Robust Estimation of Non-linear Aspects

  • Christos P. Kitsos
  • Christine H. Müller
Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)


As a first step for dealing with efficient robust estimation in non-linear models, we regard the problem of efficient robust estimation of non-linear aspects (functions) φ(β) of the unknown parameter β of a linear model. For robust estimation of a general non-linear aspect we propose estimators which are based on one-step-M-estimators and derive their asymptotic behaviour at the contaminated linear model, where the errors have contaminated normal distributions. The asymptotic behaviour provides criteria for robustness and optimality of the estimators and the corresponding designs. Because it is impossible to find globally optimal robust estimators and designs locally optimal solutions are used for efficiency comparisons. Simple formulas for the efficiency rates are given for the general case. Using these results the efficiency rates for estimating robustly the relative variation of a circadian rhythm are calculated. These efficiency rates are very similar to those for non-robust estimation although on principle there is an important difference.


Optimal Design Score Function Robust Estimation Efficiency Rate Robust Estimator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    BICKEL, P.J. (1975). One-step Huber estimates in the linear model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, 428–434.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    BICKEL, P.J. (1981). Quelque aspects de la statistique robuste. In École d’Été de Probabilités de St. Flour. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 876, 1–72.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    BICKEL, P.J. (1984). Robust regression based on infinitesimal neighbourhoods. The Annals of Statistics 12, 1349–1368.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    BUONACCORSI, J.P. and IYER, H.K. (1986). Optimal designs for ratios of linear combinations in the general linear model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 13, 345–356.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    FEDEROV, V.V. (1972). Theory of Optimal Experiments. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    FORD, I., KITSOS, C.P. and TITTERINGTON, D.M. (1989). Recent advances in nonlinear experimental design. Technometrics 13, 49–60.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    HAMPEL, F.R. (1978). Optimally bounding the gross-error-sensitivity and the influence of position in factor space. Proceedings of the ASA Statistical Computing Section, ASA, Washington, D.C., 59–64.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    HAMPEL, F.R., RONCHETTI, E.M., ROUSSEEUW, P.J. and STAHEL, W.A. (1986). Robust Statistics-The Approach Based on Influence Functions. John Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    HUBER, P.J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35, 73–101.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    KITSOS, C.P. (1986). Design and inference for nonlinear problems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, U.K.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    KITSOS, C.P. (1989). Fully-sequential procedures in nonlinear design problems. Comp. Statist. and Data Analysis 8, 13–19.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    KITSOS, C.P. (1992). Quasi-sequential procedures for the calibration problem. In COMPSTAT 1992, Vol. 2, KITSOS, C.P (eds.), 227–231, PhysicaVerlag.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    KITSOS, C.P., TITTERINGTON, D.M. and TORSNEY, B. (1988). An optimal design problem in rhythmometry. Biometrics 44, 657–671.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    KRASKER, W.S. (1980). Estimation in linear regression models with disparate data points. Econometrica 48, 1333–1346.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    KUROTSCHKA, V. and MÜLLER, Ch.H. (1992). Optimum robust estimation of linear aspects in conditionally contaminated linear models. The Annals of Statistics 20, 331–350.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    McDONALD, G.C. and STUDDEN, W.J. (1990). Design aspects of regression-based ratio estimation. Technometrics 32, 417–424.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    MÜLLER, Ch.H. (1992). One-step-M-estimators in conditionally contaminated linear models. Preprint No. A-92–11, Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Mathematik. To appear in Statistics and Decisions Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    MÜLLER, Ch.H. (1994). Optimal designs for robust estimation in conditionally contaminated linear models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 38, 125–140.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    RIEDER, H. (1987). Robust regression estimators and their least favorable contamination curves. Statistics and Decisions 5, 307–336.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    ROUSSEEUW, P.J. and LEROY, A.M. (1987). Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. John Wiley, New York.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    SILVEY, S.D. (1980). Optimal design. Chapman and Hall, London.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos P. Kitsos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christine H. Müller
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of Business and EconomicsAthensGreece
  2. 2.1st Mathematical InstituteFree UniversityBerlin 33Germany

Personalised recommendations