Abstract
A modern introduction to projective techniques does not merely concentrate its attention on the “tried and true” method. Techniques must be included which reflect outstanding promise for the future and which serve as new and creative variations of the Old.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Introduction
Bolgar, Hedda, & Fischer, Liselotte K. Personality projection in the world test. Amer. J.Orthopsychiat., 1947, 17, 117–128.
Buhler, Charlotte, Lumry, Gayle, K., & Carrol, Helen, S. World test standardization studies. J. Child Psychiat., 1951, 2, 1–81.
Levy, L. H. Psychological Interpretation. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehard, & Winston, 1963.
Lowenfeld, Margaret. The world technique. Top. Probl. Psychother., 1960, 3, 248–263.
The Human Face: The Szondi Test
Aumack, L. The Szondi: internal or external validation? Percept, mot. Skills, 1957, 7, 7–15.
Barraclough, Patricia, Cole, D., & Reeb, Mildred. The influence of test instructions on Szondi results. J. din. Psychol., 1952, 8, 165–167.
Bell, C. Essays on the Anatomy of Expression in Painting. London: Longmans, Green, 1806.
Borstelman, L. J., & Klopfer, W. G. The Szondi test: a review and critical evaluation. Psychol. Bull, 1953, 50, 112–132.
Chambers, J. L., & Lieberman, L. Differences between normal and clinical groups in Judging, evaluating, and associating needs. J. clin. Psychol, 1965, 21, 145–149.
Cohen, J., & Feigenbaum, L. The assumption of additivity on the Szondi test. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 11–16.
Coulter, W. M. The Szondi test and the prediction of antisocial behavior. J. proj. Tech., 1959, 23, 24–29.
Darwin, C. Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Murray Publishers, 1872.
David, H. P. A Szondi test bibliography, 1939-1953. J.proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 17–32.
David, H. P., Orne, M., & Rabinowitz, W. Qualitative and quantitative Szondi diagnosis. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 75–78.
David, H. P., & Rabinowitz, W. The development of a Szondi instability score. J. consult. Psychol, 1951, 15, 334–336.
David, H. P., & Rabinowitz, W. Szondi patterns in epileptic and homosexual males. J. consult. Psychol, 1952, 16, 247–250.
Davis, N. E., & Raimy, V. Stimulus functions of the Szondi cards. J. clin. Psychol, 1952, 8, 155–160.
Deri, Susan. Introduction to the Szondi Test. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1949.
Deri, Susan. The Szondi test. In Abt, L. E. & Bellak, L. Projective Psychology. New York: Knopf, 1950. Pp. 298–321.
Deri, Susan. Differential diagnosis of delinquents with the Szondi test. J. proj. Tech., 1954 18, 33–41.
Drombose, L. A., & Slobin, M. S. The IES test. Percept, mot. Skills, 1958, 8, 347–389.
Dudek, F., & Patterson, H. Relationship among the Szondi test items. J. consult. Psychol, 1952, 16, 389–394.
Eriksen, C. W. Needs in perception and projective techniques. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 425–440.
Fleishman, M. The discriminative power of Szondi’s quotient of tendency tension. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 42–46.
Fleishman, M. The investigation of changes in directional reactions on the Szondi test. J. gen. Psychol, 1956, 54, 197–202.
Fosberg, I. A. Four experiments with the Szondi test. J. consult. Psychol, 1951, 15, 39–44.
Glad, D. D., & Shearn, C. R. An emotional projection test. Percept, mot. Skills, 1956, 6, 1–12 (Monogr. suppl. no. 1).
Gordon, L. V. A factor analysis of the 48 Szondi pictures. J. Psychol, 1953, 36, 387–392.
Guerrier, R. La signification du facteur 021Cm021D de Szondi. Psyche Paris, 1954, 9, 255–258.
Guertin, W. H. A consideration of factor loadings on the Szondi test. J. clin. Psychol, 1950a, 6, 262–266.
Guertin, W. H. A test of the basic assumption of the Szondi. J. consult. Psychol, 1950b, 14, 404–407.
Guertin, W. H. A comparison of the stimulus values of the Szondi pictures with those of normal Americans. J. clin. Psychol, 1951, 7, 163–166.
Hamilton, J. T. A study of incidental stimulus values in the Szondi test. J. clin. Psychol, 1959, 15, 322–324.
Harrower, Molly. Experimental studies with the Szondi test. Szondi Newsltr., 1949, 1, (suppl.).
Harrower, Molly. The first offender: a study of Juvenile delinquents by the Szondi test. Szondi Newsltr., 1958, 6(3), 1–16.
Hill, V. T. The Szondi test and chance. Szondi Newsltr., 1951, 3, 1–16.
Horrocks, J. E. Assessment of Behavior. Columbus, Ohio: C. E. Merrill Books, 1964. Pp. 66–74.
Horwitz, M. The veridicality of liking and disliking. In Taguiri, R. & Petrullo, L. (Eds.). Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford University Press, 1958. Pp. 191-209.
Hurley, J. R. Psychodiagnostic limitations of Szondi interseries changes. J. clin. Psychol., 1957, 13, 396–399.
Laszlo, C. Die homosexualitat des mannes im Szondi test. Beitr. Sexual. Forsch., 1958, 8, 112.
Lingoes, J. C. Minnesota multiphasic personality test correlates of Szondi picture preferences. Szondi Newsltr., 1957, 6, 1–12.
Logan, J.C. Szondi profile changes from sorrow arousal. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 184–192.
Lubin, A., & Malloy, M. An empirical test of some assumptions underlying the Szondi test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1951, 46, 480–484.
Moser, U. The determination of the relative strength of masculine-feminine drives by means of the Szondi procedure. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 75-88.
Murray, H. A. The effect of fear upon estimates of the maliciousness of other personalities. J. soc. Psychol., 1933, 4, 310–329.
Nolan, E. G. Szondi test protocols of monozygotic and dizygotic twin populations. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 471–476.
Piderit, T. Mimik und Physiognomik, (4th ed.) Detmold & Meyers, 1925.
Rabin, A. I. Szondi’s pictures: identification of diagnosis. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 1950, 45, 392–395.
Rabin, A. I. Genetic factors in the selection and rejection of Szondi’s pictures: a study of twins. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 1952, 22, 551–556.
Rainwater, L. A study of personality deficiencies between middle and lower class adolescents: the Szondi test in culture-personality research. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 54, 3–86.
Ramfalk, C. W., & Rudhe, L. A contradicted hypothesis related to Szondi’s theory: the Szondi test used on alcoholics. Scand. J. Psychol, 1961, 2, 100–104.
Richardson, H. The discriminability of the “drive factors” represented in the Szondi pictures. J. clin. Psychol, 1952, 8, 384–390.
Sappenfield, B. R. Test of a Szondi assumption by means of M-F photographs. J. Pers., 1965, 33, 409–417.
Schafer, R. Review of Deri, Susan, Introduction to the Szondi Test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1950, 45, 184–188.
Scherer, I. W., Winne, J.F., Page, H. A., & Lipton, H. An analysis of patient-examiner interaction with the Szondi pictures. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 225–237.
Scott, E. An investigation of Juvenile profiles on the Szondi test. J. clin. Psychol, 1955, 11, 46–50.
Shipman, W. G. Similarity of personality in the sociometric preference of mental patients. J. clin. Psychol, 1957, 13, 292–294.
Silverstein, A. B. “Diagnosing” Szondi’s pictures. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 396–398.
Simpson, W. H., & Hill, V. T. The effects of verbal reward and punishment upon picture selection on the Szondi test. Szondi Newsltr., 1953, 4, 2–15.
Steinberg, A. Szondi’s pictures: discrimination of diagnosis as a function of psychiatric experience and of internal consistency. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 340–348.
Szollosi, E., Lamphiear, D. E., & Best, H. L. The stimulus values of the Szondi pictures. J. consult. Psychol, 1951, 15, 419–424.
Szondi, L. Contributions to fate analysis: analysis of marriage. Acta Psychol, 1937, 3, 1–80.
Szondi, L. (Tr. by Aull, G.) Experimental Diagnostics of Drives. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952, 18.
Szondi, L. Triebpathologie, Vol. I. Elemente der exakten Triebpsychologie und Trieb- psychiatrie. Bern: Hans Huber, 1952.
Szondi, L. Triebpathologie, Vol II. Ich analyse. Bern: Hans Huber, 1956.
Szondi, L., Moser, U., & Webb, M. W. The Szondi Test in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment. Philadelphia, Penn.: Lippincott, 1959.
Terstenjak, A. A critical study of the hypothesis of the affinity of instincts and sympathetic facial expression. Arch. Psicol. neur. Psich., 1956, 17, 1063–1092.
VanKrevelen, Alice. Some effects of subject-examiner interaction on projective test performance. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 107–109.
Walder, H. Die h-Bedurfnisse und ihre krimogene Bedeutung. Beih. Schweiz. Z. Psychol Anwend., 1955, 26, 112–128.
Warshaw, L., & Bailey, M. Person perception in relation to personality projection. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 216–220.
Whiteman, P. H. An experimental investigation of interseries changes as a diagnostic factor in the Szondi test. Amer. Psychol, 1951, 6, 342 (Abstract).
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. Experimental Psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1954. Pp. 111–120.
The Hand Test
Bell, C. The Hand. Bridgewater Treatise, Vol. IV. London: William Pickering, 1834.
Bricklin, B., Piotrowski, Z., & Wagner, E. The Hand Test: A New Projective Test with Special Reference to the Prediction of Overt Aggressive Behavior. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1962.
Carmichael, L., Roberts, S., & Wessell, N. A study of the judgment of manual expression as presented in still and motion pictures. J. soc. Psychol, 1937, 8, 115–142.
Carus, C. G.Über Grund und Bedeutung der verschiedenen Formen der Hand. Ver- schied. Personen., Stuttgart, 1848.
Hodge, J. R., & Wagner, E., The validity of hypnotically induced emotional states. Amer. J. Hyp., 1964, 7, 37–41.
Huberman, J. A failure of the Wagner Hand Test to discriminate among workers rated high, average, low on activity level and general acceptability. J. pro J. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1964, 28, 280–283.
Kretchmer, E. Korperbau und Charakter. Berlin, 1931.
Loevinger, Jane. Theory and techniques of assessment. Ann. Rev. Psychol, 1959, 10, 287–316.
Selg, H. Der Hand Test. Diagnostica, 1965, 11, 134–137.
Vaschide, N. Essai sur la psychologie de la main. Paris: Riviere Marcel, 1909.
Wagner, E. E. The interaction of aggressive movement responses and anatomy responses on the Rorschach in producing anxiety. J. proj. Tech., 1961a, 25, 212–215.
Wagner, E. E. The use of drawings of hands as a projective medium for differentiating normals and schizophrenics. J. clin. Psychol., 1961b, 17, 279–280.
Wagner, E. E. The Hand Test. Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. Akron, Ohio: Mark James, 1962a.
Wagner, E. E. The use of drawings of hands as a projective medium for differentiating neurotics and schizophrenics. J. clin. Psychol., 1962b, 18, 208–209.
Wagner, E. E. Application of the Hand test indicators of antisocial action tendencies in adults to teenage Juvenile delinquents. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Association, April, 1962c.
Wagner, E. E. Hand test content indicators of overt psychosexual maladjustment in neurotic males. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1963, 27, 357–358.
Wagner, E. E., & Copper, J. Differentiation of satisfactory and unsatisfactory employees at Goodwill Industries with the Hand Test. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1963, 27, 354–355.
Wagner, E. E., & Hawkins, R. Differentiation of assaultive delinquents with the Hand Test. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1964, 28, 363–365.
Wagner, E. E., & Hawver, D. A. Correlations between psychological tests and sheltered workshop performance for severely retarded adults. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1965, 69, 685–691.
Wagner, E. E., & Medvedeff, E. Differentiation of aggressive behavior of institutionalized schizophrenics with the Hand Test. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1963, 27, 111–113.
Wenk, E. Perceptual differences between aggressive and nonaggressive CYA wards. Unpublished manuscript, 1966.
Wolff, Charlotte. The Human Hand. New York: Knopf, 1943.
Wolff, W. The Expression of Personality. New York: Harper, 1943.
Mosaics: The Lowenfeld Mosaic Test (LMT)
Ames, Louise, B., & Ilg, Frances, L. Mosaic Patterns of American Children. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
Ames, Louise B., & Ilg, Frances, L. Age changes in children’s mosaic responses from five to ten years. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1964, 69, 195–245.
Ames, Louise B., Ilg, Frances, L., & August, Judith. The Lowenfeld Mosaic Test: norms for five to ten year old American public school children and comparative study of 3 groups. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1964, 70, 57–95.
Ascough, J. C, & Dana, R. H. Concurrent validation of the mosaic and Bender-Gestalt tests. J. consult. Psychol, 1962, 26, 430–434.
Barron, F. The psychology of imagination. Scient. Amer., 1958199 (3), 150–166.
Bell, J. E. Projective Techniques New York: Longman, Green, 1948.
Bowen, Barbara. An extension of the Mosaic test designed to increase its prognostic value. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 5–16.
Carr, Gwen, L. Mosaic differences in non-institutionalized retarded children. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1958, 62, 908–911.
Colm, Hanna. The value of projective methods in the psychological examination of children: the Mosaic test in conjunction with the Rorschach and Binet tests. Rorschach Res. Exch., J. proj. Tech., 1948, 12, 216–233.
Diamond, B. L., & Schmale, H. The Mosaic test. An evaluation of its clinical application. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1944, 14, 237–250.
Dorken, H., Jr. The Mosaic test: review. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 287–296.
Dorken, H., Jr. The Mosaic test: a second review. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 164–171.
Hansen, I. The Mosaic test as a diagnostic indicator of schizophrenia. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of the Pacific, 1954.
Himmelweit, H. T., & Eysenck, H. J. An experimental analysis of the Mosaic projection test. Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1945, 20, 283–294.
Home, E. P., & Lane, W. P. Constancy or creativity in patterning Mosaic test performance. J. genet. Psychol, 1960, 63, 165–170.
Johnson, T. F. The function of the Mosaic test in clinical practice. J. gen. Psychol., 1957, 56, 51–58.
Kerr, M. The validity of the mosaic test. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1939, 9, 232–236.
Levin, M. L. Validation of the Lowenfeld Mosaic Test. J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 239–248.
Lowenfeld, Margaret. The mosaic test. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1949, 19, 537–550.
Lowenfeld, Margaret. The Lowenfeld Mosaic Test. London: Newman Neame, 1954.
Maher, B., & Martin, A. Mosaic productions in cerebro-arteriosclerosis. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 40–42.
McCullough, T., & Girdner, J. Use of the Lowenfeld Mosaic test with mental defectives. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1949, 53, 486–496.
Metz, J. R. A method for measuring aspects of ego strength. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 457–470.
Pascal, G. R. Gestalt functions: the Bender-Gestalt, Mosaic, and World tests. In Brower, B. & Abt, L. (Eds.). Progress in Clinical Psychology, Vol. I. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952, chapt.
Pelz, K., Pike, F., & Ames, Louise B. A proposed battery of childhood tests for discriminating between different levels of intactness of functions in elderly subjects. J. genet. Psychol., 1962, 100, 23–40.
Reiman, Gertrude, M. The Mosaic test: its applicability and validity. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1950, 20, 600–616.
Rioch, Margaret, J. The mosaic test as a diagnostic instrument and as a technique for illustrating intellectual disorganization. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 89–94.
Shotwell, Anna, M., & Lawrence, E. S. Mosaic patterns of institutionalized mental defectives. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1951, 56, 161–168.
Stewart, Ursula, & Leland, Lorraine, A. American versus English mosaics. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 246–248.
Stewart, Ursula, & Leland, Lorraine, A. Lowenfeld mosaics made by first grade children. J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 62–66.
Stewart, Ursula, Leland, Lorraine, & Strieter, Edith. Mosaic patterns of eighth grade children. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 73–79.
Walker, R. N. Children’s mosaic designs: a normative and validating study of the Lowenfeld mosaic test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1957.
Wertham, F. The mosaic test: technique and psychopathological deductions. In Abt, L. E., & Bellak, L. (Eds.). Projective Psychology: Clinical Approaches to the Total Personality. New York: Knopf, 1950.
Wertham, F., & Golden, Lili. A differential diagnostic method of integrating Mosaics and colored block designs. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1941, 98, 124–131.
Wideman, H. Development and initial validation of an objective scoring method for the Lowenfeld Mosaic Test. J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 177–191.
Zucker, Louise. The clinical significance of the Mosaic and Rorschach methods. Amer. J. Psychother., 1950, 4, 473–474.
Symbols: Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement (KTSA)
Abidin, R. R. KTSA sorting norms for school age children. J. clin. Psychol., 1966, 22, 85–90.
Abidin, R. R. KTSA symbolization norms for school age children: interpretive notes. Unpublished manuscript, Lackland AFB, 1965.
Anderson, L., & Clack, G. S. Interscorer reliability and the KTSA. Unpublished manuscript, Lackland AFB, 1966.
Craddick, R., & Stern, M. Note on the scorer reliability of the KTSA. J. clin. Psychol., 1965, 21, 197.
Fils, D. H. Comparative performance of schizophrenics and normals on an object symbol arrangement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1950.
Fink, H. H., & Kahn, T. C. A comparison of normal and emotionally ill children on the KTSA. J. educ. Res., 1959, 53, 35–36.
Hammer, E. F. Expressive aspects of projective drawings. In Hammer, E. F. (Ed.). The Clinical Application of Projective Drawings. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1958.
Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. G. Conceptual Systems and Personality Organization. New York: Wiley, 1961.
Hedlund, J. L., & Mills, D. H. Cross validation of the KTSA with a psychiatric population. J. clin. Psychol., 1964, 20, 100–103.
Hill, L. K., & Latham, W. R., (Eds.). Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Revised edition (mimeo). Lackland AFB, Texas, 1962.
Kahn, T. C. Manual for the Kahn test of symbol arrangement. Beverly Hills: Western Psychological Service, 1949 (revised, 1953).
Kahn, T. C. Comparative performance of psychotics with brain damage and non- psychotics on an original symbol arrangement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California, 1950.
Kahn, T. C. An original test of symbol arrangement validated on organic psychotics. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 5, 439–444.
Kahn, T. C. Cross validation of the organic brain pathology scale for a test of symbol arrangement. J. consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 130.
Kahn, T. C. Kahn test of symbol arrangement: administration and scoring. Percept, mot. Skills, 1956, 6, 299–334 (suppl. no. 4).
Kahn, T. C. The Kahn test of symbol arrangement: clinical manual. Percept, mot. Skills., 1957, 7, 97–168 (suppl. no. 1).
Kahn, T. C. Auxiliary Evaluation Guide for use with Kahn test of symbol arrangement. Psychological test specialists, 1960.
Kahn, T. C, & Giffen, M. B. Psychological Techniques in Diagnosis and Evaluation. New York: Pergamon Press, 1960.
Kahn, T. C, Ferriman, M., & Ferraro, C. The use of the KTSA in differentiating between normals, neurotics, character disorders, borderline schizophrenics, and psy- chotics. Unpublished manuscript, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1956.
Kahn, T. C, Harter, H., Rider, P., & Lum, M. D. Reliability and validity of the KTSA as a technique in screening schizophrenics, psychotics with brain damage, and non-psychotics. Unpublished manuscript, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1957.
Kenny, J.A. Maladjusted children: a comparison of 216 normal and maladjusted children on the basis of their performance on psychological tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johannes Guttenberg University, Mainz, Germany, 1962.
L’Abate, L., Boelling, G. M., Hutton, R., & Mathews, D. L., Jr. The diagnostic usefulness of four potential tests of brain damage. J. onsult. Psychol., 1962, 26, 479.
L’Abate, L., & Craddick, R. A. The Kahn test of symbol arrangement (KTSA): a critical review. J. din. Psychol., 1965, 21, 115–135.
L’Abate, L., Vogler, R. E., Friedman, W. H., & Chused, T. The diagnostic usefulness of two tests of brain damage. J. din. Psychol., 1963, 19, 87–91.
Murphy, P. D., Ferriman, M. R., & Bolinger, R. W. The Kahn test of symbol arrangement as an aid to psychodiagnosis. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 503–505.
Theiner, E. C. Differences on abstract thought processes as a function of sex. J. gen. Psychol, 1965, 73, 285–290.
Theiner, E. C., & Giffen, M. B. A comparison of abstract thought processes among three cultures. In McKenzie, R. E. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of AF Clinical Psychologists. Brooks AFB, Texas: USAF SAM, 1963.
White, P. O., & McLeod, H. W. A multiple discriminant analysis comparing psychotic, neurotic, and character disorder patients on the Kahn test of symbol arrangement. Ontario Psychol. Assoc. Quart., 1963, 26, 1–5.
Whittick, A. Symbols, Signs, and Their Meaning. Massachusetts: C. T. Branford, 1960.
Wyman, B. A. The effect of sex differences, masculine-feminine interests, and opposite sex roles on performance on the Kahn test of symbol arrangement. Unpublished master’s thesis, New Mexico State University, New Mexico, 1963.
Expressive Motor Activity: Drawing Completion Techniques
Ames, Louise, B., & Hellersberg, E. G. The Horn-Hellersberg test: responses of three to eleven year old children. Rorschach Res. Exch. J. proj. Tech., 1949, 13, 415–432.
Ames, Louise, B., & Ilg, Frances. Mosaic Patterns of American Children. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
Aronfreed, J. M. Moral behavior and sex identity. In Miller, D. R. & Swanson, G. E. (Eds.). Inner Conflict and Defense. New York: Holt, 1960. Pp. 177-193.
Bauer, L. Erfahrungen mit dem Warteggtest auf unserer Kinderstation. Nervenarzt., 1952, 23, 52–55.
Bell, J. E. Projective Techniques. New York: Longman, Green, 1948. Pp. 406–409.
Bell, J. E. The case of Gregor-psychological test data. Rorschach Res. Exch. J. prof. Tech., 1949, 13, 155–205.
Bochnik, H. J. Tests unter alkoholbelastung. II. Wartegg-Zeichentest und psychiatrische iagnostik. Z. diagnost. Psychol., 1954, 2, 33–55.
Engel, Illona, M. A factor analytic study of items from five masculinity-femininity ests. Dissert. Abstr., 1962, 307–308.
Erikson, E. H. Sex differences in the play configuration of preadolescents. Arner. J. rthopsychiat., 1951, 21, 667–692.
Franck, Kate. Preference for sex symbols and their personality correlates. Genet Psychol. Monogr., 1946, 33, 73–123.
Franck, Kate. Franck Drawing completion test: preliminary manual. Melborne, Australia: Australian Counsel for Educational Research (undated, about 1952).
Franck, Kate. Manual for completion test (masculinity-femininity scale). Berkeley, Calif.: E. S. Mimopolous, 1949 (mimeo). Reproduced by Lansky, L., 1958.
Franck, Kate, & Rosen, E. A projective test of masculinity-femininity. J. consult. Psychol, 1949, 13, 247–256.
Fluckiger, F., Tripp, C, & Weinberg, G. A review of experimental research in graphology, 1933-1960. Psychol. Rep. Percept, mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 67–90.
Gough, H. G. Identifying psychological femininity. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1952, 12, 427–439.
Gleser, Goldine, C. Review of Kinget drawing completion test. In Buros, O. K. (Ed.). Fifth Mental Measurements Yearbook. New Jersey: Gryphon Press, 1959. Pp. 130.
Greenstein, J. Father characteristics and sex-role identification in a delinquent group. Dissert. Abstr., 1961, 22, 1716.
Hellersberg, Elizabeth, F. The Horn-Hellersberg Test and adjustment to reality. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1945, 15, 690–710.
Hellersberg, Elizabeth, F. The Individual’s Relation to Reality in Our Culture. Springfield, 111.: Charles C Thomas, 1950.
Hellersberg, Elizabeth, F. The Horn-Hellersberg Test. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Developm., 1953, 16, 138–170, 214-316.
Hellersberg, Elizabeth, F. The Horn-Hellersberg Test. Manual (mimeo), 1961, (3rd edition).
Hippius, M. Graphischer Ausdruck von Gefiihlen. Z. Psychol., 1936, 51, 257.
Jaskar, J. O. Levels of body image assessment of hospitalized and non-hospitalized subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Portland, 1962.
Kass, W. Review of Kinget drawing completion test. In Buros, O. K. (Ed.). Fifth Mental Measurements Yearbook. New Jersey: Gryphon Press, 1959.
Kooser, E. de T. The relation of masculinity-femininity orientation to self-report anxiety. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of North Carolina, 1955.
Kinget, G. Marian. The Drawing Completion Test. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952.
Kinget, G. Marian. The drawing completion test. In Hammer, E. F. (Ed.). The Clinical Application of Projective Techniques. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1958. Pp. 344–364.
Krout, Johanna. Symbol Elaboration Test (SET): the reliability and validity of a new projective technique. Psychol. Monogr., 1950, 64, 1–67.
Lansky, L. Mechanisms of defense: sex identity and defenses against aggression. In Miller, D. & Swanson, G. E. (Eds.). Inner Conflict and Defense. New York: Holt, 1960. Pp. 272–288.
Lansky, L. The stability over time and under stress of conscious and unconscious masculinity-femininity. Amer. Psychol, 1962, 17, 302–303.
Lansky, L. The family structure also affects the model: sex-role identification in parents of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quart., 1964, 10, 39–50.
Lansky, L. References to the Franck drawing completion test. Unpublished manuscript, 1965.
McCaulley, Mary, H. Dimensions of masculinity-femininity in relation to field dependence, dogmatism, and other estimates of perceptual-cognitive differentiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1964.
Murray, H. A. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.
Olson, J. T. The test-retest reliability of the Kinget drawing completion test. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fresno State College, Fresno, California, 1955.
Pikunas, J. Operant conditioning effects upon drawing content. J. proj. Tech. Pers. Assess., 1966, 30, 172–176.
Pikunas, J., & Carberry, H. Standardization of the graphoscopic scale: the content of children’s drawings. J. din. Psychol., 1961, 17, 297–301.
Pintner, R., & Toops, H. A. A drawing completion test. J. applied Psychol, 1918, 2, 164–173.
Reed, M. R. The masculinity-femininity dimension in normal and psychotic subjects. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1957, 55, 289–294.
Sander, F. Experimented Ergebnisse der Gestaltpsychologie. Berlin Kongr. Exp. Psychol, 1928, 23-38.
Sanford, R. N., & others. Physique, Personality, and Scholarship. Wash., D. C. National Res. Council, Soc. Res. Child Develpm., 1943.
Scarpellini, C. Diagnosis della personality col reattivo di realizzazione grafica-dal reattivo di disegno di E. Wartegg (WZT). Contrib. Inst. PsicoL, 1962, 26, 1–83.
Shepler, B. F. A comparison of masculinity-feminitsy measures. J. consult. Psychol, 1951, 15, 484–486.
Takala, M. Studies of the Wartegg drawing completion test. Ann. Acad. Scient.Finl, 1964, 131, 1–112.
Takala, M., & Hakkarainen. M. Über Faktorenstruktur und Validitat des Wartegg-Zeichentests. Ann. Acad. Scient. Finl, 1953, 81 (ser. B), 1–95.
Teepen, Nancy. Sibling relationships in sex-role identification. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ohio State University, 1963.
Wartegg, E. Gestaltung und Charakter. Z. angew. Psychol Beih., 1939, 84.
Weitzenhoffer, A. M. Hypnotic susceptibility as related to masculinity-femininity. Dissert. Abstr., 1957, 17, 1397.
Winer, F. The relationship of certain attitudes toward the mother to sex-role identity. Dissert. Abstr., 1962, 22, 4416.
Acknowledgments
Hellersberg, Elizabeth, F. The Horn-Hellersberg Test and adjustment to reality, Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1945, 15.
Lowenfeld, Margaret. In Stern, E. Handbuch der Klinischen Psychologie, Band I. Die Tests in der Klinischen Psychologie Abteilung II. Rashen, Switzerland, Fig. 1, 665.
Szondi, Lipot. Experimentelle Diagnose der Triebe, 6th ed. Berne, Switzerland: Hans Huber Publishers, 1966.
Wartegg, E. In Kinget, G. Marian. The Drawing Completion Test. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952, ii.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campos, L.P. (1968). Other Projective Techniques. In: Rabin, A.I. (eds) Projective Techniques in Personality Assessment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39575-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39575-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-38701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-39575-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive