Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((YEARBOOK,volume 1997))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Our mission to deliver high quality, compassionate intensive care during times of increased pressure on the health care dollar dictate that critical care be administered sensibly, sensitively and efficiently. Critical care decisions are always guided by the context of a given case; thus, recognizing and analyzing the contextual nature of ICU decision-making is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldman GM, Ravindranath TM (1994) The contextual nature of critical care judgement. J Intensive Care Med 9: 58–63

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luce J (1995) Physicians do not have a responsibility to provide futile or unreasonable care if a patient or family insists. Grit Care Med 23: 760–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruark JE, Raffin TA and the Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics (1988) N Engl J Med 318: 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sprung CL (1990) Changing attitudes and practices in forgoing life-sustaining treatments. JAMA 263: 2211–2215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilfix M, Raffin TA (1984) Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support–Optimizing rights and limiting liability. West J Med 141: 387–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suber DG, Tabor WJ (1982) Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: Who decides? JAMA 248: part 1:2250–2251, part 2: 2431–2432

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luce JM, Raffin TA (1988) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. Chest 94: 621–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raffin TA (1986) Value of the living will. Chest 90: 444–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinbrook R, Lo B (1984) Decision making for incompetent patients by designated proxy. N Engl J Med 310: 1598–1601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bone RC, Rackow EC, Weg JG, et al for the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Panel (1990) Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation and withdrawal of intensive care. Chest 97: 949–958

    Google Scholar 

  11. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (1989) Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 18: 1435–1439

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Thoracic Society (1992) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med 115: 478–485

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schneiderman IJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR (1990) Medical futility: Its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med 112: 949–954

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent JL (1990) European attitudes toward ethical problems in intensive care medicine: Results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 16: 256–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Sharpe SM, et al (1986) The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units. JAMA 255: 351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Youngner SJ, Lewandowski W, McClish DK, et al (1986) ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders: Incidence and implications in a medical intensive care unit. JAMA 134: 1327–1330

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, et al (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322: 309–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committees (1992) Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med 20: 320–326

    Google Scholar 

  19. Caralis P, Hammond JS (1992) Attitudes of medical students, housestaff and faculty physicians toward euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med 20: 683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, et al for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (1995) Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 273: 703–708

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL (1984) Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital: When do physicians talk with patients? N Engl J Med 310: 1089–1093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo B, McLeod GA, Saika MA (1986) Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med 146: 1613–1615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shmerling RH, Bedell SE, Lilienfeld A, Delbanco TL (1988) Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A study of elderly outpatients. J Gen Intern Med 3: 317–321

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schonwetter RS, Teasdale TA, Taffet G, Robinson BE, Luchi RJ (1991) Educating the elderly: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions before and after interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 39: 372–377

    Google Scholar 

  25. Curtis JR, Park DP, Krone MR, Pearlman RA (1995) Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt resuscitation orders. JAMA 273: 124–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Danis M, Gerrity MS, Southerland LE, Patrick DL (1988) A comparison of patient, family, and physician assessments of the value of medical intensive care. Crit Care Med 16: 594–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Asch DA, Hansen-Flachen J, Lanken PH (1995) Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: Conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151: 288–292

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA (1991) Perceived quality of life and preferences for life sustaining treatment in older adults. Arch Intern Med 151: 495–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearlman RA, Jonsen A (1985) The use of quality of life considerations in medical decision-making. J Am Geriatric Soc 33: 344–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hyers TM, Briggs DD, Hudson LD, et al (1986) Withholding and withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 134: 1327–1330

    Google Scholar 

  31. Task Force for the Distribution of ICU Resources in the United States. Society of Critical Care Medicine. (1993) Advanced directives, polticies for terminating life support and utilization of ethics committees in Intensive Care Units of the United States. Crit Care Med 21 (Suppl): S219

    Google Scholar 

  32. Silverman H, Tuma P, Caracci L, et al (1993) Patients’ reactions and behaviour toward implementation of the Patient Self Determination Act. Grit Care Med 21 (Suppl): S220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Klessig J (1992) The effect of values and culture on life support decisions. West J Med 157: 316–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Molloy DW, Guyatt GH, Alemayehu E, Mcllroy WE (1991) Treatment preferences, attitudes toward advance directives and concerns about health care. Humane Medicine 7: 285–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schonwetter RS, Walker R, Kramer DR, Robinson BE (1993) Resuscitation decision-making in the elderly: The value of outcome data. J Gen Intern Med 8: 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knaus WA, Rauss A, Alperovitch A, et al and the French Multicentric Group of ICU Research (1990) Do objective estimates of chances for survival influence decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment? Med Decis Making 10: 163–171

    Google Scholar 

  37. Danis M, Garrett J, Harris R, Patrick DL (1994) Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments. Ann Intern Med 120: 567–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. The SUPPORT Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274: 1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Raffin TA (1995) Withdrawing life support: How is the decision made? JAMA 273: 738–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Muller JH, Koenig BA (1988) On the boundary of life and death: The definition of dying by medical residents. In: Lock M, Gordon DR (eds) Biomedicine Examined. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  41. Snider G (1995) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: All systems are not yet “go”. Am Rev Respir Grit Care Med 151: 279–281

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ventres W, Nichter M, Reed R, Frankel R (1993) Limitation of medical care: A ethnographic analysis. J Clin Ethics 4: 134–145

    Google Scholar 

  43. Molloy DW, Guyatt GH, Alemayehu E, Mcllroy WE (1991) Treatment preferences, attitudes toward advance directives, and concerns. Humane Med 84: 103–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ (1989) The medical directive: A new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA 261: 3288–3293

    Google Scholar 

  45. Molloy DW, Guyatt GH (1991) A comprehensive health care directive in a home for the aged. Can Med Assoc J 145: 307–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. McCrary SV, Botkin R (1989) Hospital policy on advance directives: Do institutions ask patients about living wills? JAMA 265: 2411–2414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, et al (1991) Advance directives for medical care–A case for greater use. N Engl J Med 324: 889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Molloy DW, Harrison CX, Farrugia MC (1993) The Canadian experience in advance treatment directives. Humane Med 9: 70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahnerman D (1993) Understanding patients’ decisions; Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA 270: 72–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cook, D.J. (1997). End-of-Life Decision-Making. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 1997. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, vol 1997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13450-4_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13450-4_76

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-13452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13450-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics