Skip to main content
  • 235 Accesses

Abstract

There is a considerable gap separating personality theory and techniques used to measure personality variables even though theoretical considerations guide the use of projective techniques from the initial selection of the specific method to the final step of interpreting the data derived from it. Many of these theoretical conceptions are often the idiosyncratic products of the practicing clinical psychologist rather than formal psychological theory. This chapter is concerned with the latter—explicit attempts to formally relate psychological theory to projective techniques. It has been suggested (Abt & Bellak, 1950) that theory can serve to reduce two types of clinical errors, i.e., incautious generalizations and over-restricted interpretations. Holt (1954) stresses that understanding the psychological processes involved in projective testing would provide the clinician with greater flexibility in studying personality while it would check his tendency to engage in rank speculation. Rotter (1954) has expressed the opinion that only by explicating the theoretical assumptions underlying methods of personality study will psychologists be able to improve upon these methods and to develop newer and, hopefully, better methods. Furthermore, he feels that with theory the psychologist is better prepared to cope with the unusual client and with new clinical problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abt, L. E. A theory of projective psychology. In L. E. Abt L. Bellak (Eds.). Projective Psychology: Clinical Approaches to the Total Personality. New York: Knopf, 1950. Pp. 33–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abt, L. E., Bellak, L., (Eds.). Projective Psychology: Clinical Approaches to the Total Personality. New York: Knopf, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. Exploration using imaginative thought to assess the strength of human motives. In M. R. Jones (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation-1954. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1954. Pp. 56–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 359–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W., (Ed.). Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auld, F. Contributions of behavior theory to projective techniques. J. Proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 421–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. E. Adaptation level theory: paradigmatic application to projective testing. J. clin. Psychol., 1962, 18, 466–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. E. Clinical validation of adaptation level theory as a framework for projective testing. J. clin. Psychol., 1963, 19, 304–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G. S. A study of the psychoanalytic theory of psychosexual development. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 39, 3–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G. S. The Blacky Pictures: Manual of Instructions. New York: Psychological Corp., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G. S. Defense preferences in four countries. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, M. H., Goss, A. E. Stimulus-response analysis of inferences from projective test behavior. J. Pers., 1957, 25, 525–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brozek, K., Guetzkow, H., Baldwin, M. V. A quantitative study of perception and association in experimental semi-starvation. J. Pers., 1951, 19, 245–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. Perceptual theory and the Rorschach Test. J. Pers., 1948, 17, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A. The projective measurement of experimentally induced levels of sexual motivation. J. ex per. Psychol., 1952, 44, 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. W. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C. Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. Field theory and projective techniques. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 427–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J., Miller, N. E. Personality and Psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. The measurement of drive and conflict in humans: Theory and experiment. In M. R. Jones (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation-1962. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962. Pp. 127–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. Some theoretical considerations on the nature of ambiguity and the use of stimulus dimensions in projective techniques. J. consult. Psychol., 1966, 30, 183–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W. Some implications for TAT interpretation arising from need and perception experiments. J. Pers., 1951, 19, 282–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W. Needs in perception and projective techniques. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 435–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., Lazarus, R. S. Perceptual defense and projective techniques. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. Perceptual regression in schizophrenia: an hypothesis suggested by the use of the Rorschach test. J. genet. Psychol., 1953, 81, 63–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. Perceptual regression in schizophrenia: an hypothesis suggested by the use of the Rorschach test. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 171–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, S. C. Some implications of the new cognitive theory for projective tests. J. consult. Psychol., 1965, 29, 191–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, A. E., Brownell, M. H. Stimulus-response concepts and principles applied to projective test behavior. J. Pers., 1957, 25, 505–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanfmann, E. William Stern on “Projective Techniques.” J. Pers., 1952, 21, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego. Psychoanal. Study Child, 1950, 5, 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. Amer. J. Psychol., 1947, 60, 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 297–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. An experimental approach to personality. Psychiat. Res. Rep., 1955, 2, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. Adaptation level theory. In S. Koch (Ed.). Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 565–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H., Blake, R. R., Mouton, Jane S., Olmstead, J. A. The expression of attitudes as adjustments to stimulus, background and residual factors. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmendinger, L. Perceptual organization and development as reflected in the structure of Rorschach test responses. J. pro j. Tech., 1953, 17, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmendinger, L. Developmental theory and the Rorschach method. In M. A. RickersOvsiankina (Ed.). Rorschach Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 58–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. Implications of some contemporary personality theories for Rorschach rationale. In B. Klopfer, M. D. Ainsworth, W. G. Klopfer, R. R. Holt, Developments in the Rorschach Technique, Vol. I: Technique and Theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace 8c World, 1954. Pp. 501–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. The nature of TAT stories as cognitive products: A psychoanalytic approach. In J. Kagan 8c G. Lesser (Eds.). Contemporary Issues in Thematic Apperceptive Methods. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R., Sc Havel, J. A method for assessing primary and secondary process in the Rorschach. In M. A. Rickers-Ovsiankina (Ed.). Rorschach Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 263–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzberg, J. D. The relevance of personality theory for projective methods. J. prof. Tech., 1954, 18, 418–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzberg, J. D. The clinical and scientific methods: Synthesis or antithesis? J. pro j. Tech., 1957, 21, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzberg, J. D. Projective techniques and resistance to change in psychotherapy as viewed through a communications model. J. pro j. Tech., 1963, 27, 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. Projective techniques and the theory of action. Merrill-Palmer Quart., 1963, 9, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B., Berger, S. Increments and consistency of performance in four repeated Rorschach administrations. J. pro j. Tech., 1956, 20, 304–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, B. Rorschach hypotheses and ego psychology. In B. Klopfer, M. D. Ainsworth, W. G. Klopfer, R. R. Holt, Developments in the Rorschach Technique, Vol. 1: Technique and Theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace World, 1954. Pp. 561–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner, A. F. Theoretical considerations concerning the scope and limitations of projective techniques. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.). Handbook of Projective Techniques. New York: Basic Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kris, E. Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. A substitutive-defensive conception of apperceptive fantasy. In J. Kagan Sc G. S. Lesser (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Thematic Apperceptive Methods. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1961. Pp. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, G. Projective Techniques and Cross-Cultural Research. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. Some social consequences of achievement motivation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation-1955. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1955. Pp. 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., Sc Lowell, E. L. The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meili-Dworetzki, G. The development of perception in the Rorschach. In B. Klopfer (Ed.). Developments in the Rorschach Technique, Vol. II: Fields of Application. Yonkers: World Book, 1956. Pp. 104–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., Pribram, K. H. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.). Personality and the Behavior Disorders. New York: Ronald, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1948, 43, 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. Comments on theoretical models, illustrated by the development of a theory of conflict behavior. J. Pers., 1951, 20, 82–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation, and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.). Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 196–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. The projection of hostility on the Rorschach and as a result of ego threat. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 418–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. Nonprojective determinants of perception on the TAT. J. consult. Psychol., I958a, 22, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. Some determinants of the perception of hostility. J. consult. Psychol., 1958b, 22, 65–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. A conceptual model of projective techniques applied to stimulus variations with thematic techniques. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. Assumptions, adaptation level, and projective techniques. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.). Handbook of Projective Techniques. New York: Basic Books, 1965. Pp. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena, C. D. A genetic evaluation of perceptual structuralization in cerebral pathology: an investigation by means of the Rorschach test. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 186–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., Bruner, J. S. McGinnies, E. Personal values as selective factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1948, 43, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. K. R., Ramadevi, T. Situational analysis of TAT responses. J. All-India Inst. Ment. Health, 1958, 1, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. Principles underlying projective techniques. Char. Pers.,1942, 10,213219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. The Rorschach Test: a clinical evaluation. Bull. Menninger Clinic, 1945, 9, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. The theoretical implications of diagnostic testing procedures. Internat. Congr. psychiat. Rep., 1950, 2, 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D. Projective techniques and the theory of thinking. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 269–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D., Gill, M., Schafer, R. Diagnostic Psychological Testing: The Theory, Statistical Evaluation and Diagnostic Application of a Battery of Tests, Vol. 1. Chicago: Year Book Publishers, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, D., Gill, M., Schafer, R. Diagnostic Psychological Testing: The Theory, Statistical Evaluation and Diagnostic Application of a Battery of Tests, Vol. 2. Chicago: Year Book Publishers, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickers-Ovsiankina, M. A. Rorschach Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. Psychodiagnostics: A Diagnostic Test Based on Perception (4th ed.). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1942. (Originally published in 1921 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H., Oberholzer, E. The application of the form interpretation test. In H. Rorschach, Psychodiagnostics: A Diagnostic Test Based on Perception (4th ed.). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1942. ( Originally published in 1921 ). Pp. 184–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. Some implications of a social learning theory for the prediction of goal directed behavior from testing procedures. Psychol. Rev., 1960, 67, 301–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. Being and Nothingness. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtel, E. G. Subjective definitions of the Rorschach test situation and their effect on test performance. Psychiatry, 1945, 8, 419–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. Psychoanalytic Interpretation in Rorschach Testing: Theory and Application. New York: Grune and Stratton, I954a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. Some applications of contemporary psychoanalytic theory to projective testing. J. proj. Tech., 1954b, 18, 441–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. Regression in the service of the ego: The relevance of a psychoanalytic concept for personality assessment. In G. Lindzey (Ed.). Assessment of Human Motives. New York: Rinehart, 1958. Pp. 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, R. R., Whiting, J. M. W., Nowlis, V., Sears, P. S. Some child rearing antecedents of aggression and dependency in young children. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1953, 47, 135–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, E. L. Genetic parallels of perceptual structuralization in paranoid schizophrenia: An analysis by means of the Rorschach technique. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. Models of Man. New York: Wiley, 1957. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A. Statistical Decision Functions. New York: Wiley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. Comparative Psychology of Mental Development (rev. ed.). Chicago: Follet, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holzberg, J.D. (1968). Psychological Theory and Projective Techniques. In: Rabin, A.I. (eds) Projective Techniques in Personality Assessment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39577-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39577-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-38702-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-39577-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics