The Patient’s History

  • Morris F. Heller
  • Bernard M. Anderman
  • Ellis E. Singer


Usually when a patient presents himself to an otologist because of impaired hearing he does so with some uneasiness. He has been experiencing, over some length of time, anxiety about himself. Is he really hard of hearing; has his attitude towards his fellows changed, or their attitude towards him? He has been embarrassed and has embarrassed others by failing to hear, or failing to hear correctly.


Hearing Loss Impaired Hearing Will Emit Peritonsillar Abscess Minor Head Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Accepted Apparatus. Council on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, J.A.M.A. 1953.Google Scholar
  2. A Guide for Conservation of Hearing in Industry. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. Subcommittee on Noise in Industry of the Committee on Conservation of Hearing. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. American Standard Acoustical Terminology, Z24.1 New York, American Standards Association, Inc. (ASA). 1951Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, M.: Tinnitus aurium, some considerations concerning its origin and treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Otolarygn. 45: 68, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman, M.: The audiology clinic: A manual for planning a clinic for the rehabilitation of the acoustically handicapped. Acta oto-laryng., Supp. 89. 1950.Google Scholar
  6. Bordley, J. E., and Hardy, W. G.: A study in objective audiometry with the use of a psychogalvanometric response. Ann. Otol., Rhin. & Laryng. 58: 751–760, 1949.Google Scholar
  7. Denes, P., and Naunton, R. E.: The clinical detection of auditory recruitment. J. Laryng. & Oto. 64: 375–398, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dix, M. R., and Hallpike, C. S.: Peep show—new technique for pure tone audiometry in young children. Brit M.J. 2: 719–723, 1947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dix, M. R., Hallpike, C. S., and Hood, J. D.: Observations upon the loudness and recruitment phenomenon, with special reference to the differential diagnosis of disorders of the internal ear and VIII nerve. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 61: 516–526, 1948.Google Scholar
  10. Doerfler, L. G., and Stewart K.: Malingering and psychogenic deafness. J. Speech Disorders. 11: 181–186, 1946.Google Scholar
  11. Eby, L. G., and Williams, H. L.: Recruitment of loudness in the differential diagnosis of end-organ and nerve fiber deafness. Laryngoscope. 61: 400–414, 1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fletcher, H., and Munson, W. A.: Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Jour. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 5: 82–108, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fowler, E. P.: Tests of hearing. In Medicine of the Ear. Fowler, E. P., Jr., Ed. New York, Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1939.Google Scholar
  14. —: Tinnitus aurium in the light of recent research. Ann. Otol., Rhin. & Laryng. 50: 139, 1943.Google Scholar
  15. —: The control of head noises, their illusion of loudness and timbre. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 37: 391, 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —: Tinnitus in normal and diseased ears. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 39: 498, 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ——: Nonvibratory tinnitus, factors underlying subaudible and audible irritations. Transact. Am. Laryng., Rhin. & Otol. Society, 1947.Google Scholar
  18. —: Emotional factors in tinnitus. Laryngoscope. 58: 145–154, 1948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fowler, E. P., Jr.: Medical aspects of hearing loss. In Hearing and deafness. H. David Ed. pp. 67-100. New York, Rinehart, 1947.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, J. D.: An historical and critical review of loudness recruitment. New London, Conn: Naval Medical Research Laboratory, Report No. 200, Vol. XI, 1952.Google Scholar
  21. —: Normal hearing and its relation to audiometry. Laryngoscope. 64: 928–956, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller, M. F.: Audiology. New York Med. 7: 16-17, 34–37, 1951.Google Scholar
  23. —, and Bergman, M.: Tinnitus aurium in normal hearing persons. Ann. Otol., Rhin. & Laryng. 61: 78–83, 1953.Google Scholar
  24. —, and Lindenberg, P.: The private practice of auditory rehabilitation. Ann. Otol., Rhin. & Laryng. 63: 130, 1954.Google Scholar
  25. —: Evaluation of deafness of non-organic origin. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 58: 575–581, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirsh, I. J.: The measurements of hearing. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1952.Google Scholar
  27. —, Palva, T., and Goodman, A.: Difference limen and recruitment. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 60: 525–540, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hudgins, C. V., Hawkins, J. E., and Karlin, J. E.: The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing losses for speech. Laryngoscope. 57: 57–89, 1947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ——, and Ross, D. A.: The measurement of hearing. Volta Review, 49: No. 3, 1947.Google Scholar
  30. Jerger, J. F.: A difference limen recruitment test and its diagnostic significance. Laryngoscope. 62: 1316–1332, 1952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —: Difference limen difference test. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 57: 490–500, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kastein, S., and Fowler, E. P. Jr.: Differential diagnosis of communication disorders in children referred for hearing disorders. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 60: 468–477, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerrison, P. D.: Disease of the ear, p. 130. Philadelphia, J. P. Lippincott, 1930.Google Scholar
  34. Kopetzky, S. J.: Deafness, tinnitus, and vertigo, p. 153. New York, Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1948.Google Scholar
  35. Lempert, J.: Tympano-sympathectomy, a surgical technic for the relief of tinnitus. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 43: 199, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lüscher, E., and Zwislocki, S.: A simple method for indirect monaural determination of the recruitment phenomenon, difference limen in intensity in different types of deafness. Acta oto-larygn., Supp. 78: 156–168, 1949.Google Scholar
  37. Michels, M. W., and Randt, C. T.: Galvanic skin response in a differential diagnosis of deafness. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 45: 302–311, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Priest, R. E.: Tests for unilateral deafness. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryn. 42: 138–143, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reger, S. N.: Differences in loudness response of the normal and hard of hearing at intensity levels slightly above threshold. Ann. Otol., Rhin. & Laryng. 45: 1029–1039, 1936.Google Scholar
  40. Report on the Relations of Hearing Loss to Noise Exposure. Z24-X-2. New York, American Standards Association, Inc. (ASA), 1954.Google Scholar
  41. Saltzman, M.: Clinical audiology. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1949.Google Scholar
  42. Sonnenschein, R.: The nose, throat and ears and their diseases. Jackson, C. and Coates, G. M., Ed. pp. 472-491. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1930.Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, S. S., and Davis, H.: Hearing. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1947.Google Scholar
  44. Utley, J.: Suggestive procedures for determining auditory acuity in very young acoustically handicapped children. Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Monthly. 28: 590–595, 1949.Google Scholar
  45. Wegel, R. L.: A study of tinnitus. A.M.A. Arch. Otolaryng. 24: 158, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1955

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris F. Heller
    • 1
  • Bernard M. Anderman
  • Ellis E. Singer
  1. 1.The Audiology ClinicThe Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations