General Orientation

  • Marjorie B. Creelman

Abstract

The search for the meaning of meaning has been pursued for hundreds of years by philosophers and theologians, but until recently only sporadic forays into this misty territory have been attempted by psychologists. It is understandable that this unmapped quagmire has been avoided, and that some hardy adventurers who set out to explore it bogged down. The difficulty of the problems can be appreciated by trying to talk about the meaning of meaning without using the word itself or one of its close synonyms. Yet, according to a standard word count,1 the word “mean” is one of the commonest words in the language, and the concept is so taken for granted that we never wonder if we know what we mean when we say, “I mean.” However, as Brodbeck (1963) pointed out, meaning is a term within science, and as such it must itself be given meaning. That this has not yet been accomplished is evident not only from the statements made by psychologists and philosophers, but also from the nature of the attempts to define the term in the psychologists’ experimental laboratories and from the theoretical controversies which have arisen from those attempts.

Keywords

Hull Wharf Libr Univer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brodbeck, M. Meaning and action. Phil. Sci., 1963, 30(4), 309–324.Google Scholar
  2. Buchler, J. (Ed.). Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer. Press, 1946.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: John Wiley, and Sons, 1956.Google Scholar
  6. Chambliss, R. Mead’s way out of the basic dilemma in modern existential thought. J. soc. Psychol., 1963, 60(2), 213–220.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton, and Co., 1957. Review of Verbal Behavior, By Skinner, B. F., Language, 1959, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guthrie, E. R. Association by contiguity. In: Koch, S. II. 1959.Google Scholar
  9. Koch, S. (Ed.). Psychology: A Study of a Science. II. General systematic formulations, learning, and special processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  10. Koch, S. (Ed.). Psychology: A Study of a Science. VI. Investigations of man as socius: Their place in psychology and the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Langer, S. Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer. Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. Langer, S. Philosophical Sketches. New York: Mentor Books, New Amer. Libr. of World Lit., 1964.Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  14. Mead, G. H. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  15. Mead, G. H. Social Psychology. In: Strauss, A. 1964.Google Scholar
  16. Morris, C. W. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.Google Scholar
  17. Ogden, C. K.,, and Richards, I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Rout-ledge, and Kegan, Paul, Ltd., 1949.Google Scholar
  18. Oscood, C. E. Psycholinguistics. In: KocH, S. VI. 1963.Google Scholar
  19. Peirce, C. S. Philosophical writings. In: Buchler, J. 1955.Google Scholar
  20. Russell, B. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. New York: Norton, 1940.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, B. Dictionary of Mind, Matter, and Morals. New York: Philosophical Library, 1952.Google Scholar
  22. Strauss, A. (Ed.). George Herbert Mead on Social Psychology. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  23. Thorndike, E. L.,, and Lorge, I. The Teacher’s Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York: Teacher’s College ( Bureau of Publications ), Columbia Univer., 1959.Google Scholar
  24. Titchener, E. B. A Beginner’s Psychology. New York: MacMillan, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tolman, E. C. A behavioristic theory of ideas. Psychol. Rev., 1926, 33, 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Titchener, E. B. Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Century, 1932.Google Scholar
  27. Werner, H.,, and Kaplan, B. Symbol Formation. New York: John Wiley, and Sons, 1963.Google Scholar
  28. Whorf, B. L. Language, thought and reality. In: Carroll, J. B. 1956.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjorie B. Creelman
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral and Clinical Studies CenterSaint Elizabeths HospitalUSA

Personalised recommendations