Advertisement

Psychopathology, Assessment, and Psychotherapy

  • Max L. Hutt

Abstract

The task of assessing the human personality is beset with many obstacles. As even the layman “knows,” personality is highly complex. The psychologist has learned, moreover, from research and from clinical experience, that the personality may be conceptualized in many different Ways, that it is a variable phenomenon in respect to both time and situation, and that the meaning of any component in the make-up of person ality is highly dependent on other components and their organization. Any method of assessing “the personality” or aspects of the personality has serious limitations as well as possible virtues. The projective app roach to assessment is, as we shall see, even more hazardous than many of the so-called objective methods of measurement; at the same time, the projective method has many advantages, chief among which, according to the present writer, is that it examines the personality “in process,” i.e., while it is functioning (Hutt, 1945).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, California: 1950 and each year thereafter.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, R., Harrock, P. Sexual identification and the first figure drawn. consult. Psychol, 1961, 25, 51-59.Google Scholar
  3. Auld, F. J., Leonard, D. The use of Rorschach scores to predict whether patients will continue in psychotherapy. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 104–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank, L. Psychological Evaluation in Psychotherapy: Ten Case Histories. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, A. C. et al. The Prediction of Overt Behavior through the Use of Projective Techniques. Springfield, I11.: Charles C Thomas, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L. J. Response sets and test validity. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 1946, 6, 475–494.Google Scholar
  7. Endicott, N. A., Endicott, J. Prediction of improvement in treated and untreated patients using the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale. J. consult. Psychol, 1964, 28, 342–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiske, D. W., Cartwright, D. S., Kirtner, W. L. Are psychotherapeutic changes predictable? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1964, 69, 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibby, R. G., Stotsky, B. A., Miller, D. R., Hiler, E. W. Prediction of duration of therapy from the Rorschach Test. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 348–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goertzel, V. Shifts in Personality in the Rorschach Test and in Psychotherapy. Un published doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1953.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton, R. G., Robertson, M. H. Examiner influence on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. J. prof. Tech. & Pers. Assess., 1966, 30, 553–558.Google Scholar
  12. Hartlage, L. Common psychological tests applied to the assessment of brain damage. J. prof. Tech. & Pers. Assess., 1966, 30, 319–338.Google Scholar
  13. Henry, W. E. The Analysis of Fantasy. New York: Wiley, 1956.Google Scholar
  14. Hertzman, M., Pearce, J. The personal meaning of the human figures in the Rorschach. Psychiatry, 1947, 10, 413–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutt, M. L. The use of projective methods of personality measurement in Army medical installations. J. clin. Psychol., 1945, 1, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutt, M. L., Shor, J. Rationale for routine Rorschach “Testing-the-Limits.” Rorschach Research Exchange, 1946, 10, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutt, M. L. A clinical study of “consecutive” and “adaptive” testing with the Revised Stanford-Binet. J. consult. Psychol, 1947, 11, 93–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutt, M. L., Gibby, R. G., Milton, E., Potthurst, K. The effect of varied experimental “sets” on Rorschach test performance. J. proj. Tech., 1950, 14, 181–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutt, M. L. The psychodiagnostic test battery: general considerations. In D. Brower L. E. Abt (Eds.). Progress in Clinical Psychology, volume III. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1958.Google Scholar
  20. Hutt, M. L., Briskin, G. J. The Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1960.Google Scholar
  21. Hutt, M. L., & Feuerfile, D. The clinical meanings and predictions of a measure of perceptual adience-abience for a deaf-retarded group. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Philadelphia, Pa., 1963.Google Scholar
  22. Hutt, M. L., Isaacson, R. L., Blum, M. L. Psychology: The Science of Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
  23. Knight, R. P., Friedman, C. R. (Eds.). Psychoanalytic Psychiatry and Psychology. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  24. Kornrich, M. (Ed.). Psychological Test Modifications. Springfield, I11.: Charles C Thomas, 1965.Google Scholar
  25. Kutash, S. B. The Rorschach examination and psychotherapy. Amer. J. Psychother., 1951, 5, 405–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewin, K. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.Google Scholar
  27. Machover, K. Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure. Springfield, I11.: Charles C Thomas, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Connor, J. F., Daniels, G., Karush, A., Moses, L., Flood. C, Stern, L. O. The effects of psychotherapy on the course of ulcerative colitis-a preliminary report. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1964, 120, 738–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Piotrowski, Z. A., Schreiber, M. Rorschach perceptanalytic measurement of personal ity changes during and after psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. In G. Bychowski (Ed.). Specialized Techniques in Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, 1952.Google Scholar
  30. Pope, B., Siegman, A. An intercorrelational study of some indices of verbal fluency. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rapaport, D. The theoretical implications of diagnostic testing procedures. In R. P. Knight C. R. Friedman (Eds.). Psychoanalytic Psychiatry and Psychology. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  32. Rhode, A. R. The Sentence Completion Method. New York: Ronald Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  33. Rioch, M. J. The use of the Rorschach test in the assessment of change in patients under psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 1949, 12, 427–434.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, C. R., Dymond, R. F. (Eds.). Psychotherapy and Personality Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, C. R., Hammond, K. R. Predictions of the results of therapy by means of the Rorschach test. J. consult. Psychol, 1953, 17, 8–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarason, S. B. The Clinical Interaction. New York: Harper, 1954.Google Scholar
  37. Sargent, H., Mayman, M. Clinical psychology. In S. Arieti (Ed.). American Hand book of Psychiatry, Volume 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959.Google Scholar
  38. Schafer, R. Psychoanalytic Interpretation in Rorschach Testing. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1954.Google Scholar
  39. Shneidman, E. S. (Ed.). Thematic Test Analysis. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1951.Google Scholar
  40. Shuey, A. M. The Testing of Negro Intelligence. Lynchburg, Va.: J. P. Bell, 1958.Google Scholar
  41. Spiegelman, L., Klopfer, B. Rorschach reactions and child therapy: a case study. In B. Klopfer, et al. (Eds.). Developments in the Rorschach Technique, volume 2. New York: Basic Books, 1956.Google Scholar
  42. Stone, H. The relationship of hostile-aggressive behavior to aggressive content on the Rorschach and the TAT. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 1953.Google Scholar
  43. Wallen, R. W. Clinical Psychology. The Study of Persons. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  44. Weiss, R. L., Krasner, L., Ullman, L. Responsivity of psychiatric patients to verbal conditioning: “success” and “failure” conditions and patterns of reinforced trials. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittaker, E. M., Gilchrist, J. C, Fisher, J. Perceptual defense or response suppression? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1952, 47, 732–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max L. Hutt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations