Skip to main content

Impulse Discharges from the Retinal Nerve and Optic Ganglion of the Squid

  • Conference paper
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

The papers of Dr. Dodt and Dr. Bornschein amply demonstrate the value of the comparative approach to the study of retinal function. The availability of conetype or rod-type retinas, which otherwise are essentially similar in their anatomical features, has permitted the differences in their responses to be attributed to differences in the receptors themselves. However, a direct study of receptor response would be more satisfactory if a suitable preparation could be found in which recordings could be made from single isolated receptor cells. Thus far no such vertebrate preparation has been found, and the search for an invertebrate preparation has been, till now, nearly as unsuccessful.

From the Thomas C. Jenkins Laboratory of Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, and the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.

The research described in this paper was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. G-7086 and by a grant (No. A 2528) from the National Institutes of Arthritic and Metabolic Diseases, U.S. Public Health Service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hartline, H. K., H. G. Wagner and E. F. Macnichol jr.: The peripheral origin of nervous activity in the visual system. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 17, 125–141 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartline, H. K., H. G. Wagner and F. Ratliff: Inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J. gen. Physiol. 39, 651–673 (1956).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartline, H. K., H. G. Wagner: The discharge of impulses in the optic nerve of Pecten in response to illumination of the eye. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 11, 465–478 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalazonitis, N., and A. Arvanataki: Réparation de quelques catalyzeurs respiratoires dans la retine de Sepia. Arch. Sci. physiol. 6, 163–191 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Snodgrass, A.: Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palay, S.: Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piper, H.: Das elektromotorische Verhalten der Retina bei Eledone moschata. Arch. Anat. Physiol. (Leipzig) 453–474 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fröhlich, F. W.: Beiträge zur allgemeinen Physiologie der Sinnesorgane. Z. Sinnesphysiol. 48, 28–165 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner, H. G., and W. A. Hagins: The absolute magnitude of the membrane current in photoreceptors of the squid. Paper 02, Annual meeting of the Biophysical Society, Pittsburg, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartline, H. K., H. G. Wagner and M. L. Wolbarsht: Personal communications. Also experiments by one of us (E. F. M., jr., unpublished, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgkin, A., and W. A. H. Rushton: The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fibre. Proc. roy. Soc. 133 B, 445–479 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hodgkin, A.: J. Physiol. (Lond.) 106, 305–318 (1947).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bullock, T. H.: Neuron doctrine and electrophysiology. Science 129, 997–1002 (1959).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parry, D. A.: The function of the insect ocellus. J. exp. Biol. 24, 211–219 (1947).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoyle, G.: Functioning of the insect ocellar nerve. J. exp. Biol. 32, 397–407 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Macnichol, E. F., jr., and W. E. Love: Electrical responses of the retinal nerve and optic ganglion of the squid. Science 132, 737–738 (1960).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lapique, L., et M. Lapique: Chronaxie de l’innervation motrice du manteau chez le calmar. C. R. Soc. Biol. 102, 626–629 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thies, R. E.: Electrical recording in the living squid. Biol. Bull. 113, 333–334 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodgkin, A.: Proc. roy. Soc. 148 B, 1 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, J. W., and K. S. Cole: J. gen. Physiol. 43, 961 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adrian, E. D.: The mechanism of nervous action. Chap. 5, pp. 78–94. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1961 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

MacNichol, E.F., Love, W.E. (1961). Impulse Discharges from the Retinal Nerve and Optic Ganglion of the Squid. In: Jung, R., Kornhuber, H. (eds) Neurophysiologie und Psychophysik des Visuellen Systems / The Visual System: Neurophysiology and Psychophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22221-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22221-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-22222-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-22221-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics