Skip to main content

Abstract

Contact dermatitis, an inflammatory skin reaction to direct contact with noxious agents in our environment, was most probably recognized as an entity even in ancient times, since it must have accompanied mankind throughout its history. Early recorded reports include Pliny the Younger, who in the first century AD noticed that some individuals experienced severe itching when cutting pine trees (quoted in [1]). A review of the ancient literature could provide dozens of similar, mostly anecdotal examples and some are cited in modern textbooks, monographs and papers [2–4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castagne D (1976) Dermatoses professionnelles provoquées par les bois tropicaux. Thesis, Bordeaux

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avenberg KM (1980) Footnotes on allergy. Pharmacia, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell J, Rook AJ (1979) Botanical dermatology. Greengrass, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rostenberg A (1955) An anecdotal biographical history of poison ivy. Arch Dermatol 72: 438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dakin R (1829) Remarks on a cutaneous affection produced by certain poisonous vegetables. Am J Med Sci 4: 98–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foussereau J (1984) History of epicutaneous testing: the blotting-paper and other methods. Contact Dermatitis, 11: 219–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lachapelle JM (1986) Le test épicutané: aperçu historique. Servinfo. Gist-Brocades, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  8. Städeler J (1847) Über die eigenthümlichen Bestandtheile der Anacardium Früchte. Ann Chemie Pharmacie 63: 117–165

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fabre JH (1897) Souvenirs entomologiques, vol 6. Delagrave, Paris, pp 378–401

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rostenberg A, Solomon LM (1968) Jean Henri Fabre and the patch-test. Arch Dermatol 98: 188–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lachapelle JM (1989) Contact Dermatitis 1988: historical reflections and current problems in patch testing. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jadassohn J (1896) Zur Kenntnis der Arzneiexantheme. Arch Dermatol Forsch 34: 103

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jadassohn J (1896) Zur Kenntnis der medicamentösen Dermatosen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, V Congress, Wien ( 1895 ). Braumüller, Vienna, pp 103–129

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neisser A (1884) Ueber Jodoform-Exantheme. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 30: 467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sulzberger MD (1936) Josef Jadassohn (1863–1936). Arch Dermatol 33: 1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sulzberger MD (1986) In: Skin and allergy news. From there to here. My many lives. Institute for Dermatologic Communication and Education

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sézary A (1936) Méthodes d’exploration biologique de la peau. Les tests cutanés en dermatologie. Encycl Méd Chir 12010: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bloch B (1911) Experimentelle Studien über das Wesen der Jodoformidiosynkrasie. Exp Pathol Ther 9: 509–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sulzberger MB (1940) Dermatologie allergy. Thomas, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tzanck A, Sidi E (1952) Dermites allergiques. Statistiques des dermatoses allergiques étudiées au laboratoire des tests de l’Hôpital Saint-Louis durant les années 1949, 1950 et 1951. Sem Hôp Paris 81: 3267–3269

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bonnevie P (1939) Aetiologie und Pathogenese der Ekzemkrankheiten. Klinische Studien über die Ursachen der Ekzeme unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Diagnostischen Wertes der Ekzemproben. Busch, Copenhagen and Barth, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marcussen PV (1962) Variations in the incidence of contact hypersensitivities. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 48: 40–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lachapelle, JM. (1992). Historical Aspects. In: Rycroft, R.J.G., Menné, T., Frosch, P.J., Benezra, C. (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13119-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13119-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-13121-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13119-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics