The similarity problem for cyclic homomorphisms on a C*-algebra

  • Gilles Pisier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1618)

Summary

In this chapter, we first study inequalities satisfied by any bounded linear operator u: A→Y on a C*-algebra with values in a Banach space Y. The case when Y is another C*-algebra is of particular interest. Then we turn to homomorphisms u: A →* B(H) and prove that, if u is cyclic (= has a cyclic vector), boundedness implies complete boundedness. Hence bounded cyclic homomorphisms are similar to *-representations. This extends to homomorphisms with finite cyclic sets. We also include the positive solution to the similarity problem for C*-algebras without tracial states and for nuclear C*-algebras. Finally, we show that for a given C*-algebra, the similarity problem and the derivation problem are equivalent.

Keywords

Hull 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Remarks on Chapter 7

  1. [Ped]
    Pedersen G. C’-algebras and their automorphism groups. Academic Press, London, 1979.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [KR]
    Kadison R. and Ringrose J. Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, vol. II. Academic Press. New-York, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [H1]
    Haagerup U.: Solution of the similarity problem for cyclic representations of C’-algebras. Annals of Math. 118 (1983) 215–240.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [HP1]
    Haagerup U. and Pisier G.: Linear operators between C’-algebras. Duke Math. J. 71 (1993) 889–925.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [P5]
    Pisier G. Grothendieck’s theorem for noncommutative C’-algebras with an appendix on Grothendieck’s constants. J. Funct. Anal. 29 (1978) 397–415.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [LuPP]
    Lust-Piquard F. and Pisier G.: Non commutative Khintchine and Paley inequalities. Arkiv fr Mat. 29 (1991) 241–260.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [HP1]
    Haagerup U. and Pisier G.: Linear operators between C’-algebras. Duke Math. J. 71 (1993) 889–925.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [C1]
    Christensen E.: Extensions of derivations. J. Funct. Anal. 27 (1978) 234–247.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [C2]
    Christensen E.: Extensions of derivations II. Math. Scand. 50 (1982) 111–122.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [C3]
    Christensen E.: On non self adjoint representations of operator algebras. Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981) 817–834.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [K2]
    Kadison R. A note on the similarity problem. J. Operator Theory 26 (1991) 389–405.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [K3]
    Kadison R.: On an inequality of Haagerup-Pisier. J. Op. Theory 29 (1993) 57–68.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [Bu]
    Bunce J. W.: The similarity problem for representations of C’-algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1981) 409–414.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ki]
    Kirchberg E.: The derivation and the similarity problem are equivalent. Preprint. August 94.Google Scholar
  15. [C4]
    Christensen E.: Similarities of Ill factors with property T. Journal Operator Theory 15 (1986) 281–288.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilles Pisier
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Equipe d’AnalyseUniversité Paris VIParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations