Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 370 Accesses

Abstract

While concern for the poor has been a characteristic of many civilisations, it has been a public issue only in the last 100 years or so. In any case, in the earlier period, lacking objective data describing the circumstance of the poor, social scientists were circumscribed in their efforts to study it. However in recent times a large range of techniques have been devised to measure poverty in both developed and undeveloped countries. Poverty research has broadly proceeded from perspectives in two main disciplines, social policy and economics. The primary motivating force of social policy studies has been the observed deprivation of individuals and families. A major drawback of these studies is that while the observations have been broad and encompassing for the target group under study, the tools and methods have been generally subjective. Consequently it has not been easy to either relate the studies to one another or to form an overall impression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. In the following discussion poverty is measured among a population of income units (families), the primary target group for analysis. The study might equally be concerned with a population of individuals or households. Much of the analysis, with some minor modification would also apply were these the primary target group of concern.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mack and Lansley (1983) claimed that their method of determining poverty was a consensual approach because it embodied the concept of minimum needs. Respondents to their survey described the minimum characteristics needed to achieve a certain standard of living. However the Mack and Lansley study is best classified with its precursor, the Townsend study rather than with the Leyden based studies where respondents are specifically asked about a minimum income level.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deaton and Muellbauer (1980, p53–57) describe the theory of distance functions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, D.T. (1996). Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty. In: Poverty, Inequality and Social Welfare in Australia. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12729-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12729-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0942-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12729-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics