Skip to main content

Electricity Pricing Model

  • Chapter
  • 323 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 506))

Abstract

Comparing the pricing of electricity derivatives to the existing models for traditional commodities as presented in section 17.3 we need to encompass the unique characteristic of non-storability of power. This peculiarity of the electricity market has several crucial implications for derivatives pricing:

  1. (i)

    The non-storability feature means that due to a lack of any power inventories electricity must be produced at exactly the same time as it is consumed. This creates a load-matching problem in that the utility industry needs to discover the value of lost load and decide on the optimum amount of reserve margin to provide.161

  2. (ii)

    The non-storability problem could be diminished if there would be a physical possibility of economically transferring power from an overproduction region to a consumer region. However, the US power markets are geographically distinct with several regions serving as delivery points for electricity futures contracts. Currently, there are no satisfactory transmission policies but inter-regional price differences will decrease as deregulation proceeds and the utility industry is required to open up its transmission systems.162

  3. (iii)

    If electricity is practically non-storable, no inventories can be hold and thereby it is impossible to specify the positive returns from owning the commodity for delivery if power is not storable. Thus, the convenience yield models can hardly be extended to price electricity derivatives. This incomplete market situation asks for different pricing models to value electricity derivatives.163

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See, for example, Woodley and Hunt (1997, p. 44 f.).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the isssue of rationalising the US power transmission business see, for example, Barber (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For suggestions of different pricing models see, for example, Eydeland and Geman (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For the marked volatility in energy prices that is both high and variable over time see, for example, Duffie and Gray (1995) and Pokalsky and Robinson (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Pokalsky and Robinson (1997) and Leong (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. In applying these models for pricing purposes it needs to be ensured that power derivatives are valued risk neutrally. Leong (1997), for example, sees the need of properly distinguishing between power forward prices and forecasts of power prices.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See section 19.2 for a detailed description of the selected data sample and the estimation results of the empirical inferences.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duffie and Gray (1995, p. 39).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eydeland and Geman (1998, p. 73).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For an analysis on the impact of mean-reversion processes on, for example, interest rate contingent claims see Uhrig-Homburg (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Other proposed stochastic volatility models from the literature include Hull and White (1987), Stein and Stein (1991), and Schöbel and Zhu (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. In Heston (1993) the spot price diffusion models the dynamics of a stock price which is a tradeable and therefore hedgeable asset.

    Google Scholar 

  13. On the relevance of incorporating risk premia in the valuation of power derivatives see, for example, Pirrong and Jermakyan (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. The fomula is named after the contributions of Feynman (1948) and Kac (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a description of the differential operator see, for example, Oksendal (1995, p. 128).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, for example, Ingersoll (1987, p. 397) for an application with interest rate contingent claims.

    Google Scholar 

  17. This type of differential equation commonly arises with the squared Gaussian model of Cox, Ingersoll, and Ross (1985b); see, for example, Rogers (1995, p. 99 f.).

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a similar solution to equation (18.13) see, for example, Rogers (1995, p. 100) and Stein and Stein (1991, p. 730).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kellerhals, B.P. (2001). Electricity Pricing Model. In: Financial Pricing Models in Continuous Time and Kalman Filtering. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 506. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21901-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21901-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42364-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21901-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics