Advertisement

Trees III pp 339-357 | Cite as

Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.)

  • D. D. Ellis
  • D. E. Bilderback
Chapter
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 16)

Abstract

Pinus ponderosa Laws. (ponderosa pine) is one of the most widely distributed timber species in the United States. Its natural range includes every state west of the Great Plains and extends north into western Canada and south into Mexico. When young, the bark is dark gray in color; however, as the tree ages, it forms a characteristic thick, flaky, red-yellow, fire-resistant bark. Unable to tolerate shade, ponderosa pine usually grows in open stands (Fig. 1). A long tap root contributes to the tree’s drought tolerance, and it may live as long as 300 years (Gruell et al. 1982). Ponderosa pine is an economically important pine in western North America and produces more timber than any other American pine (Lee and Pfister 1978). In 1987 the western United States produced 3816 million board feet of ponderosa pine, representing one-third of all softwood lumber produced by these states (Warren 1989).

Keywords

Peptide Profile Tissue Culture Vessel Mature Cotyledon Softwood Lumber Lower Cotyledon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boe KN (1954) Periodicity of cone crops for five Montana conifers. Proc Montana Acad Sci 14: 5–9Google Scholar
  2. Cheng TY (1975) Adventitious bud formation in culture of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Plant Sci Lett 5: 97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellis D (1986) The competency of Pinus ponderosa cotyledons to respond to benzyladenine in tissue culture. PhD Diss, Dep. Bot, Univ Montana, 156 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis D, Bilderback D (1984) Multiple bud formation by cultured embryos of Pinus ponderosa. J Plant Physiol 115: 201–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis D, Bilderback D (1989) Temporal competence of embryonic Pinus ponderosa cotyledons to form multiple buds in vitro. Am J Bot 76 (3): 348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis D, Judd R (1987) SDS-PAGE analysis of bud-forming cotyledons of Pinus ponderosa. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 11: 57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feder N, O’Brien T (1968) Plant microtechniques: some principles and new methods. Am J Bot 55: 123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher DB (1968) Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemistry 17: 92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gruell GE, Schmidt WC, Arnold SF, Reick WJ (1982) Seventy years of vegetation change in managed ponderosa pine forest in western Montana. USDA For Sery Tech Rep INT-130Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman MR, Stevens RE (1984) Vigor of ponderosa pine trees surviving mountain pine beetle attack. USDA Res Note RM-448, 5 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee LC, Pfister RD (1978) Training manual for Montana habitat types. Montana For Consery Exp Stn, Univ Montana, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  12. Manion P (1981) Tree disease concepts. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 399 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Reilly K, Washer J (1977) Vegetative propagation of radiata pine by tissue culture: plantlet formation from embryonic tissue. N Z J For Sci 7: 199–206Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt WC, Shearer RC (1971) Ponderosa pine seed for animals or trees. USDA For Sery Res Pap INT-112, 14 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Shearer RC, Schmidt WC (1970) Natural regeneration in ponderosa pine forests of western Montana. USDA For Sery Res Pap INT-86, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Sommer H, Brown CL, Kormanik P (1975) Differentiation of plantlets in longleaf pine (Pinus palusiris Mill.) tissue cultured in vitro. Bot Gaz 136: 196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Warren DD (1989) Production, prices, employment and trade in Northwest forest industries, third quarter 1988. USDA For Sery Res Bull PNW-RB-162, p 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. D. Ellis
    • 1
  • D. E. Bilderback
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of HorticultureUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations