Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: are there any risks?

  • Edward H. Smith

Abstract

The field of diagnostic radiology has recently witnessed an extraordinary technologic explosion with ultrasound, computerized tomography, digital vascular imaging and nuclear magnetic resonance added to the diagnostic medical armamentarium. Despite these major advances the need for tissue verification of a suspected lesion is still required before definitive, often radical, therapy is begun. Because of its simplicity, speed, low cost and, above all, its apparent safety, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNABx) has increasingly become the method of choice to establish the cytologic diagnosis of a pathologic process in the abdomen and elsewhere in the body.

Keywords

Adenocarcinoma Tuberculosis Pancreatitis Posit Myeloma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Engzell U, Esposti P L, Rubio C, Sigurdson O, Sajicek J. Investigation on tumor spread in connection with aspiration biopsy. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1971; 10: 385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Struve-Christensen E. Iatrogenic dissemination of tumor cells. Dan Med Bull 1978; 25: 82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ryd W, Hagmar B, Eriksson O. Local tumor cell seeding by fine-needle aspiration bi-opsy: A semiquantitative study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1983; (A) 91: 17.Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein H M, Zornoza J, Wallace S, et al. Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and other abdominal masses. Radiology 1977; 123: 319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Livraghi T, Damascelli B, Lombardi C, Spagnoli I. Risk in fine-needle abdominal biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 1983; 11: 77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esposti P L. Cytologic malignancy grading of prostatic carcinoma by transrectal aspiration biopsy. A five-year follow-up study of 469 hormone-treated patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1971; 5: 199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kline T S, Neal H S. Needle aspiration biopsy: A critical appraisal. Eight years and 3,267 specimens later. PIMA 1978; 239: 36.Google Scholar
  8. Ho C S, McLoughlin M J, McHattie J D, Tao L C. Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1977; 125: 351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lalli A F, McCormack L J, Zelch M, et al. Aspiration biopsies of chest lesions. Radiology 1978; 127: 35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lundquist A. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the liver. Acta Med Scand 1971; 520: 1.Google Scholar
  11. Holm H H, Pedersen J F, Kristensen J K, Rasmussen S N, Hancke S, Jensen F. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous puncture. Radiol Clin North Am 1975; 13: 493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schreeb T, Amer O, Skovsted G, Wikstad N. Renal adenocarcinoma: Is there a risk of spreading tumor cells in diagnostic puncture ? Scand J Urol Nephrol 1967; 1: 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berg J W, Robbins G F. A late look of the safety of aspiration biopsy. Cancer 1962; 15: 826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrucci J T Jr, Wittenberg J, Margolies M N, Carey R W. Malignant seeding of the tract after thin-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1979; 130: 345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith F P, Macdonald J S, Schein P S, Or-nitz R D. Cutaneous seeding of pancreatic cancer by skinny-needle aspiration biopsy. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140: 855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bush W H Jr, Burnett L L, Gibbons R P. Case reports: Needle tract seeding of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1977; 129: 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riska H, Friman C Fatality after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver. (Letter) Br J Med 1975; 1: 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans W K, Ho C S, McLoughlin M J, Tao L C. Fatal necrotizing pancreatitis following fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas. Radiology 1981; 141: 61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrucci J T Jr, Wittenberg J, Mueller P R, et al. Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration. Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schnyder P A, Candardjis G, Anderegg A. Peritonitis after thin needle aspiration biopsy of an abscess. Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livraghi T, Lombardi C, Mascia G. Bile peritonitis: Another complication after fine-needle biopsy. Diagn Imaging 1983; 52: 33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schulz T B. Fine-needle biopsy of the liver complicated with bile peritonitis. Acta Med Scand 1976; 199: 141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Otto R. Results of 1000 fine needle punctures guided under real-time sonographic control. J Belge Radiol 1982; 65: 193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Silver T M, Thornbury J R. Pneumothorax: A complication of percutaneous aspiration of upper pole renal masses. Am J Roentgenol 1977; 128: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bigongiari L R. Vagal pseudohemorrhage after percutaneous biopsy. Invest Radiol 1980; 15: 350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamcheck N, Klausenstock O. Liver biopsy: The risk of needle biopsy. N Engl J Med 1953; 249: 1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kidd R, Freeny P C, Bartha M. Single pass fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 1979; 133: 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward H. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations