Skip to main content

Mixed Methods in BEM for Elasto-Plastic Problems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Boundary Elements VIII

Part of the book series: Boundary Elements ((BOUNDARY,volume 8))

Summary

The BEM is much more suitable than the FEM to solve problems with high field gradients (Brebbia1,2). However, the FEM assures, contrarily to BEM, symmetrical, positive definite stiffness matrices. This is very advantageous, especially for problems with a high number of degrees of freedom. The question arises now, in which form a coupling of BEM and FEM is possible in order to take profit of these great advantages of BEM against FEM (Zienkiewicz3,4, Schnack5, Wendland6). For this purpose, the body is divided in subdomains. One can use, then, BEM elements for domains of high stress concentrations. For these domains, a stress field is defined at first, which satisfies the equilibrium and boundary conditions exactly. The stress field will result in a displacement field, which defines the displacement vector of the boundary for the mentioned subdomains. Independently, for the same boundary, a displacement initial formulation will be formulated, which contains the trial functions of the adjacent finite elements. In the following, an optimal approximation of both of the displacement fields on the boundary will be achieved by a penalty term.

The result is the so-called ‘generalized compatibility condition1 within mixed methods. Additionally, the special element, formulated by the BEM, must be in equilibrium with the adjacent finite elements. As a consequence, the ‘generalized equilibrium equation1 will be derived from the principle of virtual work, too.

In case, if no formulation of the stress field and accompanying displacement field is possible in a theoretical way (e. g. Airy’s formulation or Boussinesq-Neuber-Papkovitch formulation), the displacement field can be computed by the collocation method from a formulated traction field by a further integral equation of quasi Fredholm-type.

Results of notch and fracture mechanics show the high rate of convergence by use of this mixed method. Therefore, the method prescribed above is extended to problems with elasto-plastic material law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brebbia C. A. (1980). The Boundary Element Method for Engin eers, Pentech Press, London and Plymouth.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brebbia C. A. (1981) Boundary Element Methods, (Ed. Brebbia C.A.), pp. 69–289, 397–622, Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Seminar, Irvine, California, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zienkiewicz O. C. Kelly D. W. and Betess B. (1977), The Coupling of the Finite Element Method and Boundary Solution Procedures, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., Vol. 11, pp. 355–375.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zienkiewicz O. C. Kelly D. W. and Betess B. (1979), Marriage à la mode. The best of both worlds (finite elements and boundary integrals). In: Energy Methods in Finite Element Analysis, (Ed. Glowinski R. Rodin E. Y. and Zienkiewicz O. C), pp. 81–107, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schnack, E. (1985), Stress Analysis with a Combination of HSM and BEM. In: The Mathematics Of Finite Elements and Applications V, (Ed. Whiteman J.), pp. 273–282, Academic Press, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wendland W. L. (1986) Asymptotic Error Estimates for the Combined Boundary and Finite Element Method, in Innovative Numerical Methods in Engineering (ed. Shaw R. P. Periaux J. Chaudouet A. Wu J. Marino C. and Brebbia C. A.), pp. 55–69, Proceedings of the 4th Int. Symp., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swedlow J. L. and Cruse T. A.(1971), Formulation of Boundary Integral Equations for three-dimensional elasto-plastic Flow, Int. J. Solids Structures, Vol. 7, pp. 1673–1683.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukherjee S. (1982). Boundary Element Methods in Creep and Fracture, Applied Science Publishers. London and New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schnack, E. (1986). Mixed Methods in BEM for Elasto-Plastic Problems. In: Tanaka, M., Brebbia, C.A. (eds) Boundary Elements VIII. Boundary Elements, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22335-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22335-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-22337-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-22335-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics