Skip to main content

The Partitioning of a Data Base Into Subfiles Matching User’s Queries

  • Chapter
GI-4.Jahrestagung

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 26))

  • 830 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses the splitting of files into smaller portions as dictated by the usage pattern in order to improve the data base performance. The feasibility of the splitting is shown. The treatment is within the context of the relational model of data [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Codd, E.F. “A relational model of data for large shared data banks”, Communication of ACM, Vol 13, No. 6, June 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, D.: “ROBOT - A new approach to database management”, Fourth European Conference on EDP Developments in Department Stores, London, November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osman, I.M.: “Matching the storage to usage pattern in relational data bases” Ph.D. thesis, Durham University, October 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delobel, C.: “Decomposition of a data base and the theory of Casey, R.G. boolean switching functions”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 17, No. 5, September 1973, pp 374–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Rissanen, J.: “Decomposition of files, a basis for data storage and Delobel,C. retrieval”, IBM Research Report, RJ-1220, May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Notley, M.G.: “The Peterlee IS/1 System” IBM (UK) Scientific Centre Report, March 1972, UKSC 0018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyce,Raymond F.: “Using a STRUCTURED English query language as Chaimberlin, a data definition facility”, IBM San Jose Donald D. (California), December 10, 1973, RJ-1318.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casey, R.G.: “Generalised page replacement algorithms in a Osman, I.M. relational data base”, Proceedings 1974 ACMSIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, to be available from ACM HQ, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knuth, D.E.: “The art of computer programming”, Vol. 3, “Sorting and searching”, Addison-Wesley, 1973, pp. 506–542.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wishart,: David “CLUSTAN USER”, Computing Laboratory, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, 1969 (obtainable from the author)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osman, I.M. (1975). The Partitioning of a Data Base Into Subfiles Matching User’s Queries. In: Siefkes, D. (eds) GI-4.Jahrestagung. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40087-6_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40087-6_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-39104-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-40087-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics