Skip to main content

Breaking Loose? Russian Reasons to End Its Dependence on Foreign Ports

  • Chapter
The NEBI YEARBOOK 2001/2002

Abstract

As a consequence of the dissolution of the Former Soviet Union, foreign trade between the Russian Federal Republic and Western Europe had to adapt to an essentially new geopolitical environment. One task was to find new routes and to establish a different framework for the conduct of water-borne transport. Nevertheless, to a very large extent prevailing trade patterns, despite many discontinuities, e.g. in exchange relations, were prisoners of the legacy of the past. In the absence of immediately available better alternatives, Russian cargoes had to be carried through the now independent Baltic States to reach ports that previously were parts of the Soviet Union. These ports were originally outlined and built within the framework of a centrally planned economy and received their cargo volumes through administrative directives. To the annoyance of certain political and nationalistic circles in Russia, ports in the Baltic States competed successfully with Russian ports for Russian foreign trade cargoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avdeev, K., Deputy Head of Division of External Economic Co-Operation; City of St Petersburg; Interview in Stockholm 2000–03–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodin, A. (1999). ‘Swedish Trade with the Former Soviet Union,’ pages 169–215 in Alvstam, C.-G. and Lindahl, R. (eds). Forskning om europafrdgor. Gothenburg, CERGU at Gothenburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodin, A. (2000). ‘Ports in Transition in Countries in Transition.’ Dissertation, Department of Human and Economic Geography at Gothenburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K., Selowsky, M. and Wallich, C. (1996). The Transition in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington D.C., The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRD Transition Report (2000). London, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, D., Partner; Booz–Allen & Hamilton; London; Interview in Stockholm 1997–09–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, A.G. (1986). ‘British ports and their export hinterlands: a rapidly changing geography,’ Geografiska Annaler 68B: 1, pages 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1993). Transport Strategies for the Russian Federation. Washington D.C., The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareva, O., Chief of Investment Department; Vyborg Rayon; Interview in Vyborg 1993–02–12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkow, P. (1997). ‘Transition in Russia’s Principal Coastal Gateways,’ Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 38: 5, pages 296–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellén, R. (1917). Staten som lifsform. Stockholm, Hugo Gebers Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, L. (1987). Exercises in spatial thinking. Aldershot, Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink van, H.A. and Berg van den, G. (1998). ‘Gateways and Intermodalism,’ Journal of Transport Geography 6: 1, pages 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushnirsky, F.I. (1997). ‘Post Soviet attempts to establish Free Zones,’ Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 38: 3, pages 144–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s List (1998–2000). Issues from the date indicated where used.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H.M. (1957). The port of Chicago and the St. Lawrence Seaway. The Department of Geography, research papers no 49. Chicago, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morskie Porti (1997–2000): Issues from the month indicated where used. Moscow, Association of Sea Commercial Ports.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, R. (1997). ‘Transport in a new reality’ in Bradshaw, M.J. (ed.). Geography and Transition in the Post-Soviet Republics. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Institute for Transport Economics (1998). Nyttekostnadsanalys av utbyggning av Oslo havn og to alternative havnelösningar. Report no 407/1998. Oslo, Norwegian Institute of Transport Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1992). An Economic History of the USSR 1917–1991. London, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfenov, A., General Director, Lenmorniiproekt; interview St Petersburg 1998–01–24 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranger, P., TACIS–Project Manager – Novorossiysk port; Scott Wilson Kirkpatrik, London; interview in Novorossiysk 1998–11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissoan, J.P. (1994). ‘River Sea navigation in Europe,’ Journal of Transport Geography 2: 2, pages 131–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russian Regional Report (2001). Weekly mail service to subscribers. New York, EastWest Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A., Treisman D., (2000). Without a Map — Political tactics and economic reform in Russia. Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1995). ‘Ethnic Relations in the new States,’ pages 34–45 in Shaw D. J. B. (ed.). The Post Soviet Republics. Harlow, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tally, W. (1998). ‘Linkages between transportation infrastructure investments and economic production,’ Logistics and Transportation Review 32: 1, pages 145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trolley, R. and Turton, B. (1995). Transport systems, policy and planning- A geographical approach. Harlow, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigarié, A. (1979). Ports de Commerce et Vie Littorale. Paris, Hachette Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D. (2000). ‘Factors affecting the pattern of future demand in the ports industry,’ PIANC Bulletin 104, pages 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Development Report (1996). From Plan to Market. Washington, D.C., Oxford University Press/World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brodin, A. (2002). Breaking Loose? Russian Reasons to End Its Dependence on Foreign Ports. In: Hedegaard, L., Lindström, B., Joenniemi, P., Östhol, A., Peschel, K., Stålvant, CE. (eds) The NEBI YEARBOOK 2001/2002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13181-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13181-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07700-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13181-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics