M. Thoroczkay: Über die Komplementbindung der Sera von Herpes und von Vartzellen. Z. Immunit. forsch. 93, 80 (1938).Google Scholar
  265. Havens, L. C. and C. R. Mayfield: (1) Antigenie properties of rabies virus. II. Multiplicity of strains as shown by agglutinin absorption and neutralization. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 51, 511 (1932).Google Scholar
  266. Havens, L. C. and C. R. Mayfield: (2) Antigenic properties of rabies virus. III. Composition of serological variants and nature of fixed virus. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 52, 364 (1933).Google Scholar
  267. Hay, G. G.: Amaas. S. afr. med. J. 12, 639 (1938).Google Scholar
  268. Hobbs, J. R.: The occurrence of natural and acquired immunity to infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. Science 73, 94 (1931).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  269. Holmboe, F. V.: Papillomatose hos Sølvraev. Nord. vet. Tskr. (Schwd.) 47, 407 (1935).Google Scholar
  270. Horgan, E. S.: The experimental transformation of variola to vaccinia. J. Hyg 38, 702 (1938).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  271. Hoskins, M.: A protective action of neurotropic against viscerotropic yellow fever virus in Macacus rhesus. Amer. J. trop. Med. 15, 675 (1935).Google Scholar
  272. Howitt, B. F.: (1) Poliomyelitis. IV. Further studies on the immunization of sheep to the virus of poliomyelitis, with a comparison of neutralization tests, using the old and a recent strain of virus. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 53, 145 (1933).Google Scholar
  273. Howitt, B. F.: (2) Tests for Cross-Immunity between the Virus of Borna Disease and that of Equine Encephalomyelitis. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 54, 364 (1934).Google Scholar
  274. Howitt, B. F.: (3) An immunological study in laboratory animals of thirteen different strains of equine encephalomyelitic virus. J. Immunol. (Am.) 29, 319 (1935).Google Scholar
  275. Howitt, B. F.: (4) Recently isolated strain of poliomyelitic virus. Science 85, 268 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  276. Howitt, B. F.: (5) The Moscow 2 strain of equine encephalomyelitis as compared with other strains of equine encephalitis. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 63, 269 (1938).Google Scholar
  277. Howitt, B. F.: (6) Recovery of the virus of equine encephalomyelitis from the brain of a child. Science 88, 455 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  278. Hudson, C. B. and F. R. Beaudette: (1) The susceptibility of pheasants and a pheasant-bantam cross to the virus of infectious bronchitis. Cornell Vet. 22, 70 (1932).Google Scholar
  279. Hudson, C. B. and F. R. Beaudette: (2) Complement fixation test differentiating three strains of equine encephalomyelitis virus and virus of lymphocytic choriomeningitis. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 35, 526 (1937).Google Scholar
  280. Hudson, C. B. and F. R. Beaudette: (3) A recently isolated strain of poliomyelitis virus. Science 85, 268 (1937).Google Scholar
  281. Hudson, C. B. and F. R. Beaudette: (4) Method of transmission of immunity to equine encephalomyelitic virus in the guinea-pig. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 61, 89 (1937).Google Scholar
  282. Hupbauer, A.: Zur Frage der Pluralität des Schweinepestvirus. Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 45, 294 (1934).Google Scholar
  283. Hurst, E. W.: (1) The histology of equine encephalomyelitis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 59, 529 (1934).Google Scholar
  284. Hurst, E. W.: (2) Discussion on paper by E. de Verteuil and F. W. Urich. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 317 (1936).Google Scholar
  285. Hurst, E. W.: (3) An effect of guinea-pig passage on the virus of rabies. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 205 (1937).Google Scholar
  286. Hurst, E. W.: (4) Myxoma and the Shope fibroma. II. The effect of intracerebral passage on the myxoma virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 15 (1937).Google Scholar
  287. Hurst, E. W.: (5) Myxoma and the Shope fibroma. III. Miscellaneous observations bearing on the relationship between myxoma neuromyxoma and fibroma viruses. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 23 (1937).Google Scholar
  288. Hurst, E. W. and J. L. Pawan: A further account o( the Trinidad outbreak of acute rabic myelitis: histology of the experimental disease. J. Path. a. Bacter. 25, 301 (1932).Google Scholar
  289. Hyde, K. E.: The relationship between the viruses of infectious myxoma and the Shope fibroma of rabbits. Amer. J. Hyg. 23, 278 (1936).Google Scholar
  290. Hyde, R. R.: Concerning the transmission of the fibroma virus (Shope) of rabbits. Amer. J. publ. Hyg. etc. 24, 217 (1936).Google Scholar
  291. Hyde, R. R. and R. E. Gardner: Infections myxoma of rabbits. Amer. J. Hyg. 17, 446 (1933).Google Scholar
  292. Irons, V.: Cross-species transmission studies with different strains of bird-pox. Amer. J. Hyg. 20, 329 (1934).Google Scholar
  293. Ivanov, B. J.: Novoe v izuČenii patologo-anatomiČeskih izmeneenii pri encefalomelite lošadef. Soveyt Vet. No. 11 & 12, p. 64 (1937).Google Scholar
  294. Jackson, L.: An intracellular protozoan parasite of the duct of the salivary glands of the guinea-pig. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 26, 347 (1920).Google Scholar
  295. Jacotot, H.: Sur la transmissibilité de la peste poreirre à diverses espèces animales. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 62, 516 (1939).Google Scholar
  296. Jahn, H.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über das Virus der Ektromelia infectiosa. Arch. Virusforsch. 1, 91 (1939).Google Scholar
  297. Jansen, J. and O. Neischulz: Over het infeeteeren van muizen met hoenderpestvirus. Tijds. Diergeneesk. 60, 245 (1933).Google Scholar
  298. Jenner, E.: An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae, a Disease Discovered in Some of the Western Counties of England, particularly Gloucestershire, and known by the name of Cow-Pox. London, 1798.Google Scholar
  299. Ježic, J. A.: (1) Beitrag zur Immunisation der Schafe gegen Schafpocken mittels Kälberrohvaccine. Z. Immunit. forsch. 69, 443 (1931).Google Scholar
  300. Ježic, J. A.: (2) Gibt es eine Pluralität des Schafpockenerregers? Z. Immunit. forsch. 75, 456 (1932).Google Scholar
  301. Jonnesco, D.: (1) Recherehes sur la rage. Bucarest: L. Geller, 1927.Google Scholar
  302. Jonnesco, D.: (2) Le virus rabique fixe pour le chien. C. r. Soc. Biol. 104, 717 (1930).Google Scholar
  303. Jonnesco, D.: (3) Recherehes sur la reversibilité du virus rabique fixe. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 48, 735 (1932).Google Scholar
  304. Jonnesco, D.: (4) Étude de quatre souches de virus des rues isolées de cas pour lesquels le traitement antirabique a echoué. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 61, 527 (1938).Google Scholar
  305. Jonnesco, D.: (5) Modification durable du virus rabique renforcé “J” due a la glycerine. C. r. Soc. Biol. 130, 578 (1939).Google Scholar
  306. Joseph, H.: Untersuchungen über Lymphocystis Woodc. Arch. Protistenk. 38, 155 (1917).Google Scholar
  307. Jouan, C. et A. Staub: Étude sur la peste aviaire. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 34, 343 (1920).Google Scholar
  308. Kasai, H.: Studies on the etiological relationship between small-pox and sheep-pox, and prophylactic vaccination against sheep-pox. Part I. On the transformation of sheep-pox virus into vaccinia. Part II. On the ovinized vaccine. Jap. J. exper. Med. (e.) 9, 281, 299 (1931).Google Scholar
  309. Kaiser, M. u. M. Gherardini: Studien über Melkerknoten. Arch. Derm. (D.) 169, 177 (1933/34).Google Scholar
  310. Kaiser, M., M. Gherardini u. H. K. Michna: Über die vaccinale Immunität von Kühen. Z. Hyg. usw. 115, 687 (1933).Google Scholar
  311. Kaiser, M. u. F. Weinfurter: Über Kuhpocken und vaccinale Melkerkrankungen. Z. Hyg. usw. 113, 192 (1931/32).Google Scholar
  312. Karström, H.: Über die Enzymbildung in Bakterien und über einige physiologische Eigenschaften der untersuchten Bakterienarten. Helsingfors: Thesis, 1930.Google Scholar
  313. Kaura, R. L. and S. Ganapathy-Iyer: Studies on a natural outbreak of pigeon-pox. Indian J. vet. Sci. 8, 199 (1938).Google Scholar
  314. Kelser, R. A.: Transmission of the virus of equine encephalomyelitis by Aëdes taeniorhynchus. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 92, 195 (1938).Google Scholar
  315. Ker, C.: Herpes and chicken-pox. Brit. med. J. II, 126 (1920).Google Scholar
  316. Kernohan, G.: (1) Infectious bronchitis in fowls. Cal. Agr. exper. Stat. Bull. 494 (1930).Google Scholar
  317. Kernohan, G.: (2) Infectious laryngotracheitis in pheasants. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 78, 553 (1931).Google Scholar
  318. Kerr, P. J.: The use of a goat tissue vaccine for the control of outbreaks of rinder-pest in Bengal. Indian J. vet. Sci. 5, 67 (1935).Google Scholar
  319. Kerr, P. J. and M. B. Menon: Preliminary note on the use of goat tissue vaccine alone for the control of outbreaks of rinderpest. Indian J. vet. Sci. 4, 75 (1934).Google Scholar
  320. Kessel, J. F., R. T. Fisk, and C. C. Prouty: Studies with the Californian strain of the virus of infectious myxomatosis. Proc. 5th Pacific Sci. Cong., Victoria and Vancouver, B. C., Canada, 1933 (1934).Google Scholar
  321. Kessel, J. F., C. C. Prouty, and J. W. Meyer: Occurrence of infectious myxomatosis in Southern California. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 28, 413 (1930/31).Google Scholar
  322. Kessel, J. F., F. D. Stimpert and R. T. Fisk: Immunologic comparison of Los Angeles strain of poliomyelitis virus with M. V. strain. Amer. J. Hyg. 27, 519 (1938).Google Scholar
  323. Kessel, J. F., R. van Wort, R. T. Fisk, and F. D. Stimpert: Observations on the virus recovered from 1934/35 poliomyelitis epidemic in Los Angeles. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 35, 326 (1936).Google Scholar
  324. Kii, N. and H. Kasai: On the transformation of sheep-pox virus into vaccinia during passages through the testicles of rabbits. Far East. Assoc. trop. Med. Trans. 6th Congr. Tokyo, 1925, 2, 859 (1926).Google Scholar
  325. Kikuth, W. u. H. Gollub: Versuche mit einem filtrierbaren Virus bei einer übertragbaren Kanarienvogelkrankheit. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 125, 313 (1932).Google Scholar
  326. Kleine, F. K.: Neue Beobachtungen zur Hühnerpest. Z. Hyg. 51, 177 (1905).Google Scholar
  327. Kobayashi, R.: Studies on virus of experimental encephalitis. Jap. med. Wld. 5, 145 (1925).Google Scholar
  328. Kolayli, A. C., N. Mavridis et Ilhami: Étude sur le virus de la variole des chèvres. Vaccination du mouton et de la chévre. Rec. Méd. vét. 109, 920 (1933).Google Scholar
  329. Komarov, A.: A study on “cell-inclusion disease” in fowls. I. On the identity of acute cell inclusion disease and fowl plague. J. camp. Path. a. Ther. 49, 282 (1934).Google Scholar
  330. Kopciowska, L.: Septinévrite à virus rabique fixe “ramené en arrière” (transformé apparemment en virus des rues). C. r. Soc. Biol. 119, 143 (1935).Google Scholar
  331. Kopciowska, L. et N. Stroian: Sur la septinévrite provoquée par le virus introduit dans le cerveau du lapin. C. r. Soc. Biol. 100, 540 (1929).Google Scholar
  332. Koritschoner: Über die Überimpfung des Encephalitis virus auf Hunde. Wien. klin. Wschr. 36, 385 (1923).Google Scholar
  333. Kraus, R. u. R. Doerr: Über das Verhalten des Hühnerpestvirus im Zentralnervensystem empfänglicher, natürlich und künstlich unempfänglicher Tiere. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 46, 709 (1908).Google Scholar
  334. Kraus, R. u. O. Loewy: Über Hühnerpest. III. Über eine Varietät des Hühnerpestvirus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 76, 343 (1915).Google Scholar
  335. Kreis, B.: La maladie d’Armstrong: chorioméningite lyphmocytaire. Une nouvelle entité morbide? Paris: Baillière et fils, 1937.Google Scholar
  336. Kuhn, P. u. E. Kuhn: Ergebnisse von Pferdesterbeimpfungen am Hunde. Z. Immunitforsch. 1, 665 (1911).Google Scholar
  337. Kumer, L.: Über die Papillomatose der Gemsen. Wien. klin. Wschr. 48, 890 (1935).Google Scholar
  338. Kundratitz, K.: Experimentelle Übertragung von Herpes zoster auf den Menschen und die Beziehung von Herpes zoster zu Varicellen. Mschr. Kinderhk. 29, 516 (1925).Google Scholar
  339. Kuttner, A. G. and S. Wang: The problem of the inclusion bodies found in the salivary glands of infants and the occurrence of inclusion bodies in the submaxillary glands of hamsters, white mice and wild rats (Peiping). J. exper. Med. (Am.) 60, 773 (1934).Google Scholar
  340. Lagrange, E.: (1) Une nouvelle maladie des poules à virus filtrable observée en Egypte. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 22, 64 (1929).Google Scholar
  341. Lagrange, E.: (2) Études sur la peste aviaire d’Egypte. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 48, 208 (1932).Google Scholar
  342. Lahaye, J.: Contribution à l’étude comparative de diverses varioles animales. Ann. Med. vet. 74–75, 515 (1929/30).Google Scholar
  343. Laigret, J.: La vaccination contre la fièvre jaune. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 26, 806 (1933).Google Scholar
  344. Larson, C. L., J. E. Shillinger, and R. G. Green: Transmission of rabbit papillomatosis by the rabbit tick, Haemophysalis leporis palustris. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 32, 536 (1935).Google Scholar
  345. Lawrence, D. A.: Foot and mouth disease in: Report of the Director Vet. Res., Southern Rhodesia, for the year 1935, p. 7. Salisbury, S. Rhodesia, 1936.Google Scholar
  346. Lazarus, A. S. and B. F. Howitt: Ultrafiltration of virus of equine encephalomyelitis (Russian strain, Moscow No. 2). Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 36, 595 (1937).Google Scholar
  347. le Chuiton, F., C. Mistral et J. Dubreuil: (1) Transmission de la peste pareine au cobaye avec passage en série. Perte de virulence rapide pour le porc dès le premier passage du virus au cobaye. C. r. Acad. Sci. 202, 96 (1936).Google Scholar
  348. le Chuiton, F., C. Mistral et J. Dubreuil: (2) Essais de vaccination du porc avec le virus de la peste pareine passé par cobaye. Perte de virulence rapide pour le porc et aussi du pouvoir antigénique vis-à-vis du virusparein original. C. r. Acad. Sci. 206, 1837 (1938).Google Scholar
  349. Leake, J. P.: Poliomyelitis following vaccination against this disease. J. amer. med. Assoc. 105, 2152 (1935).Google Scholar
  350. Ledingham, J. C. G.: (1) Alastrim and variola. The experimental side of the question. Lancet 1925 I, 199.Google Scholar
  351. Ledingham, J. C. G.: (2) Etiological importance of elementary bodies. Lancet 1931 II, 525.Google Scholar
  352. Ledingham, J. C. G.: (3) The development of agglutinins for elementary bodies in the course of experimental vaccinia and fowl-pox. J. Path. a. Bacter. 35, 40 (1932).Google Scholar
  353. Ledingham, J. C. G.: (4) The comparative study of clinically allied viruses: some unsolved problems of Edward Jenner. Proc. Soc. Med., Land. 29, 73 (1935).Google Scholar
  354. Ledingham, J. C. G.: (5) Discussion on mechanism of immunity in virus diseases and practical applications thereof. Rep. Proc. 2nd int. Congr. Microbiol., p. 102. London, 1936.Google Scholar
  355. Ledingham, J. C. G. and W. E. Gye: On the nature of the filterable tumour-exciting agent in avian sarcomata. Lancet 1935 I, 376.Google Scholar
  356. Ledingham, J. C. G. and D. McClean: The propagation of vaccine virus in the rabbit dermis. Brit. J. exper. Path. 9, 220 (1928).Google Scholar
  357. Leese, A. S.: Two diseases of young camels. J. trop. vet. Sci. 4, 1 (1909).Google Scholar
  358. Lépine, P.: (1) Neurotropisme de la peste aviaire. C. r. Soc. Biol. 121, 509 (1936).Google Scholar
  359. Lépine, P.: (2) On the evolution of fixed strains of rabies virus. J. Hyg. (Brit.) 38, 180 (1938).Google Scholar
  360. Lépine, P. et P. Haber: Inclusions leucocytaires dans la peste aviaire. Démonstration de leur non-specificité par l’electropyrexie. C. r. Soc. Biol. 119, 1083 (1935).Google Scholar
  361. Lépine, P. et V. Sautter: (1) Existence en France du virus murin de la chorioméningite lymphocytaire. C. r. Acad. Sci. 202, 1624 (1936).Google Scholar
  362. Lépine, P. et V. Sautter: (2) Aptitude negrigème du virusfixe de Sassari. C. r. Soc. Biol. 122, 542 (1936).Google Scholar
  363. Lépine, P. et R. Schoen: Étude comparative de l’aptitude encéphalitogène pour le lapin de diverses souches herpétiques hurnaines au moment de leur isolement. C. r. Soc. Biol. 108, 769 (1931).Google Scholar
  364. Levaditi, C., R. Fasquelle, J. Mesrobeanu, L. Reinié, L. Stamatin et E. Bequignon: Les “selecteurs”. Rev. Immunol. (Fr.) 4, 481 (1938).Google Scholar
  365. Levaditi, C., P. Harvier et S. Nicolau: Étude experimentale de l’encéphalite dite “lethargique”. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 36, 63 (1922).Google Scholar
  366. Levaditi, C., P. Lépine et R. Schoen: Mutation brusque du virus rabique des rues en une variété particulière de virus fixe. C. r. Soc. Biol. 101, 1050 (1929).Google Scholar
  367. Levaditi, C. et S. Nicolau: (1) Affinités du virus encéphalitique. C. r. Soc. Biol. 87, 1141 (1922).Google Scholar
  368. Levaditi, C. et S. Nicolau: (2) Ectodermoses neurotropes: études sur la vaccine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 37, 1 (1923).Google Scholar
  369. Levaditi, C., S. Nicolau et R. Schoen: Recherehes sur la rage. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 40, 973 (1926).Google Scholar
  370. Levaditi, C. et V. Sanchis-Bayarri: Infection spontanée du lapin par le virus du vaccin jennérien. C. r. Soc. Biol. 97, 371 (1927).Google Scholar
  371. Levaditi, C. et R. Schoen: Le potentiel negrigéne des virus rabique fixes. C. r. Soc. Biol. 119, 811 (1935).Google Scholar
  372. Levaditi, C., R., Schoen et J. G. Mezger: L’irreversibilité de la mutation du virus rabique des rues en virus fixe. C. r. Soc. Biol. 110, 274 (1932).Google Scholar
  373. Levaditi, C., R. Schoen et L. Reinie: Virus rabique et cellules néoplasiques. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 58, 353 (1937).Google Scholar
  374. Levaditi, C. et J. Voet: Études sur le neurovaccin. Affinités du virus vaccinal. Presse méd. 45, 113 (1937).Google Scholar
  375. Lignières, J.: Sur la variabilité de la qualité pathogène et immunisante du virus aphteux. C. r. Acad. Sci. 194, 1863 (1932).Google Scholar
  376. Lipschütz, B.: Untersuchungen über Paravaccine. Arch. Derm. (D.) 127, 193 (1919/20)Google Scholar
  377. Lipschütz, B. u. K. Kundratitz: Über die Ätiologie des Zoster und über seine Beziehungen zu Varizellen. Wien. klin. Wschr. 38, 499 (1925).Google Scholar
  378. Lloyd, W.: L’emploi d’un virus cultivé associé à l’immunsérum dans la vaccination contre la fièvre jaune. Bull. Off. internat. Hyg. publ., Par. 27, 2365 (1936).Google Scholar
  379. Lloyd, W. and H. A. Penna: (1) Estudos sobre a pathogenesa do virus neurotropico da febre amarella no Macacus rhesus. Nota previa. Brasil-Med. 46, 9 (1932).Google Scholar
  380. Lloyd, W. and H. A. Penna: (2) Yellow fever virus encephalitis in South American Monkeys. Amer. J. trop. Med. 13, 243 (1933).Google Scholar
  381. Lloyd, W., H. A. Penna, and A. F. Mahaffy: Yellow fever virus encephalitis in rodents. Amer. J. Hyg. 18, 323 (1933).Google Scholar
  382. Lloyd, W., M. Theiler, and N. I. Ricci: Modification of the virulence of yellow fever virus by cultivation of tissues in vitro. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 481 (1936).Google Scholar
  383. Loeffler u. Frosch: Berichte der Kommission zur Erforschung der Maul-und Klauenseuche bei dem Institut für Infektionskrankheiten in Berlin. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 23, 371 (1898).Google Scholar
  384. Lowe, G. H. and A. Somasundaram: Varicella herpetica. Malayan med. J. 11, 227 (1936).Google Scholar
  385. Lowe, J.: Fauna and flora of Norfolk. IV. Fishes. Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 1, 21 (1874).Google Scholar
  386. Loy, J. G.: An Account of Some Experiments on the Origin of the Cow-Pox. Whitby, 1801.Google Scholar
  387. Lührs: [Résultats scientifiques obtenus dans la lutte contre les maladies contagieuses.] Z. Veterinärk. 32, 89 (1920).Google Scholar
  388. Lush, D.: The serological relationship of myxoma and shope’s fibroma virus. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 17, 85 (1939).Google Scholar
  389. Lwoff, N. S.: Die Pockenkrankheit der Schweine. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 51, 499 (1935).Google Scholar
  390. MacCallum, F. O., G. M. Findlay and I. McNair Scott: Pseudo lymphocytic choriomeningitis. Brit. J. exper. Path. 20, 260 (1939).Google Scholar
  391. Macfie, J. W. S.: Notes on some blood parasites collected in Nigeria. Ann. trop. Med. 8, 439 (1914).Google Scholar
  392. Mackenzie, R. D. and G. M. Findlay: (1) The production of a neurotropic strain of Rift Valley fever virus. Lancet 1936 I, 140.Google Scholar
  393. Mackenzie, R. D. and G. M. Findlay: (2) Variations in fowl pest virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 138 (1937).Google Scholar
  394. McKinney, H. H.: (1) Factors affecting certain properlies of a mosaic virus. J. agric. Res. 35, 1 (1927).Google Scholar
  395. McKinney, H. H.: (2) Mosaic disease in the Canary Islands, West Africa and Gibraltar. J. agric. Res. 39, 557 (1929).Google Scholar
  396. McIntosh, J: and F. R. Selbie: The pathogenicity to animals of viruses isolated from cases of human influenza. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 334 (1937).Google Scholar
  397. McIntosh, W. C.: Diseases of fish: multiple tumours in plaice and common flounders. 3rd Ann. Rep. Sect. Fish. Board. p. 66 (1884).Google Scholar
  398. McNutt, S. H., C. Murray, and P. Purwin: Swine-pox. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 74, 752 (1929).Google Scholar
  399. Madsen, D. E. and G. F. Knowlton: Mosquito transmission of equine encephalomyelitis. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 86, 662 (1935).Google Scholar
  400. Magarinos Torres, C. e J. de Castro Teixeira: Estudo comparativo das inclusoes do alastrim e da variola vera. Mem. Inst. Cruz, Rio 30, 183 (1935).Google Scholar
  401. Maggiora, A. u. G. L. Valenti: Über eine infektiöse Krankheit beim Genus Turdus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 34, 326 (1903).Google Scholar
  402. Magill, T. P. and T. Francis jr.: (1) Antigenic differences in strains of human influenza virus. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 35, 465 (1936).Google Scholar
  403. Magill, T. P. and T. Francis jr.: (2) Antigenic differences in strains of epidemic influenza virus. I. Cross neutralization in mice. Brit. J. exper. Path. 19, 273 (1938).Google Scholar
  404. Magrassi, F.: Studii sull’infezione e sull’immunità da virus erpetico. Nota II. Sul contenuto in virus del cervello, in rapporto a diversi ceppi di virus, a diversi vie d’infezione, a diversi fasi del processo infettivo. Z. Hyg. usw. 117, 501 (1935).Google Scholar
  405. Mahlich, P.: Unsere Kaninchen. Berlin: Fritz Pfeuningstorff, 1919.Google Scholar
  406. Manninger, R.: (1) Sur la pluralité du virus aphteux. Bull. Off. internat. Epizoot. 5, 1 (1931).Google Scholar
  407. Manninger, R.: (2) Über die Beziehungen der Newcastle-Krankheit zur Geflügelpest. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der Pluralität der filtrierbaren Krankheitserreger. Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 65, 256 (1932).Google Scholar
  408. Manninger, R.: (3) Fowl plague and Newcastle disease. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 49, 279 (1936).Google Scholar
  409. Manninger, R. u. S. v. László: Untersuchungen über die Pluralität des Aphthenseuchevirus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 116, 414 (1930).Google Scholar
  410. Marchal, J.: Infectious ectromelia, a hitherto undescribed virus disease of mice. J. Path. a. Bacter. 33, 713 (1930).Google Scholar
  411. Mariani, G.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen und kritische Erwägungen über die Ätiologie der Herpeserkrankungen. Arch. Derm. (D.) 147, 259 (1924).Google Scholar
  412. Marinesco, G. et S. Draganesco: Contribution à la pathogénie et à la physiologie pathologique du zona zoster. Rev. neur. (Fr.) 30 I, 30 (1923).Google Scholar
  413. Marsden, J. P.: A critical review of the clinical features of 13,686 cases of small-pox (Variola minor). London: London Country Council, 1936.Google Scholar
  414. Marson, J. F.: Small-pox in: A System of Medicine edited by J. R. Reynolds. London: Macmillan 1, 1866.Google Scholar
  415. Martin, Sir Charles: Observations on Myxomatosis cuniculi (Sanarelli) made with a view to the use of the virus in the control of rabbit plagues. Council Sci. and Industrial Research, Commonwealth of Australia, Bull. No. 96 (1936).Google Scholar
  416. Marx, E. u. A. Sticker: Untersuchungen über das Epithelioma contagiosum des Geflügels. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 28, 893 (1902).Google Scholar
  417. Masson: An account of a disease, which affects the camels in the Province of Lus, called photo shootur by the natives, and supposed by them to have properlies analogaus to those of the variolae vaccinae. Trans. med.-phys. Soc. Bombay 3, 214 (1840).Google Scholar
  418. Mavor, J. W.: Lymphocystis vitrei, a new sporozoon from the pike-peroh Stizonstedion vitreum Mitchell. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 19, 559 (1918).Google Scholar
  419. Meck, J. S. and E. G. Acree: Attempted transformation of rabbit fibroma virus into the virus of infectious myxoma. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 40, 487 (1939).Google Scholar
  420. Melanidi, C. et N. Tzortzaki: La variole caprine. Rev. Microbiol. appl. (Fr.) 3, 25 (1937).Google Scholar
  421. Merrill, M. M.: The mass factor in immunologicäl studies upon viruses. J. Immunol. (Am.) 30, 169 (1936).Google Scholar
  422. Merrill, M. M., C. W. Lacaillade, and C. Ten Broeck: Mosquito transmission of equine encephalomyelitis. Science 80, 251 (1934).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  423. Merrill, M. M. and C. Ten Broeck: The transmission of equine encephalomyelitis virus by Aëdes aegypti. J. exper. Med. (Am.). 62, 687 (1935).Google Scholar
  424. Meyer, K. F., C. M. Haring, and B. F. Howitt: The etiology of epizootic encephalomyelitis of horses in the San Joaquin Valley, 1930. Science 74, 277 (1931).Google Scholar
  425. Meyer, K. F., F. Woon, C. M. Haring, and B. F. Howitt: Susceptibility of non-immune, hyperimmunized horses and goats to eastern, western and Argentine virus of equine encephalomyelitis. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 32, 56 (1934).Google Scholar
  426. Molina, L.: Sulle modüicazioni biologiche del virus vaccinico inoculato nell’embrione di pollo. Boll. Ist. sieroter. milan. 16, 383 (1937).Google Scholar
  427. Montgomery, R. E.: A form of swine fever occurring in British East Africa. J. camp. Path. a. Ther. 34, 159, 243 (1921).Google Scholar
  428. Moody, L. M.: Some notes on alastrim. Proc. Int. Congr. on Health Problems in Tropical America, Kingston, B. W. I., p. 760. Boston: United Fruit Co., 1924.Google Scholar
  429. Moses, A.: (1) Untersuchungen über das Virus myxomatosum der Kaninchen. Mem. Inst. Cruz, Rio 3, 46 (1911).Google Scholar
  430. Moses, A.: (2) Observações sobre o virus do myxoma infectuoso. Livro Jubilar do Professor Lauro Travassos, Rio de Janeiro. p. 579 (1938).Google Scholar
  431. Nadson, G. A.: Sur les variations héréditaires provoquées expérimentalement chez les levures. C. r. Acad. Sci. 200, 1875 (1935).Google Scholar
  432. Naidu, P. M. N.: Neurotropismus des Virus der Stomatitis vesicularis. Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 47, 203 (1935).Google Scholar
  433. Naik, R. N.: Duration of immunity following goat virus vaccination in cattle. Indian J. vet. Sci. anim. Husb. 8, 103 (1938).Google Scholar
  434. Nakamura, J., S. Oyama, K. Fukosho u. N. Tomonaga: Vergleichende immunbiologische Untersuchungen des Korea-Hühnerseuchenvirus und des Japanischen Geflügelpestvirus. Zugleich über die Beziehung zum Virus der Newcastle disease. J. Jap. Soc. vet. Sci. 12, 135 (1933).Google Scholar
  435. Nauck, E. G. u. E. Paschen: Über Züchtung von Pockenvirus in Gewebskulturen bei Verwendung von humanisierter Lymphe. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 121, 312 (1931).Google Scholar
  436. Nelson, J. B.: (1) The cocco-bacilliform bodies of fowl coryza and mause catarrh. J. Bacter. (Am.) 34, 181 (1937).Google Scholar
  437. Nelson, J. B.: (2) Growth of the fowl coryza bodies in tissue culture andin blood agar. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 69, 199 (1939).Google Scholar
  438. Netter, A. et A. Urbain: (1) Zonas varicelleux. Anticorps varicelleux dans le sérum de sujets atteints de zona. Anticorps zostériens et anticorps varicelleux dans le sérum. C. r. Soc. Biol. 90, 189 (1924).Google Scholar
  439. Netter, A. et A. Urbain: (2) Le virus varicello-zonateux. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 46, 17 (1931).Google Scholar
  440. Nicolau, S.: Étude de quelques virus dits encéphalitiques. C. r. Soc. Biol. 92, 553 (1925).Google Scholar
  441. Nicolau, S., O. Dimancesco-Nicolau et I. A. Galloway: Étude sur les septinévrites à Ultravirus neurotropes. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 43, 1 (1929).Google Scholar
  442. Nicolau, S. et I. A. Galloway: Modification de certains propriétés d’une souches de virus d’encéphalo-myelite enzootique (Maladie de Borna). C. r. Soc. Biol. 10, 135 (1931).Google Scholar
  443. Nicolau, S. et L. Kopciowska: (1) Epizootie maligne spontanée apparue chez les lapins. Vaccine maligne spontanée epizootique du lapin. C. r. Soc. Biol. 10, 551, 553 (1929). (2) Zone élective pour les corps de Negri chez les lapins morts de rage expérimentale à virus fixe. C. r. Acad. Sci. 194, 1865 (1932). (3) Sur la transformation du virus rabique fixe en virusdes rues. C. r. Soc. Biol. 119, 140 (1935). (4) Essais de transformation du virus rabique fixe en virus des rues. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. Supplément. Numéro commémoratif sur la rage, 1935.Google Scholar
  444. Nicolau, S., C. Mathis et V. Constantinesco: Sur la transformation en virus fixe d’une souehe particulière de virus rabique des rues. C. r. Soc. Biol. 110, 433 (1932).Google Scholar
  445. Nicolau, S. et P. Poincloux: Conservation des caractères particuliers du neurovaccin, malgré sa culture sur la peau humaine. C. r. Soc. Biol. 91, 1239 (1924).Google Scholar
  446. Nicolle, C. et L. Balozet: Essai de restauration du virus rabique fixe par passage intracérébraux sur le chien. C. r. Acad. Sci. 194, 1706 (1932).Google Scholar
  447. Nicolle, C. et E. Burnet: Sur la restauration du virus fixe. C. r. Soc. Biol. 9, 366 (1924).Google Scholar
  448. Nieschulz, O.: (1) Over de infectie van muizen met het virus der Zuid-Afrikaansche Paardezeikte. Tijds. Diergeneesk. 59, 1433 (1932).Google Scholar
  449. Nieschulz, O.: (2) Infection von Mäusen mit dem Virus der südafrikanischen Pferdesterbe. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 128, 465 (1933).Google Scholar
  450. Nieschulz, O. u. Bos, A.: Weitere Untersuchungen über die Infektion von Mäusen mit Hühnerpestvirus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 131, 1 (1934).Google Scholar
  451. Nocard, E.: Sur l’immunité naturelle des moutons bretons à l’égard de la clavelée. Rec. Med. vet. 7, 772 (1888).Google Scholar
  452. Nocard, E. et E. Leclainche: Les maladies microbiennes des animaux, 3e Ec Paris: Masson et Cie, 1903.Google Scholar
  453. Oberling, C. et M. Guérin: (1) Lesions turnorales en rapport avec la leucémie transmissible des poules. Bull. Assoc. franc. Étude Canc. 22, 180 (1933).Google Scholar
  454. Oberling, C. et M. Guérin: (2) Nouvelles récherohes sur la production de tumeurs malignes avec le virus de la leucémie transmissible des poules. Bull. Assoc. franc. Étude Canc. 22, 326 (1933).Google Scholar
  455. Oberling, C. et M. Guérin: (3) La leucémie érythroblastique ou erythroblastose transmissible des poules. Bull. Assoc. franc. Étude Canc. 23, 38 (1934).Google Scholar
  456. Øerskov, J. u. S. Schmidt: Infektionsmechanische Untersuchungen über die Geflügelpestinfektion der Maus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Aluminum hydroxywirkung. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 137, 1 (1936).Google Scholar
  457. Øerskov, J., S. Schmidt et E. Steenberg: Caractères immunologiques de deun souches de virus de la peste aviaire à pouvoir pathogène différent Vis-à-vis de la souris. Rev. Immunol. (Fr.). 2, 254 (1936).Google Scholar
  458. Olitsky, P. K., H. R. Cox, and J. T. Syverton: Comparative studies on the viruses of vesicular stomatitis and equine encephalomyelitis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 9, 159 (1934).Google Scholar
  459. Oliver, A.: A note on the control of rinderpest in India. Agric. Live-Stk. India 6, 626 (1936).Google Scholar
  460. Oreste and Sabbatini: Vaiuolo enzootico nei bufali. Gazz. med. vet. 30 (1876).Google Scholar
  461. Parsons, R. J. and J. G. Kidd: A virus causing oral papillomatosis in rabbits. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 35, 441 (1937).Google Scholar
  462. Paschen, E.: (1) Vaccine und Vaccineausschläge in: Handbuch der Haut-und Geschlechtskrankheiten, Bd. II, S. 64. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1932.Google Scholar
  463. Paschen, E.: (2) 1. Weitere Mitteilungen über Vakzineviruszüchtung in der Gewebekultur. 2. Elementarkörperchen im Bläscheninhalt bei Herpes zoster und Varizellen. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 130, 190 (1933).Google Scholar
  464. Paschen, E.: (3) Züchtung des Ektromelievirus auf der Chorion-Allantois-Membran von Hühner embryonen. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 135, 445 (1936).Google Scholar
  465. Paul, J. R. and J. D. Trask: (1) A comparative study of recently isolated human strains and a passage strain of poliomyelitis virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 58, 513 (1933).Google Scholar
  466. Paul, J. R. and J. D. Trask: (2) The neutralization test in poliomyelitis: comparative results with four strains of virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 61, 447 (1935).Google Scholar
  467. Pawan, J. L.: (1) Quoted by E. de Verteuil and F. W. Urich. The study and control of paralytic rabies transmitted by bats in Trinidad, British West Indies. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 317 (1936).Google Scholar
  468. Pawan, J. L.: (2) An unusual strain of rabies virus in a vampire bat. Ann. trop. Med. 32, 35 (1938).Google Scholar
  469. Pearce, L., P. D. Rosahn, and C. K. Hu: (1) Experimental transmission of rabbit-pox by a filterable virus. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 30, 894 (1933).Google Scholar
  470. Pearce, L., P. D. Rosahn, and C. K. Hu: (2) A filterable virus from a pandemic disease in rabbits. Arch. Path. (Am.) 16, 300 (1933).Google Scholar
  471. Pearce, L., P. D. Rosahn, and C. K. Hu: (3) Studies on the etiology of rabbit-pox. V. Studies on species susceptibility to rabbit-pox virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 491 (1936).Google Scholar
  472. Penna, H. A.: The production of encephalitis in Macacus rhesus with viscerotropic yellow fever virus. Amer. J. trop. Med. 16, 331 (1936).Google Scholar
  473. Perdrau, J. R.: Preservation of the virus of herpes. Brit. J. exper. Path. 8, 167 (1927).Google Scholar
  474. Pételard: De la variole spontanée du cheval. Bull. Soc. cent. Méd. vét. (1868).Google Scholar
  475. Peters, J. T.: L’anémie infectieuse du cheval chez l’homme. Presse méd. 32, 105 (1924).Google Scholar
  476. Pfenninger, W. u. S. Finik: Studien über Hühnerpest. II. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der histologischen Veränderungen im Zentralnervensystem. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 99, 145 (1926).Google Scholar
  477. Picard, W. K.: Über Pseudogeflügelpest und die Variabilität des Pseudogeflügelpestvirus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 132, 440 (1934).Google Scholar
  478. Pirquet, C. von: Paravakzine. Wien. klin. Wschr. 28, 355 (1915).Google Scholar
  479. Plotz, H.: (1) Nouvelles observations sur la souche de peste aviaire adaptée à la souris. C. r. Soc. Biol. 122, 624 (1936).Google Scholar
  480. Plotz, H.: (2) Apropos de la virulence d’une culture de peste aviaire cultivée in vitro pendant cinq ans. C. r. Soc. Biol. 125, 602 (1937).Google Scholar
  481. Poulton, W. F.: Game preservation and economic development. Govt. Press. Uganda (1927).Google Scholar
  482. Proca, G., S. Babes et D. Jonnesco: Serovaccination et Serothérapie de la rage chez la souris. C. r. Soc. Biol. 118, 729 (1935).Google Scholar
  483. Proca, G. et D. Jonnesco: (1) Sur une modification durable du virus rabique de passage. C. r. Soc. Biol. 120, 1274 (1935).Google Scholar
  484. Proca, G. et D. Jonnesco: (2) Sur une modification durable du virus rabique de passage. C. r. Soc. Biol. 120, 1274 (1935).Google Scholar
  485. Puntoni, V.: La vaccinazione antirabica degli animali. Umbria med. 3, 580 (1923).Google Scholar
  486. Purchase, H. S.: (1) An atypical fowl-plague virus from Egypt. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 44, 71 (1931).Google Scholar
  487. Purchase, H. S.: (2) A study of cross immunity with viruses of fowl plague and observations on the duration of immunity. Brit. J. exper. Path. 12, 199 (1931).Google Scholar
  488. Rachad, M.: La peste aviaire. Bull. Off. internat. epizoot. 8, 324 (1934).Google Scholar
  489. Rahim-ud-Din, M.: Experiment with bull virus (rinderpest) on animals protected with goat virus. Indian vet. J. 13, 48 (1936).Google Scholar
  490. Records, E. and L. R. Vawter: Equine encephalomyelitis cross-immunity in horses between western and eastern strains of virus. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 38, 89 (1934).Google Scholar
  491. Rector, E. J. and L. E. Rector: Intranuclear inclusions in the salivary glands of moles. Amer. J. Path. 10, 629 (1934).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  492. Reece, R. J.: An account of the circumstances associated with an outbreak of disease among much cows, horses and their attendants believed to be of the nature of “cow-pox” in the county of Somersetshire in the year 1909 and considerations arisine there from Proc. R. Soc. Med. (Sect. Epidem) 15, 13 (1921).Google Scholar
  493. Reis, J. and P. Nobrega: Sobre un virus tripathogenico de bouba de canario. Arch. Inst. biol., São Paulo. 8, 211 (1937).Google Scholar
  494. Reis, J., P. Nobrega e A. S. Reis: Tratado de doenças das Oves. São Paulo, p. 14 (1936).Google Scholar
  495. Remlinger, P. et J. Bailly: (1) Comment procéder à l’expertise d’un virus rabique fixe. Bull. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 33, 609 (1935).Google Scholar
  496. Remlinger, P. et J. Bailly: (2) Transmission de l’encéphalite argentine des equidés au chien, au chat et au hérisson. C. r. Soc. Biol. 120, 1067 (1935).Google Scholar
  497. Remlinger, P. et J. Bailly: (3) Action de la dilution sur les virus rabiques de rue. C. r. Soc. Biol. 124, 7 (1937).Google Scholar
  498. Remlinger, P. et J. Bailly: (4) Action de la dilution sur les virus rabiques de rue. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 58, 377 (1937).Google Scholar
  499. Remlinger, P. et J. Bailly: (5) La souche africaine de la maladie d’Aujeszky. Bull. Acad. Méd., Par. 118, 155 (1937).Google Scholar
  500. Ribas, E.: Alastrim, amaas, or milk-pox. Trans. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 4, 224 (1910).Google Scholar
  501. Ribbert, H.: Über protozoenartige Zellen in der Niere eines syphilitischen Neugeborenen und in der Parotis von Kindern. Zbl. Path. 15, 945 (1904).Google Scholar
  502. Richardson, S.: Ocular symptoms and complications observed in dengue. Trans. amer. ophthalm. Soc. 31, 450 (1933).Google Scholar
  503. Ritz, H.: Über Rezidive bei experimenteller Trypanosomiasis. II. Mitteilung. Arch. Schiffs-u. Tropenhyg. 20, 392 (1916).Google Scholar
  504. Rivers, T. M.: (1) Changes in epidermal cells covering myxomatous masses induced by virus myxomatosum (Sanarelli). Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.). 24, 435 (1927).Google Scholar
  505. Rivers, T. M.: (2) Infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. Observations on the pathological changes induced by Virus myxomatosum (Sanarelli). J. exper. Med. (Am.) 51, 965 (1930).Google Scholar
  506. Rivers, T. M. and L. A. Eldridge: Relation of varicella to herpes zoster. II. Clinical and experimental observations. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 49, 907 (1929).Google Scholar
  507. Rivers, T. M. and S. M. Ward: (1) Further observations on the cultivation of vaccine virus for Jennerian prophylaxis in man. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 58, 635 (1933).Google Scholar
  508. Rivers, T. M. and S. M. Ward: (2) Infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. Preparation of elementary bodies and studies of serologically active materials associated with the disease. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 66, 1 (1937).Google Scholar
  509. Roncal, A. and Sonoria: Rev. Hig. Sanid. vet. Madrid, 1915 (20th May).Google Scholar
  510. Ronse, M.: Au sujet du virus de la chorio-meningite Arch. internat. Méd. expér. (Belg.) 12, 535 (1937).Google Scholar
  511. Rosenau, M. J. and H. B. Andervont: Vaccinia: susceptibility of mice and immunologic studies. Amer. J. Hyg. 13, 728 (1931).Google Scholar
  512. Rossi, P.: La broncho-pneumonie infectieuse ou influenza des bovidés ne serait-elle pas due à un virus filtrant? C. r. Soc. Biol. 125, 104 (1937).Google Scholar
  513. Rothe Meyer, A. u. J. Engelbreth-Holm: Experimentelle Studien über die Beziehungen zwischen Hühnerleukose und Sarkom an der Hand eines Stammes von übertragbarer Leukose-Sarkoma-Kombination. Acta path. et microbiol. scand. (Dän.) 10, 380 (1933).Google Scholar
  514. Rothe Meyer, A., J. Engelbreth-Holm, and E. Uhl: Further studies on the agent of chicken leukosis. Acta path. et microbiol. scand. (Dän.) 12, 378 (1935).Google Scholar
  515. Roubaud, E. et G. J. Stefanopoulo: Recherehes sur la transmission par voie stégomyienne du virus neurotrope murin de la fièvre jaune. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 26, 305 (1933).Google Scholar
  516. Roubaud, E., G. J. Stefanopoulo et G. M. Findlay: Essais de transmission par les stégomyies du virus amaril de cultures en tissn embryonnaire. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 30, 581 (1937).Google Scholar
  517. Rous, P. and J. W. Beard: A virus-induced mammalian growth with the characters of a tumour (the Shope rabbit papilloma). J. exper. Med. (Am.) 60, 701, 723, 741 (1934).Google Scholar
  518. Rous, P., J. W. Beard, and J. G. Kidd: Concerning the relationship of the virus inducing rabbit papillomas to the cancers developing therefrom. J. Bacter. (Am.) 31, 46 (1936).Google Scholar
  519. Rous, P. and J. B. Murphy: On the causation of filterable agents of three distinct chicken tumours. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 19, 52 (1914).Google Scholar
  520. Sabin, A. B.: (1) Studies on the B. virus. I. the immunological identity of a virus isolated from a human case of ascending myelitis associated with visceral necrosis. Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 248 (1934).Google Scholar
  521. Sabin, A. B.: (2) Studies on the B. virus. II. Proparties of the virus and pathogenesis of the experimental disease in rabbits. Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 268 (1934).Google Scholar
  522. Sabin, A. B.: (3) Studies on the B. virus. III. The experimental disease in Macacus rhesus monkeys. Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 32 (1934).Google Scholar
  523. Sabin, A. B. and A. M. Wright: Acute ascending myelitis following a monkey bite, with the isolation of a virus capable of reproducing the disease. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 59, 115 (1934).Google Scholar
  524. Sabin, A. B. and A. M. Wright: (4) The immunological relationships of pseudorabies (infectious bulbar paralysis, mad itch). Brit. J. exper. Path. 15, 372 (1934).Google Scholar
  525. Sacco, L.: Trattato di Vaccinazione. Milano, 1809.Google Scholar
  526. Salto, T.: Untersuchungen über Immunitätsreaktionen bei Geflügelpocken. Z. Immunit. forsch. 46, 23 (1926).Google Scholar
  527. Salkan, P. M.: Zur Klinik der Epidemiologie und Ätiologie der Melkerknoten. Acta derm.-vener. (Schwd.) 14, 342 (1933).Google Scholar
  528. Sanarelli, G.: Das myxomatogene Virus. Beitrag zum Studium der Krankheitserreger außerhalb des Sichtbaren. (Vorläufige Mitteilung.) Zbl. Bakter. usw. Abt. I, Orig. 23, 865 (1898).Google Scholar
  529. Sanjwa Rao, R.: Cultivation of sheep-pox virus on the chorio-allantoic membrane of the chick embryo. Indian J. med. Res. 26, 497 (1938).Google Scholar
  530. Sawyer, W. A., S. F. Kitchen, and W. Lloyd: Vaccination of humans against yellow fever with immune serum and virus fixed for mice. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 29, 62 (1931).Google Scholar
  531. Sawyer, W. A. and W. Lloyd: The use of mice in tests of immunity against yellow fever. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 54, 533 (1931).Google Scholar
  532. Sayer, S. W. and F. B. Amos: Outbreak of cow pox caused by a vaccination involving two families and two herds of cattle. N. Y. J. Med. 36, 1163 (1936).Google Scholar
  533. Schmidt, M.: Zoologische Klinik. Handbuch der vergleichenden Pathologie und pathologischen Anatomie der Säugetbiere und Vögel. I. Die Krankheiten der Affen, S. 96. Berlin: A. Hirschwald, 1870.Google Scholar
  534. Schmidt, S.: Immunisierung des Meerschweinchens gegen drei verschiedene Typen von Maul-und Klauenseuchenvirus vermittels eines trivalenten Aluminiumhydroxydabsorbaten. Z. Immunit. forsch. 88, 91 (1936).Google Scholar
  535. Schmidt, S., J. Oerskov et E. Steenberg: Immunisation active contre la peste aviaire. Biol. Medd. danske Vidensk. Selsk. 12, 21 (1936).Google Scholar
  536. Schweinburg, F. and S. Wolfram: Überserologische und immunologische Beziehungen zwischen den Erregern des Pemphigus und Lyssa. Z. Immunit. forsch. 91, 341 (1937).Google Scholar
  537. Schoening, H. W.: Studies on the single-injection method of vaccination as a prophylactic against rabies in dogs. J. agric. Res. 30, 431 (1925).Google Scholar
  538. Sellards, A. W.: The behaviour of the virus of yellow fever in monkeys and mice. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. Wash. 17, 339 (1931).Google Scholar
  539. Seton, E. T.: Life Histories of Northern Animals, Part I, p. 672. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909.Google Scholar
  540. Shattock, S. G.: Molluscum contagiosum in two (mated) bunting sparrows. Trans. path. Soc. Lond. 49, 394 (1898).Google Scholar
  541. Shaw, D. R., A. S. Kenney and J. Stokes Jr.: Serologic and immunologic studies relative to the viruses of human and swine influenza virus. Amer. J. med. Sci. 197, 247 (1939).Google Scholar
  542. Shope, R. E.: (1) Swine influenza. III. Filtration experiments and etiology. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 54, 373 (1931).Google Scholar
  543. Shope, R. E.: (2) An experimental study of “mad itch” with especial reference to its relationship to pseudorabies. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 54, 233 (1931).Google Scholar
  544. Shope, R. E.: (3) A transmissible tumour-like condition in rabbits. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 56, 793 (1932).Google Scholar
  545. Shope, R. E.: (4) A filterable virus causing a tumour-like condition in rabbits and its relationship to virus myxomatosum. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 56, 803 (1932).Google Scholar
  546. Shope, R. E.: (5) Modification of the pathogenicity of pseudorabies virus by animal passage. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 57, 925 (1933).Google Scholar
  547. Shope, R. E.: (6) Infectious papillomatosis of rabbits. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 58, 607 (1933).Google Scholar
  548. Shope, R. E.: (7) Serial transmission of infectious papillomatosis in domestic rabbits. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 32, 830 (1935).Google Scholar
  549. Shope, R. E.: (8) Infectious fibroma of rabbits. III. The serial transmission of virus myxomatosum in cotton-tail rabbits and cross-immunity tests with the fibroma virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 33 (1936).Google Scholar
  550. Shope, R. E.: (9) Infectious fibroma of rabbits. IV. The infection with virus myxomatosum of rabbits recovered from fibroma. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 43 (1936).Google Scholar
  551. Shope, R. E.: (10) A change in rabbit fibroma virus suggesting mutation. II. Behaviour of the variant virus in cotton-tail rabbits. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 173 (1936).Google Scholar
  552. Shope, R. E.: (11) The incidence of neutralizing antibodies for swine influenza virus in the sera of human beings of different ages. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 669 (1936).Google Scholar
  553. Shope, R. E.: (12) Immunological relationship between the swine and human influenza viruses in swine. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 66, 151 (1937).Google Scholar
  554. Shope, R. E. and T. Francis jr.: The susceptibility of swine to the virus of human influenza. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 64, 791 (1936).Google Scholar
  555. Siegl, J.: Zum ätiologischen Zusammenhang von Herpes zoster und Varizellen. Münch. med. Wschr. 1927, 189.Google Scholar
  556. Smith, E. C.: Nigerian Insectivora (hedgehogs and shrews)—their reaction to neurotropic yellow fever virus. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 413 (1936).Google Scholar
  557. Smith, G. M. and R. F. Nigrelli: Lymphocystis disease in Angelichthys. Zoologica 22, 293 (1937).Google Scholar
  558. Smith, H. H. and M. Theiler: The adaptation of unmodified strains of yellow fever virus to cultivation in vitro. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 801 (1937).Google Scholar
  559. Smith, W. and C. H. Andrewes: Serological races of influenza. Brit. J. exper. Path. 19, 293 (1938).Google Scholar
  560. Smith, W., C.H. Andrewes, and P.P. Laidlaw: (1) A virus obtained from influenza patients. Lancet 1933 II, 66.Google Scholar
  561. Smith, W., C.H. Andrewes, and P.P. Laidlaw: (2) Influenza: experiments on immunization of ferrets and mice. Brit. J. exper. Path. 16, 291 (1935).Google Scholar
  562. Soper, F. L.: Rural and Jungle Yellow Fever. A New Public Health Problem in Colombia. Bogota: Edit. Minerva, 1935.Google Scholar
  563. Splendore, A.: Über das Virus myxomatosum der Kaninchen. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 48, 300 (1909).Google Scholar
  564. Sprunt, D. H.: Infectious myxomatosis (Sanarelli) in pregnant rabbits. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 56, 601 (1932).Google Scholar
  565. Srikantaiah, G. N.: Rinderpest in sheep, with a special reference to artificial infection. Indian vet. J. 11, 104 (1934).Google Scholar
  566. Stark, A. M., M. M. Tiesenhausen, N. M. Gozanskaja, E. W. Skrozky, D. S. Schtschastny u. W. A. Zuk: Über die Pockenätiologie der sogenannten Melkerknoten. Arch. Derm. (D.) 170, 38 (1934).Google Scholar
  567. Stéfanopoulo, G. J.: Sur le virus amaril d’origine murine inoculé à Macacus rhesus. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 25, 866 (1932).Google Scholar
  568. Stéfanopoulo, G. J. et P. Mollaret: Hémiplégie d’origine cérébrale et névrite optique au cours d’un cas de fièvre jaune. Bull. Soc. méd. Hôp. Par. 50, 1463 (1934).Google Scholar
  569. Stéfanopoulo, G. J. et R. Wassermann: Sensibilité du cobaye au virus neurotrope de la fièvre jaune. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 26, 557 (1933).Google Scholar
  570. Stern, L. S.: The mechanism of herpes zoster. Brit. J. Derm. 49, 263 (1937).Google Scholar
  571. Stewart, F. W. and C. P. Rhoads: Intradermal versus subcutaneous immunization of monkeys against poliomyelitis. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 49, 959 (1929).Google Scholar
  572. Stimpert, F. D. and J. F. Kessel: (1) Variations in strains of poliomyelitis virus. J. Bacter. (Am.) 36, 292 (1938).Google Scholar
  573. Stimpert, F. D. and J. F. Kessel: (2) Variations in strains of poliomyelitis virus. Amer. J. Hyg. 29, 57 (1939).Google Scholar
  574. Stockman, S. and F. C. Minett: (1) Experiments on Foot-and-Mouth disease. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 39, 231 (1926).Google Scholar
  575. Stockman, S. and F. C. Minett: (2) 2nd Progress Rep. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Committee. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1927.Google Scholar
  576. Stuart-Harris, C. H.: A neurotropic strain of human influenza virus. Lancet 1939 I, 497.Google Scholar
  577. Takaki, I.: Über das Virus der Encephalitis japonica. Z. Immunit. forsch. 47, 456 (1926).Google Scholar
  578. Ten Broeck, C. and M. K. Merrill: A serological difference between eastern and western encephalomyelitis virus. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 31, 217 (1933).Google Scholar
  579. Theiler, A.: (1) Transmission of horse sickness into dogs. J. comp. Path. a. Ther. 18, 160 (1906).Google Scholar
  580. Theiler, A.: (2) On the correlation of various diseases of stock in South Africa. Rep. vet. Bact. S. Afr. 1905/06. Transvaal Dept. Agric. 67 (1907).Google Scholar
  581. Theiler, A.: (3) Inoculation of mules with polyvalent virus and serum. Rep. vet. Bact. S. Afr. 1906/07. Transvaal Dept. Agric. 162 (1908).Google Scholar
  582. Theiler, M.: (1) Studies on the action of yellow fever virus in mice. Ann. trop. Med. 24, 249 (1930).Google Scholar
  583. Theiler, M.: (1) (2) Spontaneaus encephalomyelitis of mice—a new virus disease. Science 80, 122 (1934).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  584. Theiler, M.: (1) (3) Spontaneaus encephalomyelitis of mice, a new virus disease. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 705 (1937).Google Scholar
  585. Theiler, M. and T. P. Hughes: Studies on circulating virus and protective anti-bodies in susceptible and relatively insusceptible monkeys after inoculation with yellow fever virus. Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 481 (1935).Google Scholar
  586. Theiler, M. and H. H. Smith: (1) The effect of prolonged cultivation in vitro upon the pathogenicity of yellow fever virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 767 (1937).Google Scholar
  587. Theiler, M. and H. H. Smith: (2) The use of yellow fever virus modified by in vitro cultivation for human immunization. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 787 (1937).Google Scholar
  588. Thompson, J.: (1) Intranuclear inclusions in the submaxillary gland of the rat. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 50, 162 (1932).Google Scholar
  589. Thompson, J.: (2) Inclusion bodies in the salivary glands and liver of mice and rats. Amer. J. Path. 10, 676 (1934).Google Scholar
  590. Thompson, R. L.: The influence of temperature upon proliferation of infectious fibroma and infectious myxoma virus in vivo. J. infect. Dis. (Am.). 62, 307 (1938).Google Scholar
  591. Thomsen, O.: Komplementbindungsuntersuchungen bei Zoster und Varizellen. Z. Immunit. forsch. 82, 88 (1934).Google Scholar
  592. Tietz, G.: Über die Empfänglichkeit verschiedener Vogelarten für eine Infektion mit originärem Hühner-und Taubenpockenvirus. Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 65, 244 (1932).Google Scholar
  593. Todd, C.: Experiments on the virus of fowl plague. Brit. J. exper. Path. 9, 101 (1928).Google Scholar
  594. Toomey, J. A.: Poliomyelitisantiserum obtained from horses. II. Neutralizing effect against various strains of virus. Amer. J. Dis. Childr. 55, 1261 (1938).Google Scholar
  595. Toth, A. V.: Beiträge zur Ätiologie der Pocken bei Vögeln, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Pferdepocken. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 30, 249 (1922).Google Scholar
  596. Toyoda, T.: Versuche über Infektion nnd Immunität bei verschiedenen Tierpockenarten. Z. Hyg. usw. 102, 592 (1924).Google Scholar
  597. Trask, J. D. and J. R. Paul: Experimentalpoliomyelitis induced by intracutaneous inoculation: a strain of the virus apparently peculiarly infective when injected by this route. J. Bacter. (Am.) 31, 527 (1936).Google Scholar
  598. Trask, J. D., J. R. Paul, A. R. Beebe, and W. J. German: Viruses of poliomyelitis: an immunological comparison of six strains. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 65, 687 (1937).Google Scholar
  599. Traub, E.: (1) A filterable virus recovered from white mice. Science 81, 298 (1935).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  600. Traub, E.: (2) Immunization of guinea-pigs with a modified strain of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 66, 317 (1937).Google Scholar
  601. Traub, E.: (3) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über einen durch Taubenpassage veränderten Virusstamm der amerikanischen Pferdeenzephalomyelitis. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 143, 7 (1938).Google Scholar
  602. Traub, E. and C. Ten Broeck: Protective vaccination of horses with modified equine encephalomyelitis vaccine. Science 81, 572 (1935).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  603. Traum, J.: Vesicular exanthema of swine. J. amer. vet. med. Assoc. 88, 316 (1936).Google Scholar
  604. Trautwein, K.: (1) Die Pluralität des Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus. Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 56, 505 (1927).Google Scholar
  605. Trautwein, K.: (2) Die Pluralität des Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 110, 164 (1929).Google Scholar
  606. Trautwein, K.: (3) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über einen durch Taubenpassage veränderten Virus-Stamm der amerikanischen Pferde-Enzephalomyelitis. Zbl. Bakter. usw. Abt. I, Orig. 143, 7 (1939).Google Scholar
  607. Trautwein, K. u. K. Reppin: Über die Variabilität der Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus. I. Mitteilung. Z. Immunit. forsch. 73, 347 (1932).Google Scholar
  608. Trincas: Una forma d’anemia dei cani data da un virus filtrabile attraverso il Berkefeld W. Boll. Soc. Sci. med. nat. Cagliari 4 (1906).Google Scholar
  609. Troisier, J. et J. Sifferlen: Leucose et aareomatose des poules: unité de virus. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 55, 501 (1935).Google Scholar
  610. Tyzzer, E. E., A. W. Sellards and B. L. Bennett: The occurrence in nature of equine encephalomyelitis in the ring-necked pheasant. Science 88, 505 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  611. Vallée, H. et H. Carré: Sur la pluralité des virus aphteux. C. r. Acad. Sci. 174, 1498 (1922).Google Scholar
  612. van de Kasteele, R. P.: Immuniteit en complementbindung bij vaccine. Leiden, 1915.Google Scholar
  613. van Heelsbergen, T.: Kuhpocken beim Menschen durch das Virus der Stomatitis pustulosa contagiosa equi. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 89, 173 (1922).Google Scholar
  614. van Rooyen, C. E. and A. J. Rhodes: The immunotogical relationship of Shope’s rabbit fibroma virus to the virus of infectious myxomatosis: complement fixation. Zbl. Bakter. usw., Abt. I, Orig. 142, 149 (1938).Google Scholar
  615. Vegni, R.: Contributo allo studio sperimentale dell’infezione erpetica. Riforma med. 38, 270 (1922).Google Scholar
  616. Viborg: Quoted by Gins in: Die Beziehungen zwischen den Menschen-und Tierpocken. Handbuch der Pockenbekämpfung und Impfung. Berlin: R. Schoetz, 1927.Google Scholar
  617. Virga, E.: Sulla virulenza e sulla resistenza al vari agenti di attenuazione del virus rabbico fisso. G. Batt. Immun. 20, 47 (1938).Google Scholar
  618. Vittoz, R.: Récherehes sur la diphtérie aviaire en Cochinchine (virus gallin et virus colombin). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Indochine, Saigon 6, 375 (1936).Google Scholar
  619. Vogelsang, E. E.: Viruela aviavia en el nandu (Rhea americana). Sem. méd. (Arg.) 45, 556 (1936).Google Scholar
  620. Voigt, L.: Tierversuche mit Vakzine, Variola und Ovine. Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 6, 101 (1909).Google Scholar
  621. Waldmann, O. u. J. Pape: (1) Die künstliche Übertragung der Maul-und Klauenseuche auf das Meerschweinchen. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 36, 519 (1920).Google Scholar
  622. Waldmann, O. u. J. Pape: (2) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Maul-und Klauenseuche. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 37, 349 (1921).Google Scholar
  623. Waldmann, O. u. K. Trautwein: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Pluralität des Maul-und Klauenseuche-Virus. (Vorläufige Mitteilung.) Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 42, 569 (1926).Google Scholar
  624. Walthard, B.: Die Züchtung des Vaccinevirus in nichtektodermalen Geweben. Z. Hyg. usw. 107, 221 (1927).Google Scholar
  625. Ward, A. R. and B. A. Gallagher: Diseases of Domesticated Birds. London and New York: Macmillan, 1926.Google Scholar
  626. Webster, L. T. and F. H. Wright: Recovery of eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus from the brain tissue of human cases of encephalitis in Massachusetts. Science 88, 305 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  627. Weissenberg, R.: (1) Über infektiöse Zellhypertrophie bei Fischen (Lymphocystiserkrankung). Uber. preuß. Akad. Wiss., Berl., Physik.-math. Kl. 30, 792 (1914).Google Scholar
  628. Weissenberg, R.: (2) Lymphocystiskrankheit der Fische. Handbuch der pathogenen Protozoen, edited by Prowazek-Nöller, 3, 1344 (1921).Google Scholar
  629. Weissenberg, R.: (3) Studies on virus diseases of fish. I. Lymphocystis disease of the orange file fish (Aleutera schoepfii). Amer. J. Hyg. 28, 455 (1938).Google Scholar
  630. Weissenberg, R.: (4) Studies on virus diseases of fish. II. Lymphocystis disease of Fundulus heteroclitus. Biol. Bull. (Am.) 76, 251 (1939).Google Scholar
  631. Weissenberg, R., R. F. Nigrelli and G. M. Smith: Lymphocystis in the hog fish, Lachnolaimus maximus. Zoologica. 22, 303 (1937).Google Scholar
  632. Whitman, L.: Failure of Aëdes aegypti to transmit yellow fever cultured virus (17 D). Amer. J. trop. Med. 19, 19 (1939).Google Scholar
  633. Whitman, L. and P. C. A. Antunes: The transmission of two strains of jungle yellow fever virus by Aëdes aegypti. Amer. J. trop. Med. 18, 135 (1938).Google Scholar
  634. Wyschelesskij, N. S. and M. N. Ssuchow: The virus of equine encephalomyelitis. Sovyet Vet. No. 9, 36 (1934).Google Scholar
  635. Yoshikawa, M.: Die Untersuchungen über die Schweinepocken in Mandschurei. II. Mitteilung. Über den prophylaktischen Wert von Schweinepocken und Variola-Vaccine und ihr Zusammenhang bezüglich der Immunität. J. Jap. Soc. vet. Sci. 9 (1930).Google Scholar
  636. Zoltan, L.: (Cancerous degeneration of verrucoe). Orv. Hetil. (Ung.) 82, 192 (1938).Google Scholar
  637. Zwick, W.: Über die Beziehungen der Stomatitis pustulosa contagiosa des Pferdes zu den Pocken der Haustiere und des Menschen. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 52, 757 (1924).Google Scholar
  638. Zwick, W., O. Seifried u. J. Schaaf: Die Schutzimpfung gegen Hühnerpocken und Hühnerdiphtherie. Z. Infekt. krkh. Haustiere 34, 300 (1928).Google Scholar
  639. Ainsworth, G. C.: (1) Mosaic disease of the eueumber. Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 55 (1935).Google Scholar
  640. Ainsworth, G. C.: (2) A note on certain viruses of the eueumber virus 1 type isolated from monocotyledonous plants. Ann. appl. Biol. 25, 867 (1938).Google Scholar
  641. Atanasoff, D.: Mosaic disease of drupaceous fruit trees. Yearbook Univ. Sofia Fac. Agric. 1934-1935, 13, 9 (1935).Google Scholar
  642. Bald, J. G.: An F type potato virus in Australia. Nature (Brit.) 139, 674 (1937).Google Scholar
  643. Bawden, F. C.: (1) A study on the histological changes resulting from certain virus infections of the potato. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 111, 74 (1932.Google Scholar
  644. Bawden, F. C.: (2) quoted by Smith, K. M.: Recent advances in the study of plant viruses. London, 1933.Google Scholar
  645. Bawden, F. C.: (3) Studies on a virus causing foliar necrosis of the potato. Proc. roy. Soc., Land., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 116, 375 (1934).Google Scholar
  646. Bawden, F. C.: (4) The relationship between the serological reactions and the infectivity of potato virus X. Brit. J. exper. Path. 16, 435 (1935).Google Scholar
  647. Bawden, F. C. and N. W. Pirie: (1) Liquid crystalline preparations of encumber viruses 3 and 4. Nature (Brit.) 139, 546 (1937).Google Scholar
  648. Bawden, F. C. and N. W. Pirie: (2) The relationships between liquid crystalline preparations of eueumber viruses 3 and 4 and strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 18, 275 (1937).Google Scholar
  649. Bawden, F. C., N. W. Pirie, J. D. Bernal, and I. Fankuchen: Liquid crystalline substanees from virus infected plants. Nature (Brit.) 138, 1051 (1936).Google Scholar
  650. Bawden, F. C. and F. M. L. Sheffield: The intracellular inclusions of some plant virus diseases. Ann. appl. Biol. 20, 102 (1939).Google Scholar
  651. Beale, H. P.: The serum reactions as an aid in the study of filterable viruses of plants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 6, 407 (1934).Google Scholar
  652. Bennett, C. W.: (1) Further observations and experiments on the eurl disease of raspberries. Phytopathology 20, 787 (1930).Google Scholar
  653. Bennett, C. W.: (2) Studies on properties of eurly top virus. J. agric. Res. 50, 211 (1935).Google Scholar
  654. Bernal, J. D. and I. Fankuchen: Structure types of protein “crystals” from virus infected plants. Nature (Brit.) 139, 923 (1937).Google Scholar
  655. Bewley, W. F.: (1) Diseases of Glasshouse Plants. London, 1923.Google Scholar
  656. Bewley, W. F.: (2) 11th Ann. Rept. Cheshunt exp. sta for 1925, p. 86 (1926).Google Scholar
  657. Birkeland, J. M.: (1) Serological studies of plant viruses. Bot. Gaz. 95, 419 (1934).Google Scholar
  658. Birkeland, J. M.: (2) Further serological studies of plant viruses. Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 719 (1935).Google Scholar
  659. Blood, H. L. and R. D. Watson: A modification of the tobacco mosaic virus no. 1 occurring in Datura meteloides. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci. 15, 15 (1937).Google Scholar
  660. Böhme, R. W.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen mit Stämmen des “X”-und “Y”-Virus. Phytopath. Z. 6, 517 (1933).Google Scholar
  661. Brierley, P.: (1) Dahlia mosaic and its relation to stunt. Amer. Dahlia Soc. Ser. 65, 6 (1933).Google Scholar
  662. Brierley, P.: (2) Symptoms of rose mosaic. Phytopathology. 25, 8 (1935).Google Scholar
  663. Brooks, A. J.: Ann. Rept. Dept. Agric. Gambia (1932).Google Scholar
  664. Burnett, G.: Stunt, a virosis of Delphinium. Phytopathology 24, 467 (1934).Google Scholar
  665. Caldwell, J.: On the interaction of two strains of a plant virus: experiments on induced immunity in plants. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 117, 120 (1935).Google Scholar
  666. Carsner, E.: Attenuation of the virus of sugar beet curly top. Phytopathology 15, 745 (1925).Google Scholar
  667. Carsner, E. and C. F. Lackey: Further studies on attenuation of the virus of sugar beet curly top. Phytopathology 18, 951 (1928).Google Scholar
  668. Carsner, E. and C. F. Stahl: Studies on curly top disease of the sugar beet. J. agric. Res. 28, 297 (1924).Google Scholar
  669. Chester, K. S.: (1) Specific quantitative neutralization of the viruses of tobacco mosaic, tobacco ringspot and cucmnber mosaic by immune sera. Phytopathology 24, 1180 (1934).Google Scholar
  670. Chester, K. S.: (2) Serological evidence in plant-virus classification. Phytopathology 25, 686 (1935).Google Scholar
  671. Chester, K. S.: (3) Separation and analysis of virus strains by means of precipitin tests. Phytopathology 26, 778 (1936).Google Scholar
  672. Chester, K. S.: (4) A critique of plant serology. Part II. Application of serology to the classification of plants and the identification of plant products. Quart. Rev. Biol. (Am.) 12, 165 (1937).Google Scholar
  673. Chester, K. S.: (5) Serological studies of plant viruses. Phytopathology 27, 903 (1937).Google Scholar
  674. Clayton, E. E.: A study of the mosaic disease of crucifers. J. agric. Res. 40, 263 (1930).Google Scholar
  675. Clinch, P., J. B. Loughnane, and P. A. Murphy: A study of the aucuba or yellow mosaics of the potato. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 21, 431 (1936).Google Scholar
  676. Cochran, L. C. and L. M. Hutchins: Further studies on host relationships of peach mosaic in Southern California. Phytopathology 28, 890 (1938).Google Scholar
  677. Coleman, L. C.: The transmission of sandal spike. Ind. forester. 49, 6 (1923).Google Scholar
  678. Cooley, L. M.: The identity of raspberry mosaics. Phytopathology 26, 44 (1936).Google Scholar
  679. Dodge, B. O. and R. B. Wilcox: Diseases of raspberries and blackberries. U. S. Dept. agric. Bull., No. 1488 (1926).Google Scholar
  680. Doolittle, S. P.: (1) The mosaic disease of cucurbits. U. S. Dept. agric. Bull., No. 879 (1920).Google Scholar
  681. Doolittle, S. P.: (2) Commelina nudiflora, a monocotyledonous host of celery mosaic (Abstract). Phytopathology 21, 114 (1931).Google Scholar
  682. Doolittle, S. P. and F. L. Wellman: Commelina nudiflora, a monocotyledonous host of celery mosaic in Florida. Phytopathology 24, 48 (1934).Google Scholar
  683. Dorst, E. H.: Studies on the genus Cicadula (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc. 4, 39 (1931).Google Scholar
  684. Dykstra, T. P.: (1) A top necrosis virus found in some apparently healthy potatoes. Phytopathology 25, 1115 (1935).Google Scholar
  685. Dykstra, T. P.: (2) A study of the yellow mosaic of potato. Phytopathology 29, 6 (1939).Google Scholar
  686. Eriksson-Quensel, I. B. and T. Svedberg: Sedimentation and electrophoresis of the tobacco mosaic virus protein. J. amer. chem. Soc. 58, 1863 (1936).Google Scholar
  687. Fawcett, G. L.: The curly top of sugar beet in the Argentine. Phytopathology 17, 407 (1927).Google Scholar
  688. Foster, A. C. and G. F. Webber: Celery diseases in Florida. Florida agric. exper. Sta. Bull., No. 173 (1924).Google Scholar
  689. Fukushi, T.: Plants susceptible to dwarf disease of rice plant (translated). Trans. Sapparo. Nat. Rist. Soc. 13, 162 (1934).Google Scholar
  690. Giddings, N. J.: Studies of selected strains of curly top virus. J. agric. Res. 56, 883 (1938).Google Scholar
  691. Gratia, A. et P. Manil: Différenciation sérologique des virus X et y de la pomme de terre chez les plantes infectées ou porteuses de ces virus. C. r. Soc. Biol. 25, 490 (1934).Google Scholar
  692. Hamilton, M. A.: On three new virus diseases of Hyoscyamus niger. Ann. appl. Biol. 19, 550 (1932).Google Scholar
  693. Harris, R. V.: (1) The strawberry ‘yellow-edge’ disease. J. Pom. hort. Sci. 11, 56 (1933).Google Scholar
  694. Harris, R. V.: (2) Mosaic diseaseoftheraspberryin Great Britain. J. Pom. hort. Sci. 11, 237 (1933).Google Scholar
  695. Harris, R. V.: (3) Some observations on the raspberry disease situation in North America. Ann. Rept. East Mailing Res. sta. 1934 (1935).Google Scholar
  696. Harris, R. V.: (4) Transmissionexperiments with crinkle in 1935. Ann. Rept. East Mailing Res. Sta. for 1936 (1937).Google Scholar
  697. Hayes, T. R.: Rosette disease of the peanut. Trop. Agric. Trinidad. 9, 211 (1932).Google Scholar
  698. Hertzsch, W.: Beiträge zur infektiösen Chlorose. Z. Bot. 20, 65 (1927).Google Scholar
  699. Hoggan, I. A.: (1) Some viruses affecting spinach and certain aspects of insect transmission. Phytopathology 23, 446 (1933).Google Scholar
  700. Hoggan, I. A.: (2) Two viruses of the cucumber mosaic group on tobacco. Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 27 (1935).Google Scholar
  701. Hoggan, I. A. and J. Johnson: A virus of crucifers and other hosts. Phytopathology 25, 648 (1935).Google Scholar
  702. Holmes, F. O.: (1) A masked strain of tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopathology 24, 845 (1934).Google Scholar
  703. Holmes, F. O.: (2) Comparison of derivatives from distinctive strains of tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopathology 26, 896 (1936).Google Scholar
  704. Iwanowski, D.: Über die Mosaikkrankheit der Tabakspflanze. Bull. Acad. Sci., St. Pétersb., n. s. III, 35, 67 (1892).Google Scholar
  705. Jensen, J. H.: (1) Isolation of yellow mosaic viruses from plants infected with tobacco mosaic. Phytopathology 23, 964 (1933).Google Scholar
  706. Jensen, J. H.:(2) Studies on the origin of yeilow mosaic viruses. Phytopathology 26, 266 (1935).Google Scholar
  707. Jensen, J. H.:(3) Studies on representative strains of tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopathology 27, 69 (1937).Google Scholar
  708. Johnson, E. M.: Virus diseases of tobacco in Kentucky. Kentucky agric. exper. Sta. Bull., No. 306, 289 (1930).Google Scholar
  709. Johnson, J.: (1) The transmission of viruses from apparently healthy potatoes. Wis. agric. exper. Sta. Res. Buil., No. 63 (1925).Google Scholar
  710. Johnson, J.: (2) The attenuation of plant viruses and the inactivating influence of oxygen. Science 64, 610 (1926).Google Scholar
  711. Johnson, J.: (3) The classification of plant viruses. Wis. agric. exper. Sta. Res. Bull., No. 76 (1927).Google Scholar
  712. Johnson, J. and T. J. Grant: The properties of plant viruses from different host species. Phytopathology 22, 741 (1932).Google Scholar
  713. Kerling, L. C. P.: The anatomy of the “kroepoek”-diseased leaf of Nicotiana tabacum and of Zinnia elegans. Phytopathology 23, 175 (1933).Google Scholar
  714. Keur, J. Y.: Studies on the occurrence and transmission of virus disease in the genus Abutilon. Bull. Torrey bot. Cl. 61, 53 (1934).Google Scholar
  715. Köhler, E.: (1) Untersuchungen über die Viruskrankheit der Kartoffel. III. Weitere Versuche mit Viren aus der Mosaikgruppe. Phytopath. Z. 7, 1 (1934).Google Scholar
  716. Köhler, E.: (2) Über die Variabilität des Ringmosaikvirus (X-Virus) der Kartoffel. Naturw. 23, 828 (1935).Google Scholar
  717. Köhler, E.: (3) Über ein “Veinbanding-Virus” der Kartoffel. Phytopath. Z. 10, 17 (1937).Google Scholar
  718. Köhler, E.: (4) Fortgeführte Untersuchungen mit verschiedenen Stämmen des X-Virus der Kartoffel (Ringmosaik-Virus). Phytopath. Z. 10, 31 (1937).Google Scholar
  719. Köhler, E.: (5) Zur Frage der Schutzimpfung bei den Veinbanding-Viren. Nachr. bl. dtsch. Pfl.sch.dienst 17, 32 (1937).Google Scholar
  720. Köhler, E.: (6) Über Variationserscheinungen am X-Mosaikvirus. Naturw. 25, 669 (1937).Google Scholar
  721. Köhler, E.: (7) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit verschiedener Stämme des X-Mosaikvirus in der Tabakpflanze. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. 48, 118 (1938).Google Scholar
  722. Köhler, E.: (8) Über das Auftreten abweichender Varianten bei den Os-Stämmen des Kartoffel X-Virus. Arch. Virusforsch. 1, 46 (1939).Google Scholar
  723. Kunkel, L. O.: (1) A possible causative agent for the mosaic disease of corn. Bull. Hawaii. Sug. Ass. bot. Ser. 3, 44 (1921).Google Scholar
  724. Kunkel, L. O.: (2) Insect transmission of yellow stripe disease. Hawaii. Plant. Rec. 26, 58 (1922).Google Scholar
  725. Kunkel, L. O.: (3) The corn mosaic of Hawaii distinct from sugar cane mosaic. Phytopathology 16, 67 (1927).Google Scholar
  726. Kunkel, L. O.: (4) Studies on aster yellows in some new hast plants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 3, 85 (1931).Google Scholar
  727. Kunkel, L. O.: (5) Celery yellows of California not identical with the aster yellows of New York. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 3, 405 (1932).Google Scholar
  728. Kunkel, L. O.: (6) Studies on acquired immunity with tobacco and aucuba mosaics. Phytopathology 24, 437 (1934).Google Scholar
  729. Kunkel, L. O.: (7) Possibilities in plant virus classification. Bot. Rev. 1, 1 (1935).Google Scholar
  730. Kunkel, L. O.: (8) Immunological studies on the three peach diseases, yellows, rosette and little peach. Phytopathology 26, 201 (1936).Google Scholar
  731. Kunkel, L. O.: (9) Isolation of mild strains of aster yellows from heat-treated leaf-hoppers. J. Bacter. (Am.) 34, 132 (1937).Google Scholar
  732. Lackey, C. F.: (1) Attenuation of curly-top virus by resistant sugar beets which are symptomless carriers. Phytopathology 19, 975 (1929).Google Scholar
  733. Lackey, C. F.: (2) Further studies on the modification of sugar-beet curly-top virus by its various hosts. Phytopathology 19, 1141 (1929).Google Scholar
  734. Lackey, C. F.: (3) Restoration of virulence of attenuated curly-top virus by passage through Stellaria media. J. agric. Res. 44, 755 (1932).Google Scholar
  735. Lackey, C. F.: (4) Restoration of virulence of attenuated curly top virus by passage through susceptible plants. J. agric. Res. 55, 453 (1937).Google Scholar
  736. Loring, H. S. and W. M. Stanley: Comparative properties of virus proteins from a single lesion strain and from ordinary tobacco-mosaic virus (Abstract). Phytopathology 27, 134 (1937).Google Scholar
  737. Loring, H. S. and R. W. G. Wyckoff: The ultracentrifugal isolation of latent mosaic virus protein. J. biol. Chem. (Am.) 121, 225 (1937).Google Scholar
  738. MacClement, D. and J. Henderson Smith: Filtration ofplant viruses. Nature (Brit.) 130, 129 (1932).Google Scholar
  739. McFarlane, A. S.: Chemistry of the plant viruses. Biol. Rev. Garnbridge philos. Soc. 14, 223 (1939).Google Scholar
  740. McFarlane, A. S. and R. A. Kekwick: Physical properties of Bushy stunt virus protein. Biochem. J. (Brit.) 32, 1607 (1938).Google Scholar
  741. McKenny Hughes, A. W.: Aphides as vectors of “breaking” in tulips. Ann. appl. Biol. 18, 16 (1931).Google Scholar
  742. McKinney, H. H.: (1) A mosaic disease of winter wheat and winter rye. U. S. Dept. agric. Bull., No. 1361 (1925).Google Scholar
  743. McKinney, H. H.: (2) Virus mixtures that may not be detected in young tobacco plants. Phytopathology 16, 893 (1926).Google Scholar
  744. McKinney, H. H.: (3) Mosaic diseases in the Canary Islands, West Africa and Gibraltar. J. agric. Res. 39, 557 (1929).Google Scholar
  745. McKinney, H. H.: (4) A mosaic of wheat transmissible to all cereal species in the tribe Hordeae. J. agric. Res. 40, 547 (1930).Google Scholar
  746. McKinney, H. H.: (5) étude sur les mélanges de virus. IIe Congr. int. Path. camp., C. R. et Commun. 2, 449 (1931).Google Scholar
  747. McKinney, H. H.: (6) Differentiation of viruses causing green and yellow mosaics of wheat. Science 73, 650 (1931).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  748. McKinney, H. H.: (7) Evidence of virus mutation in the common mosaic of tobacco. J. agric. Res. 51, 951 (1935).Google Scholar
  749. McKinney, H. H.: (8) The inhibiting influence of a virus on one of its mutants. Science 82, 463 (1935).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  750. McKinney, H. H.: (9) Virus mutation and the gene concept. J. Hered. (Am.) 28, 51 (1937).Google Scholar
  751. McKinney, H. H.: (10) Mosaic diseases of wheat and related cereals. U. S. Dept. Agriculture Circular No. 442 (1937).Google Scholar
  752. McWhorter, F. P.: (1) A preliminary analysis of tulip breaking (Abstract). Phytopathology 22, 998 (1932).Google Scholar
  753. McWhorter, F. P.: (2) The properties and interpretation of tulip-breaking viruses. Phytopathology 25, 898 (1935).Google Scholar
  754. McWhorter, F. P.: (3) The antithetic virus theory of tulip-breaking. Ann. appl. Biol. 25, 254 (1938).Google Scholar
  755. Magee, C. J.: A new virus disease of bananas. Agric. Gaz. New South Wales 41, 929 (1930).Google Scholar
  756. Matsumato, T.: Differentiation of two mosaic diseases of petunia by means of serological, cytological and inoculation experiments (trans.). Bot. a. Zool. (Tokyo) 3, 893 (1935).Google Scholar
  757. Merkel, L.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mosaikkrankheit der Familie der Papilionaceen. Z. Pflanz. krkh. 39, 289 (1929).Google Scholar
  758. Mungomery, R. W. and A. F. Bell: Fiji disease of sugar cane and its transmission. Bur. Sug. exper. Sta. Dir. Path. Bull., No. 4, Brisbane (1933).Google Scholar
  759. Murphy, P. A. and J. B. Loughnane: A comparison of some Dutch and Irish potato mosaic viruses. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 21, 419 (1936).Google Scholar
  760. Murphy, P. A. and A. M’Kay: (1) A comparison of some European and American virus diseases of the potato. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 20, 347 (1932).Google Scholar
  761. Murphy, P. A. and A. M’Kay: (2) Methods for investigating the virus diseases of the potato and some results obtained by their use. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 18, 169 (1936).Google Scholar
  762. Nelson, R.: Investigations in the mosaic disease of bean (Phasealus vulgaris L.). Tech. Bull. Mich. agric. exper. Sta., No. 118 (1932).Google Scholar
  763. Newton, W.: Virus studies. II. Streak X, a disease of tomatoes caused by a virus of the potato X group unassociated with tobacco mosaic. Canad. J. Res. 14, 415 (1936).Google Scholar
  764. Norval, I. P.: Derivatives from an unusual strain of tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopathology 28, 675 (1938).Google Scholar
  765. Ocfemia, G. O.: An insect vector of the Fiji disease of sugar cane. Amer. J. Bot. 21, 113 (1934).Google Scholar
  766. Ocfemia, G. O. and G. O. Buhay: Bunchy top of abaca or Manila hemp. II. Further studies on the transmission of the disease and a trial planting of abaca seedlings in a bunchy-top devastated field. Philipp. Agric. 22, 567 (1934).Google Scholar
  767. Osborn, H. T.: Studies on pea virus 1. Phytopathology 28, 923 (1938).Google Scholar
  768. Pierce, W. H.: (1) Viruses of the bean. Phytopathology 24, 87 (1934).Google Scholar
  769. Pierce, W. H.: (2) The identification of certain viruses affecting leguminaus plants. J. agric. Res. 51, 1017 (1935).Google Scholar
  770. Pirie, N. W., K. M. Smith, E. T. C. Spooner And W. D. McClement: Purified preparations of tobacco necrosis virus. Parasitology 30, 543 (1938).Google Scholar
  771. Plakidas, A. G.: Strawberry Xanthosis (Yellows), a new insect-borne disease. J. agric. Res. 35, 1057 (1927).Google Scholar
  772. Porter, R. H.: (1) A new mosaic disease of cucumber. (Abstract.) Phytopathology 20, 113 (1930).Google Scholar
  773. Porter, R. H.: (2) The reactions of cucumbers to types of mosaic. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 6, 95 (1931).Google Scholar
  774. Price, W. C.: (1) Acquired immunity to ring spot in Nicotiana. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 4, 359 (1932).Google Scholar
  775. Price, W. C.: (2) Isolation and study of some yellow strains of cucumber mosaic. Phytopathology 24, 743 (1934).Google Scholar
  776. Price, W. C.: (3) Acquired immunity from cucumber mosaic in Zinnia. Phytopathology 25, 776 (1935).Google Scholar
  777. Price, W. C.: (4) Classification of southern celery mosaic virus. Phytopathology 25, 947 (1935).Google Scholar
  778. Price, W. C.: (5) Specificity of acquired immunity from tobacco ring spot diseases. Phytopathology 26, 665 (1936).Google Scholar
  779. Price, W. C.: (6) Classification of lily-mosaic virus. Phytopathology 27, 561 (1937).Google Scholar
  780. Price, W. C. and R. W. G. Wyckoff: The ultracentrifugation of the proteins of cucumber viruses 3 and 4. Nature (Brit.) 141, 685 (1938).Google Scholar
  781. Rankin, W. H.: Virus diseases of black raspberries. Tech. Bull. N. Y. Sta. agric. exper. Sta., No. 175 (1931).Google Scholar
  782. Rankin, W. H., J. F. Hockey, and J. B. McCurry: Leaf curl and mosaic of the cultivated red raspberry. (Abstract.) Phytopathology 12, 58 (1922).Google Scholar
  783. Salaman, R. N.: (1) Virus disease of the potato: streak. Nature (Brit.) 126, 246 (1930).Google Scholar
  784. Salaman, R. N.: (2) The analysis and synthesis of some diseases of the mosaic type: the problem of carriers and auto-infection in the potato. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 110, 186 (1932).Google Scholar
  785. Salaman, R. N.: (3) Protective iqoculation against a plant virus. Nature (Brit.) 131, 468 (1933).Google Scholar
  786. Salaman, R. N.: (4) Immunity to virus diseases in plants. Trans. III. Int. Congr. comp. Path., Athens. I, 167 (1936).Google Scholar
  787. Salaman, R. N.: (5) Plant viruses and their relation to those affecting man and animal. Lancet 1937 I, 827.Google Scholar
  788. Salaman, R. N.: (6) Acquired immunity against the Y potato virus. Nature (Brit.) 139, 925 (1937).Google Scholar
  789. Salaman, R. N.: (7) (Personal communication.) (1937.)Google Scholar
  790. Salaman, R. N.: (8) The potato virus “X”, its strains and reactions. Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. London 229, 137 (1938).Google Scholar
  791. Salaman, R. N. and F. C. Bawden: An analysis of some necrotic virus diseases of the potato. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 111, 53 (1932).Google Scholar
  792. Severin, H. H. P.: (1) Yellows disease of celery, lettuce and other plants transmitted by Cicadula sexnotata Fall. Hilgardia 3, 543 (1929).Google Scholar
  793. Severin, H. H. P.: (2) Transmission of carrot, parsley and parsnip yellows by Cicadula divisa. Hilgardia 7, 163 (1932).Google Scholar
  794. Severin, H. H. P.: (3) Transmission of California aster and celery yellows virus by three species of leaf-hoppers. Hilgardia 8, 339 (1934).Google Scholar
  795. Severin, H. H. P. and F. A. Haasis: Transmission of California. aster yellows to potato by Cicadula divisa. Hilgardia 8, 329 (1934).Google Scholar
  796. Smith, E. F.: Peach yellows and peach rosette. U. S. D. A. Farmer’s Bull. No. 17 (1894).Google Scholar
  797. Smith, K. M.: (1) Studies on potato virus diseases. IV. Further experiments with potato mosaic. Ann. appl. Biol. 16, 1 (1929).Google Scholar
  798. Smith, K. M.: (2) On the composite nature of certain potato virus diseases of the mosaic group. Proc. roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 109, 251 (1931).Google Scholar
  799. Smith, K. M.: (3) Recent advances in the study of plant viruses. London: J. and A. Churchill, 1933.Google Scholar
  800. Smith, K. M.: (4) A virus disease of Primula obconica and related plants. Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 236 (1935).Google Scholar
  801. Smith, K. M.: (5) Colour changes in wall flowers and stocks. Gdn. Chron. 98, 112 (1935).Google Scholar
  802. Smith, K. M.: (6) New virus diseases of the tomato. J. R. Hort. Soc. 60, 448 (1935).Google Scholar
  803. Smith, K. M.: (7) A virus disease of cultivated crucifers. Ann. appl. Biol. 22, 239 (1935).Google Scholar
  804. Smith, K. M.: (8) A text book of plant virus diseases. London (1937).Google Scholar
  805. Smith, K. M. and J. G. Bald: A necrotic virus disease affecting tobacco and other plants. Parasitology 27, 231 (1935).Google Scholar
  806. Smith, R. E. and P. A. Boncquet: Connection of a bacterial organism with the curly leaf of the sugar beet. Phytopathology 5, 335 (1915).Google Scholar
  807. Spooner, E. T. and F. C. Bawden: Experiments on the serological relations of the potato virus “X”. Brit. J. exper. Path. 16, 218 (1935).Google Scholar
  808. Stahl, C. F.: Corn stripe disease in Cuba not identical with cane mosaic. Bull. trop. Pl. Res. Fdn., No. 7 (1927).Google Scholar
  809. Stanley, W. M.: (1) Isolation of a crystalline protein possessing the properlies of tobacco mosaic virus. Science 81, 664 (1935).Google Scholar
  810. Stanley, W. M.: (2) Aucuba mosaic virus protein isolated from diseased excised tomato roots grown in vivo. J. biol. Chem. (Am.) 126, 125 (1938).Google Scholar
  811. Stanley, W. M. and R. W. G. Wyckoff: The isolation of tobacco ringspot and other virus proteins by ultracentrifugation. Science 85, 181 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  812. Storey, H. H.: (1) A mosaic virus of grasses, not virulent to sugar cane. Ann. appl. Biol. 16, 525 (1929).Google Scholar
  813. Storey, H. H.: (2) The bearing of insect vectors on the differentiation and classification of plant viruses. IIe Congr. int. Path. comp., C. R. et Commun. 2, 471 (1931).Google Scholar
  814. Storey, H. H.: (3) 8th Ann. Rept. East African agric. Res. Sta. Amani. (1936).Google Scholar
  815. Storey, H. H.: (4) Virus diseases of East African plants. IV. A survey of the viruses attacking the Gramineae. East Afric. agric. J. 1, 333 (1936).Google Scholar
  816. Storey, H. H. and A. M. Bottomley: The rosette disease of peanuts. Ann. appl. Biol. 15, 26 (1928).Google Scholar
  817. Storey, H. H. and A. P. D. Maclean: The transmission of streak disease between maize, sugar cane and wild grass. Ann. appl. Biol. 17, 691 (1930).Google Scholar
  818. Storey, H. H. and R. F. W. Nicnols: Studies of the mosaic disease of cassava. Ann. appl. Biol. 25, 790 (1938).Google Scholar
  819. Stover, W. G. and M. T. Vermillion: Some experiments with a yellow mosaic of tomato. Phytopathology 23, 34 (1933).Google Scholar
  820. Stubbs, M. W.: Certain viruses of the garden pea, Pisum sativum. Phytopathology 27, 242 (1937).Google Scholar
  821. Summers, E. M.: Types of mosaic on sugar cane in Louisiana. Phytopathology 24, 1040 (1934).Google Scholar
  822. Thomas, H. E. and E. M. Hildebrand: A virus disease of prune. Phytopathology 26, 1145 (1936).Google Scholar
  823. Thung, T. H.: (1) Smetstof en plantencel bij enkele virusziekten van de tabaksplant. Hand. 6. ned.-ind. natuurw. Cong., p. 450. Bandoeng (Java), 1931.Google Scholar
  824. Thung, T. H.: (2) De krul-en kroepoekziekten van tabakende oorzaken van hare verbreidung. Meded. Proefst. vorstenl. Tab. 72, 54 (1932).Google Scholar
  825. Thung, T. H.: (3) Smetstof en plantencel bij enkele virusziekten van de tabaksplant IV. Tijdschr. Plantenziekten. 44, 225 (1938).Google Scholar
  826. Tims, E. C.: Severe type of mosaic on a sugar cane variety. Phytopathology 25, 36 (1935).Google Scholar
  827. Tims, E. C., P. J. Mills, and C. W. Edgerton: Studies on sugar cane mosaic in Louisiana. Bull. La. agric. Exp. Sta., No. 263 (1935).Google Scholar
  828. Tompkins, C. M.: (1) Breaking in stock (Matthiola incana). Phytopathology 24, 1137 (1934).Google Scholar
  829. Tompkins, C. M.: (2) Two mosaic diseases of annual stock. J. agric. Res. 58, 63 (1939).Google Scholar
  830. Tompkins, C. M., M. W. Gardner and H. R. Thomas: Black ring, a virosis of cabbage and other crucifers. Phytopathology 27, 955 (1937).Google Scholar
  831. Valleau, W. D.: (1) Seed transmission and sterility studies of two strains of tobacco ring spot. Bull. Ky. agric. exp. Sta., No. 327, 43 (1928).Google Scholar
  832. Valleau, W. D.: (2) A virus disease of Delphinium and tobacco. Kentucky agric. exp. Sta. Bull. 327, 81 (1932).Google Scholar
  833. Valleau, W. D. and E. M. Johnson: Burning and non-burning strains of tobacco mosaic. Kentucky agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull., No. 361, 233 (1935).Google Scholar
  834. Venkata Rao and K. Gopala Iyengar: (1) Two types of spike disease. Mysare Sandal Spike Invest. Comm. Bull. 4 (1934).Google Scholar
  835. Venkata Rao and K. Gopala Iyengar: (2) Studies in spike disease of sandal. Mysare Sandal Spike Invest. Comm. Bull. 5 (1934).Google Scholar
  836. Weimer, J. L.: (1) Alfalfa dwarf: a hitherto unreported disease. Phytopathology 21, 71 (1931).Google Scholar
  837. Weimer, J. L.: (2) Studies on alfalfa mosaic. Phytopathology 24, 239 (1934).Google Scholar
  838. Wellman, F. L.: Identification of celery virus. 1. The cause of southern celery mosaic. Phytopathology 24, 695 (1934).Google Scholar
  839. Wingard, S. A.: Hosts and symptoms of ring spot, a virus disease of plants. J. agric. Res. 37, 127 (1928).Google Scholar
  840. Wyckoff, R. W. G.: An ultracentrifugal analysis of the aucuba mosaic virus protein. J. biol. Chem. (Am.). 124, 585 (1938).Google Scholar
  841. Wyckoff, R. W. G., J. Biscoe, and W. M. Stanley: An ultracentrifugal analysis of the crystalline virus proteins isolated from plants diseased with different strains of tobacco mosaic virus. J. biol. Obern. (Am.) 117, 57 (1937).Google Scholar
  842. Zaumeyer, W. J.: (1) Pea streak and its relationship to strains of alfalfa mosaic. (Abstract.) Phytopathology 27, 144 (1937).Google Scholar
  843. Zaumeyer, W. J.: (2) A streak disease of peas and its relation to several strains of alfalfa mosaic virus. J. agric. Res. 56, 747 (1938).Google Scholar
  844. Zaumeyer, W. J. and B. L. Wade: (1) The relationship of certain legume mosaics to beans. J. agric. Res. 51, 715 (1935).Google Scholar
  845. Zaumeyer, W. J. and B. L. Wade: (2) Pea mosaic and its relation to other legume mosaic viruses. J. agric. Res. 53, 161 (1936).Google Scholar
  846. Asheshov, I. N.: 8th Conf. Med. Res. Workers. Simla, 1931.Google Scholar
  847. Asheshov, I. N., J. Asheshov, S. Khan, and M. N. Lahiri: Bacteriophage inquiry. Report on the work during the period from 1st. January to 1st. September 1929. Indian J. med. Res. 17, 971 (1930).Google Scholar
  848. Asheshov, I. N., I. Asheshov, S. Khan, M. N. Lahiri, and S. K. Chatterji: Studies on cholera bacteriophage. Indian J. med. Res. 20, 1101 (1933).Google Scholar
  849. Bail, O.: Versuche über die Vielheit von Bakteriophagen. Z. Immunit. forsch. 38, 57 (1923).Google Scholar
  850. Basset, J., E. (Mme.) Wollman, M, Macheboeuf A. et M. Bardach: Études sur les effets biologiques des ultra-pressions: action des pressions très élevées sur les bactériophages et sur un virus invisible (virus. vaccinal). C. r. Acad. Sci. 196, 1138 (1933).Google Scholar
  851. Basset, J., E. Wollman, E. (Mme.) Wollman et M. A. Macheboeuf: Études sur les effets biologiques des ultra-pressions: action des pressions très élevées sur les bactériophages des spores et sur les autolysines. C. r. Acad. Sci. 200, 1072 (1935).Google Scholar
  852. Bruce White, P. B.: Lysogenic strains of V. cholerae and the influence of Iysozyme on cholera phage activity. J. Path. a. Bacter. 44, 276 (1937).Google Scholar
  853. Burnet, F. M.: (1) The classification of dysentery-coli bacteriophages. II. The serological classification of coli-dysentery phages. J. Path. a. Bacter. 36, 307 (1933).Google Scholar
  854. Burnet, F. M.: (2) The classification of dysentery-coli bacteriophages; III. A correlation of the serological classification with certain biochemical tests. J. Path. a. Bacter. 37, 179 (1933).Google Scholar
  855. Burnet, F. M.: (3) The phage-inactivating agent of bacterial extracts. J. Path. a. Bacter. 38, 285 (1934).Google Scholar
  856. Burnet, F. M. and M. Freeman: A comparative study of the inactivation of a bacteriophage by immune serum and by bacterial polysaccharide. Austral. J. exper. Biql. a. med. Sci. 15, 49 (1937).Google Scholar
  857. Craigie, J. and Chn Hui Yen: The demonstration of types of B. typhosus by means of preparations of Type II Vi phage. Canad. publ. Health. J. 29, 448 (1938).Google Scholar
  858. Burnet, F. M. and D. Lush: Induced lysogenicity and mutation of bacteriophage within lysogenic bacteria. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 14, 27 (1936).Google Scholar
  859. dHerelle, F. and T. L. Rakieten: Mutations as governing bacterial characters and serologic reactions. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 54, 313 (1934).Google Scholar
  860. dHerelle, F.: Bacteriophagy and bacteriophage. Trans. 7th Cong. Far Eastern Ass. Trop. Med. II, 278 (1927).Google Scholar
  861. Elford, W. J. and C. H. Andrewes: The sizes of different bacteriophages. Brit. J. exper. Path. 13, 446 (1932).Google Scholar
  862. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: An interference phenomenon in relation to yellow fever and other vituses. J. Path. a. Bacter. 44, 405 (1937).Google Scholar
  863. Gratia, A.: Mutation d’un bactériophage du Bacillus megatherium. Considérations sur le pouvoir lysogène et sur l’épidémiologie. C. r. Soc. Biol. 123, 1253 (1936).Google Scholar
  864. Harvey, W. R.: Bacteriophage with special reference to plague and cholera. Trop. Dis. Bull. 30, 331 (1933).Google Scholar
  865. Krueger, A. P.: Nature of bacteriophage and its mode of action. Physiol. Res. 16, 129 (1936).Google Scholar
  866. Lominski, I.: Attentuation de virulence des bactériophages entretenus par souche lysogènes. C. r. Soc. Biol. 127, 866 (1938).Google Scholar
  867. Morison, J.: Bacteriophage. Ann. Rept. Pasteur Inst. Shillong, p. 2 (1932).Google Scholar
  868. Northrop, J. H.: Bacteriophage. J. Bacter. (Am.) 34, 131 (1937).Google Scholar
  869. Sandholzer, L. A., M. M. Mann and G. P. Berry: Determination of ultraviolet light absorption by certain bacteriophages. Science 86, 104 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  870. Schlesinger, M.: (1) Die Bestimmung von Teilchengröße und spezifischem Gewicht des Bakteriophagen durch Zentrifugierversuche. Z. Hyg. usw. 114, 161 (1932).Google Scholar
  871. Schlesinger, M.: (2) Die spezifische Agglutination von Bakteriophagenteilchen. Z. Hyg. usw. 116, 171 (1934).Google Scholar
  872. Sertic, V.: Procédé d’obtention de variantes du bactériophage adaptées à lyser des formes bactériennes secondaires. C. r. Soc. Biol. 100, 612 (1929).Google Scholar
  873. Watanabe, T.: Serologische Untersuchungen an Shiga-Bakteriophagen. Z. Immunit. forsch. 37, 106 (1923).Google Scholar
  874. Whitehead, H. R., and G. J. E. Hunter: Observations on the activity of bacteriophage in the group of lactic streptococci. J. Path. a. Bacter. 44, 337 (1937).Google Scholar
  875. Wollman, E. et E. (Mme.) Wollman: (1) Recherches sur le phénomène de Twort-dHérelle (bactériophage). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 49, 41 (1932).Google Scholar
  876. Wollman, E. et E. (Mme.) Wollman: (2) Recherehes sur le phénomène de Twort-dHérelle (bactériophage ou autolyse hérédo-contagieuse). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Par. 56, 137 (1936).Google Scholar
  877. Andrewes, C. H. and R. E. Shope: A change in rabbit fibroma suggesting mutation. III. Interpretation of findings. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 63, 179 (1936).Google Scholar
  878. Asheshov, I.N., J. Asheshov, S. Khan, M. N. Lahiri, and S. K. Chatterji: Studies on cholera bacteriophage. Indian J. med. Res. 20, 1101 (1933).Google Scholar
  879. Burnet, F. M. and D. Lush: Induced lysogenicity and mutation of bacteriophage within lysogenic bacteria. Austral. J. exper. Biol. a. med. Sci. 14, 27 (1936).Google Scholar
  880. Carrick, R.: Experiments to test the efficiency of protective adaptations in insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. London 85, 131 (1936).Google Scholar
  881. Craigie, J. and Chun Hui Yen: The demonstration of types of B. typhosus by means of preparations of Type II Vi phage. Canad. publ. Health J. 29, 448 (1938).Google Scholar
  882. dHerelle, F. and T. L. Rakieten: Mutations as governing bacterial characters and serologic reactions. J. infect. Dis. (Am.) 54, 313 (1934).Google Scholar
  883. Findlay, G. M.: Variation in animal viruses. J. microsc. Soc. 56, 213 (1936).Google Scholar
  884. Findlay, G. M. and F. O. MacCallum: Spontaneous variation in the neurotropic strain of yellow fever virus. Brit. J. exper. Path. 19, 384 (1938).Google Scholar
  885. Green, R. G.: On the nature of filterable viruses. Science 82, 443 (1935).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  886. Griffiths, F.: The significance of pneumococcal types. J. Hyg. (Brit.) 27, 113 (1928).Google Scholar
  887. Jensen, J. H.: Isolation of yellow mosaic viruses from plants infected with tobacco mosaic. Phytopathology 23, 964 (1933).Google Scholar
  888. Laidlaw, P. P.: Virus diseases and viruses. The Rede lecture. Cambridge, 1938.Google Scholar
  889. McKinney, H. H.: (1) Mosaic diseases in the Canary Islands, West Africa and Gibraltar. J. agric. Res. 39, 557 (1929). (2) Evidence of virus mutation in the common mosaic of tobacco. J. agric. Res. 51, 951 (1935).Google Scholar
  890. McKinney, H. H.: (3) Virus mutation and the gene concept. J. Hered. (Am.) 28, 51 (1937).Google Scholar
  891. Merrill, M. M.: The mass factor in immunological studies upon viruses. J. Immunol (Am.) 30, 169 (1936).Google Scholar
  892. Morton-Jones, F.: Insect coloration and the relative acceptability of insects to birds. Trans. R. ent. Soc. London 80, 345 (1932).Google Scholar
  893. Pantin, C. F.: Physiological adaptation. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool., London 37, 705 (1932).Google Scholar
  894. Penrose, L. S. and J. B. S. Haldane: Mutation rates in man. Nature (Brit.) 135, 907 (1935).Google Scholar
  895. Reichert, E. T.: A biochemic basis for the study of problems of taxonomy. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. 270, pt. l.Google Scholar
  896. Reimann, H. A.: The reversion of R to S pneumococci. J. exper. Med. (Am.) 40, 237 (1929).Google Scholar
  897. Riley, N. D.: Presidential address. Proc. S. Lond. ent. nat. Rist. Soc., p. 74 (1924).Google Scholar
  898. Robson, G. C.: The species problem. Edinburgh-London, 1928.Google Scholar
  899. Robson, G. C. and O. W. Richards: The variation of animals in nature. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1936.Google Scholar
  900. Salaman, R. N.: (1) Protective inoculation against a plant virus. Nature (Brit.) 131, 468 (1933).Google Scholar
  901. Salaman, R. N.: (2) The potato virus “X” its strains and reactions. Philos. Trans. London 229, 137 (1938).Google Scholar
  902. Thung, T. H.: Smetstof en plantencel bij enkels virusziekten van de tabaksplant. Hdb. ned.-ind. natuurw. Congr., p. 459. Bandoerg (Java), 1931.Google Scholar
  903. Timofféeff-Ressovsky, N. W.: (1) The experimentell production of mutations. Biol. Rev. Cambridge philos. Soc. 9, 411 (1934).Google Scholar
  904. Timofféeff-Ressovsky, N. W.: (2) A discussion on the prcsent state of the theory of natural selection. Proc. roy. Soc. London, Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 121, 45 (1936).Google Scholar
  905. Willis, A. G.: Age & Area. Cambridge: University Press, 1922.Google Scholar
  906. Yudkin, J.: Enzyme variation in microorganisms. Biol. Rev. Cambridge philos. Soc. 13, 93 (1938).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1938

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. M. Findlay
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellcome Bureau of Scientific ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations