Advertisement

Heat Exchanger Construction

  • Krishna P. Singh
  • Alan I. Soler

Abstract

A wide range of industries — pharmaceutical, chemical, petrochemical, dairy, food, refrigeration, bio-chemical, fossil and nuclear power, etc. — utilize tubular heat exchangers. Exchangers have been given a variety of names depending on their heat transfer functions; viz. kettle reboiler, condenser, thermosiphon reboiler, regenerator, recuperator, blow-down heat exchanger, heating element, and so on. These names serve to identify the heat transfer function of the hardware, and in many cases, also conjure up the image of the shape and appearance of the unit. In most instances, thermal design considerations dictate the external appearance of the unit. Rating engineers recognize that boiling, partial or total condensation, highly viscous flows, etc., are considerations which may profoundly affect the desirable shape of the heat exchanger. Books covering thermal design of heat exchangers must labor through the maze of heat transfer conditions which might exist in an operating unit. The picture from the mechanical design viewpoint, however, is far more unified.

Keywords

Heat Exchanger Mechanical Design Tube Bundle Impingement Plate Expansion Joint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1.2.1]
    “Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturer’s Association,” 6th edition (1978).Google Scholar
  2. [1.2.2]
    “1982 Addenda to Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturer’s Association” (1982).Google Scholar
  3. [1.2.3]
    Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part A,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; SA688, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  4. [1.2.4]
    Singh, K. P., “Predicting Flow Induced Vibrations in U-Bend Regions of Heat Exchangers: An Engineering Solution,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 302, No. 2, pp. 195–205 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [1.2.5]
    Singh, K. P., and Holtz, M., “On Thermal Expansion Induced Stresses in U-Bends of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanges,” Trans. ASME, Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 643–649 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. [1.2.6]
    Standards for Power Plant Heat Exchangers,” 1st edition, Heat Exchange Institute, Cleveland (1980).Google Scholar
  7. [1.2.7]
    “Standards for Closed Feedwater Heaters,” 3rd edition, Heat Exchange Institute (1979).Google Scholar
  8. [1.2.8]
    “Standard for Surface Condensers,” 7th edition, Heat Exchanger Institute (1978).Google Scholar
  9. [1.7.1]
    Ramamurthy, A. S., and Bhaskaran, P., “Velocity Exponent for Erosion and Noise Due to Cavitation,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 101, pp. 69–75 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [1.7.2]
    McDonald, A. T., and Fox, R. W., “An Experimental Investigation of the Incompressible flow in Conical Diffusers,” Inter. J. Mechanical Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 125–139 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [1.7.3]
    Singh, K. P., “How to Locate Impingement Plates in Tubular Heat Exchangers,” Hydrocarbon Processing, pp 147–149, October 1974.Google Scholar
  12. [1.8.1]
    Holtz, M., Singh, K. P., and Soler, A. I., “Heat Exchanger for Withstanding Cyclic Changes in Temperature,” U.S. Patent #4, 207, 944 (1980).Google Scholar
  13. [1.8.2]
    “Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Div. 1,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  14. [1.9.1]
    Singh, K. P., “On the Necessary Criteria for Stream-Symmetric Tubular Heat Exchanger Geometries,” Heat Transfer Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. [1.9.2]
    Singh, K. P., and Holtz, M. J., “Generalization of the Split Flow Heat Exchanger Geometry for Enhanced Heat Transfer,” AIChE Symposium Series No. 189, Vol. 75, pp. 219–226 (1979).Google Scholar
  16. [1.10.1]
    Feedwater Heater-Workshop Proceedings,” Electric Power Research Institute, WS-78–123, Palo Alto, California (1979).Google Scholar
  17. [1.11.1]
    Dallora, F., “European Pressure Vessel Codes,” Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 93–96 (June 1971).Google Scholar
  18. [1.11.2]
    Mahajan, K. K., “Design of Process Equipment,” Pressure Vessel Handbook Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishna P. Singh
    • 1
  • Alan I. Soler
    • 2
  1. 1.Joseph Oat CorporationCamdenUSA
  2. 2.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations