Advertisement

Specialized Training for Research

  • Leslie Phillips

Abstract

In clinical psychology the concept of research includes the development of new knowledge and new methods in the area of mental health programming. As noted in the report16 on the Stanford Conference, “Present knowledge of the nature, etiology and treatment of mental illness and of the factors involved in the establishment and maintenance of mental health is so inadequate that research must be given highest priority,” and “... opinion favored placing higher priority on research and on the development of preventive programs” (p. 128).

Keywords

Mental Health Specialized Training Clinical Psychologist Graduate Education Mental Health Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychological Association, Education and Training Bd., Ad Hoc Comm., Education for research in psychology. Amer. Psychol., 1959, 14, 167–179. (Estes Park Seminar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, K. E., The summary of progress. In Training for research in psychology, K. S. Bernhardt, ed. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1961, 119–123.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coons, W. H., Training for clinical research. In Training for research in psychology, K. S. Bernhardt, ed. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1961, 99.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennis, W., Productivity among American psychologists. Amer. Psychol., 1954, 9, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garmezy, N., Some problems related to training for research in clinical psychology. Paper read at APA, New York, Sept., 1957.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holzberg, J., Research training during the internship. In Training for clinical psychology, M. H. P. Finn and F. Brown, eds. New York: International Universities Press, 1959, 120–138.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly, E. L., Clinical Psychology—1960. Newsletter, Div. of Clin. Psychol., APA, 1961, 14, 1–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly, E. L., and Goldberg, L. R., Correlates of later performance and specialization in psychology. Psychol. Monogr., 1959, 73 (12, Whole No. 482).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy, L. H., The skew in clinical psychology. Amer. Psychol., 1962, 17, 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pratt, S., Of myth and models: An agonizing reappraisal. Paper read at APA, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Price, D. J. de S., A calculus of science. International Science & Technology, 1963, 15, 37–43.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabin, A. I., Doctoral dissertations in clinical training programs: 1948–1953. Amer. Psychol., 1954, 9, 114–116. Cited in L. H. Levy, The skew in clinical psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raimy, V. C. ed., Training in clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1950.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodnick, E. H., Training for research in the mental health field. In Psychology and mental health. C. R. Strother, ed. Washington, D.C.: APA, 1956, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Segal, J., Personal communication. May, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strother, C. R. ed., Psychology and mental health. Washington, D.C.: APA, 1956.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tryon, R. C., Psychology in flux: the academic-professional bipolarity. Amer. Psychol., 1963, 18, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, The research grant program of the National Institute of Mental Health (1961). Bethesda, Md.: 1962.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yates, M., and Ross, J., A new approach to training in research design. Amer. Psychol., 1963, 18, 214–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie Phillips

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations