Abstract
At a Centenary Symposium whose announced topic is ‘Wittgenstein: Towards A Reevaluation’, it seems appropriate to preface the main part of my paper with a brief overview concerning the very mixed reactions which Wittgenstein’s contribution to ethics has provoked from commentators. Among those whose reactions have been very positive are R.W. Beardsmore, Ilham Dilman, H.O. Mounce, D.Z. Phillips, and Peter Winch, who tend to see themselves as interpreting and developing views which they attribute to Wittgenstein.1 It seems fair to say, however, that the reactions of most philosophers have been strongly negative. The reasons for these negative reactions have been rather varied. Some critics, such as Robert J. Fogelin,2 P.M.S. Hacker,3 and David Pears,4 agree in maintaining that, in some respect or other, Wittgenstein’s ethical position is not well argued. Colin Radford goes further by arguing that Wittgenstein’s entire ethical position is incoherent. In explaining the famous ‘ethical silence’ in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, Radford maintains that ethics presented the mature Wittgenstein with a problem he could not resolve. Hence, he adds, “the mature Wittgenstein could not say anything about ethics, and he (virtually) does not”.5 Most extreme of all is E.D. Klemke’s conclusion concerning Wittgenstein’s ‘Lecture on Ethics’ that “it is of no worth whatever for ethical inquiry, and that the manner of philosophizing which it exhibits is despicable”.6
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Such positive reactions are found, for example, in the following works: R.W. Beardsmore, Moral Reasoning (New York, 1969); Ilham Dilman: R.W. Beardsmore, Moral Reasoning (New York, 1969); Ilham Dilman, “Wittgenstein on the Soul”, in Under standing Wittgenstein, ed. Godfrey Vesey (London/Basingstoke, 1974); D. Z. Phillips and H. O. Mounce, Moral Practices (New York, 1970); Peter Winch, Ethics and Action (London, 1972 ).
Robert J. Fogelin, Wittgenstein (London, 1987 ).
P. M. S. Hacker, Insight and Illusion (Oxford/New York, 1986 ).
David Pears, Ludwig Wittgenstein (New York, 1969).
Colin Radford, “Wittgenstein on Ethics”, an unpublished paper read at a Colloquium of the Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, February, 1988.
E. D. Klemke, “Discussions: Wittgenstein’s Lecture on Ethics”, Journal of Value Inguiry IV (1975), p. 127.
Bertrand Russell, in his Introduction to Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London, 1922), p. 22.
A. J. Ayer, Wittgenstein (London 1985 ) p. 33.
Pears (1969), p. 92.
A. Phillips Griffiths, “Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer, and Ethics”, in Understanding Wittgenstein, ed. Godfrey Vesey (London/ Basingstoke, 1974 ), p. 97.
Quoted in P. Engelmann, Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein with a Memoir (Oxford, 1967), p. 143.
Pears (1969), p. 88.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Notebooks 1914–1916. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe (Oxford/New York, 1961 ), p. 79e.
Brian McGuinness, “The Grundgedanke of the Tractatus”,in Understanding Wittgenstein,ed. Godfrey Vesey (London/Basingstoke, 1974), p. 61.
W. Donald Hudson, Wittgenstein and Religious Belief (London, 1975), p. 111.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, “Lecture on Ethics” Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 3 ff. All references to this work will be incorporated into the text preceded by LE.
Klemke (1975), p. 118.
Hacker (1986), p. 106.
For a very clear account of these issues see Paul W. Taylor, “The Normative Function of Metaethics”, Philosophical Review 78 (1969), pp. 16–32.
Thomas Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London,1969), p. 258.
J. L. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth/New York, 1977 ), p. 35.
Mackie (1977), p. 33
Mackie (1977), p. 35
Bernard Williams, “Ethics and the Fabric of the World”, in Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J. L. Mackie,ed. Ted Honderich (London/Boston, 1985), p. 203.
R. M. Hare, Moral Thinking (Oxford, 1981 ), p. 82.
Brian McGuinness, “The Mysticism of the Tractatus”, Philosophical Review 75 (1966), p. 321.
Reid (1969), p. 258.
Williams (1985), p. 208.
Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann,ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Joachim Schultz and Brian McGuinness (Oxford, 1979), p. 69.
G. E. M. Anscombe, An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus (London, 1959) p. 170.
Some persons will no doubt argue that Wittgenstein was not entirely silent concerning ethics his later period and that his later writings contain many suggestions as to how he might have developed his ethical position. In response I can only say, respectfully and after much thought, that it is my strong conviction that such suggestions, though utterly fascinating, are ultimately inconclusive and unhelpful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jensen, H. (1990). Is Wittgenstein’s Ethical Theory a Kind of Error Theory?. In: Haller, R., Brandl, J. (eds) Wittgenstein — Eine Neubewertung / Wittgenstein — Towards a Re-Evaluation. Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft, vol 19/1. J.F. Bergmann-Verlag, Munich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30086-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30086-2_28
Publisher Name: J.F. Bergmann-Verlag, Munich
Print ISBN: 978-3-209-01122-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-30086-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive