Applied Welfare Indicators and the Economics of Exhaustible Resources
In the past, many economists writing on the subject of exhaustible resources have utilized the concept of consumer surplus as the benefit function to be evaluated [e.g. Hotelling, 1931; Manne]. Unfortunately, as is well-known, this measure, first proposed by Dupuit in 1844, is fraught with difficulties. However, many economists have doggedly refused to abandon consumer surplus procedures, largely on the grounds that no suitable alternative exists. Fortunately, this is no longer the case. In this paper, I propose to develop a simple computational procedure for accurately approximating welfare variations. The method represents an extension of the procedures discussed by Pearce and myself [1976, 1982a].
KeywordsDemand Function Marginal Utility Consumer Surplus Welfare Indicator Benefit Function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Antonelli, G.B.: Sulla teoria matematica della economia politica. Pisa 1886; English translation “On the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy” J.S. Chipman et al. Preferences, Utility and Demand. New York 1971, 332–364.Google Scholar
- Hildebrand, F.B.: Introduction to Numerical Analysis. New York 1974.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, G.W.: Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology: A Comment. American Economic Review 69, 1979, 465–468.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, G.W.: New Methods for Measuring Economic Welfare. Cambridge 1982.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, G. W., and I.F. Pearce: Welfare Measurement — A Unification. American Economic Review 72, 1982.Google Scholar
- Pearce, I.F.: A Contribution to Demand Analysis. Oxford 1964.Google Scholar
- Samuelson, P.A.: Constancy of the Marginal Utility of Income. Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics. Ed. by O. Lange, F. Mclntyre, and T.O. Yntema, Chicago 1942.Google Scholar
- Samuelson, P.A.: Complementarity — An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory. Journal of Economic Literature 12, 1255–89.Google Scholar
- Vartia, Y. O.: Efficient Methods of Measuring Welfare Change and Compensated Income in Terms of Market Demand Functions. Keskustelvaiheta Discussion Papers, No. 20. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki 1978.Google Scholar
- Willig, R.D.: Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology: Reply. American Economic Review 69, 1979, 469–474.Google Scholar