Risk Management and Derivatives Pricing

  • B. Philipp Kellerhals
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 506)

Abstract

After examining the implications of our theoretical term structure model on the different term structures that are relevant in pricing term structure derivatives we now answer the question on how the model can be used in risk management. The management of interest rate risk is especially concerned with rebalancing a fixed income portfolio exposed to interest rate risk due to the desired risk return characteristics. The types of interest rate risk considered to be of relevance in interest rate risk management are generally considered to be: (i) Market risk is the risk of changing prices due to general changes of the overall level of interest rates on default free securities, (ii) yield curve risk is considered the risk associated with non-parallel shifts in the yield curve, i.e. a reshaping of the yield curve due to, for example, steepening, flattening, or twisting, and (iii) credit risk which is related to altering security prices caused by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer.

Keywords

Income Volatility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 102.
    See, for example, Macaulay (1938) and Bierwag, Kaufman, and Toevs (1983).Google Scholar
  2. 103.
    Other recent concepts include the functional duration from Klaffky, Ma, and Nozari (1992) and the partial duration by Waldman (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 104.
    For a comparative analysis of current credit risk models used as internal models by banks see, for example, Crouhy, Galai, and Mark (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 105.
    See, for example, Wu (1996) and Chen (1996a).Google Scholar
  5. 106.
    For a broad variety of applications of this method see, for example, Musiela and Rutkowski (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 107.
    A method studied extensively for different contingent claims by, for example, Wilmott, Dewynne, and Howison (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 108.
    For the complete definitions and the relevant conditions see, for example, Duffle (1996), Karatzas and Shreve (1991), and Oksendal (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 109.
    For example, the previously derived discount bond formula is the solution toGoogle Scholar
  9. 110.
    This results in discounted asset prices being martingales with respect to ℚ; see Harrison and Pliska (1981) and Geman, Karoui, and Rochet (1995).Google Scholar
  10. 111.
    From now onwards we drop the notation for the x-dependence of discount bonds, i.e. we denote their price by P (t, T).Google Scholar
  11. 112.
    The technique of changing numéraire was developed by Geman (1989) for the general case of stochastic interest rates. Jamshidian (1989) implicitly uses this technique in the Gaussian interest rate framework of Vasicek (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 113.
    See, for example, Dothan (1990, p. 288).Google Scholar
  13. 114.
    See, for example, Oksendal (1995).Google Scholar
  14. 115.
    The put-call parity was first described by Stoll (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 116.
    For the origin and the development of the swap markets see, for example, Das (1994, ch. 1).Google Scholar
  16. 117.
    For variant forms of interest rate swaps see, for example, Marshall and Kapner (1993, ch. 3).Google Scholar
  17. 118.
    For the pricing of default-free interest rate caps, for example, under the direct approach see Briys, Crouhy, and Schöbel (1991) and under the log-normal approach see Miltersen, Sandmann, and Sondermann (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Philipp Kellerhals
    • 1
  1. 1.Gesellschaft für Wertpapieranlagen mbHDeutscher Investment-TrustFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations