Advertisement

Male Sterility

  • Walter W. Williams
Chapter
Part of the Handbuch der Urologie / Encyclopedia of Urology / Encyclopédie D’Urologie book series (HDBUROL, volume 12)

Abstract

Since the time of Leewenhoek, over two hundred years ago, it has been recognized that spermatozoa are essential for reproduction, but it was not generally appreciated that differences in the health of the ejaculated spermatozoa dictated differences in potential fertility until 1925 when Williams and Savage reported their observations on the relationship of spermatic structure to the reproductive fitness of bulls. Prior to this, Cary had pointed out that spermatic abnormalities, the reduction of sperm concentration and reduced sperm motility played an important role in male infertility, but his observations went essentially unnoticed because of his failure to record in precise terms his cytologic observations and to document his material so as to bring out the clinical correlations which were so obvious to him. About ten years elapsed before the more precise and better documented observations on animal breeding revealed the close correlation between spermatic pathology and the reproduction efficiency of various species of animals. It was then realized that fundamental spermatic disease played a very significant role in the etiology of infertility in various species. Such correlations of spermatic pathology to the fertility potential were reported with respect to the bull by Williams and Savage 1925 and 1927, Lagerlöf 1934, Brochart in 1951, on the cock by Conklin in 1929, the stallion by Savage, Williams and Fowler in 1930, Bielanski in 1951, and the ram in 1937 by McKensie and Berliner.

Keywords

Male Sterility Male Infertility Artificial Insemination Sperm Concentration Seminal Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Austin, C.R.: The function of hyaluronidase in fertilization. Nature (Lond.) 162, 63 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayle, H.: Technique de l’anastomose epididmyo-deferentielle. Soc. d’urologie 1945.Google Scholar
  3. Bayle, H., et C. Gouygoit: La sterilite masculine. Ass. Francaise d’Urologie, Paris 1953.Google Scholar
  4. Belonoschkin, Boris: Zeugung beim Menschen. Stockholm: Sjobergs Folag 1949.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, Per.: Spermigation and its relation to morphology and motility of spermatozoa. Int. J. Fertility 1, 45 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Bielanski, W.: Characteristics of the semen of stallions. Macroscopic and microscopic investigations with an etsimation of fertility, extrait du mémoires de l’académie polonaise des science et des letters, Cacovie, 1951.Google Scholar
  7. Birnberg, C. H., D. L. Sherber and R. L. Kurzrok: Fructose and fructolysis in human semen. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 63, 877 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blom, E.: Spontaneous detachment of the galea capitis in spermia of bull and stallion. Skand. Veterin.-T. 35, 779–789 (1945).Google Scholar
  9. Blom, E.: One minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin. Fertil. and Steril. 1, 176 (1950).Google Scholar
  10. Boreau, J., P. Hermann et R. Fua: L’epididymographie. Presse méd. 59, 1406 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Breitschneider, L. H.: An electron-microscopical study of sperm IV. Proc. kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 12, 526 (1949).Google Scholar
  12. Breitschneider, L. H.: An electron-microscopical study of the bull Sperm III. Proc. kon. ned. Akad. Wet. 12, 301 (1949).Google Scholar
  13. Brochart, M., et S. M. Montrose: Morphologie normale et anormale due spermatozoide de taureau. Rec. Med. vet. 127, 449–475 (1951).Google Scholar
  14. Brodny, M. Leopold: Epididymography, varicocelography and testicular angiography. Fertil. and Steril. 6, 158–168 (1955).Google Scholar
  15. Bunge, R.G., and J.K. Sherman: Frozen human semen. Fertil. and Steril. 5, 193, (1954).Google Scholar
  16. Cary, W. H.: Examination of semen with special reference to its gynecologic aspects. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 74, 615–635 (1916).Google Scholar
  17. Castillo, E. B. del, A. Trabucco and F. A. de la Balze: Syndrome produced by absence of the germinal epithelium without impairment of the Sertoli or Leydig cells. J. clin. Endocr. 7, 493–502 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castro, E.: Ocupacion y fertilidad masculina: Relacion de ocupaciones a la fertuluda disminuida y a la infertilidad. Proc. First World Congr. on Fertility and Sterility, New York 1953.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, M. E., and W. W. McCune: Fructolysis of human spermatozoa. Fertil. and Steril. 1, 363 (1950).Google Scholar
  20. Conklin, R. L.: The relation of sexual health of the domestic cock to fertility and hatchability of the eggs. Cornell Vet. 19, 25–32 (1929).Google Scholar
  21. Davis, M. E., and W. W. McCune: Fructolysis of human spermatozoa. Fertil. and Steril. 1, 363 (1950).Google Scholar
  22. Dunn, H. O.: Personal communication, 1958.Google Scholar
  23. Dunn, H. O.: New advances in bovine semen preservation. Int. J. Fertility 3, 332 (1958).Google Scholar
  24. Echeandia, M. Ateea and Munoz, A. Pieros: Velocidad de progression del espermio humano en glucose y levulosa. Arch. Med. exp. (Madr.) 2, 273–299 (1954).Google Scholar
  25. Emmons, C. W.: The effect of variation in osmotic pressure and electrolyte concentration on the motility of rabbit spermatozoa at different hydrogen ion concentrations. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 107, 129 (1948).Google Scholar
  26. Fincher, M. G., and J. Ferguson: Sterility in bulls, annual report N. Y. State Vet. College, 1942.Google Scholar
  27. Flechter, Joseph: Artificial insemination. Fertil. and Steril. 9, 372 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Foote, R. H., D. C. young and H. O. Dunn: Fertility of bull semen stored for one and two days at 5° C. with yolk-citrate, glycine, glucose extenders. J. Dairy Sci. 41, 732 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Getzoff, P. L.: Clinical evaluation of testicular biopsy and the rebound phenomena. Fertil. and Steril. 6, 465 (1955).Google Scholar
  30. Getzoff, P. L.: The treatment of male sterility with testosterone. Int. J. Fertility 1, 175 (1956).Google Scholar
  31. Getzoff, P. L.: The effect of chronic prostatovesiculitis on sperm motility. Int. J. Fertility 3, 316–319 (1958).Google Scholar
  32. Getzoff, P. L.: Purulent semen and male infertility. Int. J. Fertility 3, 408–412 (1958).Google Scholar
  33. Giarola, A.: Biochemical and morphological characters of human semen. Annali, Milano, 1953.Google Scholar
  34. Green, W. W.: The chemistry and cytology of the sperm membrane of sheep. Anat. Rec. 76, 467 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haman, John O.: Legal aspects of artificial insemination. Progr. Gynec. 3, 359–373 (1957).Google Scholar
  36. Haman, John O.: Results in artificial insemination. Trans. Amer. Urol. Assoc. Aug. 1954.Google Scholar
  37. Hammen, R.: Studies on impaired fertility of man with special reference to the male. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard 1944.Google Scholar
  38. Hammond, J., and S. A. Adsell: The vitality of spermatozoa in the male and female reproductive tracts. Brit. J. exp. Biol. 4, 155–185 (1926/27).Google Scholar
  39. Hellinga, Gerhardus: Het onderzek nig stoornissen in de mannelijke. Vruchbaarheld, N. V. Noord-Hollandsche, Uitgevers Mastschappij, 1949. Henley, Howard G.: The surgery of male subinfertility. Ann. roy. Coll. Surg. Engl. 17, 159–183 (1955).Google Scholar
  40. Hoyne, A., J.H. Diamond and J. R. Christian: Diethylstilbesterol and prevention of mumps orchitis. J. Amer. med. Ass. 140, 662 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huggins, C., and W. J. Neal: Coagulation and liquefaction of semen, proteolytic enzymes, and citric acid in the prostate. J. exp. Med. 76, 527 (1942).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huggins, C. B., W. W. Scott and J. H. Heinen: Chemical composition of the human semen and of the secretion of the prostate and seminal vesicles. Amer. J. Physiol. 130, 467 (1942).Google Scholar
  43. Huxley, H. E.: Muscular contraction. Endeavour 15, 177–188 (1956).Google Scholar
  44. Klinefelter, H. F., E. C. Reifenstein and F. Albright: Syndrome characterized by gynemastia, aspermatogenesis without a-leydigism and increased secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone. J. clin. Endocr. 2, 615 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knudsen, O.: Cytomorphological investigations into the spermocytogenesis of bulls with normal fertility and bulls with acquired disturbances in spermiogenesis. Acta path, micro-biol. scand. Suppl. 100, 1 (1954).Google Scholar
  46. Knudsen, O.: Studies on spermatocytogenesis of bulls. Int. J. Fertility 3, 389–403 (1958).Google Scholar
  47. Lagerlöf, Nils: Investigations on sterility in Swedish bulls during, the period 1928–1949, Vlaams diergeneesk. T. 19, 285–294 (1950).Google Scholar
  48. Knudsen, O.: Biologic aspects of infertility of male domestic animals. Int. J. Fertility 2, 99 (1957).Google Scholar
  49. Lane-Roberts, Cedric et al.: Sterility and impaired fertility. Hamish Hamilton Med. Books, p. 15. 1948.Google Scholar
  50. Lundquist, F.: Studies on biochemistry of human semen; amio acids and proteolytic. enzymes. Acta physiol. scand. 25, 178 (1952).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. MacLeod, J.: The metabolism of human spermatozoa. Amer. J. Physiol. 132, 193 (1941).Google Scholar
  52. MacLeod, J., and R.Z. Gold: The male factor in fertility and infertility. Fertil. and Steril. 8. 36–49 (1957).Google Scholar
  53. Mann, T.: Studies in metabolism of semen. Biochem. J. 39, 451 (1945).Google Scholar
  54. Mann, T.: Studies in metabolism of semen, glycolosis in spermatozoa. Biochem. J. 39, 458 (1945).Google Scholar
  55. Mann, T.: Studies on the metabolism of semen. Biochem. J. 40, 481 (1946).Google Scholar
  56. Mann, T.: The biochemistry of semen. New York: Wiley 1954.Google Scholar
  57. Markus, H.: Über die Struktur der menschlichen Spermien. Arch. Zellforsch. 15, 445–448 (1919/21).Google Scholar
  58. McEntee, K., and P. Olafson: Reproductive trat pathology in hyperkeratosis of cattle and sheep. Fertil. and Steril. 4, 128–136 (1953).Google Scholar
  59. McKensie, F. F., and V. Berliner: The reproductive capacity of rams. Missouri Agr. Exp. St. Res. Bul. No. 265, 1937.Google Scholar
  60. Michelson, Lewis: Treatment of azoospermia by vasoepididymal anastomosis. Trans. Amer. Soc. Study Sterility 150 (1946).Google Scholar
  61. Michelson, Lewis: Vasoepididymal anastomosis. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 82, 327 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Moeller, A. M., and N. L. van Demark: In-vitro speeds of bovine spermatozoa. Fertil. and Steril. 6, 506–512 (1955).Google Scholar
  63. Moench, G. L., and H. Holt: Sperm morphology in relation to fertility. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 22, 199–210 (1931).Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, W. O.: The physiologic basis of hypergonadism. Med. Clin. N. Amer. 32, 97–110 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Nordlander, E.: The influence of orchitis parotidea on spermatogneesis. Proc. First World Congr. on Fertility and Sterility, 1953.Google Scholar
  66. Palmer, Raoul: La sterilite involuntaire. Paris: Masson & Cie. 1950.Google Scholar
  67. Perloff, W.H., and B.J. Channick: Infertility due to large semen volume. Fertil. and Steril. 9, 171 (1958).Google Scholar
  68. Pius XII.: Address by His Holiness Second World Congr. on Fertility and Sterility. Int. J. Fertility 2, 1 (1957).Google Scholar
  69. Polge, C., and L. E. A. Rowson: Fertilizing capacity of bull spermatozoa after freezing at —79°C. Nature (Lond.) 169, 626 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rao, B. Krishna: Male infertility. Med. Dig. (New Delhi) 23, 890 (1955).Google Scholar
  71. Risman, G. G.: Effect of cortisone in orchitis of epidemic parotitis. J. Amer. med. Ass. 62, 875 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reifenstein, Edward C.: The relation of the adrenal cortes to gynecology. Progress in Gynecology, p. 270–283.Google Scholar
  73. J. Meigs & S. Sturgis. Grune & Stratton 1950.Google Scholar
  74. Savage, A., W. L. Williams and N. M. Fowler: A study of the head length variability of equine spermatozoa. Cand. J. Res. 3, 327–355 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Savage, A., W. W. Williams and N. M. Fowler: A statistical study of head length variability of bovine spermatozoa and its application to the determination of fertility. Trans. roy. Soc. Can., Sect. V, 21, 425 (1927).Google Scholar
  76. Savin, J.: Diethylstilbesterolin in prevention of mumps orchitis. Rhode Island Med. J. 29, 662 (1946).Google Scholar
  77. Schall, M. D.: Electromicroscopic study of human spermatozoa. Fertil. and Steril. 3, 62–82 (1952).Google Scholar
  78. Schall, M. D.: Quoted by Buxton, Artificial insemination. Fertil. and Steril. 9, 368 (1958).Google Scholar
  79. Schultz-Larsen, J.: The morphology of the human sperm, Villars. Copenhagen: Lunn 1958.Google Scholar
  80. Seymour, F., C. Duffy and A. Koerner: A case of authenticated fertility in a man aged 94. J. Amer. med. Ass. 105, 1423 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simmonet, H., and M. Brunaud: Remarques sur le metabilosme et las motilite du spermatozoide. Atti 1. Congr. Fisiopath. Animal, Milan, 1948.Google Scholar
  82. Sorensen, Ed.: The dehydrogenization power of sperm cells as a mesurea of fertility. Skand. Veter. 32, 358–373 (1942).Google Scholar
  83. Szent-Gyorgy, A.: Nature of life. New York: Academic Press 1948.Google Scholar
  84. Walton, A., and W. Uruski: The effect of low atmospheric pressure of fertility of the male rabbit. J. exp. Biol. 23, 71–76 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Weisman, Abner: A technique for aspirating viable spermatozoa from the cavity of the uterus. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 39, 475 (1940).Google Scholar
  86. Weisman, Abner: Spermatozoa and sterility, p. 129. New York: Hoeber 1941.Google Scholar
  87. Williams, W. L.: Disease of the genital organs of domestic animals. Ithaca (N.Y.) 1943.Google Scholar
  88. Williams, W. W.: Spermatic abnormalities. New Engl. J. Med. 217, 945–951 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Williams, W. W.: The germ plasm factor in sterility. Urol, cutan. Rev. 43, 587 (1939).Google Scholar
  90. Williams, W. W.: The routine order of examinations for the diagnosis of sterility. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 47, 537 (1944).Google Scholar
  91. Williams, W. W.: Mitochondrial and centrosomic disease of spermatozoa. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 64, 614–617 (1950).Google Scholar
  92. Williams, W. W.: Sterility, the diagnostic survey of the infertility. Int. J. Fertility 1, 155–169 (1956).Google Scholar
  93. Williams, W. W., and O. J. Pollak: Study of sperm vitality with the aid of eosin-nigrosin stain. Fert. and Steril. 1, 178 (1950).Google Scholar
  94. Williams, W. W., and A. Savage: Observations on seminal micropathology of bulls. Cornell Vet. 15, 353 (1925).Google Scholar
  95. Williams, W. W., and F. A. Simmons, The clinical approach to the diagnosis of sterility. Urol. cutan. Rev. 46, 558–570 (1942).Google Scholar
  96. Williams, W. W.: Biochemistry of semen. Int. J. Fertility 4, 29–37 (1959).Google Scholar
  97. Yerushalmy, G.: Age of father and survival of offspring. Hum. Biol. 2, 342–356 (1939).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter W. Williams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations