Advertisement

Projective Methods: An Historical Introduction

  • A. I. Rabin

Abstract

Methods of personality assessment that were to become known as projective techniques developed gradually over a long period of time. It is even tempting to paraphrase Ebbinghaus’ remark about psychology (Boring, 1929), that projective techniques have a “long past but a short history.” The penchant of man for imposing his own ideas and inter pretations upon unstructured stimuli was noted, and occasionally re corded, centuries ago. For example, Leonardo da Vinci reports in his Introduction to the Painter concerning the associative experiences possible as a result of viewing a blot made by a sponge upon the wall: “... various experiences can be seen in such a blot, provided one wants to find them in it-human heads, various animals, battles, cliffs, seas, clouds or forests and other things . . .” (quoted in Zubin, et al, 1965, p. 167). Also mentioned by Leonardo is the possibility of “hearing” words when a bell is ringing. The stimuli are, therefore, not restricted to any one sensory modality as to their potential to evoke the associative experiences.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abt., L., Bellak, L. (Eds.). Projective Psychology. New York: Knopf, 1950.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, H. H., Anderson, Gladys L. (Eds.). An Introduction to Projective Tech niques. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, S. J. Introduction to the Rorschach method: A manual of personality study. Amer. Orthopsychiat. Assn. Monogr., 1937, 1.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, J. E. Projective Techniques. New York: Longmans, Green, 1948.Google Scholar
  5. Boring, E. G. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: The Century Company, 1929.Google Scholar
  6. Frank, L. K. Projective methods for the study of personality. J. Psychol., 1939, 8, 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frank, L. K. Projective Methods. Springfield, 111.: Charles C Thomas, 1948.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, L. K. Toward a projective psychology. J. proj. Tech., 1960, 24, 246–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freud, S. Totem and Taboo. New York: Moffatt, Yard & Co., 1919.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. Psycho-analytic notes upon an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). Collected Papers, Vol. III. London: The Hogarth Press, 1949. (originally published in 1911).Google Scholar
  11. Klopfer, B., et al. Developments in the Rorschach Technique, Vol. II. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N.Y.: World Book Co., 1956.Google Scholar
  12. Krugman, M. Out of the inkwell: the Rorschach method. Character & Pers., 1940, 9, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kutash, S. B. The impact of projective techniques on basic psychological science. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 453–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lennep, Van D. I. The four-picture test. In H. H. Anderson Gladys L. Anderson (Eds.). An Introduction to Projective Techniques. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951.Google Scholar
  15. Lindzey, G. Projective Techniques and Cross-cultural Research. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, Christiana D., Murray, H. A. A method for investigating fantasies. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1935, 34, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murray, H. A., et al. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  18. Murray, H. A. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  19. Murstein, B. I. Theory and Research in Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  20. Murstein, B. I., Pryer, R. S. The concept of projection: a review. Psychol. Bull., 1959, 56, 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rabin, A. I. Projective methods and projection in children. In A. I. Rabin Mary R. Haworth (Eds.). Projective Techniques with Children. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1960.Google Scholar
  22. Rabin, A. I. Do we need another projective technique? Merrill-Palmer Quart., 1963, 9, 73–77.Google Scholar
  23. Rabin, A. I., Hurley, J. R. Projective techniques. In Abt, L., Reiss, E. (Eds.). Progress in Clinical Psychology, Vol. VI. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1964.Google Scholar
  24. Rapaport, D. Diagnostic Psychological Testing, Vol. II. Chicago: Year Book Publishers, 1946.Google Scholar
  25. Rapaport, D. Projective techniques and the theory of thinking. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 269–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rorschach, H. Psychodiagnostik. Bern and Leipzig: Ernst Bircher Verlag, 1921.Google Scholar
  27. Rorschach, H., Oberholser, E. The application of the interpretation of form to psychoanalysis. J. new. ment. Dis., 1924, 60, 225–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanford, N. Will psychologists study human problems? Amer. Psychologist, 1965, 20, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz, L. A. Social-situation pictures in the psychiatric interview. Amer. J. Ortho- psychiat., 1932, 2, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shakow, D. Seventeen years later: clinical psychology in the light of the 1947 committee on training in clinical psychology report. Amer. Psychologist, 1965, 20, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tulchin, S. H. The pre-Rorschach use of ink blot tests. Rorch., Res. Exsch., 1940, 4, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zubin, J., Eron, L. D., Schumer, Florence. An Experimental Approach to Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Rabin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations