Decision Support Systems Using Reference Point Optimization

  • Andrzej Lewandowski
  • Andrzej P. Wierzbicki
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 331)

Abstract

This paper presents a review of various approaches to decision support, distinguishes a methodological approach based on reference point optimization and reviews advances in this field done in Poland under the contracted study agreement “Theory, Software and Testing Examples for Decision Support Systems” with the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Keywords

Transportation Estima 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthonisse, J.M., K.M. van Hee and J.K. Lenstra (1987). Resource constrained project scheduling: an international exercise in DSS development. Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Operations research and System Theory, Note OS-N9701, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1985). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bonczek, R. H., Holsapple, C. W. and Whinston, A. B. (1981). Foundations of Decision Support Systems. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Cooke, S. and Slack, N. (1984). Making Management Decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  5. Dinkelbach, W. (1982). Entscheidungsmodelle, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, R. E. (1984). Beyond rationality. In: Grauer, M., Thompson, M., Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes. Proceedings, Sopron, Hungary, 1984. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 248. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Erlandson, F. E. (1981). The satisficing process: A new look. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-11, No. 11, November 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Feldbaum, A. A. (1962). Foundations of the theory of optimal control systems (in Russian: Osnovy teorii optimalnych avtomaticheskikh sistem ). Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, W. F. (1979). Utility models for multiple objective decisions: Do they accu- rately represent human preferences? Decision Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 451–477.Google Scholar
  10. Ginzberg M. J. and Stohr E. A. (1982). Decision Support Systems: Issues and Perspectives. In: Ginzberg, M. J., Reitman, W. R. and Stohr, E. A. Eds.: Decision Support Systems, Proceedings of the NYU Symposium on Decision Support Systems, New York, 21–22 May, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Glushkov, V. M. (1972). Basic principles of automation in organizational management systems (in Russian). Upravlayushcheye Sistemy i Mashiny 1.Google Scholar
  12. Grauer, M., Lewandowski, A., and Wierzbicki, A. P. (1984). DIDAS — theory, implementation and experiences. In: Grauer, M. and Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Interactive Decision Analysis, Proceedings, Laxenburg, Austria, 1983. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 229. Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, P. (1986). Group Decision Support Systems. In: McLean E. and Sol, H. G. Eds: Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on Decision Support Systems, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Horsky, D. (1984). Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Management Science Vol. 30, No. 7, July 1984. Google Scholar
  15. Ignizio, J. P. (1978). Goal programming — a tool for multiobjective analysis. Journal for Operational Research29, pp. 1109–1119. Google Scholar
  16. Jacquet-Lagreze, E. and Shakun, M. F. (1984). Decision Support Systems for Semi-Structured Buying Decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 16, pp. 48–58.Google Scholar
  17. Jarke, M. (1986). Group Decision Support through Office Systems: Developments in Distributed DSS Technology. In: McLean, E. and Sol, H. G. Eds: Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on Decision Support Systems, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Katoh, N. (1987). An efficient algorithm for bicriteria minimum-cost circulation problem. Working Paper WP-87–98, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  19. Katoh, N. (1987). An efficient algorithm for a bicriteria single-machine scheduling problem. Working Paper WP-87–100, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  20. Keen, P. G. W and Scott Morton, M. S. (1978). Decision Support Systems — An Organizational Perspective. Addison-Wesley Series on Decision Support.Google Scholar
  21. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Willey, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. Korhonen, P., and Laakso, J. (1986). Solving a generalized goal programming problem using a visual interactive approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 26, pp. 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurzhanski, A. (1986). Inverse problems in multiobjective dynamic optimization. In: Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Proceedings, Kyoto, Japan, 1986, Y. Sawaragi, K. Inoue and H. Nakayama, Eds. Kurzhanski, A. 286, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Larichev, O. (1987). New directions in multicriteria decision making research. Working Paper WP-87–67, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  25. Lewandowski, A., Rogowski, T. and Kreglewski T. (1985). A trajectory-oriented extension of DIDAS and its application. In: Grauer, M., Thompson, M., Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes. Proceedings, Sopron, Hungary, 1984. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 248. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Lewandowski, A., Johnson, S. and Wierzbicki, A. P. (1986). A prototype selection committee decision analysis and support system, SCDAS: theoretical background and computer implementation. Working Paper WP-86–27, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  27. Lewandowski, A. and A.P. Wierzbicki (1987). Interactive decision support systems — the case of discrete alternatives for committee decision making. Working Paper WP-87–38, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  28. Lewandowski, A. (1988). SCDAS — decision support system for group decision making: information processing issues. Working Paper WP-88–48, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  29. Michalevich, M. V. (1986). Stochastic approaches to interactive multicriteria optimization problems. Working Paper WP-86–10, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Naisbit, J. (1984). Megatrends. H. Mifflin, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Nakayama, H. and Sawaragi, Y. (1983). Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming. In: Grauer, M. and Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Interactive Decision Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  32. Nakayama, H. (1986). Geometrical approach to Iserman duality in linear vector optimization. Collaborative Paper CP-86–02, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  33. OPTIONS (1987). Decision Support Systems, No. 3–4, 1987. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, B. J. and Al-Utabi, G. A. (1986). Decision support systems. The reality that seems to be hard to accept? OMEGA Int. Journal of Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1986.Google Scholar
  35. Pospelov, G. S. and Irikov, V. A. (1976). Program-and Goal Oriented Planning and Management (in Russian). Sovietskoye Radio, Moscow.Google Scholar
  36. Rappoport, A. (1984). The uses of experimental games. In: Grauer, M., Thompson, M., Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes. Proceedings, Sopron, Hungary, 1984. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 248. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Roy, B. (1971). Problems and methods with multiple objective functions, Math. Programming, Vol. 1, pp. 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saari, D. (1982). Inconsistencies of weighted Voting Systems. Math. of Operations Res., Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  39. Saari, D. (1987). Symmetry and extensions of Arrow’s theorem. Working Paper WP-87–109, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  40. Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, Lifetime Learning Publ., Belmont.Google Scholar
  41. Sage, A. P. (1981). Behavioural and organizational considerations in the design of information systems and processes for planning and decision support. IEEE Trans. Systems and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-11, No. 9, September 1981.Google Scholar
  42. Sakawa, M. and H. Yano (1987). An interactive fuzzy satisficing method using augmented minimax problems and its application to environmental systems. Research Report RR-87–14, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  43. Sawaragi, Y., H. Nakayama and T. Tanino (1985). Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Seo, F. and M. Sakawa (1987). Fuzzy multiattribute utility analysis for collective choice. Research Report RR-87–13, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, H. (1958). Administrative Behaviour, McMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Sprague, R. H. and Carlson, C. Eds. (1982). Building Effective Decision Support Systems. Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Stabel C. B. (1986). Decision Support Systems: Alternative Perspectives and Schools. In: McLean, E. and Sol, H. G. Eds: Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on Decision Support Systems, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  48. Steuer, R., and Cho., E. V. (1983). An interactive weighted Chebyshev procedure for multiple objective programming Mathematical Programming 26, pp. 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanino, T. (1986). Sensitivity analysis in multiobjective optimization. Working Paper WP-86–05, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  50. Tanino, T. (1986). Stability and sensitivity analysis in convex vector optimization. Working Paper WP-86–15, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  51. Tversky, A., Kaheman, D. and Slovic, P. (1983). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristic and Biases, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Valyi, I. (1986). On approximate vector optimization. Working Paper WP-86–07, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  53. Valyi, I. (1987). Epsilon solution and duality in vector optimization. Working Paper WP-87–43, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  54. Vlacic, Lj., Matic, B. and Wierzbicki, A. P. (1986). Aggregation Procedures for Hierarchically Grouped Decision Attributes with Application to Control System Performance Evaluation. International Conference on Vector Optimization, Darmstadt, 1986.Google Scholar
  55. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1980). The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel, G. and Gal, T. Eds: Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Applications. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  56. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1982). A mathematical basis for satisfying decision making. Math. Modelling, Vol. 3, pp. 391–405.Google Scholar
  57. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1983a). Negotiation and mediation in conflicts: The role of mathematical approaches and methods. In: Chestnut, H. et al., Eds: Supplemental Ways to Increase International Stability. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
  58. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1983b). Critical essay on the methodology of multiobjective analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
  59. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1984a). Models and Sensitivity of Control Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.Google Scholar
  60. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1984b). Interactive decision analysis and interpretative computer intelligence. In: Grauer, M. and Wierzbicki, A. P. Eds: Interactive Decision Analysis, Proceedings, Laxenburg, Austria, 1983. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 229. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  61. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1985). Negotiation and mediation in conflicts: Plural rationality and interactive decision processes. In: Grauer, M., Thompson M. and Wierzbicki A. P., Eds: Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes, Proceedings, Sopron, 1984. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 248. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  62. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1986). On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR-Spektrum, Vol. 8, pp. 7387.Google Scholar
  63. Wynne, B. (1982). Decision support systems — a new plateau of opportunity or more emperor’s clothing? INTERFACES, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Lewandowski
    • 1
  • Andrzej P. Wierzbicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Automatic ControlWarsaw University of TechnologyPoland

Personalised recommendations