Abstract
Sensory ecology is mainly concerned with the mechanisms that enable an animal to produce or utilize signals within its specific environment, and how the information about identity or location of the sender is transmitted to the receiver(s). Biotic and abiotic factors constrain the transmission of an acoustic signal and the performance of receivers in detection and location. Since animals use acoustic signals in a wide range of carrier frequencies — from infrasound to high ultrasound — with corresponding wavelengths spanning a range from tens of meters to a few millimeters, the rate of attenuation and degradation of sound signals varies largely in different communication systems. As a result, the active range of a sound signal covers probably hundreds of kilometers for marine mammals, several kilometers for elephants, to less than 1 m in some grasshoppers. This chapter examines some mechanisms by which these different animals achieve a maximum range of communication. In particular, I will show how sound interference in stratified environments can dramatically influence communication distance, and how animals adapt their timing and location of the site of their signaling to these environmental conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arak A, Eiriksson T (1992) Choice of singing sites by male bushcrickets (Tettigonia viridissima) in relation to signal propagation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 365–372
Belwood J, Morris GK (1987) Bat predation and its influence on calling behavior in neotropical katydids. Science 238: 64–67
Cade WH (1975) Acoustically orienting parasitoids: fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science 190: 1312–1313
Cade WH (1981) Field cricket spacing, and the phonotaxis of crickets and parasitoid flies to clumped and isolated cricket songs. Z Tierpsychol 55: 365–375
Dusenbery DB (1992) Sensory Ecology. WH Freeman and Company, New York
Embleton TFW (1996) Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors. J Acoust Soc Am 100: 31–48
Garstang M, Larom D, Raspet R, Lindeque M (1995) Atmospheric controls on elephant communication. J Exp Biol 198: 939–951
Geiger R, Aron RH, Todhunter P (1995) The Climate Near the Ground. Textbook Meteorology. Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden
Georges TM, Boden LR, Palmer DR (1994) Features of the Heard Island signals received at Ascension. JASA 96: 2441–2447
Gilbert F, Elsner N (2000) Directional hearing of a grasshopper in the field. J Exp Biol 203: 983–993
Griffm DR (1971) The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim Behav 19: 55–61
Henwood K, Fabrik A (1979) A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am Nat 114: 260–274
Keuper A, Kühne R (1983) The acoustic behavior of the bushcricket Tettigonia cantans. II. Transmission of airborne sound and vibration signals in the biotope. Behav Processes 8: 125–145
Lakes-Harlan R, Heller KG (1992) Ultrasound sensitive ears in a parasitoid fly. Naturwissenschaften 79: 224–226
Lang F (in press) Acoustic communication distances of a gomphocerine grasshopper. Bioacoustics
Langbauer WR, Payne KB, Charif RA, Rapaport L, Osborn F (1991) African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low-frequency conspecific calls. J Exp Biol 157: 35–46
Larom D, Garstang M, Payne K, Raspet R and Lindeque M (1997) The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations. J Exp Biol 200: 421–431
Laundré JW (1981) Temporal variation in coyote vocalization. J Wildl Mgmt 45: 767–769
Marten K, Marier P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations. I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 271–290
Michelsen A (1978) Sound Reception in Different Environments In: Ali MA (ed) Sensory Ecology. New York, London, Plenum, pp 345–373
Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Berlin Heidelberg New York, Tokyo, Springer, pp 322–332
Michelsen A (1998) Biophysics of sound localization in insects. In: RR Hoy, AN Popper, RR Fay (eds) Comparative Hearing: Insects. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, pp 18–62
Moore SW, Lewis EE, Narins PM and Lopez PT (1989) The call-timing algorithm of the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris. J Comp Physiol A 164: 309–319
Morris GK (1970) Sound analysis of Metrioptera sphagnorum (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Can Ent 102: 363–368
Morris GK, Kerr, GE and Gwynne DT (1975) Calling song function in the bog katydid, Metrioptera sphagnorum (F.Walker) (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae ): Female phonotaxis to normal and altered song. Z Tierpsychol 37: 502–514
Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 108: 17–34
Munk W and Forbes AMG (1989) Global ocean warming: an acoustic measure. J Phys Oceanogr 19: 1765–1778
Munk W, Spindel RC, Baggeroer A, Birdsall TG (1994) The Heard Island feasability test: JASA 96: 2330–2342
Narins P (1995) Frog communication. Sci Am 273: 62–67
Neuweiler G (1989) Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. TEE 4: 160–166
Piercy JE, Embleton TFW, Sutherland LC (1977) Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. J Acoust Soc Am 61: 1402–1418
Popov AV, Shuvalov VF, Svetlogorskaya ID, Markovich AM (1972) Acoustic behavior and auditory system of insects. Rhein.-Westf. Akad Wiss 53: 281–306
Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1986) Insect hearing in the field. I. The use of identified nerve cells as ‘biological microphones’. J Comp Physiol A 158: 647–651
Riede K (1995) Diversity of sound producing insects of a Bornean lowland rain forest. Proc Int Conf Trop Rainforest Res. Brunei, Daressalam
Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of hearing in insects. In: RR Hoy, AN Popper, RR Fay (eds) Comparative Hearing: Insects. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer pp 63–96
Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 437–444
Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti Lion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 480 pp
Spiesberger JL and Fristrup KM (1990) Passive localization of calling animals and sensing of their acoustic environment using acoustic tomography. Am Nat 135: 107–153
Staaden, van MJ, Römer H (1997) Sexual signalling in bladder grasshoppers: Tactical design for maximizing calling range. J Exp Biol 200: 2597–2608
Urick RJ (1983) Principles of Underwater Sound. New York, McGraw-Hill
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Quellet H (eds) Acoustic Communication in Birds. New York, Academic Press, pp 131–181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Römer, H. (2001). Ecological Constraints for Sound Communication: From Grasshoppers to Elephants. In: Barth, F.G., Schmid, A. (eds) Ecology of Sensing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22644-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22644-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08619-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-22644-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive