Clinical Features

  • Niels K. Veien

Abstract

A diagnosis of contact dermatitis can be made only after the careful consideration of many variables. A thorough knowledge of the clinical features of the skin’s reactions to various contactants is important in making a correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis.

Keywords

Mercury Rubber Vasculitis Rhinitis Acne 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher AA (1987) Contact urticaria and anaphylactoid reaction due to corn starch surgical glove powder. Contact Dermatitis 16: 224–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van der Meeren HLM, Van Erp PEJ (1986) Life-threatening contact urticaria from glove powder. Contact Dermatitis 14: 190–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rystedt I (1985) Hand eczema and long-term prognosis in atopic dermatitis. Dissertation, Department of Occupational Dermatology, National Board of Occupational Safety and Health and Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thelin I, Agrup G (1985) Pompholyx — a one year series. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 65: 214–217Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwanitz HJ (1986) Das Atopische Palmoplantarekzem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edman B (1988) Palmar eczema: a pathogenetic role for acetylsalicylic acid, contraceptives and smoking? Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 68: 402–407Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menné T (1983) Nickel allergy. Dissertation, University of CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menné T, Veien NK, Maibach HI (1989) Systemic contact-type dermatitis due to drugs. Semin Dermatol 8: 144–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dooms-Goosens AE, Debusschere KM, Gevers DM et al. (1986) Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 15: 1–11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7: 238–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (1977) A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28: 197–209Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clemmensen O, Hjorth N (1982) Perioral contact urticaria from sorbic acid and benzoic acid in a salad dressing. Contact Dermatitis 8: 1–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andersen KE, L¢wenstein H (1978) An investigation of the possible immunological relationship between allergen extracts from birch pollen, hazelnut, potato and apple. Contact Dermatitis 4: 73–79Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy GM, Rycroft RJG (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from silver birch pollen. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goosens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 146–148Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amlot PL, Kemeny DM, Zachary C, Parkes P, Lessor MH (1987) Oral allergy syndrome (OAS): symptoms of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to foods. Clin Allergy 17: 33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello E, Bigi A, Ansaloni R (1988) The oral allergy syndrome. Ann Allergy 61: 47–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ackerman AB (1978) Histological diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases. Lea and Fibiger, Philadelphia, p 863Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menné T, Hjorth N (1983) Pompholyx–dyshidrotic eczema. Semin Dermatol 2: 75–80Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frosch PJ (1989) Irritant contact dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 385–403Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rothenborg HW, Menné T, Sjolin K-E (1977) Temperature dependent primary irritant dermatitis from lemon perfume. Contact Dermatitis 3: 37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rycroft RJG (1985) Low humidity and microtrauma. Am J Ind Med 8: 371–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rycroft RJG (1987) Low-humidity occupational dermatoses. In: Gardner AW (ed) Current approaches to occupational health, 3rd edn. Wright, Bristol, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hellgren L, Mobacken H (1969) Nummular eczema–clinical and statistical data. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 49: 189–196Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rycroft RJG (1981) Soluble oil dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 6: 229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Torinuki W, Tagami H (1987) Pustular irritant dermatitis due to croton oil. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 68: 257–260Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sevadjian CM (1985) Pustular contact hypersensitivity to fluorouracil with rosacealike sequelae. Arch Dermatol 121: 240–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weston WL, Weston JA (1984) Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Am J Dis Child 138: 932–936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jones HE, Lewis CW, McMarlin SL (1973) Allergic contact sensitivity in atopic patients. Arch Dermatol 107: 217–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Svensson A, Möller H (1986) Eyelid dermatitis: the role of atopy and contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 15: 178–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rystedt I (1985) Contact sensitivity in adults with atopic dermatitis in childhood. Contact Dermatitis 12: 1–8Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghoj P, Andersen KE, Brandrup F, Kaaber K, Osmundsen PE, Thestrup-Pedersen K, Veien NK (1989) Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Contact Dermatitis 21: 291–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Möller H, Svensson A (1986) Metal sensitivity: positive history but negative test indicates atopy. Contact Dermatitis 14: 57–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Todd DJ, Burrows D, Stanford CF (1989) Atopy in subjects with a history of nickel allergy but negative patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 21: 129–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bonnevie P (1939) Aethiologie and Pathogenese der Eczemkrankheiten (Dissertation). Nyt Nordisk, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Larsson-Stymne B, Widström L (1985) Ear piercing–a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? Contact Dermatitis 13: 289–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gawkrodger DJ, Vestey JP, Wong W-K, Buxton PK (1986) Contact clinic survey of nickel-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 14: 165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moorthy TT, Tan GH (1986) Nickel sensitivity in Singapore. Int J Dermatol 25: 307–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hemingway JD, Molokhia MM (1987) The dissolution of metallic nickel in artificial sweat. Contact Dermatitis 16: 99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Emmett EA, Risby TH, Jiang L, Ng SK, Feinman S (1988) Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: bioavailability from consumer products and provocation threshold. J Am Acad Dermatol 19: 314–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kanan MW (1969) Contact dermatitis in Kuwait. J Kuwait Med Assoc 3: 129–144Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fisher AA (1985) Nickel dermatitis in men. Cutis 35: 424–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    De Corres LF, Garrastazu MT, Soloeta R, Escayol P (1982) Nickel contact dermatitis in a blood bank. Contact Dermatitis 8: 32–37Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oakley AMM, Ive FA, Car MM (1987) Skin clips are contraindicated when there is nickel allergy. J R Soc Med 80: 290–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cunningham MJ, Zone JJ, Petersen MJ, Green JA (1986) Circulating activated ( DR-positive) T lymphocytes in a patient with autoeczematization. J Am Acad Dermatol 14: 1039–1041Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Andersen KE, Maibach HI (1983) Drugs used topically. In: de Weck AL, Bundgaard H (eds) Allergic reactions to drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 313–377Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wilkinson JD, Hambly EM, Wilkinson DS (1980) Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 60: 245–249Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Edman B, Möller H (1986) Medicament contact allergy. Derm Beruf Umwelt 34: 139–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Avnstorp C, Hamann K (1981) Neglelakeksem. Ugeskr Læger 143: 2504–2505Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burnett JW, Calton GJ (1987) Jellyfish envenomation syndromes updated. Ann Emerg Med 16: 1000–1005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hogan DJ, Dosman JA, Li KYR et al. (1986) Questionnaire survey of pruritus and rash in grain elevator workers. Contact Dermatitis 14: 170–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lachapelle JM (1986) Industrial airborne irritant or allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14: 137–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beck MH, Hausen BM, Dave VK (1984) Allergic contact dermatitis from Machaerium scleroxylum Tul. ( Pao ferro) in a joinery shop. Clin Exp Dermatol 9: 159–166Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ippen H, Wereta-Kubek M, Rose U (1986) Haut-and Schleimhautreaktionen durch Zimmerpflanzen der Gattung Dieffenbachia. Dermatosen 34: 93–101Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hausen BM (1982) Häufigkeit and Bedeutung toxischer and allergischer Kontaktdermatitiden durch Machaerium scleroxylum Tul. (Pao ferro), einem Ersatzholz für Palisander (Dalbergia nigra All.). Hautarzt 33: 321–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Möller NE, Nielsen B, Von Würden K (1986) Contact dermatitis to semisynthetic penicillins in factory workers. Contact Dermatitis 14: 307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J, Thomsen K (1976) Airborne contact dermatitis from Compositae oleoresins simulating photodermatitis. Br J Dermatol 95: 613–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Berg M (1988) Skin problems in workers using visual display terminals. Contact Dermatitis 19: 335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    LaMarte FP, Merchant JA, Casale TB (1988) Acute systemic reactions to carbonless copy paper associated with histamine release. JAMA 260: 242–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kligman AM, Klemme JC, Susten AS (eds) (1985) The chronic effects of repeated mechanical trauma to the skin. Am J Ind Med 8: 253–513Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nequin ND (1978) Letter to the editor. N Engl. J Med 298: 405–406Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tomecki KJ, Mikesell JF (1987) Rower’s rump. J Am Acad Dermatol 16: 890–891Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hersle K, Mobacken H (1982) Hyperkeratotic dermatitis of the palms. Br J Dermatol 107: 195–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Plewig G, Fulton JE, Kligman AM (1970) Pomade acne. Arch Dermatol 101: 580–584Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pecegueiro M, Brandao M (1984) Contact plantar pustulosis. Contact Dermatitis 11: 126–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Andersen KE, Sjolin KE, Solgaard P (1989) Acute irritant contact folliculitis in a galvanizer. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 417–418Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rystedt I, Fischer T, Lagerholm B (1983) Patch testing with sodium tungstate. Contact Dermatitis 9: 69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Freeman S (1986) Woman allergic to husband’s sweat and semen. Contact Dermatitis 14: 110–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Held JL, Ruszkowski AM, Deleo VA (1988) Consort contact dermatitis due to oak moss. Arch Dermatol 124: 261–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rycroft RJG, Baran R (1984) Occupational abnormalities and contact dermatitis. In: Baran R et al. (eds) Diseases of the nails. Blackwell, London, pp 267–287Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mathias CGT, Maibach HI (1984) Allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants. Arch Dermatol 120: 1202–1205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cronin E (1982) “New” allergens of clinical importance. Semin Dermatol 1: 33–41Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Clemmensen O, Knudsen HE (1980) Contact sensitivity to aluminium in a patient hyposensitized with aluminium precipitated grass pollen. Contact Dermatitis 6: 305–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Veien, NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Nörholm A (1986) Aluminium allergy. Contact Dermatitis 15: 295–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fischer T, Rystedt I (1982) A case of contact sensitivity to aluminium. Contact Dermatitis 8: 343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Feinglos MN, Jegasothy BV (1979) “Insulin” allergy due to zinc. Lancet is 122–124Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J (1976) Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis 2: 28–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Von Krogh G, Maibach HI (1981) The contact urticaria syndrome — an updated review. J Am Acad Dermatol 5: 328–342Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Menné T (1983) Reactions to systemic exposure to contact allergens. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) Dermatotoxicology, 2nd edn. Hemisphere, Washington, pp 483–500Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Veien NK (1989) Systemically induced eczema in adults. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 147 ( Dissertation, University of Copenhagen )Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Veien NK, Krogdahl A (1989) Is nickel vasculitis a clinical entity? In: Frosch P, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 172–177Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kaaber K, SjOlin KE, Menné T (1983) Elbow eruptions in nickel and chromate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 9: 213–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Calnan CD (1956) Nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 68: 229–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Andersen KE, Hjorth N, Menné T (1984) The baboon syndrome: systemically-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 10: 97–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Christensen OB (1981) Nickel allergy and hand eczema in females. Dissertation, University of Lund, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ghadially R, Ramsay CA (1988) Gentamicin: systemic exposure to a contact allergen. J Am Acad Dermatol 19: 428–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lechner T, Grytzmann B, Bäurle G (1987) Hämatogenes allergisches Kontaktekzem nach oraler Gabe von Nystatin. Mykosen 30: 143–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bernard P, Rayol J, Bonnafoux A et al. (1988) Toxidermies apres prise orale de pristinamycine. Ann Dermatol Venereol 115: 63–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sehgal VN, Gangwani OP (1987) Fixed drug eruption. Int J Dermatol 26: 67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Alanko K, Stubb S, Reitamo S (1987) Topical provocation of fixed drug eruption. Br J Dermatol 116: 561–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shelmire B (1941) Cutaneous and systemic reactions observed during oral poison ivy therapy. J Allergy 12: 252–271Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kligman AM (1958) Poison ivy (Rhus) dermatitis. AMA Arch Dermatol 77: 149–180Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rycroft RJG (1980) Acute ulcerative contact dermatitis from Portland cement. Br J Dermatol 102: 487–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Rycroft RJG (1980) Acute ulcerative contact dermatitis from ready mixed cement. Clin Exp Dermatol 5: 245–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Osmundsen PE, Alani MD (1971) Contact allergy to an optical whitener, “CPY”, in washing powders. Br J Dermatol 85: 61–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Kojima S, Kaniwa M, Nakamura A (1985) Naphthol AS as a cause of pigmented contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 13: 20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Schmidt H, Barfred T (1979) Caterpillar dermatitis of the palm associated with osteitis of finger bones. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 59 [Suppl 851: 157–159Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Wersted A, Hjorth N (1985) Pityrosporum orbiculare — a pathogenic factor in atopic dermatitis of the face, scalp and neck? Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 114: 146–148Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kieffer M, Bergbrant IM, Faergemann J et al. (1990) Immune reactions to Pityrosporum ovale in adult patients with atopic dermatitis and seborrhoeic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 29: 739–742Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Maibach HI (1987) Oral substitution in patients sensitized by transdermal clonidine treatment. Contact Dermatitis 16: 1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Harari Z, Sommer I, Knobel B (1987) Multifocal contact dermatitis to nitroderm TTS 5 with extensive postinflammatory hypermelanosis. Dermatologica 174: 249–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Holdiness MR (1989) A review of contact dermatitis associated with transdermal therapeutic systems. Contact Dermatitis 20: 3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Weickel R, Frosch PJ (1986) Kontaktallergie auf Glyceroltrinitrat ( Nitroderm TTS ). Hautarzt 37: 511–512Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Edman B (1985) Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens. Contact Dermatitis 13: 129–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Näher H, Frosch PJ (1987) Contact dermatitis to thioxolone. Contact Dermatitis 17: 250–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Storrs FJ (1984) Permanent wave contact dermatitis: contact allergy to glyceryl monothioglycolate. J Am Acad Dermatol 11: 74–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kellet JK, Beck MH (1985) Ammonium persulphate sensitivity in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 13: 26–28Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Andersen KE, Roed-Petersen J, Kamp P (1984) Contact allergy related to TEAPEG-3 cocamide sulfate and cocamidopropyl betaine in a shampoo. Contact Dermatitis 11: 192–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Frain-Bell W, Lakshmipathi T, Rogers J, Willock J (1974) The syndrome of chronic photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid. Br J Dermatol 91: 617–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Hausen BM, Oestmann G (1988) Untersuchungen über die Häufigkeit berufsbedingter allergischer Hauterkrankungen auf einem Blumengroßmarkt. Dermatosen 36: 117–117Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD et al. (1988) The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 124: 1525–1529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Adams RM, Maibach HI (1985) A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13: 1062–1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Mathias CGT (1982) Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis from contact allergy to a toilet soap containing chromium. Contact Dermatitis 8: 29–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Mathias CGT, Maibach HI, Conant MA (1980) Perioral leukoderma simulating vitiligo from use of a toothpaste containing cinnamic aldehyde. Arch Dermatol 116: 1172–1173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Arima Y (1987) Depigmented contact dermatitis due to incense. Contact Dermatitis 16: 272–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Fisher AA, Dooms-Goossens A (1976) Persulfate hair bleach reactions. Arch Dermatol 112: 1407–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Guin JD, Berry VK (1980) Perfume sensitivity in adult females. J Am Acad Dermatol 3: 299–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Brandrup F, Hansen NS, Schultz K (1987) Ansigtseksem fremkaldt of gummi i ândedretsvern. Ugeskr Leger 149: 968Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Hannuksela M, Lahti A (1977) Immediate reactions to fruits and vegetables. Contact Dermatitis 3: 79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Frosch PJ, Weickel R, Schmitt T, Krastel H (1988) Nebenwirkungen von ophthalmologischen Externa. Z Hautkr 63: 126–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Grundmann H, Wozniak K-D, Tost M (1981) Zum allergischen Kontaktekzem im Lid-and Augenbereich. Folia Ophthalmol 6: 258–261Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Nethercott JR (1978) Skin problems associated with multifunctional acrylic monomers in ultraviolet curing inks. Br J Dermatol 98: 541–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tosti A, Tosti G (1988) Thimerosal: a hidden allergen in ophthalmology. Contact Dermatitis 18: 268–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Ottosen C-O, Irgens-Moller L (1984) Ojenskader kan skyldes stueplanten Dieffenbachia. Ugeskr Læger 146: 3927–3928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Kieffer M (1979) Nickel sensitivity: relationship between history and patch test reaction. Contact Dermatitis 5: 398–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Hatch KL, Maibach HI (1985) Textile fiber dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 12: 1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Hatch KL, Maibach HI (1986) Textile chemical finish dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14: 1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Andersen KE, Hamann K (1982) Cost benefit of patch testing with textile finish resins. Contact Dermatitis 8: 64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Tegner E (1985) Sheet dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 65: 254–257Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Coskey RJ (1977) Contact dermatitis caused by ECG electrode jelly. Arch Dermatol 113: 839–840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Larsen WG (1977) Perfume dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 113: 623–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Larsen WG (1979) Allergic contact dermatitis to the perfume in Mycolog cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 1: 131–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Coskey RJ (1978) Contact dermatitis due to multiple corticosteroid creams. Arch Dermatol 114: 115–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Seymour JL, Keswick BH, Hanifin JM, Jordan WP, Milligan MC (1989) Clinical effects of diaper types on the skin of normal infants and infants with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 17: 988–997Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Romaguera C, Grimait F (1981) Contact dermatitis from a copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive device. Contact Dermatitis 7: 163–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Frosch PJ, Raulin C (1987) Kontaktallergie auf Bufexamac. Hautarzt 38: 331–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, 1\4m-holm A (1987) Dermatoses in coffee drinkers. Cutis 40: 421–422Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Heskel NS (1987) Allergic contact dermatitis from stomadhesive paste. Contact Dermatitis 16: 119–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Beck MH, Burrows D, Fregert S, Mendelsohn S (1985) Allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin in ostomy bags. Br J Surg 72: 202–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Mann RJ, Stewart E, Peachey RDG (1983) Sensitivity to urostomy pouch plastic. Contact Dermatitis 9: 80–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 341–346Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Rothstein MS (1986) Dermatologic considerations of stoma care. J Am Acad Dermatol 15: 411–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 349–352Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    van Ketel WG (1977) Allergic contact dermatitis of amputation stumps. Contact Dermatitis 3: 50–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Hausen BM, Schulz (1984) Strumpffarben-Allergie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 109: 1469–1475Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Rietschel RL (1984) Role of socks in shoe dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 120: 398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Möller H (1972) Atopic winter feet in children. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 52: 401–405Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Jones SK, English JSC, Forsyth A, Mackie RM (1987) Juvenile plantar dermatosis: an 8-year follow-up of 102 patients. Clin Exp Dermatol 12: 5–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Ashton RE, Griffiths WAD (1986) Juvenile plantar dermatosis: atopy or footwear? Clin Exp Dermatol 11: 529–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Mobacken H, Hersle K, Sloberg K, Thilander H (1984) Oral lichen planus: hypersensitivity to dental restoration material. Contact Dermatitis 10: 11–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Finne K, Göransson K, Winckler L (1982) Oral lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury. Int J Oral Surg 11: 236–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Burrows D (1989) Mischievous metals–chromate, cobalt, nickel and mercury. Clin Exp Dermatol 14: 266–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Hensten-Pettersen (1989) Nickel allergy and dental treatment procedures. In: Maibach HI, Menné T (eds) Nickel and the skin-immunology and toxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 195–205Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Izumi AK (1982) Allergic contact gingivostomatitis due to gold. Arch Dermatol 272: 387–391Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Fisher AA (1987) Reactions of the mucous membrane to contactants. Clin Dermatol 5: 123–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Sonnex TS, Dawber RPR, Ryan TJ (1981) Mucosal contact dermatitis due to instant coffee. Contact Dermatitis 7: 298–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Van Joost T, Van Ulsen J, Van Loon LAJ (1988) Contact allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis 18: 97–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Peters MS, Schroeter AL, Van Hale HM, Broadbent JC (1984) Pacemaker contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 11: 214–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Romaguera C, Grimalt F (1981) Pacemaker dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7: 333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Wilkinson JD (1989) Nickel allergy and orthopedic prostheses. In: Maibach HI, Menné T (eds) Nickel and the skin: immunology and toxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 187–193Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Lacroix J, Morin CL, Collin P-P (1979) Nickel dermatitis from a foreign body in the stomach. J Pediatr 95: 428–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    McFadden N, Lyberg T, Hensten-Pettersen A (1989) Aluminium-induced granulomas in a tattoo. J Am Acad Dermatol 20: 903–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Feeurman EJ, Ingber A, David M, Weissman-Katzenelson V (1982) Lichen ruber planus beginning as a dyshidrosiform eruption. Cutis 30: 401–404Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels K. Veien

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations