Advertisement

Completely bounded homomorphisms and derivations

  • Gilles Pisier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1618)

Summary

In this chapter, we study completely bounded homomorphisms u: A → B(H) when A ⊂ B(ℋ) is a subalgebra. We first consider the case when H and ℋ are Banach spaces but mostly concentrate on the Hilbert space case. In the latter case, we prove the fundamental result that a unital homomorphism is completely bounded if it is similar to a completely contractive one. Let δ: A → B(H) be a derivation on a C*-algebra. We show that δ is completely bounded if it is inner. When A is the disc algebra, we prove that an operator T on H is similar to a contraction iff it is completely polynomially bounded, or in other words if the associated homomorphism ff(T) is completely bounded. We discuss a variant for operators on a Banach space and give several related facts. Finally, we give examples showing that a bounded (and actually contractive) unital homomorphism on a uniform algebra is not necessarily completely bounded.

Keywords

Hilbert Space Banach Space Operator Algebra Uniform Algebra Disc Algebra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Remarks on Chapter 4

  1. [Sa]
    Sarason D.: Generalized interpolation in H°°. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1967) 179–203.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [P4]
    Pisier G.: Completely bounded maps between sets of Banach space operators. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39 (1990) 251–277.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [Had]
    Hadwin D.: Dilations and Hahn decompositions for linear maps. Canad. J. Math. 33 (1981) 826–839.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Wi1]
    Wittstock G.: Ein operatorwertigen Hahn-Banach Satz. J. Funct. Anal. 40 (1981) 127–150.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [H1]
    Haagerup U.: Solution of the similarity problem for cyclic representations of C’-algebras. Annals of Math. 118 (1983) 215–240.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Pa1]
    Paulsen V. Completely bounded maps and dilations. Pitman Research Notes in Math. 146, Longman, Wiley, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. [C2]
    Christensen E.: Extensions of derivations II. Math. Scand. 50 (1982) 111–122.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [J]
    Johnson B. E.: Cohomology in Banach algebras. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. [Ri]
    Ringrose J.: Cohomology theory for operator algebras. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 38 (1982) 229–252.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [K4]
    Kadison R.: Derivations of operator algebras. Ann. Math. 83 (1966) 280–293.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [S]
    Sakai S.: Derivations of W’-algebras. Ann. Math. 83 (1966) 273–279.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [SS]
    Sinclair A. and Smith R.: Hochschild cohomology of von Neumann algebras. LMS Lecture notes series. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [Di2]
    Dixmier J.: les algèbres d’opérateurs dans l’espace Hilbertien (Algèbres de von Neumann). Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1969. (Translated into: von Neumann algebras, North-Holland, 1981.)Google Scholar
  14. [C5]
    Christensen E.: Perturbation of operator algebras II. Indiana Math. J. 26 (1977), 891–904.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [Ar2]
    Arveson W.: Ten lectures on operator algebras. CBMS 55. Amer. Math. Soc. Providence (RI ) 1984.Google Scholar
  16. [St]
    Stampfli J.: The norm of a derivation. Pacific J. Math. 33 (1970) 737–747.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [Pa3]
    Paulsen V. Every completely polynomially bounded operator is similar to a contraction. J. Funct. Anal. 55 (1984) 1–17.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [M]
    Mascioni V.: Ideals of the disc algebra, operators related to Hilbert space contractions, and complete boundedness. Houston J. Math. 20 (1994) 299–311.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [SN]
    Sz: Nagy B.: Completely continuous operators with uniformly bounded iterates. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. 4 (1959) 89–92.Google Scholar
  20. [Bo]
    Bourgain J.: On the similarity problem for polynomially bounded operators on Hilbert space. Israel J. Math. 54 (1986) 227–241.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [Ro]
    Rota G.C.: On models for linear operators. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960) 468–472.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [Pet]
    Petrovic S.: A dilation Theory for Polynomially Bounded Operators. J. Funct. Anal. 108 (1992) 458–469.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [PPP]
    Paulsen V., Pearcy C. and Petrovic S.: On centered and weakly centered operators. J. Funct. Anal. 128 (1995) 87–101.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [Pe1]
    Peller V.: Estimates of functions of power bounded operators on Hilbert space. J. Oper. Theory 7 (1982) 341–372.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [Pa5]
    Paulsen V. Representations of function algebras, abstract operator spaces and Banach space geometry. J. Funct. Anal. 109 (1992) 113–129.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [DP]
    Douglas V. and Paulsen V.: Hilbert modules over function algebras. Pitman Longman 1989.Google Scholar
  27. [CCFW]
    Carlson J., Clark D., Foias C. and Williams J. Projective Hilbert A(D)modules. Preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilles Pisier
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Equipe d’AnalyseUniversité Paris VIParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations