Abstract
A sign indicates something else than what it is in itself, and it combines the functions of signifying and of indicating as its most essential characteristics. The function of signifying serves the recognition of a cognition-content other than the sign itself; so for instance does smoke signify the related cognition-content of fire, and a frown signifies anger or perplexity. The function of indicating the cognition-content of what the sign signifies serves the purpose of suggesting a way of behavior related to what the sign signifies. The aspect of signifying is more dominant in signs as the product of a causal relation, whereas the aspect of indicating dominates more in signs as the product of a social contract and in signals, as will be discussed later.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1963 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Wit, G.A. (1963). Sign, Signal, and Symbol. In: Symbolism of Masculinity and Femininity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40397-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40397-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-39351-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-40397-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive