The similarity problem for cyclic homomorphisms on a C*-algebra

  • Gilles Pisier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1618)


In this chapter, we first study inequalities satisfied by any bounded linear operator u: A→Y on a C*-algebra with values in a Banach space Y. The case when Y is another C*-algebra is of particular interest. Then we turn to homomorphisms u: A →* B(H) and prove that, if u is cyclic (= has a cyclic vector), boundedness implies complete boundedness. Hence bounded cyclic homomorphisms are similar to *-representations. This extends to homomorphisms with finite cyclic sets. We also include the positive solution to the similarity problem for C*-algebras without tracial states and for nuclear C*-algebras. Finally, we show that for a given C*-algebra, the similarity problem and the derivation problem are equivalent.




Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Remarks on Chapter 7

  1. [Ped]
    Pedersen G. C’-algebras and their automorphism groups. Academic Press, London, 1979.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [KR]
    Kadison R. and Ringrose J. Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, vol. II. Academic Press. New-York, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [H1]
    Haagerup U.: Solution of the similarity problem for cyclic representations of C’-algebras. Annals of Math. 118 (1983) 215–240.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [HP1]
    Haagerup U. and Pisier G.: Linear operators between C’-algebras. Duke Math. J. 71 (1993) 889–925.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [P5]
    Pisier G. Grothendieck’s theorem for noncommutative C’-algebras with an appendix on Grothendieck’s constants. J. Funct. Anal. 29 (1978) 397–415.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [LuPP]
    Lust-Piquard F. and Pisier G.: Non commutative Khintchine and Paley inequalities. Arkiv fr Mat. 29 (1991) 241–260.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [HP1]
    Haagerup U. and Pisier G.: Linear operators between C’-algebras. Duke Math. J. 71 (1993) 889–925.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [C1]
    Christensen E.: Extensions of derivations. J. Funct. Anal. 27 (1978) 234–247.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [C2]
    Christensen E.: Extensions of derivations II. Math. Scand. 50 (1982) 111–122.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [C3]
    Christensen E.: On non self adjoint representations of operator algebras. Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981) 817–834.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [K2]
    Kadison R. A note on the similarity problem. J. Operator Theory 26 (1991) 389–405.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [K3]
    Kadison R.: On an inequality of Haagerup-Pisier. J. Op. Theory 29 (1993) 57–68.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [Bu]
    Bunce J. W.: The similarity problem for representations of C’-algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1981) 409–414.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ki]
    Kirchberg E.: The derivation and the similarity problem are equivalent. Preprint. August 94.Google Scholar
  15. [C4]
    Christensen E.: Similarities of Ill factors with property T. Journal Operator Theory 15 (1986) 281–288.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilles Pisier
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Equipe d’AnalyseUniversité Paris VIParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations