Abstract
While many papers in the literature have provided a rationale for the existence of debt, such as tax benefits or signaling effects, only a few have made the distinction between senior and junior debt and analyzed the consequences of differing priority of claims for firm behavior. Perotti and Spier (1993) and Hart and Moore (1995) are two recent exceptions. Both of these papers explore the effects of the existence of both senior and junior debt on the firm’s investment decision. Perotti and Spier (1993) show that value may be extracted from senior claims through the issue of junior debt. The reason is that by retiring equity through a junior debt issue, the shareholders credibly threaten not to undertake valuable new investment unless senior debt holders concede to a reduction of their claims. Hart and Moore (1995) show that a mix of short-term and senior long-term debt might be necessary to deter management from undertaking unprofitable investment. The basic intuition, extending that of Jensen (1986), is that short-term debt forces management to disgorge free cash flows.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziegler, A. (1999). Junior Debt. In: A Game Theory Analysis of Options. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 468. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21589-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21589-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65628-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21589-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive