Advertisement

On Engineering Applications of Interactive Multiobjective Programming Methods

  • Hirotaka Nakayama
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 397)

Abstract

The methodology of interactive multiobjective programming has been developed remarkably over the past decade. Now it seems to be the time to apply it to real problems. The author has been trying to apply an interactive multiobjective programming method to various kinds of real problems. In this paper, some of these results will be reported, and gaps between theory and practice will be discussed.

Keywords

Mathematical System Cement Production Cable Length Cable Tension Cable Stay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eschenauer, H.A., Koski, J. and Osyczka, A. (eds.) (1990). Multicriteria Design Optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grauer, M. Lewandowski, A. and Wierzbicki A.P. (1984). DIDAS Theory, Implementation and Experiences, in M. Grauer and A.P. Wierzbicki (eds.) Interactive Decision Analysis. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Interactive Decision Analysis and Interpretative Computer Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 229, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ishido, K., Nakayama, H., Furukawa, K., Inoue, K. and Tanikawa, K. (1987). Management of Erection for Cable Stayed Bridge Using Satisficing Trade-off Method. In Y. Sawaragi, K. Inoue and H. Nakayama (eds.) Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Volume 1, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 285, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Korhonen, P. and Wallenius, J. (1988). A Pareto Race. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 35, pp. 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lewandowski A. and Wierzbicki, A.P. (eds.) (1989). Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 331, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  6. Nakayama, H. (1984). Proposal of Satisficing Trade-Off Method for Multi-objective Programming. Transact. SICE, 20,pp, 29–35 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Nakayama, H. and Sawaragi, Y. (1984). Satisficing Trade-off Method for Interactive Multiobjective Programming Methods. In M. Grauer and A.P. Wierzbicki (eds.) Interactive Decision Analysis, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Interactive Decision Analysis and Interpretative Computer Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 229, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakayama, H., Nomura, J., Sawada, K. and Nakajima, R. (1986). An Application of Satisficing Trade-off Method to a Blending Problem of Industrial Materials. In G. Fandel et al. (eds), Large Scale Modelling and Interactive Decision Analysis, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 273, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakayama, H. (1989). An Interactive Support System for Bond Trading. In A. G. Lockett and G. Islei (eds.) Improving Decision Making in Organizations, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 335, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakayama, H. (1991). Satisficing Trade-off Method for Problems with Multiple Linear Fractional Objectives and its Applications. In A. Lewandowski and V. Volkovich (eds.) Multiobjective Problems of Mathematical Programming, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 351, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 42–50.Google Scholar
  11. Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H. and Tanino, T. (1985). Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  12. Ueno, N., Nakagawa, Y., Tokuyama, H., Nakayama, H. and Tamura, H. (1990). A Multiobjective Planning for String Selection in Steel Manufacturing, Communications of Operations Research Society of Japan, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 656–661.Google Scholar
  13. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1981). A Mathematical Basis for Satisficing Decision Making, in J. Morse (ed.) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 190, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 466–485.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hirotaka Nakayama
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsKonan UniversityHigashinada, Kobe 658Japan

Personalised recommendations