Skip to main content

Silence in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: An Enigma

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft ((SWG,volume 19/1))

Abstract

Wittgenstein is generally considered to be a decisive philosopher, but a great many of what have always been looked upon as main philosophical problems (like the questions of the meaning of life, of the nature of being, or of the destiny of humanity) are passed over in silence by his later philosophy1, so that it is not immediately clear in which sense Wittgenstein has to be considered as decisive. The enigma consists in the fact that it seems that there is no satisfactory explanation for this silence.2 On the one hand, in fact, we cannot believe that a thought which has nothing to do with such subjects can have the last word in philosophy. Moreover, if we think both of some themes present in Wittgenstein’s works (not only in the Tractatus, but also in following writings, like Culture and Value) and of his way of living, we are led to think that throughout his whole life such questions were the core of his existence and of his consideration. On the other hand, every attempt to show in which sense Wittgenstein’s philosophical silence can be seen as an answer to those questions seems to fail in its object.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Apart from the Tractatus logico-philosophicus (London, 1961) and the Notebooks 1914-(Oxford, 19792) we can find a direct treatment of questions of this kind only in “A Lecture on Ethics”, in Philosophical Review,74 (1965), pp. 3–12. There are, indeed, other writings that contain important remarks apropos of those subjects; such are, in particular, “Bemerkungen über Frazers `The Golden Bough”’, Synthese,16 (1967), pp. 233–253, and Culture and Value,ed. G.H. von Wright (Oxford, 1980). However these remarks are quantitatively not very considerable and above all it is difficult to think of them as belon ging to the core of Wittgenstein’s actual philosophical investigations. Similar considerations can be done apropos of some interesting hints present in writings like Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief,ed. C. Barrett (Oxford, 1966), or F. Waismann, “ Notes on Talks with Wittgenstein ”, Philosophical Review,64 (1969), pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a deeper treatment of the questions touched on in this paper and for the discussion of the concerned literature see L.Tarca, Il linguaggio sub specie aeterni. La filosofia di L. Wittgenstein come attività razionale ed esperienza mistica (Abano-Padova, 1986), where the here suggested interpretation of Wittgenstein’s whole philosophy is widely discussed and supplied with textual evidence.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the question of ethical silence in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy see in particular C. Radford, “Wittgenstein on Ethics”, in Wittgenstein in Focus, eds. B. McGuinness/R. Haller (Amsterdam-Atlanta, 1989 ), pp. 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Compare this point to I.Valent, La forma del linguaggio (Abano - Padova, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the question of the `positive’ or `negative’ sense of Wittgenstein’s thought see S. Borutti, “Wittgenstein e le figure del silenzio”, Il piccolo Hans,42 (1984), pp. 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Wittgenstein, The Blue Book,in The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford, 19692), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. NB,p. 74e; cf.: “[chrw(133)]the world is independent of my will” (TLP,6.373).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf.: “The way to solve the problem you see in life is to live in a way that will make what is problematic disappear (das Problemhafte zum Verschwinden bringt).” (CV,p. 27).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Waismann (1969), p. 14.: “Für mich hat die Theorie keinen Wert. Eine Theorie gibt mir nichts”.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf.: “[chrw(133)]we must be able to understand a proposition without knowing if it is true or false.” (Notes on Logic,in NB,pp. 93–106, p. 98. (cf. TLP,4.0621). Cf. “[chrw(133)]propositions have a sense which is independent of their truth or falsehood” (ibid.,p. 97).

    Google Scholar 

  11. On this point see in particular On Certainty (Oxford, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For the importance of ethical attitude regarding Wittgenstein’s philosophy see A.G. Gargani’s interpretation, in particular “ Wittgensteins ethische Einstellung ”, in B. McGuinness /R. Haller (1989), pp. 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. “It seems clear that what we MEAN must always be ”sharp“.”(NB, p.68e). Cf. NB, pp. 60–71; cf. TLP, 2.0211, 2.0212, 3.23, 3.251, 5.156.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford, 1953); L.Wittgenstein, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford, 19783).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See S. Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford, 1982); cf. S. Holtzman/ C. Leich (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule (London, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. the clarity that we are aiming at is indeed complete clarity. But this simply means that the philosophical problems should completely disappear.“ (PI,133).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See in particular PI, RFM, Philosophische Bemerkungen (Oxford, 1964), Philosophische Grammatik (Oxford, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Apropos of this point see the question raised by M. O’C. Drury (“Have I seen that the Philosophische Bemerkungen could have been inscribed `to the glory of God’ ? Or that the problems discussed in the Philosophical Investigations are being seen from a religious point of view ?”) in “Some Notes on Conversations with Wittgenstein”, in Recollections of Wittgenstein, ed. R. Rhees (Oxford, 1984), pp. 76–96, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On this point see A. Kenny, “Wittgenstein on the Nature of Philosophy”, in A. Kenny, The Legacy of Wittgenstein (Oxford, 1984), cap. 4, especially the final part.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For a reading of Wittgenstein’s thought led on the basis of a radical philosophical questioning, see C. Sini, Wittgenstein e l’immagine, in C. Sini, I segni dell’anima (Roma-Bari, 1989 ), pp. 213–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rudolf Haller Johannes Brandl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tarca, L. (1990). Silence in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: An Enigma. In: Haller, R., Brandl, J. (eds) Wittgenstein — Eine Neubewertung / Wittgenstein — Towards a Re-Evaluation. Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft, vol 19/1. J.F. Bergmann-Verlag, Munich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30086-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30086-2_30

  • Publisher Name: J.F. Bergmann-Verlag, Munich

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-209-01122-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-30086-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics