Applying robots to complex product assembly

  • P. J. Sackett
  • S. J. Harrington
Conference paper

Abstract

There are many successful robotic assembly systems in operation. They have been applied to the assembly of relatively simple products, with few different piece parts, produced in high volume. This is a small subset of the spectrum of assembly requirements. Research has indicated the problems facing robotic assembly systems outside this application area. These problems have been quantified during the design and build of a commercial system for the assembly of a highly complex product. This product has over 150 piece parts and is produced in small to medium volume with several variations. Typically the available assembly hardware was found to be both too costly and too dedicated to a simple product format and range to make it viable.

This paper demonstrates an integrated approach to robotic assembly. Particular emphasis is given to piece part preparation, parts presentation, robot tooling and the assembly sequence. Approaching these in an integrated way leads to an economically viable system for a highly complex, volatile demand, product. The approach is applicable outside the case study presented.

Keywords

Rubber Peris Hone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Redford, A.H. and Lo, E.K. Robots in Assembly. Open University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Boothroyd, G. “Economics of General Purpose Assembly Robots”. CIRP Int. Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Amherst, Massachussetts, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Funk, J.L. “The Potential Market for Robotic Assembly”. Int. Joural of Prod. Research, May/June 1986. pp.663–686.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Cranfield Robotics and Automation Group, “EHV - Product Cell”, Group Project MSc Courses 1985–86.College of Manufacturing, Cranfield Institute of Technology, June 1986.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Wiendahl, H.P. and Ziersch, W.D. “Increasing the Availability of Assembly Systems”, Assembly Automation, November 1985, pp. 217–224.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Stout, K. Quality Control in Automation. Kogan Page Ltd., 1985.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Owen, A.E. Flexible Assembly Systems, Plenum Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Redford, A.H. “Development of a Magazine Feeding System for General Purpose Assembly”. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Assembly Automation, Feb. 1986.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Gandhi, M.V., Thompson, B.S. and Maas, D.J. “Adaptable Fixture Design: an Analytical and Experimental Study of Fluidized-bed Fixturing”. Jnl. of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, Vol. 108, March 1986.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Asada, H. and By, A.B. “Kinematic Analysis and Design for Automatic Workpart Fixturing in Flexible Assembly”. Proc. 2nd Int. Sym. on Robotics Res. Kyoto, August 1984.Google Scholar
  11. Neads, S.J., Graham, D and Woodwark, J. “Towards a Fixture Building Robot”. Proc. I.Mech.E., C470/84, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Slocum, A.H., Peris, J. and Donmez, A. “Development of a Flexible Automated Fixturing System”. US National Bureau of Standards, Automated Production Technology Division, 1st November 1985.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Woltzer, J.D., Volz, R.A. and Wood, A.C. “Automatic Generation of Gripping Positions for Assembly”. Robot Grippers, Ed. D.T. Pham and W.B. Heginbotham, IFS Publications Ltd., 1986.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Bracken, F.L. “Parts Classification and Gripper Design for Automatic Handling and Assembly”, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Assembly Automation, May 1984.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Johansson, C. and Martensson, N. “Grippers, Tools and Fixtures for Flexible Automated Assembling”. Annals of the CIRP, Vol.34/1/1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Sackett
    • 1
  • S. J. Harrington
    • 1
  1. 1.Cranfield Institute of TechnologyUK

Personalised recommendations