Integration Of Projective Techniques in the Clinical Case Study

  • Walter G. Klopfer


It is regrettable that as clinical psychologists, so many of us acquire consummate skill in detecting the fine points of interpretation of psychological tests, reading between every line in an interview, and splitting every diagnostic hair without having any clear guidelines as to what to do with this information and what the purpose of the evaluation should really be. As scientist-clinicians, we have a nagging curiosity which generates an interest in doing the case study for its own sake, because we hope that it will help us to gain a broader and deeper understanding of any given personality and build up our apperceptive reservoir. However, in looking at the matter somewhat more practically, we see that there are really three parties involved in the clinical case study whose needs must be considered and somewhat met if the whole project is to be worthwhile. These are the examiner, the patient, and the reader of the clinical case study. Each one of these has a stake in the enterprise although each may perceive his interests in a somewhat different manner. In addition to his rational goals, the examiner, for instance, may want to use the clinical case study as a way of communicating a certain impression to the reader: he might like the reader to consider him erudite, sophisticated, agreeable, gregarious, or intellectually stimulating. It may be that the clinical case study will serve as a political instrument, designed to sell a particular point of view to anyone who may come across it. It is possible that interprofessional or intraprofessional relationships which are currently tense will be attacked indirectly through a description of certain kinds of causality and the prediction of certain outcomes on the basis of the case study.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, F., & Walter, V. A. The relationship between a self-and-other reference sentence completion test. J. counsel. Psychol., 1957, 4, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, S. J. Rorschach’s Test. Vol. II. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1945.Google Scholar
  3. Bendick, Maureen, & Klopfer, W. G. The effects of sensory deprivation and motor inhibition on Rorschach movement responses. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1964, 28, 261–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burwen, L. S., Campbell, D., & Kidd, J. The use of a sentence completion test in measuring attitudes toward superiors and subordinates. J. appl. Psychol., 1956, 40, 248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davids, A., & Pildner, H. Jr. Comparison of direct and projective methods of personality assessment under different conditions of motivation. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 72, No. 11 (Whole No. 464).Google Scholar
  6. Dorris, R. J., Levinson, D. J., & Hanfmann, Eugenia. Authoritarian personality studied by a new variation of the sentence completion test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elizur, A. Content analysis of the Rorschach with regard to anxiety and hostility. Ror. Res. Exch., 1949, 13, 247–284.Google Scholar
  8. Filmer-Bennett, G., & Klopfer, W. G. Levels of awareness in projective tests. J. proj. Tech., 1962, 26, 34–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finney, B. C. Rorschach test correlates of assaultive behavior. J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 6–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forer, B. The fallacy of personal validation; a classroom demonstration of gullibility. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfield, S. L., Heine, R. W., & Leventhal, M. An evaluation of psychological reports in a clinical setting. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 281–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Getzels, J. W., & Walsh, J. J. The method of paired direct and projective questionnaires in the study of attitude structure and socialization. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 72 (1).Google Scholar
  13. Gray, S. W., & Klaus, R. The assessment of parental identification. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 54, 87–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Klopfer, B., Ainsworth, Mary D., Klopfer, W. G., & Holt, R. R. Developments in the Rorschach Technique. Vol. I. New York: World Book, 1954.Google Scholar
  15. Klopfer, W. G. The Psychological Report: Use and Communication of Psychological Findings. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1960.Google Scholar
  16. Leary, T. F. The Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald, 1957.Google Scholar
  17. Lindgren, H. The use of SCT in measuring attitudes among college freshmen. J. soc. Psychol, 1954, 40, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGreevey, J. C. Interlevel disparity and predictive efficiency. J. proj. Tech., 1962, 26, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McReynolds, P. Perception of Rorschach concepts as related to personality deviations. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masling, J. The effects of warm and cold interaction on the administration and scoring of an intelligence test. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matarazzo, J. D., Allen, Bernadene, Saslow, G., & Wiens, A. N. Characteristics of successful policemen and firemen applicants. J. appl. Psychol, 1964, 48, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meltzoff, J. The effect of mental set and item structure upon response to a projective test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1951, 46, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murstein, B. I. The projection of hostility on the Rorschach and as a result of ego threat. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 418–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murstein, B. I. Theory and Research in Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  25. Rhode, Amanda, R. Explorations in personality by the sentence completion method. J. appl Psychol, 1946, 30, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, H. K., & Dellis, N. P. An exploratory investigation into the levels hypothesis. J. proj. Tech., 1960, 24, 333–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stotsky, B. A., & Weinberg, H. The prediction of the psychiatric patients’ work adjustment. J. counsel. Psychol, 1956, 3, 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomkins, S. Thematic Apperception Test. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ullmann, L. P., Berkman, V. C., & Hammister, R. C. Psychological reports related to behavior and benefit of placement in home care. J. din. Psych., 1958, 14, 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Warren, Sue, & Klopfer, W. G. Prediction of Public Image by Means of Self-report. (unpublished study).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter G. Klopfer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations