Advertisement

The Projective Use of the Bender- Gestalt Test

  • Max L. Hutt

Abstract

As currently employed, the Bender-Gestalt Test consists of nine geometric figures, each of which is presented on a card about the size of the usual index card. Although there have been a number of modifications of these figures, two sets of cards, one prepared by Bender and the other by Hutt (see below), are the ones currently in widest use. These simple materials, the ease and rapidity of their administration, and the increasingly rich clinical and research evidence which have become available, have made this instrument very popular among clinicians. In general, two different, but complementary, approaches have been employed in the use of the test: 1) as a device to assess disturbance in the perceptual-motoric aspects of behavior, usually with some objective measure of the severity of this disturbance; and 2) as a projective technique to assess various aspects of personality functioning, sometimes with objective scores, sometimes with single or configurational indices, and sometimes with careful, clinical evaluation of all aspects of test behavior as well as test performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, R. G., & Hauck, P. A. Correlates of the Bender-Gestalt scores in children. J. din. Psychol., 1960, 11, 153–158.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, L. A Visual Motor Gestalt Test and its Clinical Use. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association, Research Monographs, No. 3, 1938.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, L. Instructions for Use of the Visual Motor Gestalt Test. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association, 1946.Google Scholar
  4. Bender, L. Foreword. In A. Tolor & H. C. Schulberg. An Evaluation of the Bender Gestalt Test. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. Billingslea, F. Y. The Bender-Gestalt: an objective scoring method and validating data. J. clin. Psychol, 1948, 4, 1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billingslea, F. Y. The Bender-Gestalt: a review and a perspective.Psychol. Bull., 1963, 60, 233–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breen, H. The differential diagnostic technique as a measure of hostility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, 1953.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. S., & Krech, D. Perception and Personality: A Symposium. Durham: Duke University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. Clawson, A. The Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test as an index of emotional disturbance in children. J. proj. Tech., 1959, 23, 198–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guertin, W. H. A factor analysis of curvilinear distortions on the Bender-Gestalt. J. clin. Psychol, 1954, 10, 12–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hain, J. D. The Bender Gestalt test: a scoring method for identifying brain damage. J. consult. Psychol, 1964, 28, 34–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutt, M. L. A tentative guide for the administration and interpretation of the Bender-Gestalt Test. U.S. Army Adjutant General’s School, 1945 (Restricted).Google Scholar
  13. Hutt, M. L. The Bender-Gestalt Test. In D. Rosenthal (Ed.). The Genain Quadruplets. New York: Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  14. Hutt, M. L., & Briskin, G. J. The Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1960.Google Scholar
  15. Hutt, M. L., & Feuerfile, D. The clinical meanings and predictions of a measure of perceptual adience-abience for a deaf-retarded group. Paper presented at American Psychological Association, Philadelphia, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. Hutt, M. L. The Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test: Revised. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1968.Google Scholar
  17. Keogh, B. K., & Smith, C. E. Group techniques and proposed scoring system for the Bender-Gestalt test with children. J. clin. Psychol, 1961, 17, 172–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koppitz, E. M. The Bender Gestalt Test for Young Children. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1964.Google Scholar
  19. Mira, E. Myokinetic psychodiagnosis: a new technique for exploring the cognitive trends of the personality. Proc. roy. Soc. Med., 1939-1940, November-April.Google Scholar
  20. Mira, E. Psychiatry in War. New York: Norton, 1943.Google Scholar
  21. Olin, T. D., & Rezinkoff, M. Quantification of the Bender-Gestalt recall: a pilot study. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 265–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pascal, G. R., & Suttell, B. J. The Bender-Gestalt Test: Quantification and Validity for Adults. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1951.Google Scholar
  23. Peek, R. M., & Olson, G. W. The Bender-Gestalt recall as an index of intellectual functioning. J. clin. Psychol, 1955, 11, 185–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, D. The Genain Quadruplets. New York: Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  25. Solley, C. M., & Murphy, G. Development of the Perceptual World. New York: Basic Books, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snortum, J. R. Performance of different diagnostic groups on the tachistoscopic and copy phases of the Bender-Gestalt. J. consult. Psychol, 1965, 29, 345–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suczek, R. F., & Klopfer, W. G. Interpretation of the Bender-Gestalt Test: the associative values of the figures. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1952, 22, 62–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sundberg, N. D. The practice of psychological testing in clinical services in the United States. Amer. Psychol, 1961, 16, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tagiuri, R., & Petrullo, L. Person, Perception and Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  30. Tolor, A., & Schulberg, H. An Evaluation of the Bender-Gestalt Test. Springfield, I11.: Charles C Thomas, 1963.Google Scholar
  31. Werner, H. Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, Revised Edition. New York: International Universities Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max L. Hutt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations