Can Intensive Care Units be Compared?

  • F. J. Lamb
  • A. Rhodes
  • E. D. Bennett
Conference paper
Part of the Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (YEARBOOK, volume 1997)


Simple measures such as counting of numbers of patients and fatalities, do not provide either adequate or comprehensive data with regards to the performance of an intensive care unit (ICU), due to the great variations in case mix which includes age, diagnoses, severity of acute illness and co-morbidities. Consequently, complex scoring systems have emerged. These systems and in particular the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III were developed for intensive care units (ICU) for sone principal reason [1]. This was to predict the risk of death for admitted patients. Subsequently to these, various authors have used these systems, although they were not specifically designed for this purpose, to evaluate the efficiency, clinical effectiveness and quality of care within each unit [2–6].


Intensive Care Unit Standardize Mortality Ratio Intensive Care Unit Mortality General Ward Gross National Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Chest 100: 1619–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Judson JA, et al (1988) Patient selection for intensive care: A comparison of New Zealand and United States hospitals. Crit Care Med 16: 318–326Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacobs S, Chang RWS, Lee B, Lee B (1988) Audit of intensive care: A 30-month experience using the APACHE II severity of disease classification system. Intensive Care Med 14: 567–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S, Buckley T, Lin E, Leung D (1993) Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 21: 698–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Tase C, et al (1992) An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States. Crit Care Med 20: 1207–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey MP (1993) Intensive Care Society’s APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland-II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method. Br Med J 307: 977–981Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM (1991) A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA 266: 803–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    South Thames (West) Regional Intensive Care Committee (March 1996) Evidence of the inadequacy of intensive care provision (This document can be obtained from Dr ED Bennett at Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London, UK SW 17 OQT.)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    King’s Fund panel (1989) Intensive care in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 44: 428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldhill DR, Withington PS (1996) Mortality prediction by APACHE II. Anaesthesia 51: 719–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacKirdy FN, Livingston BM, Howie JC, Millar BW (1996) The effects of errors in data on mortality prediction generationGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bion JF, Edlin SA, Ramsay G, McCabe S, Ledingham IM (1985) Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport. Br Med J 291: 432–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dragsted L, Jorgensen J, Jensen NH, et al (1989) Interhospital comparisons of patient outcome from intensive care: Importance of lead time bias. Crit Care Medicine 17: 418–422Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boyd O, Grounds RM (1993) Physiological scoring systems and audit. Lancet 341: 1573–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartos PG, Sun X, Wagner DP, et al (1996) Application of the APACHE III prognostic system in Brazilian intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 22: 564–570Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al (1996) The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 276: 889–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Draper EA (1987) Identification of low-risk monitor admissions to medical-surgical intensive care units. Chest 92: 523–530Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Intensive Care Society (1990) Intensive Care AuditGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Department of Health and Social Security (1970) Intensive Therapy Unit Hospital buildings. Note no 27, HMSO LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomlin PJ (1978) Intensive Care-a medical audit. Anaesthesia 33: 710–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Royal College of Anaesthetists (1992/1993) National ITU auditGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell IA,Grounds RM, Bennett ED (1995) Lancet 345:652 (letter)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Department of Health, NHS Executive ( March 1996 ) Guidelines on admission to and discharge from intensive care and high dependency unitsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. Lamb
  • A. Rhodes
  • E. D. Bennett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations