Advertisement

Trees III pp 142-151 | Cite as

Eastern Redbud (Cercis canadensis L.) and Judas Tree (Cercis siliquastrum L.)

  • R. L. Geneve
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 16)

Abstract

Cercis is a genus of 11 species native to North America, Asia, and Europe. All are large shrubs or small trees under 10 m in height. The genus Cercis is an unusual member of the caesalpinoid subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae sub. Caesalpiniaceae) producing pea-like, papilionaceous flowers more common to the Fabaceae subfamily. The two most important species are C. canadensis (Eastern redbud) and C. siliquastrum (Judas tree). Both species are similar in appearance, with C. canadensis, produced as a nursery crop in the United States, where it is native, and C. siliquastrum, being commercially important in its natural distribution in Europe (Table 1). Cercis is cultivated as an ornamental landscape tree and for establishment in windbreaks or wildlife habitats.

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Somatic Embryogenesis Adventitious Root Zygotic Embryo Woody Plant Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammirato PV (1974) The effect of abscisic acid on the development of somatic embryos from cells of caraway (Carum carvi L.). Bot Gaz 135: 328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett L (1987) Tissue culturing redbud. Am Nurseryman 166: 85–91Google Scholar
  3. Bignami C (1984) Trials on the micropropagation of Cercis siliquastrum L. Inf Agr 40: 103–105Google Scholar
  4. Dirr MA (1977) Manual of woody plants. Their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation and uses. Stipes, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  5. Dirr MA, Heuser CW (1987) The reference manual of woody plant propagation. Varsity Press, Athens, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Geneve RL, Kester ST (1990) The initiation of Somatic embryos and adventitious roots from developing zygotic embryo explants of Cercis canadensis L. cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 22: 71–76Google Scholar
  7. Grubisic D, Culafic L (1986) In vitro vegetative propagation of Cercis siliquastrum L. Bull Sci Yug A 31: 69Google Scholar
  8. Hackett WP (1985) Juvenility, maturation and rejuvenation in woody plants. Hortic Rev 9:109–155 Hillier HG (1981) Hillier’s manual of trees and schrubs. David and Charles Publ, Newton Abbot, London Jensen WA ( 1962 ) Botanical histochemistry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Lloyd G, McCown B (1980) Commercially feasible micropropagation of Mountain Laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Proc Int Plant Propagators Soc 30: 421–427Google Scholar
  10. Merkle SA, Wetzstein HY, Sommer HE (1987) Somatic embryogenesis in tissue cultures of pecan. HortSci 22 (1): 128–130Google Scholar
  11. Mullins MG (1985) Regulation of adventitious root initiation in microcuttings. Acta Hortic 166:53–61 Pence BC, Hasegawa PM, Janick J (1979) Asexual embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104 (2): 145–148Google Scholar
  12. Rajasekaran K, Heim MB, Vasil IK (1987) Endogenous abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid and somatic embryogenesis in cultured leaf explants of Pennisetum purpureum Schum. Plant Physiol 84: 47–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robertson KR (1976) Cercis: the redbuds. Arnoldia. 36: 37–49Google Scholar
  14. Sharp WR, Sondahl MR, Caldas LS, Maraffa SB (1980) The physiology of in vitro asexual embryogenesis. Hortic Rev 2: 268–310Google Scholar
  15. Trigiano RN, Beaty RM, Graham ET (1988) Somatic embryogenesis from immature embryos of redbud (Cercis canadensis). Plant Cell Rep 7: 148–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tulecke W, McGranahan G (1985) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cotyledons of walnut, Juglans regia L. Plant Sci 40: 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vining D (1986) Redbud. Horticulture 64: 26–28Google Scholar
  18. Williams EG, Maheswaran G (1986) Somatic embryogenesis: Factors influencing coordinated behavior of cells as an embryogenic group. Ann Bot London 57: 433–462Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Geneve
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Horticulture and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations